From owner-freebsd-alpha  Fri Jul 14 10:55: 9 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org
Received: from feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CD24237C9DD; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 10:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mjacob@feral.com)
Received: from beppo.feral.com (beppo [192.67.166.79])
	by feral.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA15351;
	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 10:54:58 -0700
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 10:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>
Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com
To: Don <don@blacksun.org>
Cc: David Greenman <dg@root.com>, Mike Smith <msmith@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely8.cicely.de>, freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: fxp0 hangs on a PC164 using STABLE 
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10007141340320.48143-100000@calis.blacksun.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10007141054430.34427-100000@beppo.feral.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


Do these fxp cards run on Alpha boxes?


On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Don wrote:

> >    It does? I've never heard of a bug report like this for x86 and in fact I'm
> > not aware of any bugs in the driver for x86.
> I run about 25 systems that have Intel EtherExpress cards (82558 and
> 82559 chipsets) in them. All are running various FreeBSD releases (From
> 3.4 - various 4.0-STABLE variants). None of these boxes are in the
> lsightest bit unstable. In fact, I have never seen more reliable systems
> in my life.
> 
> -don
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
> 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message