From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 16 00:41:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14CE316A4D1; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 00:41:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (xorpc.icir.org [192.150.187.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C0DE43FB1; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 00:41:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo@xorpc.icir.org) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.3) with ESMTP id hAG8fpFw016717; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 00:41:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo@xorpc.icir.org) Received: (from rizzo@localhost) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.3/Submit) id hAG8fpw2016716; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 00:41:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 00:41:51 -0800 From: Luigi Rizzo To: Peter Jeremy Message-ID: <20031116004151.B10853@xorpc.icir.org> References: <200311142102.hAEL2Nen073186@repoman.freebsd.org> <20031114153145.A54064@xorpc.icir.org> <3FB593F5.1053E7E2@pipeline.ch> <20031115002921.B68056@xorpc.icir.org> <3FB60181.4256A519@pipeline.ch> <20031116014814.GB74756@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20031116003939.A10853@xorpc.icir.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20031116003939.A10853@xorpc.icir.org>; from rizzo@icir.org on Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 12:39:39AM -0800 cc: Andre Oppermann cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet in_var.h ip_fastfwd.c ip_flow.c ip_flow.h ip_input.c ip_output.c src/sys/sys mbuf.h src/sys/conf files src/sys/net if_arcsubr.c if_ef.c if_ethersubr.c if_fddisubr.c if_iso88025subr.c if_ppp.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 08:41:53 -0000 On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 12:39:39AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote: ... > might result in the second timing call being executed before > the section of code in the middle is complete. There is > some nonintuitive instruction (which i now forget) to flush the follow up to myself -- the instruction is "cpuid" cheers luigi