Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 08 Jan 2004 08:45:13 +0100
From:      "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
To:        David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au>
Subject:   Re: perl malloc slow? 
Message-ID:  <622.1073547913@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 07 Jan 2004 20:28:16 PST." <20040108042816.GA1813@VARK.homeunix.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20040108042816.GA1813@VARK.homeunix.com>, David Schultz writes:

>FWIW, you can do the required gymnastics with mmap() as long as
>the mapped region is backed by a file.

There has been a lot of talk about using file backing instead of
swap backing.  The typically proposed scenario is for each process
to open "$HOME/.backingstore/$$" or some such.

There are a lot of interesting applications, good ideas and nifty
tricks enabled by this, but there are also some nasty details, a
few security concerns and probably a performance impact.

All in all it has not happened yet, and given the size of fish
we are currently catching in other areas, I don't see it happening
anytime soon.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?622.1073547913>