From owner-freebsd-i18n@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 28 14:24:11 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-i18n@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D4AF37B401 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 14:24:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A37943F75 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 14:24:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru) Received: from pobrecita.freebsd.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3SLO4nd003899; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 01:24:04 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by pobrecita.freebsd.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h3SLO4U7003898; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 01:24:04 +0400 (MSD) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 01:24:03 +0400 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" To: Joan Picanyol i Puig Message-ID: <20030428212403.GA3833@nagual.pp.ru> References: <20030422151739.GA2097@grummit.biaix.org> <20030423161120.A28072@phantom.cris.net> <20030428191005.GB2983@grummit.biaix.org> <20030428193209.GA2031@nagual.pp.ru> <20030428202605.GA7407@grummit.biaix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030428202605.GA7407@grummit.biaix.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: lists-freebsd-i18n@biaix.org cc: i18n@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [incomplete PATCH] help needed with misc/45874 X-BeenThere: freebsd-i18n@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Internationalization Effort List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 21:24:11 -0000 On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 22:26:05 +0200, Joan Picanyol i Puig wrote: > * Andrey A. Chernov [20030428 21:29]: > > 1) All patches are committed to -current first, so please submit patches > > for -current, not for -stable. > I think it should apply to -current as well (the original patch in the > PR was also against -stable) It is not apply to -current. > > 2) We already have some ca_ES data in -current. What is wrong with it? > Is this MFC'd? I don't have any -current box to try, what happens if you No.