Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 23 Feb 2004 19:21:03 +0100
From:      Oliver Lehmann <lehmann@ans-netz.de>
To:        freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Cc:        freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org
Subject:   Bad performance on alpha? (make buildworld)
Message-ID:  <20040223192103.59ad7b69.lehmann@ans-netz.de>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

I run several buildworld's on both, an Alpha EV56 and a Intel PII. I'm
wondering that the Pentium beats the Alpha. Both systems have INVARIANTS*
and WITNESS* disabled. Furthermore, no special tweakups - nearly "out of
the box" configured.

Alpha EV45, 600MHz, single CPU
768MB RAM
UW-SCSI SEAGATE ST34573W 6244
running:  5.2.1-RC2 (15th Feb 2004)
building: 5.2.1-RC2 (15th Feb 2004)


/usr/src ufs, /usr/obj ufs
 make     buildworld    19808.17 real     17126.29 user      1965.42 sys
 make -j2 buildworld    20085.05 real     17314.00 user      2139.92 sys
 make -j3 buildworld    20182.12 real     17467.14 user      2175.41 sys


########################################################################


Intel PII, 333MHz, single CPU
256MB RAM
UDMA33 WDC AC26400R
running:  5.2-CURRENT (20th Feb 2004)
building: 5.2.1-RC2 (15th Feb 2004)


/usr/src ufs, /usr/obj ufs
 make     buildworld    16916.70 real     14185.83 user      2028.82 sys
 make -j2 buildworld    16991.71 real     14445.95 user      2201.29 sys
 make -j3 buildworld    17042.71 real     14532.71 user      2235.48 sys
 make -j4 buildworld    17171.15 real     14583.99 user      2242.81 sys

And I don't think CURRENT is that "faster" than 5.2.1. Why does (my) alpha
performs so bad? Some ideas? Is that behaviour common for FreeBSD/alpha or
did I missed something in my consideration?

-- 
 Oliver Lehmann
  http://www.pofo.de/
  http://wishlist.ans-netz.de/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040223192103.59ad7b69.lehmann>