From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 16 09:15:32 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A53A216A4B3 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 09:15:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unix18.sihope.com (unix18.sihope.com [207.195.195.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B052843FDD for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 09:15:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from adamm@sihope.com) Received: from unixws1 (unixws1.sihope.com [207.195.195.190]) by unix18.sihope.com (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h9GGFU7P044903 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 11:15:30 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adamm@sihope.com) From: Adam Maloney To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1066320928.7414.54.camel@unixws1> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 11:15:30 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: NIS problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 16:15:32 -0000 (Posted to freebsd-isp on Tuesday, but got no responses) Feel my pain :) We have just begun a migration to NIS (please keep the "NIS sucks", "Sendmail sucks", "FreeBSD sucks", "You suck", "I suck", etc posts to a dull roar.) In the last couple of days we have seen a lot of messages like the one below appearing in /var/log/messages: Oct 13 06:14:58 xxxxx ypserv[45883]: access to master.passwd.byname denied -- client 1.2.3.4:3458 not privileged This goes on for a number of minutes, and then fixes itself. Obviously, the problem is that the NIS lookup request is coming from a non-priveleged (> 1024) port, and ypserv won't honor it. What's not so obvious is why/how this is happening. I'm suspecting it's Sendmail, since the frequency of the message somewhat coincides with the rate of incoming mail on this box. But I can't seem to find any clues on the web or usenet confirming this. Has anyone seen this before, or know of a solution?