Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:54:41 +0200 From: Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org> To: ajtiM <lumiwa@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: opera Message-ID: <4CC6C181.8070301@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201010260604.44933.lumiwa@gmail.com> References: <201010260604.44933.lumiwa@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 26.10.2010 13:04, schrieb ajtiM: > Hi! > > I am an Opera user but usually I installed it by myself because version in > ports for native Opera are old. For example there are version 10.61 and > outside is 10.63 and outisde is develpment version 10.70 which has a saved > problem with fonts but port version is 10.20?? (there is also alpha version 11 > of Opera which works much better than 10.61 which we have in ports). > > My question is: does FreeBSD doesn't "like" Opera to much? In this case is > better to live choice to Opera users that installed the browser when and where > they wanted and quit porting it. Questions as to the maintenance status of individual ports should be taken up with the respective maintainer - you can always figure that out with "make maintainer" in the ports's directory, and currently that is freebsd-maintainer@opera.com for both www/opera and www/opera-devel. If there are issues that the maintainer does not respond for extended amounts of time, we can either reset the maintainer, hand the project to a new maintainer, or commit non-maintainer updates. Alternatively, you could try to enable Linux emulation (see the FreeBSD handbook for details), and then use www/linux-opera, currently at release 10.63. However, given it's based on the Fedora 10 Linux distribution which is no longer maintained upstream and ships a vulnerable pango library according to VuXML, this bears a share of problems of its own, from installation (overriding vulnerability checks) to run-time use. -- Matthias Andree
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4CC6C181.8070301>