Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2013 22:49:36 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Questions about ldconfig Message-ID: <20130309214936.GW18971@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <513BA7BC.3030300@missouri.edu> References: <513BA7BC.3030300@missouri.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--b/3kIrr+SWblMf9a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 03:21:00PM -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > I am looking at committing a port which creates the following files: >=20 > /usr/local/lib/libGmsh.so > /usr/local/lib/libGmsh.so.0 > /usr/local/lib/libGmsh.so.2.7 > /usr/local/lib/libGmsh.so.2.7.0 >=20 > libGmsh.so is a link to libGmsh.so.0, which is a link to libGmsh.so.2.7, > which is a link to libGmsh.so.2.7.0. >=20 > My concern is that this will confuse ldconfig. Is my concern justified? It will not confuse the os at all but it will confuse ldconfig -r which is = not able to list libraries ending with more that one digit. Which is just informational, so not a big deal except that bsd.port.mk is not clever enou= gh to correctly deal with libraries. so only detection from ports will be confuse= d, all the rest will work. https://wiki.freebsd.org/ports/fix_lib_depends for more details regards, Bapt --b/3kIrr+SWblMf9a Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlE7rnAACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ex7ZwCgl4EV2ta9zVuS78ZiRZ2jhODV d3gAoJhww5NoY6wUFlnzIigDyF1Ez+AV =YEto -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --b/3kIrr+SWblMf9a--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130309214936.GW18971>