Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 19:34:28 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 195229] New: security/gnupg installs gpg-zip.1.gz. But it dose'nt install gpg-zip. So, gpg-zip.1.gz shoud not be installed. Message-ID: <bug-195229-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195229 Bug ID: 195229 Summary: security/gnupg installs gpg-zip.1.gz. But it dose'nt install gpg-zip. So, gpg-zip.1.gz shoud not be installed. Product: Ports Tree Version: Latest Hardware: i386 OS: Any Status: Needs Triage Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: kuriyama@FreeBSD.org Reporter: crest@sahiro.org Assignee: kuriyama@FreeBSD.org Flags: maintainer-feedback?(kuriyama@FreeBSD.org) security/gnupg installs ${PREFIX}/man/man1/gpg-zip.1.gz. But, security/gnupg dose not install ${PREFIX}/gpg-zip and so on. I think that man/man1/gpg-zip.1.gz should not be installed by using this port. And, security/gnupg1 installs bin/gpg-zip and man/man1/gpg-zip.1.gz. So, if we do not set security/gnupg not to install man/man1/gpg-zip.1.gz, security/gnupg and security/gnupg1 both installes man/man1/gpg-zip.1.gz. This cause bad conflict, I think. --- pkg-plist.orig 2014-11-20 14:11:20.000000000 +0900 +++ pkg-plist 2014-11-21 04:00:27.000000000 +0900 @@ -25,7 +25,6 @@ %%PORTDOCS%%man/man1/gpg-agent.1.gz %%PORTDOCS%%man/man1/gpg-connect-agent.1.gz %%PORTDOCS%%man/man1/gpg-preset-passphrase.1.gz -%%PORTDOCS%%man/man1/gpg-zip.1.gz %%PORTDOCS%%man/man1/gpg2.1.gz %%PORTDOCS%%man/man1/gpgconf.1.gz %%PORTDOCS%%man/man1/gpgparsemail.1.gz --- Comment #1 from Bugzilla Automation <bugzilla@FreeBSD.org> --- Auto-assigned to maintainer kuriyama@FreeBSD.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-195229-13>