From owner-freebsd-smp  Sun Jul 20 09:52:49 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-smp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA23988
          for smp-outgoing; Sun, 20 Jul 1997 09:52:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ady.warp.starnets.ro (ady.warp.starnets.ro [193.226.124.33])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA23971
          for <freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 20 Jul 1997 09:52:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (ady@localhost)
	by ady.warp.starnets.ro (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA09251;
	Sun, 20 Jul 1997 19:50:58 +0300 (EEST)
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 1997 19:50:57 +0300 (EEST)
From: Penisoara Adrian <ady@warp.starnets.ro>
To: Steve Passe <smp@csn.net>
cc: freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Need advice for SMP production server 
In-Reply-To: <199707201635.KAA00807@Ilsa.StevesCafe.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970720194725.8584L-100000@ady.warp.starnets.ro>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi!

On Sun, 20 Jul 1997, Steve Passe wrote:

> Hi,
> 
[...]
> your mptable shows the proper connections for the new code.  I would tend
> to suggest the latest SNAP: 970718.  Most reports are of good success.

 Great ! That means I can taste the new kernel architecture and also that
I have the chance to remain -current in time...
 What about stability ? Did anybody had problems with configurations
similar to mine (specially the SCSI subsystem)?

> 
> --
> Steve Passe	| powered by 
> smp@csn.net	|            Symmetric MultiProcessor FreeBSD

  Ady (@warp.starnets.ro)