Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 18:14:57 +0000 From: Rene Ladan <rene@freebsd.org> To: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: portsnap depreciation Message-ID: <20200918181457.GA72138@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <SN6PR04MB502151E5AC0A3EFE89DC80D9803F0@SN6PR04MB5021.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> References: <SN6PR04MB5021D2A75180EF9C50467031803F0@SN6PR04MB5021.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> <c038fcf52a1219e42625d1f90aedcf99@gundo.com> <SN6PR04MB502151E5AC0A3EFE89DC80D9803F0@SN6PR04MB5021.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 01:58:29PM -0400, Carmel NY wrote: > On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:43:48 +0000, Pau Amma stated: > >On 2020-09-18 11:14, Carmel NY wrote: > >> Is 'portsnap' > >> going to be depreciated? > > > >Yes. > > > >> If so, when? > > > >I believe when 13.0 is released, or already if you're using a recent > >-current. > > > >> If is is depreciated, how will > >> this affect poudriere? > > > >See > >https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/testing-poudriere.html#testing-poudriere-ports-tree > >and the next sections. > > According to the above page, "The most straightforward way is to have > Poudriere create a default ports tree for itself, using either > portsnap(8) (if running FreeBSD 12.1 or 11.4) or Subversion (if running > FreeBSD-CURRENT)" Am I to understand that if I am running 11.4-RELEASE, > I cannot use subversion? > You can if you specify the -m (method) parameter when creating the poudriere ports tree. René
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200918181457.GA72138>