Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:07:23 -0600 From: Jeffrey Goldberg <jeffrey@goldmark.org> To: Paul B. Mahol <onemda@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: large binary, why not strip ? Message-ID: <519DC9CC-29C4-437B-9AA7-2A7BE68D02D3@goldmark.org> In-Reply-To: <3a142e750811180645g4b32541ek90a80d4d8fe71beb@mail.gmail.com> References: <b10011eb0811160042w158656bld3b91a2bf7cfdd3f@mail.gmail.com> <20081116125622.E24752@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20081117172100.GB43367@hub.freebsd.org> <b10011eb0811171040y536d5e18y171ca9aed686f9bf@mail.gmail.com> <3a142e750811180645g4b32541ek90a80d4d8fe71beb@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 18, 2008, at 8:45 AM, Paul B. Mahol wrote: > And what about /usr/local/lib/** ? Interesting. I found that only 11 are stripped on my system compared to 272 not stripped That is pretty much the opposite of the ratio I round in /usr/local/ bin where there were something like 350 stripped and only 35 not stripped. Cheers, -j -- Jeffrey Goldberg http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?519DC9CC-29C4-437B-9AA7-2A7BE68D02D3>