Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:43:51 -0400
From:      FC <kei-29ij@myamail.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Mounting NetBSD disk under FreeBSD.
Message-ID:  <C2A905FE-1065-4C14-A8C9-30585BF1C8D3@myamail.com>
In-Reply-To: <44psqtyro2.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
References:  <DFD5CFC6-532E-439A-BB37-39FE6639DCC6@myamail.com> <4464smhav9.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <7C079D45-1A89-4795-A6B0-586CB8D28BF6@myamail.com> <44u0g5dwd5.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <F2D99804-2008-4116-9B74-0111C93D8DB5@myamail.com> <44psqtyro2.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Sep 28, 2005, at 2:26 PM, Lowell Gilbert wrote:

> ***
> This message was sent to your KasMail disposable email address:
> FC kei-29ij@myamail.com
> ***
>
> FC <kei-29ij@myamail.com> writes:
>
>
>> I thinks it is a shame that all the BSD OS can get together and have
>> something consistent through all the platforms. ext2fs can be mounted
>> on all the Linux flavors.
>>
>
> You do realize that your problem had nothing to do with filesystem
> format, right?  As your solution showed, both OS *do* understand UFS.

Yes, I understand that. The only think I am saying is kind of little  
detail give a bad customer/user experience and it can be easily  
avoided. I don't mind snorkeling around in the OS, but this came at  
some point which I ad no time to loose and I spend almost two day  
trying to figure out why this disk would not be mounted. I'm not  
accusing FreeBSD nor NetBSD people. I just think, that's sad.

Anyway, I finally got what I wanted and thanks for your patience and  
your help.

-fred-




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C2A905FE-1065-4C14-A8C9-30585BF1C8D3>