Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 20:46:32 +0200 (EET) From: Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee> To: Chris Pressey <cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Most wanted Message-ID: <20040307204413.W68396@haldjas.folklore.ee> In-Reply-To: <20040306155513.6a75e264.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> References: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0403011839470.3269-100000@pilchuck.reedmedia.net> <20040306005744.T38020@haldjas.folklore.ee> <20040306013914.D38020@haldjas.folklore.ee> <6.0.1.1.1.20040306214526.08c5ed70@imap.sfu.ca> <20040306141742.4f41ba27.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> <20040306155513.6a75e264.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Chris Pressey wrote: > > And, yeah. A hash table is really nothing by itself. It's just a way > of taking a long list (or other structure) and splitting it up into N > smaller structures. If your lists are never that long in the first > place, there's no point. > URKH! No it doesn't. Or rather, it should - there are almost no good reasons to use a naive chaining hash table. > > -Chris >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040307204413.W68396>