From owner-freebsd-audit Thu May 16 14:14:26 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-audit@freebsd.org Received: from mail.k12us.com (mail.k12us.com [65.112.222.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 083A037B404 for ; Thu, 16 May 2002 14:14:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 24090 invoked by uid 1001); 16 May 2002 21:14:13 -0000 Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 17:14:13 -0400 From: Christopher Weimann To: Thomas David Rivers Cc: tlambert2@mindspring.com, audit@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG, fenner@research.att.com, knu@iDaemons.org Subject: Re: moused(8): char signed-ness problem with gcc 3.1 Message-ID: <20020516171413.B61691@mail.k12us.com> References: <3CE33321.B2FBD340@mindspring.com> <200205161047.g4GAldU47929@lakes.dignus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200205161047.g4GAldU47929@lakes.dignus.com>; from rivers@dignus.com on Thu, May 16, 2002 at 06:47:39AM -0400 X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: owner-freebsd-audit@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 06:47:39AM -0400, Thomas David Rivers wrote: > > Terry Lambert wrote: > > RS/6000's didn't used to use PPC processors at all; so it's > > probably intentional software compatability. > > I'm confused then - the one we have here seems to. There > was a version of something very RS/6000-like that didn't, > but I thought RS/6000s did... > RS/6000s used to use Power before there was PowerPC. I'm doubting there is much difference between the two from a software point of view. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message