Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 20 Nov 2014 20:15:51 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 195024] [maintainer-update] net-mgmt/seafile: remove requirements of /proc
Message-ID:  <bug-195024-13-BOrvwY5Mbj@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-195024-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-195024-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195024

--- Comment #12 from Jingfeng Yan <yan_jingfeng@yahoo.com> ---
(In reply to John Marino from comment #11)
> (In reply to Jingfeng Yan from comment #9)
> > BTW, if the fuse discussion not fit here, you can send email to me yan_jingfeng@yahoo.com.
> 
> It's fine here.
> 
> > Do you mean DragonFly miss fuse kernel side support? 
> 
> Correct - no kernel support for FUSE
> 
> > I thought I checked
> > roughly before, but not go to too much detail. FreeBSD and NetBSD, and
> > openBSD seems to fine. the founder of DragonFlyBSD started playing eithe
> > fuse-like idea in 2006.  Could you give me some idea of why fuse is missing
> > there, what I can help to make this port happen on DragonFly? 
> 
> FUSE basically doesn't work that well.  None of the FUSE ports are
> maintained (literally, they have no maintainer).  It's unclear who is
> responsible for FUSE maintenance in the kernel.  I think there's no
> designated person.  Basically, it barely works on FreeBSD, when there is a
> problem nobody is there to fix it, and DragonFly just decided it wasn't
> worth pursuing.  Maybe not officially, but nobody is making an effort to
> support it.
> 
> 
> > You are DPort creator, and active on DragonFly. If you can have some
> > evaluation, maybe we can have a way to make it work. At the same time, I
> > will check why we need fuse.
> 
> I think the only hope is that FUSE is optional and that we don't set the
> option on DragonFly.  If it's truly required, there's no hope.
> 
> John

No, it is not required.  It can be ignored. I will make FUSE to an option.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-195024-13-BOrvwY5Mbj>