From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 7 05:10:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87F35106564A for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 05:10:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F2C8FC0C for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 05:10:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p975ABVc051249 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 05:10:11 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p975ABm7051241; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 05:10:11 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 05:10:11 GMT Message-Id: <201110070510.p975ABm7051241@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Lapo Luchini Cc: Subject: Re: ports/160539: [PATCH] security/botan: update to 1.10.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Lapo Luchini List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 05:10:12 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/160539; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Lapo Luchini To: Bert JW Regeer Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, tremere@cainites.net, jaap@NLnetLabs.nl Subject: Re: ports/160539: [PATCH] security/botan: update to 1.10.1 Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 07:03:12 +0200 Bert JW Regeer wrote: > The reason why I included the number in the installed library is to provide an easier upgrade path in the future. I have proprietary code that will not compile under 1.10.1 but does compile under 1.8.x. All three ports that depend on botan seems to work with 1.10 too so the easiest way would be to just upgrade it to 1.10 and drop 1.8, but yes, people can have code that won't upgrade as easily so it's probably safer to start with committing a separate security/botan-1.10 port and then upgrade dependencies in time (and then drop 1.8 someday). > If need be I can resubmit it as a new port, not sure if you (Lapo Luchini) want to be the maintainer for that version or not, but I am hoping that it gets included soon. Maintaining it it's fine by me, I just had a few busy days lately. :) -- Lapo Luchini - http://lapo.it/