From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 04:28:50 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0313C8E0 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 04:28:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org [192.94.73.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.sdf.org", Issuer "SDF.ORG" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD517D7E for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 04:28:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sdf.org (IDENT:bennett@sdf.lonestar.org [192.94.73.15]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.8/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s8S4Sfal001490 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Sun, 28 Sep 2014 04:28:42 GMT Received: (from bennett@localhost) by sdf.org (8.14.8/8.12.8/Submit) id s8S4SftK018265; Sat, 27 Sep 2014 23:28:41 -0500 (CDT) From: Scott Bennett Message-Id: <201409280428.s8S4SftK018265@sdf.org> Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2014 23:28:41 -0500 To: Andrew Berg Subject: Re: ZFS and 2 TB disk drive technology :-( User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 04:28:50 -0000 Thank you for your reply. On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 06:37:30 -0500 Andrew Berg wrote: >On 2014.09.24 06:08, Scott Bennett wrote: >> If anyone reading this has any suggestions for a course of action >> here, I'd be most interested in reading them. Thanks in advance for any >> ideas and also for any corrections if I've misunderstood what a ZFS >> mirror was supposed to have done to preserve the data and maintain >> correct operation at the application level. >I skimmed over the long message, and my first thought is that you have a messed >up controller that is lying. I've run into such a controller on a hard drive Yes, this thought has crossed my mind, too. I don't think it explains all of the evidence well, but OTOH, I can't quite rule it out yet either. The error rate appears to differ from drive to drive. >enclosure that is supposed to support disks larger than 2TB, but seems to write >to who knows where when you want a sector beyond 2TB, and the filesystem layer >has no idea anything is wrong. This is all just an educated, guess, but I ran into that problem last year when I had a 3 TB drive put into a case with the interface combination that I wanted. Someone on the list clued me in about old controllers, so we checked, and sure enough, the controller in that case was unable to handle devices larger than 2 TB. In the current situation, however, all four drives are 2 TB drives. >considering you get errors at a level below ZFS (would it be called the CAM >layer?), my advice would be to check the controllers and perhaps even the disks >themselves. AFAIK, issues at that layer are rarely software ones. Yes, as noted in earlier threads, I've already seen the problem of undetected write errors on these drives without ZFS being involved, just UFS2. I had been planning to set up a gvinum raid5 device until I realized that protection against loss of a drive would not protect me from corruption of data without loss. Although running a parity check on the raid5 device should reveal errors, it would not fix them, whereas the claim was made that raidzN would fix them. So I decided to try ZFS in hopes that errors would be both detected when they occurred (they are not) and corrected upon detection (they appear not to be, regardless of what ZFS scrub results say). Meanwhile, Seagate has not seemed willing to replace running drives that have errors with running drives that have been tested and shown to have no errors. :-( That leaves me with my money spent on equipment that does not work properly. I may have to buy another card and swap it with the one that is in the tower at present, but I'd rather not do that unless I find better evidence that the problems come from the card I have now, especially given that much of the evidence thus far gathered points to the quality of the drives as the culprit. I suppose I could reconnect the USB 3.0 drives to USB 2.0 ports and then repeat my tests, but I'm already kind of fed up with all the delays. Also, as previously noted, the Western Digital drive is connected via Firewire 400 and is showing scrub errors as well, albeit comparatively few. It has been several months now since I last had a place to write backups, and the lack of recent backups is giving me the heebie jeebies more and more by the day. Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ********************************************************************** * Internet: bennett at sdf.org *xor* bennett at freeshell.org * *--------------------------------------------------------------------* * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * * -- a standing army." * * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * ********************************************************************** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 09:06:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CF9A76E for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 09:06:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yh0-x232.google.com (mail-yh0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F846889 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 09:06:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f50.google.com with SMTP id z6so409283yhz.23 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 02:06:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=hE1XmcWxm+Di1fPnqEVuy2Ca27kI+ZPWScBQ4Ngit/I=; b=FAQzBlxn9OoG8+fhdHLMHUMsQWZ2qLFOE+ZZcKdKeU72LEq+258SjkWOvBlnYo30/p NRXvSKQCRpCts7/GzA9rZGLCFeVuqmcvGxN8KY1DAEgBEvM0viSjNCa5u+jYGYuvo60C UA2Wbyaie0yU7L3Ubdohh4D7n5H/iL9fFbsh7vmW4BFsAjAZz3C3UJaRaq+v8x85PXq0 wBwNYcIg7KSdE+7EkTrgGtY7GIdhHo0O8iJpvMzKaxlPC8OTdJJWnJxiUqi770dkVkBL nn8PhNIQ0sJeDaF234E4sSwcufcL1xrptA4ukJipqWIFwyJb9wJpechrkxUb1GJKp7wm jyUg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.29.5 with SMTP id h5mr44914698yha.58.1411895197147; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 02:06:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.170.150.85 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 02:06:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <23187F4C-0413-4F84-9C86-6EC1084C794C@btinternet.com> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 05:06:37 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: freebsd-update question From: FF To: "firmdog@gmail.com" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Dave X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 09:06:39 -0000 Can you provide the output of those commands? Freebsd-update is usually pretty good about telling you what's wrong. Thanks On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 3:02 PM, firmdog@gmail.com wrote: > Yes I ran freebsd-update install. Then I rebooted. Then I did it again. > Still at 8.3 > On Sep 27, 2014 2:37 PM, "Dave" wrote: > > > On 27 September 2014 18:22:15 BST, "firmdog@gmail.com" < > firmdog@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> Trying to use freebsd-update to go from 8.3 to 8.4 and I am doing this: > >> > >> # freebsd-update -r 8.4-RELEASE upgrade > >> # freebsd-update install > >> # reboot > >> > >> After reboot I am still at 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0 > >> > >> What am I doing wrong? > >> ------------------------------ > >> > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >> > >> > > Don't you need run rub "freebsd-update install"? > > -- > > Dave > > > > GPG/PGP ID: CDB94DA1 > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- FF From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 10:30:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C16506C4 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:30:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org [192.94.73.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.sdf.org", Issuer "SDF.ORG" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CE24F3A for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:30:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sdf.org (IDENT:bennett@sdf.lonestar.org [192.94.73.15]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.8/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s8SAU8Hd027694 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:30:08 GMT Received: (from bennett@localhost) by sdf.org (8.14.8/8.12.8/Submit) id s8SAU8dR027634; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 05:30:08 -0500 (CDT) From: Scott Bennett Message-Id: <201409281030.s8SAU8dR027634@sdf.org> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 05:30:08 -0500 To: Paul Kraus Subject: Re: ZFS and 2 TB disk drive technology :-( User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:30:11 -0000 On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 11:24:35 -0400 Paul Kraus wrote: Thanks for chiming in, Paul. >On 9/24/14 7:08, Scott Bennett wrote: > > > >What version of FreeBSD are you running ? FreeBSD hellas 9.2-STABLE FreeBSD 9.2-STABLE #1 r264339: Fri Apr 11 05:16:25 CDT 2014 bennett@hellas:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/hellas i386 >What hardware are you running it on ? The CPU is a Q6600 running on a PCIE2 Gigabyte motherboard, whose model number I did have written down around here somewhere but can't lay hands on at the moment. I looked it up at the gigabyte.com web site, and it supposed to be okay for a number of considerably faster CPU models. It has 4 GB of memory, but FreeBSD ignores the last ~1.1 GB of it, so ~2.9 GB usable. It has been running mprime worker threads on all four cores with no apparent problems for almost 11 months now. The USB 3.0 card is a "rocketfish USB 3.0 PCI Express Card", which reports a NEC uPD720200 USB 3.0 controller. It has two ports, into which I have two USB 3.0 hubs plugged. There are currently four 2 TB drives plugged into those hubs. The Firewire 400 card reports itself as a "VIA Fire II (VT6306)", and it has two ports on it with one 2 TB drive connected to each port. > >> Then I copied the 1.08 TB file again from another Seagate 2 TB drive >> to the mirror vdev. No errors were detected during the copy. Then I >> began creating a tar file from large parts of a nearly full 1.2 TB file >> system (UFS2) on yet another Seagate 2TB on the Firewire 400 bus with the >> tar output going to a file in the mirror in order to try to have written >> something to most of the sectors on the four-drive mirror. I terminated >> tar after the empty space in the mirror got down to about 3% because the >> process had slowed to a crawl. (Apparently, space allocation in ZFS >> slows down far more than UFS2 when available space gets down to the last >> few percent.:-( ) > >ZFS's space allocation algorithm will have trouble (performance issues) >allocating new blocks long before you get a few percent free. This is >known behavior and the threshold for performance degradation varies with >work load and historical write patterns. My rule of thumb is that you >really do not want to go past 75-80% full, but I have seen reports over >on the ZFS list of issues with very specific write patterns and work >load with as little as 50% used. For your work load, writing very large >files once, I would expect that you can get close to 90% used before >seeing real performance issues. Thanks for that information. Yeah, I think I saw it starting to slow when it got into the low 90s% full, but I wasn't watching all of the time, so I don't know when it first became noticeable. Anyway, I'll keep those examples in mind for planning purposes. > >> Next, I ran a scrub on the mirror and, after the scrub finished, got >> the following output from a "zpool status -v". >> >> pool: testmirror >> state: ONLINE >> status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data >> corruption. Applications may be affected. >> action: Restore the file in question if possible. Otherwise restore the >> entire pool from backup. >> see: http://illumos.org/msg/ZFS-8000-8A >> scan: scrub repaired 1.38M in 17h59m with 1 errors on Mon Sep 15 19:53:45 2014 > >The above means that ZFS was able to repair 1.38MB of bad data but still >ran into 1 situation (unknown size) that it could not fix. But I'm not sure that the repairs actually took. Read on. > >> config: >> >> NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM >> testmirror ONLINE 0 0 1 >> mirror-0 ONLINE 0 0 2 >> da1p5 ONLINE 0 0 2 >> da2p5 ONLINE 0 0 2 >> da5p5 ONLINE 0 0 8 >> da7p5 ONLINE 0 0 7 >> >> errors: Permanent errors have been detected in the following files: >> >> /backups/testmirror/backups.s2A > >And here is the file that contains the bad data. > Yes. There are only two files, and that one is the larger one and was written first. >> >> Note that the choices of recommended action above do *not* include >> replacing a bad drive and having ZFS rebuild its content on the >> replacement. Why is that so? > >Correct, because for some reason ZFS was not able to read enough of the >data without checksum errors to gibe you back your data in tact. Okay, laying aside the question of why no drive out of four in a mirror vdev can provide the correct data, so that's why a rebuild wouldn't work. Couldn't it at least give a clue about drive(s) to be replaced/repaired? I.e., the drive(s) and sector number(s)? Otherwise, one would spend a lot of time reloading data without knowing whether a failure at the same place(s) would just happen again. > >> Thinking, apparently naively, that the scrub had repaired some or >> most of the errors > >It did, 1.38MB worth. But it also had errors it could not repair. It *says* it did, but did it really? How does it know? Did it read the results of its correction back in from the drive(s) to see? > >> and wanting to know which drives had ended up with >> permanent errors, I did a "zpool clear testmirror" and ran another scrub. >> During this scrub, I got some kernel messages on the console: >> >> (da7:umass-sim5:5:0:0): WRITE(10). CDB: 2a 00 3b 20 4d 36 00 00 05 00 >> (da7:umass-sim5:5:0:0): CAM status: CCB request completed with an error >> (da7:umass-sim5:5:0:0): Retrying command >> (da7:umass-sim5:5:0:0): WRITE(10). CDB: 2a 00 3b 20 4d 36 00 00 05 00 >> (da7:umass-sim5:5:0:0): CAM status: CCB request completed with an error >> (da7:umass-sim5:5:0:0): Retrying command > >How many device errors have you had since booting the system / creating >the zpool ? Those were the first two times that I've gotten kernel error messages on any of those devices ever. My (non-ZFS) comparison results presented here some weeks ago showed that the errors found in the comparisons went undetected by hardware or software while the file was being written to disk. No errors were detected during readback either, except by the application (cmp(1)). > >> I don't know how to decipher these error messages (i.e., what do the hex >> digits after "CDB: " mean?) > >I do not know the specifics in this case, but whenever I have seen >device errors it has always been due to either bad communication with a >drive or a drive reporting an error. If there are ANY device errors you >must address them before you go any further. Yes, but I need to know what those messages actually say when I talk to manufacturers. For example, if they contain addresses of failed sectors, then I need to know what those addresses are if the manufacturers want me to attempt to reassign them. Also, if I tell them there are kernel messages, they want to look up Micro$lop messages, and when I point out that I don't use Micro$lop and that I run FreeBSD, they usually try to tell me that "We don't support that", so it really helps if I can translate the messages to them. IOW, I can't address the device errors if I don't know how to read the messages, which I'm hoping someone reading this may be able to help with. (I wish the FreeBSD Handbook had a comprehensive list of kernel messages and what they mean.) > >As an anecdotal note, I have not had terribly good luck with USB >attached drives under FreeBSD, especially under 9.x. I suspect that the >USB stack just can't keep up and ends up dropping things (or hanging). I >have had better luck with the 10.x release but still do not trust it for >high traffic loads. I have had no issues with SAS or SATA interfaces Okay. I'll keep that in mind for the future, but for now I'm stuck with 9.2 until I can get some stable disk space to work with to do the upgrades to amd64 and then to later releases. The way things have been going, I may have to relegate at least four 2 TB drives to paperweight supply and then wait until I can replace them with smaller capacity drives that will actually work. Also, I have four 2 TB drives in external cases that have only USB 3.0 interfaces on them, so I have no other way to connect them (except USB 2.0, of course), so I'm stuck with (some) USB, too. >(using supported chipsets, I have had very good luck with any of the >Marvell JBOD SATA controllers), _except_ when I was using a SATA port >multiplier. Over on the ZFS list the consensus is that port multipliers >are problematic at best and they should be avoided. What kinds of problems did they mention? Also, how are those Marvell controllers connected to your system(s)? I'm just wondering whether I would be able to use any of those models of controllers. I've not dealt with SATA port multipliers. Would an eSATA card with two ports on it be classed as a port multiplier? At the moment, all of my ZFS devices are connected by either USB 3.0 or Firewire 400. I now have an eSATA card with two ports on it that I plan to install at some point, which will let me move the Firewire 400 drive to eSATA. Should I expect any new problem for that drive after the change? > >> When it had finished, another "zpool status >> -v" showed these results. >> >> pool: testmirror >> state: ONLINE >> status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data >> corruption. Applications may be affected. >> action: Restore the file in question if possible. Otherwise restore the >> entire pool from backup. >> see: http://illumos.org/msg/ZFS-8000-8A >> scan: scrub repaired 1.25M in 18h4m with 1 errors on Tue Sep 16 15:02:56 2014 > >This time it fixed 1.25MB of data and still had an error (of unknown >size) that it could not fix. Unfortunately, ZFS did not report the addresses of any of the errors. If there are hard errors, how can I find out where the bad sectors are located on each disk? It might be possible to reassign those sectors to spares if ZFS can tell me their addresses. > >> config: >> >> NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM >> testmirror ONLINE 0 0 1 >> mirror-0 ONLINE 0 0 2 >> da1p5 ONLINE 0 0 2 >> da2p5 ONLINE 0 0 2 >> da5p5 ONLINE 0 0 6 >> da7p5 ONLINE 0 0 8 > >Once again you have errors on ALL your devices. This points to a Why did it not fix them during the first scrub? >systemic problem of some sort on your system. On the ZFS list people >have reported bad memory as sometimes being the cause of these errors. I >would look for a system component that is common to all the drives and >controllers. How healthy is your power supply ? How close to it's limits >are you ? The box is mostly empty and nowhere near the power supply's capacity. The box and all other attached devices are plugged into a SmartUPS 1000, which is plugged into a surge protector. As for the health of the power supply, I guess I don't know how to check that, but everything else that depends upon the power supply seems to be working fine. > >> >> errors: Permanent errors have been detected in the following files: >> >> /backups/testmirror/backups.s2A >> >> So it is not clear to me that either scrub fixed *any* errors at >> all. > >Why is it not clear? The message from zpool status is very clear: It is not clear because I got similar results reported after two consecutive scrubs with no changes made by me in between them. If it really fixed all but one error during the first scrub, why are there still more errors for the second one to correct? Unless ZFS checks the results of its corrections, how can it know whether it really succeeded in fixing anything? > >scan: scrub repaired 1.25M in 18h4m with 1 errors on Tue Sep 16 15:02:56 >2014 > >There were errors that were repaired and an error that was not. Yes, like it said the first time. > >> I next ran a comparison ("cmp -z -l") of the original against the >> copy > >If you are comparing the file that ZFS reported was corrupt, then you >should not expect them to match. Well, you omitted the results of the comparison that I ran after the second scrub had completed. As I wrote before, + Another issue revealed above is that ZFS, in spite of having *four* + copies of the data and checksums of them, failed to detect any problem + while reading the data back for cmp(1), much less feed cmp(1) the correct + version of the data rather than a corrupted version. Similarly, the hard + error (not otherwise logged by the kernel) apparently encountered by + vm_pager resulted in termination of cmp(1) rather than resulting in ZFS + reading the page from one of the other three drives. I don't see how ZFS + is of much help here, so I guess I must have misunderstood the claims for + ZFS that I've read on this list and in the available materials on-line. Now, given that there were 10 errors widely separated in that file (before the kernel-detected error that killed cmp(1)) that went undetected by hardware, drivers, or ZFS when the file was written and also went undetected by ZFS when read back in, in spite of all the data copies and checksum copies, and in view of two consecutive scrubs without changes made between them to the data yielding nearly identical numbers of errors "fixed", I am skeptical of the claims for ZFS's "self-healing" ability. With access to four copies of each of those 10 data blocks and four copies of each of the checksums, why did ZFS detect nothing while reading the file? And in the case of the uncorrectable error, why could ZFS not find any copy of the data block that matched any copy of the checksum or even two matching copies of the data block, so that it could provide the correct data to the application program anyway, while logging the sector(s) involved in the block containing the uncorrectable error? If it can't do any of those things, why have redundancy? > >> [stuff deleted --SB] > >It sounds like you are really pushing this system to do more than it >reasonably can. In a situation like this you should really not be doing >anything else at the same time given that you are already pushing what >the system can do. > It seems to me that the only places that could fail to keep up would be the motherboard's chip(set) or one of the controller cards. The motherboard controller knows the speed of the memory, so it will only cycle the memory at that speed. The CPU, of course, should be at a lower priority for bus cycles, so it would just use whatever were left over. There is no overclocking involved, so that is not an issue here. The machine goes as fast as it goes and no faster. If it takes longer for it to complete a task, then that's how long it takes. I don't see that "pushing this system to do more than it reasonably can" is even possible for me to do. It does what it does, and it does it when it gets to it. Would I like it to do things faster? Of course, I would, but what I want does not change physics. I'm not getting any machine check or overrun messages, either. Further, because one of the drives is limited to 50 MB/s (Firewire 400) transfer rates, ZFS really can't go any faster than that drive. Most of the time, a systat vmstat display during the scrubs showed the MB/s actually transferred for all four drives as being about the same (~23 - ~35 MB/s). The scrubs took from 5% to 25% of one core's time, and associated kernel functions took from 0% to ~9% (combined) from other cores. cmp(1) took 25% - 35% of one core with associated kernel functions taking 5% - 15% (combined) from other cores. I used cpuset(1) to keep cmp(1) from bothering the mprime thread I cared about the most. (Note that mprime runs niced to 18, so its threads should not slow any of the testing I was doing.) It really doesn't look to me like an overload situation, but I can try moving the three USB 3.0 drives to USB 2.0 to slow things down even further. That leaves still unexplained ZFS's failure to make use of multiple copies for error correction during the reading of a file or to fix in one scrub everything that was fixable. >> >> Script started on Wed Sep 17 01:37:38 2014 >> [hellas] 101 % time nice +12 cpuset -l 3,0 cmp -z -l /backups/s2C/save/backups.s2A /backups/testmirror/backups.s2A > >This is the file the ZFS told you was corrupt, all bets are off. > There should be only one bad block because the scrubs fixed everything else, right? And that bad block is bad on all four drives, right? > > >> [point made again elsewhere deleted --SB] > >ZFS told you that file was corrupt. You are choosing to try to read it. >ZFS used to not even let you try to access a corrupt file but that >behavior was changed to permit people to try to salvage what they could >instead of write it all off. See what I wrote above. It was a *four-way mirror*, not an unreplicated pool. It strikes me as extremely unlikely that the *same* blocks would be damaged on *all four* drives. ZFS ought to be able to identify and provide the correct version from one or more blocks and checksums. > >> [text included in a quotation above deleted here --SB] > >I suggest that you are ignoring what ZFS is telling you, specifically >that your system is incapable of reliably write to and reading from >_any_ of the four drives you are trying to use and that there is a >corrupt file due to this and here it the name of that corrupt file. > >Until you fix the underlying issues with your system, ZFS (or any FS for >that matter) will not be of much use to you. It looks to me as nearly certain that the underlying issue is poor manufacturing standards for 2 TB drives. > >> I don't know where to turn next. I will try to call Seagate/Samsung >> later today again about the bad Samsung drive and the bad, refurbished >> Seagate drive, but they already told me once that having a couple of kB >> of errors in a ~1.08 TB file copy does not mean that the drive is bad. >> I don't know whether they will consider a hard write error to mean the >> drive is bad. The kernel messages shown above are the first ones I've >> gotten about any of the drives involved in the copy operation or the >> tests described above. > >The fact that you have TWO different drives from TWO different vendors >exhibiting the same problem (and to the same degree) makes me think that >the problem is NOT with the drives but elsewhere with your system. I >have started tracking usage an failure statistics for my personal drives >(currently 26 of them, but I have 4 more coming back from Seagate as Whooweee! That's a heap of drives! IIRC, for a chi^2 distribution, 30 isn't bad for a sample size. How many of those drives are of larger capacity than 1 TB? >warranty replacements). I know that I do not have a statistically >significant sample, but it is what I have to work with. Taking into >account the drive I have as well as the hundreds of drives I managed at >a past client, I have never seen the kind of bad data failures you are >seeing UNLESS I had another underlying problem. Especially when the >problem appears on multiple drives. I suspect that the real odds of >having the same type of bad data failure on TWO drives in this case is >so small that another cause needs to be identified. Recall that I had two 2 TB drives that failed this year at, IIRC, 11 and 13 months since purchase, which is why two of the drives I was testing in the mirror were refurbished drives (supplied under warranty). One of those drives was showing hard errors on many sectors for a while before it failed completely. Having two drives that are bad doesn't seem so unlikely, although having two drives (much less four!) with an identical scattering of bad sectors on each is rather a stretch. You are referring to the two drives that showed two checksum errors each in both post-scrub status reports? Yes, those were from two manufacturers, but the two drives with the greatest numbers of checksum errors, along with one of the drives showing only 2 checksum errors, were all from one manufacturer, who claims that such occurrences are "normal" for those drives because they have no parity checking or parity recording. That manufacturer does not suggest that there is anything wrong with the system to which they are attached. (By that, I mean that the guy at that manufacturer who spoke with me on the phone made those claims.) > >> If anyone reading this has any suggestions for a course of action >> here, I'd be most interested in reading them. Thanks in advance for any >> ideas and also for any corrections if I've misunderstood what a ZFS >> mirror was supposed to have done to preserve the data and maintain >> correct operation at the application level. > >The system you are trying to use ZFS on may just not be able to handle >the throughput (both memory and disk I/O) generated by ZFS without >breaking. This may NOT just be a question of amount of RAM, but of the >reliability of the motherboard/CPU/RAM/device interfaces when stressed. I did do a fair amount of testing with mprime last year and found no problems. I monitor CPU temperatures frequently, especially when I'm running a test like the ones I've been doing, and the temperatures have remained reasonable throughout. (My air-conditioning bill has not been similarly reasonable, I'm sorry to say.) That having been said, though, between your remarks and Andrew Berg's, there does seem cause to run another scrub, perhaps two, with those three drives connected via USB 2.0 instead of USB 3.0 to see what happens when everything is slowed down drastically. I'll give that a try when I find time. That won't address the ZFS-related questions or the differences in error rates on different drives, but might reveal an underlying system hardware issue. Maybe a PCIE2 board is too slow for USB 3.0, although the motherboard controller, BIOS, USB 3.0 controller, and kernel all declined to complain. If it is, then the eSATA card I bought (SATA II) would likely be useless as well. :-< >In the early days of ZFS it was noticed that ZFS stressed the CPU and >memory systems of a server harder than virtually any other task. > When would that have been, please? (I don't know much ZFS history.) I believe this machine dates to 2006 or more likely 2007, although the USB 3.0 card was new last year. The VIA Firewire card was installed at the same time as the USB 3.0 card, but it was not new at that time. Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ********************************************************************** * Internet: bennett at sdf.org *xor* bennett at freeshell.org * *--------------------------------------------------------------------* * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * * -- a standing army." * * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * ********************************************************************** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 12:06:46 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99D9598B for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 12:06:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org [192.94.73.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.sdf.org", Issuer "SDF.ORG" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 614FCA16 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 12:06:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sdf.org (IDENT:bennett@sdf.lonestar.org [192.94.73.15]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.8/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s8SC6huw022606 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Sun, 28 Sep 2014 12:06:43 GMT Received: (from bennett@localhost) by sdf.org (8.14.8/8.12.8/Submit) id s8SC6h3L017080; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 07:06:43 -0500 (CDT) From: Scott Bennett Message-Id: <201409281206.s8SC6h3L017080@sdf.org> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 07:06:43 -0500 To: paul@kraus-haus.org Subject: Re: ZFS and 2 TB disk drive technology :-( User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 12:06:46 -0000 I wrote: > On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 11:24:35 -0400 Paul Kraus >wrote: >>What hardware are you running it on ? > > The CPU is a Q6600 running on a PCIE2 Gigabyte motherboard, whose model >number I did have written down around here somewhere but can't lay hands on >at the moment. I looked it up at the gigabyte.com web site, and it supposed >to be okay for a number of considerably faster CPU models. It has 4 GB of >memory, but FreeBSD ignores the last ~1.1 GB of it, so ~2.9 GB usable. It >has been running mprime worker threads on all four cores with no apparent >problems for almost 11 months now. Here's the motherboard model info. Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. G41M-ES2L Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ********************************************************************** * Internet: bennett at sdf.org *xor* bennett at freeshell.org * *--------------------------------------------------------------------* * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * * -- a standing army." * * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * ********************************************************************** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 14:45:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B311ECC0 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 14:45:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 627A99F1 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 14:45:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8SEjZq4053214 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 28 Sep 2014 08:45:36 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id s8SEjZxe053211; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 08:45:35 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 08:45:35 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Scott Bennett Subject: Re: ZFS and 2 TB disk drive technology :-( In-Reply-To: <201409281030.s8SAU8dR027634@sdf.org> Message-ID: References: <201409281030.s8SAU8dR027634@sdf.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 28 Sep 2014 08:45:36 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Paul Kraus , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 14:45:37 -0000 On Sun, 28 Sep 2014, Scott Bennett wrote: > On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 11:24:35 -0400 Paul Kraus > wrote: > Thanks for chiming in, Paul. > >> On 9/24/14 7:08, Scott Bennett wrote: >> >> >> >> What version of FreeBSD are you running ? > > FreeBSD hellas 9.2-STABLE FreeBSD 9.2-STABLE #1 r264339: Fri Apr 11 05:16:25 CDT 2014 bennett@hellas:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/hellas i386 > >> What hardware are you running it on ? > > The CPU is a Q6600 running on a PCIE2 Gigabyte motherboard, whose model > number I did have written down around here somewhere but can't lay hands on > at the moment. sysutils/dmidecode will show that without having to open the case. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 15:02:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E68F28D0 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 15:02:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x235.google.com (mail-lb0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EC02EDA for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 15:02:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f181.google.com with SMTP id n15so2374956lbi.12 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 08:01:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qqVBgX/HZkMN36VZrmR6axAV7XFfZdP6DanWh6ShjZ8=; b=pCZTzpnUqkZUeOoJA422Ne3EGyPulW4R+3sH5oO9aZ3zIzM2mY9dwh1hxGa0ZxKiFV DZ3VGb9o2r93pmLqLDTRqdurTYuJYTk8wwTh07UD18DFgjxTPa9dWrM8PKPfyn66aK3N OBisIvvyHKuNDMVtKktVb4pn6lOHf9+9M6nB0zn9gKXZxEQTirMRs7h0V4UV+LezkirL bmJryN29cnyLq7RNw/Gl3Igw3bu69MBRojbJPl2d2np8qkKEUFVejwXTrLx182jbKVGQ 79AtvPYBxrRPbblISGvZsmAcYi1CZS8JTu+qVr194SUvIOPl48A/2KamEHJgnGUq783g ZClQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.203.167 with SMTP id kr7mr33662932lac.9.1411916519255; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 08:01:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.19.6 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 08:01:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <23187F4C-0413-4F84-9C86-6EC1084C794C@btinternet.com> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 11:01:59 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: freebsd-update question From: "firmdog@gmail.com" To: FF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , Dave X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 15:02:02 -0000 I just installed a brand new 8.3 box and got the same behavior. I see in my output below that I have to build or update my own kernel? # uname -a FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0: Tue Apr 10 17:33:58 UTC 2012 root@mynewhost:/usr/obj/i386/usr/src/sys/XENHVM i386 # Starting the upgrade attempt: # freebsd-update -r 8.4-RELEASE upgrade Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. Fetching public key from update6.freebsd.org... done. Fetching metadata signature for 8.3-RELEASE from update6.freebsd.org... don= e. Fetching metadata index... done. Fetching 2 metadata files... done. Inspecting system... done. WARNING: This system is running a "xenhvm" kernel, which is not a kernel configuration distributed as part of FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE. This kernel will not be updated: you MUST update the kernel manually before running "/usr/sbin/freebsd-update install". The following components of FreeBSD seem to be installed: src/base src/bin src/cddl src/contrib src/crypto src/etc src/games src/gnu src/include src/krb5 src/lib src/libexec src/release src/rescue src/sbin src/secure src/share src/sys src/tools src/ubin src/usbin world/base world/dict world/doc world/games world/info world/manpages world/proflibs The following components of FreeBSD do not seem to be installed: kernel/generic world/catpages Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y Fetching metadata signature for 8.4-RELEASE from update6.freebsd.org... don= e. Fetching metadata index... done. Fetching 1 metadata patches. done. Applying metadata patches... done. Fetching 1 metadata files... done. Inspecting system... done. Fetching files from 8.3-RELEASE for merging... done. Preparing to download files... done. Fetching 32149 patches.....10....20....30....40....50....60....70....80....= 90....100....110....120....130....140....150....160....170....180.... SNIP=E2=80=A6. done. Applying patches... Fetching 778 files... done. Attempting to automatically merge changes in files... done. The following file could not be merged automatically: /etc/mail/freebsd.cf Press Enter to edit this file in vi and resolve the conflicts manually... Then a bunch more of /etc/mail files and also a merge of /etc/master.passwd= : Then this: The following files will be updated as part of updating to 8.4-RELEASE-p16: Then I run this: # freebsd-update install Installing updates... Kernel updates have been installed. Please reboot and run "/usr/sbin/freebsd-update install" again to finish installing updates. # reboot #uname -a FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0: Tue Apr 10 17:33:58 UTC 2012 root@mynewhost:/usr/obj/i386/usr/src/sys/XENHVM i386 On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 5:06 AM, FF wrote: > Can you provide the output of those commands? Freebsd-update is usually > pretty good about telling you what's wrong. > > Thanks > > On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 3:02 PM, firmdog@gmail.com > wrote: >> >> Yes I ran freebsd-update install. Then I rebooted. Then I did it again. >> Still at 8.3 >> On Sep 27, 2014 2:37 PM, "Dave" wrote: >> >> > On 27 September 2014 18:22:15 BST, "firmdog@gmail.com" >> > >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Trying to use freebsd-update to go from 8.3 to 8.4 and I am doing thi= s: >> >> >> >> # freebsd-update -r 8.4-RELEASE upgrade >> >> # freebsd-update install >> >> # reboot >> >> >> >> After reboot I am still at 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0 >> >> >> >> What am I doing wrong? >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> >> >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> >> >> > Don't you need run rub "freebsd-update install"? >> > -- >> > Dave >> > >> > GPG/PGP ID: CDB94DA1 >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > -- > FF From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 15:21:29 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B16EC4F for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 15:21:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from p3plsmtpa08-05.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa08-05.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [173.201.193.106]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFBD310A for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 15:21:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from titania.midsummerdream.org ([107.197.157.90]) by p3plsmtpa08-05.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with id wfML1o0041xJNYB01fMMKB; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 08:21:21 -0700 X-Sender: oberon@midsummerdream.org From: Rob Rati Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Freebsd 9.3-RELEASE and Virtualbox Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 11:21:18 -0400 Message-Id: <57884ABE-A0AB-4EC1-8B94-8998389196CB@midsummerdream.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 15:21:29 -0000 I've tried upgrading my 9.2-RELEASE system to 9.3-RELEASE a few times, = but each time I had to revert because starting any Virtualbox VMs causes = a kernel panic. I found this thread about the issue: = https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/2014-August/011767.h= tml What I don't understand is why it is expected that the repository kernel = module wouldn't be in sync with the 9.3-RELEASE kernel. Is it because = the packages are relevant to all 9.x releases and there's no way to have = a kernel module work with them all? If so, why bother having a kmod = package at all? On a related note, how difficult is it to build the kernel module? I = have never built it from source in the past and don't even have kernel = sources installed. I use stock kernels from the releases. Are there = ways this build can get screwed up if options/packages aren't correct? Rob= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 15:47:16 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89739A8 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 15:47:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-x235.google.com (mail-qg0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FBA7338 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 15:47:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id e89so10378468qgf.26 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 08:47:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsd.com.br; s=capeta; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:organization :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RjHhTWEacJq0Jx2degMYhhyvJyQfd0Id7o3aFsV4Yn4=; b=aD0ryflbkkCpfiRBt4UG5JOPlL0RWoOnzYMkprNe7ra3W23NXM8yWYCZLigLdkDujD R+dBQUtFBVdc1X4NLUmh2HLuNwZtqEPWmrtfCTL2nZ756NYqLDmcQ6mEuNIbdEBZUml+ mpKRZa1IOsE/u7Nxrz3tE2qXm/GebHGK0nhm8= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=RjHhTWEacJq0Jx2degMYhhyvJyQfd0Id7o3aFsV4Yn4=; b=h7KLPeszkWXczKww+3AZ37kMF/Y8WdngIxVBWppc3+LXyIwDX2Swpzfp/Ihp4euF+x Z+oHyqioRF7LyX0Iwn+aAuV1E3teYk1hUOxKHMPQgp3EngHkNSUC6dHiiwzKtj07qQ/Q VPlo/NjMHWHQ3+ouEdL6fVhw0A6lLOI1LMsworXJvpwelLacbHsMLZklKFN8cpXb1AhJ NmnzgOc/+N3p0iXyb5QEvM0+catUFe7M7crH0FJTEgqOIId8ow2BVIRTDhQOTxSWnA7z T5oqTjZeAsbgRx4JR9gSpGSBly/RKnM8mkTVT6UcpgEe3yL/qyFWPD7zqiGRJHbGvOhX yaCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlDqP2DLbIJbzxQmp/SGRxyaOtBZsXrTd+fpQTKmbUPkWnfugEUl/RZd4INZqEmSgmNAQFi X-Received: by 10.224.122.137 with SMTP id l9mr46393950qar.76.1411919235073; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 08:47:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Papi ([177.43.8.234]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id v10sm9205827qar.10.2014.09.28.08.47.13 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 28 Sep 2014 08:47:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 12:47:29 -0300 From: Mario Lobo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems starting tor service .... Message-ID: <20140928124729.73ab0725@Papi> In-Reply-To: <5427000C.4040002@hiwaay.net> References: <20140928004052.C49907@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <5426FA18.1080209@hiwaay.net> <5426FDEA.2070803@hiwaay.net> <5427000C.4040002@hiwaay.net> Organization: BSD X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 15:47:16 -0000 On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 13:21:00 -0500 "William A. Mahaffey III" wrote: > On 09/27/14 13:11, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > > On 09/27/14 12:55, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > >> On 09/27/14 10:20, Ian Smith wrote: > >>> In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 538, Issue 11, Message: 6 > >>> On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 06:43:16 +0200 Polytropon > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> > The important information is this: > >>> > > >>> > On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 22:19:07 -0500, William A. Mahaffey III > >>> > wrote: > >>> > > # tor_enable (bool): Set it to "YES" to enable tor. > >>> Default: NO > >>> > > # tor_conf (str): Points to your torrc file. > >>> > > # Default: /usr/local/etc/tor/torrc > >>> > > # tor_user (str): Tor daemon user. Default: _tor > >>> > > # tor_datadir (str): Tor datadir. Default: /var/db/tor > >>> > > # tor_logfile (str): Tor log file. Default: /var/log/tor > >>> > > # tor_loglevel (str): Tor log severity level. Default: > >>> > > notice > >>> > [snip] > i.e. it is still using the old OpenSSL .... No biggie (& possibly > pilot error), but seems a bit off .... > Hi William; What follows is just about all I can add to help out. I hope this helps. Here is what I got running: #### torrc SocksPort 9050 SocksListenAddress 127.0.0.1 SocksPolicy accept 127.0.0.1/32 SocksPolicy reject * ReachableDirAddresses *:80 ReachableDirAddresses *:443 #HttpProxy 10.14.200.245:7777 #HttpsProxy 10.14.200.245:7777 KeepalivePeriod 30 mapaddress 10.40.40.40 mejokbp2brhw4omd.onion mapaddress 10.40.40.40 5t7o4shdbhotfuzp.onion # Log debug file /var/log/tor/debug.log [~]>ls -l /var/log/ drwxr-xr-x 2 _tor _tor 512 Jun 8 2013 tor [~]>ls -l /var/log/tor/ total 452 -rw-r--r-- 1 _tor _tor 69246 Jun 8 2013 debug.log -rw-r--r-- 1 _tor _tor 374478 Sep 28 12:31 notices.log [~]>ls -l /var/db drwx------ 3 _tor _tor 512 Sep 28 12:31 tor [~]>ls -l /var/db/tor/ total 6656 -rw------- 1 _tor _tor 19391 Sep 5 07:42 cached-certs -rw------- 1 _tor _tor 1229433 Sep 28 11:29 cached-microdesc-consensus -rw------- 1 _tor _tor 2984111 Sep 22 18:41 cached-microdescs -rw------- 1 _tor _tor 2487055 Sep 28 12:32 cached-microdescs.new drwx------ 2 _tor _tor 512 Jun 8 2013 data -rw------- 1 _tor _tor 0 Sep 28 12:30 lock -rw------- 1 _tor _tor 9258 Sep 28 12:30 state [~]>ps axww | grep tor 1007 ?? S 0:03.08 /usr/local/bin/tor -f /usr/local/etc/tor/torrc --PidFile /var/run/tor/tor.pid --RunAsDaemon 1 --DataDirectory /var/db/tor --+Log notice file /var/log/tor/notices.log [~]>cat /etc/rc.conf | grep tor tor_enable=YES [~]>tor --version Sep 28 12:45:20.665 [notice] Tor v0.2.3.25 (git-17c24b3118224d65) running on FreeBSD. Sep 28 12:45:20.665 [notice] Tor can't help you if you use it wrong! Learn how to be safe at https://www.torproject.org/download/download#warning Tor version 0.2.3.25 (git-17c24b3118224d65). -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) "UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 16:21:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28B168C9 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 16:21:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm6-vm3.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (nm6-vm3.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [212.82.96.119]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 656928F6 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 16:21:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.es; s=s2048; t=1411921070; bh=O+/BeaeKVa/ZXuEOVqzUY86SgKkWseDYLAXXqWLe17Q=; h=Received:Received:Received:DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Disposition-Notification-To:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Subject; b=ai41Ccf0phYDDeh4BD2e3kaH0Z7Ib7LRfv2hWq9HQjNs5TX/F791xlszUh7p48cNBfoX0JAvg9r2/Y+YH5m85Flm0Ojnn1LkDwqOd8KCk8dLbGzZLmFb8HL/EyTd6etQAPmaKoGrxIWRseepmT8WvumBYyNM956ntYMFjOcimThqSZnZOyJAe4+ps+rHO9ghEl6ydCJyLhH3BWvixHEoEwqo6GaTZEXGEO2KF7znhVnNRL2d0Zdmkof5ntRJ+t5Hd1IF2ylRXVtoox13ZCqBIja/PkXedGdUPl/HkyCMiLKTUDVwsD0JiXgSDrfbZQgCTQ1Luck+qSu9xYJDKUvsMw== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s2048; d=yahoo.es; b=DbTFEYlWWJzup3971yr/qbOT3ZK9kjV/vB8azeHpSkMgAyaf56QlQJlOPWy0MM5E3c4IsPVUHN7zodmNdWiRTDpQ/5V4GyBt9hXJHgfnm0MtjQy3B7xKvHTuBeZxPcc0VbdVn56PwRiwtCRdIIkuyfW8z9+6VlCpkJX8KQ7f4kGAFgxfAXtTWz+WiVQCcSFjiAnjoqtn/kK/RnQNOggubtqDtfB2H8t4L+Uhni2m71y9MpISginrSqmzSn7EW3majst8Aa6rR4TilNO1Mxo7k/H+f5iP96VbEyy06aqJtvZ0hVqn9bV5EfTqkOyFNKZmXtjPevhxRri2eKWQ2Jkq0g==; Received: from [212.82.98.48] by nm6.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Sep 2014 16:17:50 -0000 Received: from [46.228.39.99] by tm1.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Sep 2014 16:17:50 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp136.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Sep 2014 16:17:50 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.es; s=s1024; t=1411921070; bh=O+/BeaeKVa/ZXuEOVqzUY86SgKkWseDYLAXXqWLe17Q=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Disposition-Notification-To:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=zNtwnjTCBrYBqB9PwhWdS/dH9V2DQLJGrLZq+rqyUjHBWsEbc+RcShV8nmCUBn4XshNJna3xIbkIrLkgbehZIxsZ9J0Xy6lNdNmVH2eB5pRspgVQ8GFEbNcStAKRwNexeZyuZiKxkNE7CRu7BehUBu9aEyZg9phG4n63EJv+Zqc= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 15055.45656.bm@smtp136.mail.ir2.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: 0ZM81CYVM1mRY9ayYrOwf.qm1dhKnjTWIB8gfCJzRcUmQtz FLPoajcYVMtdK.0MZc1gjlprdZFJG6dd8UCXLtm3sNAIgXb5IoMGk8zjJO0v cUTrakBkAKMlKL7Jb8La3niPIfuR3kMCeDNjyhRTW21sxrWGyRbj0bMBygwB UjYX.FHHEW1cOnLgkr6oonYEXYAEknIsUCeNuh1XF..x4osyaTRQJyzDEPV4 MXCH7aI5es5sSNHsdGTzoFaugjFZtcL4oOCybVG5RPfDVb0BeXKc2E1oHvyY UDN_5NKRyHppdgMglzs9Oa.KCKdwm_CD0g8tniZlU190nxhszaNHOUY3R4Ak MGOhmxYRuT2k4VwAP4Kuc5yD.gwj9BqJ5HiaCBE0W5zaBhE6nw14hbW3j3VG AuIIwtYEs.ecnCINQVs1I7TDyWFJrwgWHTTgVzBxw4My_D4hHGx0urVYMlGs kwdigD8RLqoFsiwsKBqH8JVfhoml3DrfHmp2Dq9YiKDmPLTzxSt5YsHk81yH niFFbd5Z4i9lNIRMoDZdgn5DntYa0vHx3QfMbhNZCSaFcAFkE2TeMdnWtdx1 43aKuEYUZ9SO5fybmJILSUV3eHUFUkM5e3BIYGY75NPcDp.Mv_8YTr0udmvZ wAP_V2vVITw-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: mX392iiswBAeJNdO_s.EW62LZDJR Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 18:18:21 +0200 From: Eduardo Morras To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freebsd 9.3-RELEASE and Virtualbox Message-Id: <20140928181821.76adad527982addeac22ceb5@yahoo.es> In-Reply-To: <57884ABE-A0AB-4EC1-8B94-8998389196CB@midsummerdream.org> References: <57884ABE-A0AB-4EC1-8B94-8998389196CB@midsummerdream.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.2 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 16:21:17 -0000 On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 11:21:18 -0400 Rob Rati wrote: > I've tried upgrading my 9.2-RELEASE system to 9.3-RELEASE a few > times, but each time I had to revert because starting any Virtualbox > VMs causes a kernel panic. I found this thread about the issue: > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/2014-August/011767.html > > What I don't understand is why it is expected that the repository > kernel module wouldn't be in sync with the 9.3-RELEASE kernel. Is it > because the packages are relevant to all 9.x releases and there's no > way to have a kernel module work with them all? If so, why bother > having a kmod package at all? Did you update /usr/src to 9.3 too? Kernel module needs to use some /usr/src source code to compile and the resulting kernel module will work only on that /usr/src version kernel. > On a related note, how difficult is it to build the kernel module? I > have never built it from source in the past and don't even have > kernel sources installed. I use stock kernels from the releases. > Are there ways this build can get screwed up if options/packages > aren't correct? > > Rob --- --- Eduardo Morras From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 16:33:27 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94875BC2 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 16:33:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU004-OMC4S17.hotmail.com (blu004-omc4s17.hotmail.com [65.55.111.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50C8E9C1 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 16:33:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU437-SMTP4 ([65.55.111.136]) by BLU004-OMC4S17.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22724); Sun, 28 Sep 2014 09:32:19 -0700 X-TMN: [YukNTsG9Kvnt4C7QlcxKe0cE1SoWU5Kq] X-Originating-Email: [carmel_ny@outlook.com] Message-ID: Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 12:32:17 -0400 From: Carmel NY To: User questions Subject: update to linux_base-c6 Organization: seibercom NET X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Sep 2014 16:32:19.0159 (UTC) FILETIME=[C595EE70:01CFDB39] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 16:33:27 -0000 Sun, 28 Sep 2014 12:30:18 -0400 I want to update to emulators/linux_base-c6. According to UPDATING, I should remove all linux-f10 ports. In my case, that would be: linux-f10-atk-1.24.0_1 linux-f10-cairo-1.8.0_3 linux-f10-cups-libs-1.3.11_1 linux-f10-curl-7.19.6_1 linux-f10-cyrus-sasl2-2.1.22_2 linux-f10-expat-2.0.1_1 linux-f10-flashplugin-11.2r202.400 linux-f10-fontconfig-2.6.0_1 linux-f10-gdk-pixbuf-0.22.0_1 linux-f10-gnutls-2.4.2_1 linux-f10-gtk2-2.14.7_5 linux-f10-jpeg-6b linux-f10-libgcrypt-1.4.4 linux-f10-libgpg-error-1.6_1 linux-f10-libssh2-0.18 linux-f10-libtasn1-1.5_1 linux-f10-libxml2-2.7.3_2 linux-f10-nspr-4.7.6_1 linux-f10-nss-3.12.3.99.3_1 linux-f10-openldap-2.4.12_1 linux-f10-openssl-0.9.8g linux-f10-pango-1.28.3_1 linux-f10-png-1.2.37_2 linux-f10-sqlite3-3.5.9_2 linux-f10-tiff-3.8.2 linux-f10-xorg-libs-7.4_1 However, in addition to them, I have the following ports that depend on linux_base-f10: acroread9-9.5.5_1 acroreadwrapper-0.0.20130208 linux-libgtkembedmoz-0.0.20100806 nspluginwrapper-1.4.4_4 nvidia-driver-331.67_1 My question is, after removing the linux-f10 ports and the linux_base-f10, making the necessary changes to the /etc/makefile, etcetera and then installing linux_base-c6, do I have to then install the corresponding c6 ports for the f10 ports that have deleted or is that done automatically I assume, that I have to rebuild the remaining ports that use to depend on linux_base-f10? -- Carmel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 17:26:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7228B92 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 17:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cosmo.uchicago.edu (cosmo.uchicago.edu [128.135.52.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE25E42 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 17:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by cosmo.uchicago.edu (Postfix, from userid 48) id 2EABECB8CA0; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 12:26:41 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 76.192.184.214 (SquirrelMail authenticated user valeri) by cosmo.uchicago.edu with HTTP; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 12:26:41 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <50282.76.192.184.214.1411925201.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> In-Reply-To: References: <23187F4C-0413-4F84-9C86-6EC1084C794C@btinternet.com> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 12:26:41 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: freebsd-update question From: "Valeri Galtsev" To: "firmdog@gmail.com" Reply-To: galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el5.centos.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: Dave , FF , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 17:26:47 -0000 On Sun, September 28, 2014 10:01 am, firmdog@gmail.com wrote: > I just installed a brand new 8.3 box and got the same behavior. I see > in my output below that I have to build or update my own kernel? > > > # uname -a > FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0: Tue Apr 10 17:33:58 UTC > 2012 root@mynewhost:/usr/obj/i386/usr/src/sys/XENHVM i386 > # > > Starting the upgrade attempt: > > # freebsd-update -r 8.4-RELEASE upgrade > Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. > Fetching public key from update6.freebsd.org... done. > Fetching metadata signature for 8.3-RELEASE from update6.freebsd.org... > done. > Fetching metadata index... done. > Fetching 2 metadata files... done. > Inspecting system... done. > > WARNING: This system is running a "xenhvm" kernel, which is not a > kernel configuration distributed as part of FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE. > This kernel will not be updated: you MUST update the kernel manually > before running "/usr/sbin/freebsd-update install". > > The following components of FreeBSD seem to be installed: > src/base src/bin src/cddl src/contrib src/crypto src/etc src/games > src/gnu src/include src/krb5 src/lib src/libexec src/release src/rescue > src/sbin src/secure src/share src/sys src/tools src/ubin src/usbin > world/base world/dict world/doc world/games world/info world/manpages > world/proflibs > > The following components of FreeBSD do not seem to be installed: > kernel/generic world/catpages > > Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y > > Fetching metadata signature for 8.4-RELEASE from update6.freebsd.org... > done. > Fetching metadata index... done. > Fetching 1 metadata patches. done. > Applying metadata patches... done. > Fetching 1 metadata files... done. > Inspecting system... done. > Fetching files from 8.3-RELEASE for merging... done. > Preparing to download files... > done. > Fetching 32149 > patches.....10....20....30....40....50....60....70....80....90....100....110....120....130....140....150....160....170....180.... > SNIPā€¦. > done. > Applying patches... > Fetching 778 files... done. > Attempting to automatically merge changes in files... done. > > The following file could not be merged automatically: /etc/mail/freebsd.cf > Press Enter to edit this file in vi and resolve the conflicts > manually... > > Then a bunch more of /etc/mail files and also a merge of > /etc/master.passwd: > > Then this: > > The following files will be updated as part of updating to > 8.4-RELEASE-p16: > > Then I run this: > > # freebsd-update install > Installing updates... > Kernel updates have been installed. Please reboot and run > "/usr/sbin/freebsd-update install" again to finish installing updates. > > # reboot > In last message before reboot it instructed to "reboot then run /usr/sbin/freebsd-update install again". Did you run "freebsd-update install" after reboot? Valeri > > #uname -a > FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0: Tue Apr 10 17:33:58 UTC > 2012 root@mynewhost:/usr/obj/i386/usr/src/sys/XENHVM i386 > > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 5:06 AM, FF wrote: >> Can you provide the output of those commands? Freebsd-update is usually >> pretty good about telling you what's wrong. >> >> Thanks >> >> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 3:02 PM, firmdog@gmail.com >> wrote: >>> >>> Yes I ran freebsd-update install. Then I rebooted. Then I did it again. >>> Still at 8.3 >>> On Sep 27, 2014 2:37 PM, "Dave" wrote: >>> >>> > On 27 September 2014 18:22:15 BST, "firmdog@gmail.com" >>> > >>> > wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Hi, >>> >> >>> >> Trying to use freebsd-update to go from 8.3 to 8.4 and I am doing >>> this: >>> >> >>> >> # freebsd-update -r 8.4-RELEASE upgrade >>> >> # freebsd-update install >>> >> # reboot >>> >> >>> >> After reboot I am still at 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0 >>> >> >>> >> What am I doing wrong? >>> >> ------------------------------ >>> >> >>> >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> >>> >> >>> > Don't you need run rub "freebsd-update install"? >>> > -- >>> > Dave >>> > >>> > GPG/PGP ID: CDB94DA1 >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> >> >> -- >> FF > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 17:49:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 471D21E6 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 17:49:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x22c.google.com (mail-la0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7BCCFF6 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 17:49:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f44.google.com with SMTP id gi9so6522297lab.31 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:49:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=XlO3GPv661zSk99ddAzNLgWIokTMvXHfjda6KnlNGBk=; b=YfATr7G6u7mZdaFFLbOYACqgQp5yQRzdyUQh67et47ngHfkkJUXeFwWt4q1hFrtYOf JMBeTpXHyb54lPUa/OB2ZILvSWShRdoPfLI+Av0bPo2xL6a7SWs2+6kAj0+Un9flqaHq zRb0h99IW4un8vzel/+/4DlIpnjhYxiYGhLxom86VwEWQVOr4Bf+l9P3PnpxpXgcN6Dg vo4Q56Qbxrt4uE1Jy54gQz47mPSM9l4RcayZxx/UBxB/hbJhro1DCmV9fvllFfeUVTX8 5riLz5gMhjL7hZYFYHO0J/ctpnAMc9ICZiiyyb5ChzQ0VHDxlBEfHeDlFqLHJyTflhJo W/Bg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.83.235 with SMTP id t11mr673313lby.101.1411926548617; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:49:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.162.145 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:49:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:49:08 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: ZFS root failure after 9.2 -> 9.3 ugprade From: Patrick Gibson To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 17:49:11 -0000 I just did a freebsd-update upgrade on a 9.2 system with zfsroot and now when it boots, I get: Booting from Hard Disk... / Can't find /boot/zfsloader FreeBSD/x86 boot Default: disk0:/boot/kernel/kernel boot: \ Can't find /boot/kernel/kernel I've tried booting from a 9.3 install disc and going into the LiveCD and reinstalling the bootloader with: gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr -p /boot/gptzfsboot -i 1 ada0 Which says it's installed correctly, but still won't boot. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 18:26:06 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0723A153 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 18:26:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm5-vm8.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm5-vm8.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [216.39.63.213]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD898626 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 18:26:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [216.39.60.176] by nm5.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Sep 2014 18:24:23 -0000 Received: from [216.39.60.252] by tm12.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Sep 2014 18:24:23 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1023.access.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Sep 2014 18:24:23 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 806853.59369.bm@omp1023.access.mail.gq1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 94540 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Sep 2014 18:24:23 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sbcglobal.net; s=s1024; t=1411928663; bh=q6rdIwwkZdgvEJSJFvrJ6+c2BjabNPeC37i2lrmLDaE=; h=References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=MiDOH3Ky2lbiqCctYGARtf2oNdGuAkttDkRp3JTa7tWCexjHig3R0gE+BLH4UsGQ3Mdqs9LH6+tyLIgJVOGwZgwwsBgvuOGy26pdy8amPyamayPVPtTL3O5Vxf1f5VQPvpTLET1znSoXSuXyqjY40U4Ql1Io/DejIPigYVaUGvM= X-YMail-OSG: QkPYOewVM1nKrIQ4eIb3hMiSYzqrf9k0ROXFlkCvsTZT9lP lKYhko2TuTDIhGwoq3FOnsOdHV8ZVg7boX2nRi7eEerUMjM9bIkOiSZYff6O lVNQAu2MALUTzoN8gbMR529KK9oyfU9lWnFLkxkxrIzuusEIv7X5N8Xc5Vmk iSs1ku9MJORECCE2tC1yDOLLYA9sVlU1CvrvOKUtp.3uzpTmBccug6I8g17j Isc.metmw9yPhHcA5Ks8jXIO1rB3903UmRMl.pQz0h_XwBwvtxYsJHDuxJ5G awznfZEexQfx3Bmoa3CxM_eTmnNq6fAotqJYLimoI75490ZDomS6v_cM5cyn 5E3FZ_qZZmedJdIdAl67ZA26t3VQkZbU1CZWDseJdXmE3RI8CJBgUTdz821B 58PcO5GJa0sUqRGl8njR2IvK5ZkaJuf_jnoHpXS3cOGIWygtO_J32woRDXdN ogrfD_5RS5Ibz.sxupQDcT1uN1HnQq0blGk2nlEelUXUOeZjaftviMhy28zw Tqa3MPPxe1XQV5TzlhTmYX3n.GU.OghzchOFEZuCHLJEn8YWKthOxmOR1N7L 8kJvxhQbb9A-- Received: from [162.239.0.170] by web180901.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 11:24:22 PDT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001, Tm8sIEJJT1MgYm9vdCBpcyBjb21wbGV0ZWx5IGlycmVsZXZhbnQgdG8gdGhpcyBwcm9ibGVtLiAKCkl0IGxvb2tzIGxpa2UgSSBoYXZlIHRvIHJlLWFkZHJlc3MgdGhpcyBpc3N1ZSBkZWJhdGVkIDE1LTIwIHllYXJzIGFnby4KCkZpcnN0IG9mIGFsbCwgbGV0J3MgY2xlYXIgQklPUyBxdWVzdGlvbiBzbyB5b3Ugd2lsbCBub3QgYXJndWUgaXQgYWdhaW4uCkJJT1MgYm9vdCBzZXF1ZW5jZSBjYW4gYmUgc3BlY2lmaWVkIGluIGFueSBvcmRlciwgYW5kIGl0IGJvb3RzIGRlc2lyZWQgIGRyaXZlIGNvcnJlY3RseS4BMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.203.696 References: <1411851225.9364.YahooMailNeo@web180902.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1411928662.22540.YahooMailNeo@web180901.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 11:24:22 -0700 From: Jin Guojun Reply-To: Jin Guojun Subject: Re: Inproper ada# assignment in 10-BETA2 To: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "hackers@freebsd.org" , questions freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 18:26:06 -0000 No, BIOS boot is completely irrelevant to this problem. It looks like I have to re-address this issue debated 15-20 years ago. First of all, let's clear BIOS question so you will not argue it again. BIOS boot sequence can be specified in any order, and it boots desired drive correctly. If not, 10.1-BETA2 will not be loaded, and we will not see this problem, period. After 10.1-BETA2 is loaded and booted, it enumerates drive(s) dynamically to assign ID to ada or da node. Kernel clearly knows which drive is ad1, 2, 3, ..., but it does not assigned proper ID to existing drive(s) for ada and da nodes. That is, ad note IDs are still correct, but ada and da node IDs are wrong. The dynamic enumeration is likely used for moving a boot drive from on system to another or from one bus to another without manually modifying fstab entries. That is, this mechanism wants to ensure no matter where this drive is plugged in, Boot drive should be always enumerated as ID 0 or the ID installation assigned to. How to ensure this? For boot drive, this is relatively easy -- the boot drive is always this first one in general, so this drive should always enumerated as ada0 or da0. If installation has assigned drive ID to not 0 somehow, then generic enumeration apply. Generic enumeration is drive serial number (S#) based enumeration mechanism, which has been used for at least two decades. For example, if two drives installed and their S# are AAAA and XXXXX (boot drive), regardless what SATA port they resides at -- AAAA at ad9 and XXXXX at ad5, We knew installation will likely name drive XXXXX as ada0 and AAAA as ada1. In fixed fashion, drive XXXXX is ad5 and AAAA is ad9, when a new drive is inserted as ad0, we knew drive XXXXX will be still ad5 and boot should not fail. But in current 10.1-BETA2, the new drive is likely will be ada0, drive XXXXX will be ada1, and AAAA will be ada2, then boot will fail. In case if new drive is inserted as ad8, drive XXXXX will remain as ada0 but AAAA will be ada21. Even though boot will succeed in this case, but mounting drive AAAA will fail. The S#-based enumeration will record the S# for corresponding device ID in a dynamic boot configuration file, which is used in boot time to determine what device ID should be assigned to each drive. After existing drive ID has been enumerated, any new drive(s) will be given a unused ID sequentially. This ensures that existing drive(s) will always get device ID originally assigned to, so the disk mounting operation will never fail no matter where a disk drive (has FreeBSD already installed) is plugged in. Hopefully, this explains what is correct the dynamic enumeration operation. In old time, we have a mechanisms to alter the dynamic enumeration to fixed one, but I do not know if this mechanism is still in 10.x-R. Because it looks like that current developers have no knowledge about this concept, I am going to open a bug to track this problem again soon, unless I will hear if we have a work around for this problem. On Saturday, September 27, 2014 3:15 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Jin Guojun wrote: Installed 10-BETA2 on SATA port 4 (ad8) and then added another SATA port 3 (ad6), the system has not correctly enumerate the ada # for the boot device. >As original boot (without the second SATA drive), the ad8 is enumerated as ada0 -- the boot drive: > >Sep 24 22:51:30 R10-B2 kernel: ada0 at ahcich2 bus 0 scbus2 target 0 lun 0 >Sep 24 22:51:30 R10-B2 kernel: ada0: ATA-8 SATA 2.x device >... >Sep 24 22:51:30 R10-B2 kernel: ada0: Previously was known as ad8 > > >However, after added another SATA drive (ad6), this new drive is assigned to ada0, but ad8 has changed to ada1. This is incorrect dynamic device assignment. FreeBSD has kept using fixed disk ID assignment due to the same problem introduced in around 4-R (or may be slightly later), and after a simple debate, a decision was made to use fixed drive ID to avoid such hassle. > >If now we want to use dynamic enumeration for drive ID# assignment, this has to be done correctly -- boot drive MUST assigned to 0 or whatever the # as installation assigned to; otherwise, adding a new drive will cause system not bootable, or make other existing drive not mountable due to enumeration # changes. > >Has this been reported as a known problem for 10-R, or shall I open a bug to track? > >-Jin > One point should be checked : On mainboards SATA ports are numbered from 0 or 1 to upward . BIOS always uses first SATA drive for boot . This is NOT related to the operating system . Therefore , it is necessary to check port numbers of existing drives and the bootable SATA drive should be connected to the smallest numbered SATA port among existent drives . For example , assume bootable drive is connected to SATA port 2 . New drive should be connected to a higher numbered SATA port . If there are only two SATA ports , then bootable drive should be connected to the first SATA port . If mainboard BIOS allows definition of any SATA port for boot , and bootable SATA port and drive is specified in there , again it may boot from that drive . Up to now , I did not see any BIOS which supplies such an ordering among SATA ports . Please check your BIOS for such a feature . If it is present you may use it , otherwise it is necessary to reconnect SATA cables . Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 18:36:14 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E97F04CD for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 18:36:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yh0-x230.google.com (mail-yh0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A64C1768 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 18:36:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f48.google.com with SMTP id c41so1259713yho.21 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 11:36:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=rvfzoNOlKS1SFKl7vjVC5pxd5OXhgsyRC2nMf93qoxs=; b=AGYxm5+8yGkHTfTzVO64gL5ZJuo6L/gU0F+Jglg2EW3pZdFdJdwffn1l4F7Yg0/vQz XjbLZlsgrx3KlfeoRSZcfWHZ2G0MEdUF7H2v/8VERk0RVLwQnhBWG0/20erz23QhKRSl nUtjKf2ORWBftmR5SPOwNS3D/V70jPXvNCfdL8xbe33ULbpRcOKeWoFpswkj6tDqt5HG E3S1XTzKAsb9xg8gQ3dt3R3CZT09nwXJsGj47ni/SXWQnsKzDj8uJbZdoqJYgRDpLsRq YMKNq8PfWuiTKoBU6sFb6StaD4/Z/htUD+iRxiDSN3qJhpnWNJ1NvU87xQX1QmY1jcMG 3lRg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.164.38 with SMTP id b26mr4168296yhl.2.1411929373710; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 11:36:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.170.150.213 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 11:36:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <50282.76.192.184.214.1411925201.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> References: <23187F4C-0413-4F84-9C86-6EC1084C794C@btinternet.com> <50282.76.192.184.214.1411925201.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 14:36:13 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: freebsd-update question From: FF To: galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "firmdog@gmail.com" , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , Dave X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 18:36:15 -0000 So your kernel won't be updated because you are running a custom kernel. Your uname is based on the running kernel. If you want to confirm that you've in fact updated, you can reboot to the GENERIC kernel which will confirm you are at 8.4 or whatever. FreeBSD update is a binary update based on the release versions -- deviate from them and it doesn't break, but it can't touch those files. Since you know enough to put a custom kernel on there, you should follow the source rebuild instructions which would be basically be to svn down the whole 8.4 source tree, make the world, make the kernel and install it, reboot, and install the world. I think the directions are in the FreeBSD handbook. Best, On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Sun, September 28, 2014 10:01 am, firmdog@gmail.com wrote: > > I just installed a brand new 8.3 box and got the same behavior. I see > > in my output below that I have to build or update my own kernel? > > > > > > # uname -a > > FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0: Tue Apr 10 17:33:58 UTC > > 2012 root@mynewhost:/usr/obj/i386/usr/src/sys/XENHVM i386 > > # > > > > Starting the upgrade attempt: > > > > # freebsd-update -r 8.4-RELEASE upgrade > > Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. > > Fetching public key from update6.freebsd.org... done. > > Fetching metadata signature for 8.3-RELEASE from update6.freebsd.org... > > done. > > Fetching metadata index... done. > > Fetching 2 metadata files... done. > > Inspecting system... done. > > > > WARNING: This system is running a "xenhvm" kernel, which is not a > > kernel configuration distributed as part of FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE. > > This kernel will not be updated: you MUST update the kernel manually > > before running "/usr/sbin/freebsd-update install". > > > > The following components of FreeBSD seem to be installed: > > src/base src/bin src/cddl src/contrib src/crypto src/etc src/games > > src/gnu src/include src/krb5 src/lib src/libexec src/release src/rescue > > src/sbin src/secure src/share src/sys src/tools src/ubin src/usbin > > world/base world/dict world/doc world/games world/info world/manpages > > world/proflibs > > > > The following components of FreeBSD do not seem to be installed: > > kernel/generic world/catpages > > > > Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y > > > > Fetching metadata signature for 8.4-RELEASE from update6.freebsd.org... > > done. > > Fetching metadata index... done. > > Fetching 1 metadata patches. done. > > Applying metadata patches... done. > > Fetching 1 metadata files... done. > > Inspecting system... done. > > Fetching files from 8.3-RELEASE for merging... done. > > Preparing to download files... > > done. > > Fetching 32149 > > > patches.....10....20....30....40....50....60....70....80....90....100....= 110....120....130....140....150....160....170....180.... > > SNIP=E2=80=A6. > > done. > > Applying patches... > > Fetching 778 files... done. > > Attempting to automatically merge changes in files... done. > > > > The following file could not be merged automatically: /etc/mail/ > freebsd.cf > > Press Enter to edit this file in vi and resolve the conflicts > > manually... > > > > Then a bunch more of /etc/mail files and also a merge of > > /etc/master.passwd: > > > > Then this: > > > > The following files will be updated as part of updating to > > 8.4-RELEASE-p16: > > > > Then I run this: > > > > # freebsd-update install > > Installing updates... > > Kernel updates have been installed. Please reboot and run > > "/usr/sbin/freebsd-update install" again to finish installing updates. > > > > # reboot > > > > In last message before reboot it instructed to "reboot then run > > /usr/sbin/freebsd-update install > > again". Did you run "freebsd-update install" after reboot? > > Valeri > > > > > #uname -a > > FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0: Tue Apr 10 17:33:58 UTC > > 2012 root@mynewhost:/usr/obj/i386/usr/src/sys/XENHVM i386 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 5:06 AM, FF wrote: > >> Can you provide the output of those commands? Freebsd-update is usuall= y > >> pretty good about telling you what's wrong. > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 3:02 PM, firmdog@gmail.com > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Yes I ran freebsd-update install. Then I rebooted. Then I did it agai= n. > >>> Still at 8.3 > >>> On Sep 27, 2014 2:37 PM, "Dave" wrote: > >>> > >>> > On 27 September 2014 18:22:15 BST, "firmdog@gmail.com" > >>> > > >>> > wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> Hi, > >>> >> > >>> >> Trying to use freebsd-update to go from 8.3 to 8.4 and I am doing > >>> this: > >>> >> > >>> >> # freebsd-update -r 8.4-RELEASE upgrade > >>> >> # freebsd-update install > >>> >> # reboot > >>> >> > >>> >> After reboot I am still at 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0 > >>> >> > >>> >> What am I doing wrong? > >>> >> ------------------------------ > >>> >> > >>> >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >>> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >>> >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >>> >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> > Don't you need run rub "freebsd-update install"? > >>> > -- > >>> > Dave > >>> > > >>> > GPG/PGP ID: CDB94DA1 > >>> > > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> FF > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Valeri Galtsev > Sr System Administrator > Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics > Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics > University of Chicago > Phone: 773-702-4247 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > --=20 FF From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 18:46:34 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41AFECFB for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 18:46:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x22a.google.com (mail-la0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA55885E for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 18:46:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f42.google.com with SMTP id mk6so584283lab.15 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 11:46:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ffn4QaAT8ReMDIblJIhJfQ2BAroGc2GV0QNzCGFGZe8=; b=GC396GCjLwsy3vYcTmx0F0WsOplsArUZGEjLp9pU34mpPUmmqKaR5OgkhVAjm2rPKT SBaBpo0L4ApmBCah4ZA/GF8KZ0DNcUJoU7bdp5nMpBOwHtXZdFE5VAErEreQJ8GnyYHs wHCajS/jDfLzWt2yEoyfwoKzmtUxHTsfZcHNvJk2aTlXu13FGZWP1i6HitrRJXOBEoLP 9/87aidsjUxKWOs00BwuXSllSzxM7JyWUJbfzmf/ahrAMFMHBfoXtcCJ1zPE7WQSfoxT wAmpgj3IJPQMTV0wXW4YzAT/s9/QJwl1bV4FgY49tHiIQc8SVgoLbA8GKYtydIURhe73 szTg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.209.2 with SMTP id mi2mr4249498lbc.51.1411929990958; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 11:46:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.19.6 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 11:46:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <50282.76.192.184.214.1411925201.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> References: <23187F4C-0413-4F84-9C86-6EC1084C794C@btinternet.com> <50282.76.192.184.214.1411925201.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 14:46:30 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: freebsd-update question From: "firmdog@gmail.com" To: galtsev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Dave , FF , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 18:46:34 -0000 I did this multiple times: #freebsd-update install Installing updates... Completing this upgrade requires removing old shared object files. Please rebuild all installed 3rd party software (e.g., programs installed from the ports tree) and then run "/usr/sbin/freebsd-update insta= ll" again to finish installing updates. # reboot still at 8.3-RELEASE Since I am running the xenhvm kernel on an Amazon AWS server, I must update the kernel manually right? On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Sun, September 28, 2014 10:01 am, firmdog@gmail.com wrote: >> I just installed a brand new 8.3 box and got the same behavior. I see >> in my output below that I have to build or update my own kernel? >> >> >> # uname -a >> FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0: Tue Apr 10 17:33:58 UTC >> 2012 root@mynewhost:/usr/obj/i386/usr/src/sys/XENHVM i386 >> # >> >> Starting the upgrade attempt: >> >> # freebsd-update -r 8.4-RELEASE upgrade >> Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. >> Fetching public key from update6.freebsd.org... done. >> Fetching metadata signature for 8.3-RELEASE from update6.freebsd.org... >> done. >> Fetching metadata index... done. >> Fetching 2 metadata files... done. >> Inspecting system... done. >> >> WARNING: This system is running a "xenhvm" kernel, which is not a >> kernel configuration distributed as part of FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE. >> This kernel will not be updated: you MUST update the kernel manually >> before running "/usr/sbin/freebsd-update install". >> >> The following components of FreeBSD seem to be installed: >> src/base src/bin src/cddl src/contrib src/crypto src/etc src/games >> src/gnu src/include src/krb5 src/lib src/libexec src/release src/rescue >> src/sbin src/secure src/share src/sys src/tools src/ubin src/usbin >> world/base world/dict world/doc world/games world/info world/manpages >> world/proflibs >> >> The following components of FreeBSD do not seem to be installed: >> kernel/generic world/catpages >> >> Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y >> >> Fetching metadata signature for 8.4-RELEASE from update6.freebsd.org... >> done. >> Fetching metadata index... done. >> Fetching 1 metadata patches. done. >> Applying metadata patches... done. >> Fetching 1 metadata files... done. >> Inspecting system... done. >> Fetching files from 8.3-RELEASE for merging... done. >> Preparing to download files... >> done. >> Fetching 32149 >> patches.....10....20....30....40....50....60....70....80....90....100...= .110....120....130....140....150....160....170....180.... >> SNIP=E2=80=A6. >> done. >> Applying patches... >> Fetching 778 files... done. >> Attempting to automatically merge changes in files... done. >> >> The following file could not be merged automatically: /etc/mail/freebsd.= cf >> Press Enter to edit this file in vi and resolve the conflicts >> manually... >> >> Then a bunch more of /etc/mail files and also a merge of >> /etc/master.passwd: >> >> Then this: >> >> The following files will be updated as part of updating to >> 8.4-RELEASE-p16: >> >> Then I run this: >> >> # freebsd-update install >> Installing updates... >> Kernel updates have been installed. Please reboot and run >> "/usr/sbin/freebsd-update install" again to finish installing updates. >> >> # reboot >> > > In last message before reboot it instructed to "reboot then run > > /usr/sbin/freebsd-update install > > again". Did you run "freebsd-update install" after reboot? > > Valeri > >> >> #uname -a >> FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0: Tue Apr 10 17:33:58 UTC >> 2012 root@mynewhost:/usr/obj/i386/usr/src/sys/XENHVM i386 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 5:06 AM, FF wrote: >>> Can you provide the output of those commands? Freebsd-update is usually >>> pretty good about telling you what's wrong. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 3:02 PM, firmdog@gmail.com >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Yes I ran freebsd-update install. Then I rebooted. Then I did it again= . >>>> Still at 8.3 >>>> On Sep 27, 2014 2:37 PM, "Dave" wrote: >>>> >>>> > On 27 September 2014 18:22:15 BST, "firmdog@gmail.com" >>>> > >>>> > wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> Hi, >>>> >> >>>> >> Trying to use freebsd-update to go from 8.3 to 8.4 and I am doing >>>> this: >>>> >> >>>> >> # freebsd-update -r 8.4-RELEASE upgrade >>>> >> # freebsd-update install >>>> >> # reboot >>>> >> >>>> >> After reboot I am still at 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0 >>>> >> >>>> >> What am I doing wrong? >>>> >> ------------------------------ >>>> >> >>>> >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>> >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>> >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> > Don't you need run rub "freebsd-update install"? >>>> > -- >>>> > Dave >>>> > >>>> > GPG/PGP ID: CDB94DA1 >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> FF >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Valeri Galtsev > Sr System Administrator > Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics > Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics > University of Chicago > Phone: 773-702-4247 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 18:50:19 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D554812A for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 18:50:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from p3plsmtpa11-06.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa11-06.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [68.178.252.107]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6AC289F for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 18:50:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from titania.midsummerdream.org ([107.197.157.90]) by p3plsmtpa11-06.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with id wiob1o0011xJNYB01iobxq; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 11:48:42 -0700 X-Sender: oberon@midsummerdream.org Subject: Re: Freebsd 9.3-RELEASE and Virtualbox Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Rob Rati In-Reply-To: <20140928181821.76adad527982addeac22ceb5@yahoo.es> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 14:48:33 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <79BD0C3C-FF83-4399-8250-12D3E4DA15CC@midsummerdream.org> References: <57884ABE-A0AB-4EC1-8B94-8998389196CB@midsummerdream.org> <20140928181821.76adad527982addeac22ceb5@yahoo.es> To: Eduardo Morras X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 18:50:19 -0000 On Sep 28, 2014, at 12:18 PM, Eduardo Morras wrote: > On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 11:21:18 -0400 > Rob Rati wrote: >=20 >> I've tried upgrading my 9.2-RELEASE system to 9.3-RELEASE a few >> times, but each time I had to revert because starting any Virtualbox >> VMs causes a kernel panic. I found this thread about the issue: >>=20 >> = https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/2014-August/011767.h= tml >>=20 >> What I don't understand is why it is expected that the repository >> kernel module wouldn't be in sync with the 9.3-RELEASE kernel. Is it >> because the packages are relevant to all 9.x releases and there's no >> way to have a kernel module work with them all? If so, why bother >> having a kmod package at all? >=20 > Did you update /usr/src to 9.3 too? Kernel module needs to use some = /usr/src source code to compile and the resulting kernel module will = work only on that /usr/src version kernel. I don't have any src installed. The virtualbox kernel module I am using = is from the prebuild packages. I've never built the kernel module and = don't have the kernel src installed. >> On a related note, how difficult is it to build the kernel module? I >> have never built it from source in the past and don't even have >> kernel sources installed. I use stock kernels from the releases. >> Are there ways this build can get screwed up if options/packages >> aren't correct? >>=20 >> Rob >=20 > --- --- > Eduardo Morras >=20 Rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 19:04:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F41364D7 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 19:04:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x232.google.com (mail-lb0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AF1CA18 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 19:04:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f178.google.com with SMTP id w7so41771lbi.23 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 12:04:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/cJHKqI5riVYqggnKHCZaA5Tyn687HEWSrGLaIJeyG0=; b=W347LaioQOZAuR9/50LxOi6RPVPnZVMQCf7v9dx6GbXttPRxnb31oM2gqBRAawH+4q YA4Ct/hNyiKLi+8Oi4OPwLGA/iHOuEdwycf5Hsnp84ulw+BEF7F3Xjwfhlp5GqyC9Pr6 NVTFq2q+Z0L5FTVqgP0tMWTBo8tzg4mpQwRs7gmPFPlpU4zpKoPnIBU8D+tjcCTo979Y KR7DzmEVMz3YWAv4FI7duKI11+nOsI8bjjfkcvaoQbJKaSUazA/TAwhKL6c8JtBgEK1V NOIH8zrvH/P3g9qifj0bemjJyXBTNGfP/ba3ybaI5xqn0+w4qYaSPNOAWEUBDr9JmIhr nkMA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.42.194 with SMTP id q2mr21450980lal.75.1411931054248; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 12:04:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.19.6 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 12:04:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <23187F4C-0413-4F84-9C86-6EC1084C794C@btinternet.com> <50282.76.192.184.214.1411925201.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 15:04:14 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: freebsd-update question From: "firmdog@gmail.com" To: FF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Dave , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , galtsev X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 19:04:17 -0000 OK. I will try that. Found these notes from 10 years ago. Gonna give this a try, not sure if cvsup will work anymore.... cvsup -g -L 2 update-file The update-file contains this: *default host=3Dcvsup11.us.FreeBSD.org *default base=3D/var/db *default prefix=3D/usr *default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_8 *default delete use-rel-suffix src-all ports-all tag=3D. doc-all tag=3D. cd /usr/src make buildworld make buildkernel make installkernel mergemaster make installworld On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 2:36 PM, FF wrote: > So your kernel won't be updated because you are running a custom kernel. > Your uname is based on the running kernel. > > If you want to confirm that you've in fact updated, you can reboot to the > GENERIC kernel which will confirm you are at 8.4 or whatever. FreeBSD upd= ate > is a binary update based on the release versions -- deviate from them and= it > doesn't break, but it can't touch those files. > > Since you know enough to put a custom kernel on there, you should follow = the > source rebuild instructions which would be basically be to svn down the > whole 8.4 source tree, make the world, make the kernel and install it, > reboot, and install the world. > > I think the directions are in the FreeBSD handbook. > > Best, > > > > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Valeri Galtsev > wrote: >> >> >> On Sun, September 28, 2014 10:01 am, firmdog@gmail.com wrote: >> > I just installed a brand new 8.3 box and got the same behavior. I see >> > in my output below that I have to build or update my own kernel? >> > >> > >> > # uname -a >> > FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0: Tue Apr 10 17:33:58 UTC >> > 2012 root@mynewhost:/usr/obj/i386/usr/src/sys/XENHVM i386 >> > # >> > >> > Starting the upgrade attempt: >> > >> > # freebsd-update -r 8.4-RELEASE upgrade >> > Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. >> > Fetching public key from update6.freebsd.org... done. >> > Fetching metadata signature for 8.3-RELEASE from update6.freebsd.org..= . >> > done. >> > Fetching metadata index... done. >> > Fetching 2 metadata files... done. >> > Inspecting system... done. >> > >> > WARNING: This system is running a "xenhvm" kernel, which is not a >> > kernel configuration distributed as part of FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE. >> > This kernel will not be updated: you MUST update the kernel manually >> > before running "/usr/sbin/freebsd-update install". >> > >> > The following components of FreeBSD seem to be installed: >> > src/base src/bin src/cddl src/contrib src/crypto src/etc src/games >> > src/gnu src/include src/krb5 src/lib src/libexec src/release src/rescu= e >> > src/sbin src/secure src/share src/sys src/tools src/ubin src/usbin >> > world/base world/dict world/doc world/games world/info world/manpages >> > world/proflibs >> > >> > The following components of FreeBSD do not seem to be installed: >> > kernel/generic world/catpages >> > >> > Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y >> > >> > Fetching metadata signature for 8.4-RELEASE from update6.freebsd.org..= . >> > done. >> > Fetching metadata index... done. >> > Fetching 1 metadata patches. done. >> > Applying metadata patches... done. >> > Fetching 1 metadata files... done. >> > Inspecting system... done. >> > Fetching files from 8.3-RELEASE for merging... done. >> > Preparing to download files... >> > done. >> > Fetching 32149 >> > >> > patches.....10....20....30....40....50....60....70....80....90....100.= ...110....120....130....140....150....160....170....180.... >> > SNIP=E2=80=A6. >> > done. >> > Applying patches... >> > Fetching 778 files... done. >> > Attempting to automatically merge changes in files... done. >> > >> > The following file could not be merged automatically: >> > /etc/mail/freebsd.cf >> > Press Enter to edit this file in vi and resolve the conflicts >> > manually... >> > >> > Then a bunch more of /etc/mail files and also a merge of >> > /etc/master.passwd: >> > >> > Then this: >> > >> > The following files will be updated as part of updating to >> > 8.4-RELEASE-p16: >> > >> > Then I run this: >> > >> > # freebsd-update install >> > Installing updates... >> > Kernel updates have been installed. Please reboot and run >> > "/usr/sbin/freebsd-update install" again to finish installing updates. >> > >> > # reboot >> > >> >> In last message before reboot it instructed to "reboot then run >> >> /usr/sbin/freebsd-update install >> >> again". Did you run "freebsd-update install" after reboot? >> >> Valeri >> >> > >> > #uname -a >> > FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0: Tue Apr 10 17:33:58 UTC >> > 2012 root@mynewhost:/usr/obj/i386/usr/src/sys/XENHVM i386 >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 5:06 AM, FF wrote: >> >> Can you provide the output of those commands? Freebsd-update is usual= ly >> >> pretty good about telling you what's wrong. >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 3:02 PM, firmdog@gmail.com >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Yes I ran freebsd-update install. Then I rebooted. Then I did it >> >>> again. >> >>> Still at 8.3 >> >>> On Sep 27, 2014 2:37 PM, "Dave" wrote= : >> >>> >> >>> > On 27 September 2014 18:22:15 BST, "firmdog@gmail.com" >> >>> > >> >>> > wrote: >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Hi, >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Trying to use freebsd-update to go from 8.3 to 8.4 and I am doing >> >>> this: >> >>> >> >> >>> >> # freebsd-update -r 8.4-RELEASE upgrade >> >>> >> # freebsd-update install >> >>> >> # reboot >> >>> >> >> >>> >> After reboot I am still at 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0 >> >>> >> >> >>> >> What am I doing wrong? >> >>> >> ------------------------------ >> >>> >> >> >>> >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> >>> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> >>> >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> >>> >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > Don't you need run rub "freebsd-update install"? >> >>> > -- >> >>> > Dave >> >>> > >> >>> > GPG/PGP ID: CDB94DA1 >> >>> > >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> FF >> > _______________________________________________ >> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Valeri Galtsev >> Sr System Administrator >> Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics >> Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics >> University of Chicago >> Phone: 773-702-4247 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > -- > FF From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 19:33:45 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E3F0D83 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 19:33:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm35-vm3.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (nm35-vm3.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [212.82.97.126]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 999ABCC7 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 19:33:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ymail.com; s=s2048; t=1411932644; bh=j5oFAuwc8kM2TlNXAJ1jQlS5V43V4YWHPmPQ//++jgc=; h=Received:Received:Received:DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:X-Received:MIME-Version:Received:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:Cc:Content-Type:From:Subject; b=XJtDQ7GWB4ef1y96drhW0XsJJvIPhaYE/7t/TyookE1uum5f9s64sr78IoNmu7cvnFG7Efqkah/Zx1aLh5S86U3rR8Y0qsi7ZlF0VKmTUpRtJFbc00udPGZW92yHW4ufzI2Fes7vdzHsqorLq64yohXvAP87xWwXBqf2wWyl++qHpy+OCjOjGplgByeAHRl0lEO9HVdFags/wc0LaYdzbrLu2IIxa+tJMqSqWMRDQM5XQob1W7n7uCgVVha1PhAFQGgO1Xc8QKxfc39uSkGUNRvSqtDOwqbogEezG7W+IPPoOVthkWhHyENi6MjwZ43FEUJjvZ5IoLpi6JLmIOrcyg== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s2048; d=ymail.com; b=KlttK5VRCRCyu3JHLoyfKHSvaMavKxMl8vhls4BrBRa+AyTYY110C10zbLDXXEJ8W5iZlHZ44kWFGr40ZroqswHD40nyiG4JX1y7yRZ7O+mggkQ+pIQpQw1W7LjoWP6qcZi7kbWNBSlnD2exrAVZIywzVjVPH3FCS6tAPecKBnmPPGzOlkTVt+n8516u93CNo05QAWdlB4BrK3hiNtO5DAhxml1NcqN67TKW53wtgK1tqxiTX3We4fFHU/xMYJZPbOhU29k2cKYSMmZ0abX4iQqdXUjGdvoSW9YpD5samHBWLxl1Za5sHcMWNIyv63KSHxJgEjfZ2QinpQP4CBhlRA==; Received: from [212.82.98.62] by nm35.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Sep 2014 19:30:44 -0000 Received: from [46.228.39.84] by tm15.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Sep 2014 19:30:44 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp121.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Sep 2014 19:30:44 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ymail.com; s=s1024; t=1411932644; bh=j5oFAuwc8kM2TlNXAJ1jQlS5V43V4YWHPmPQ//++jgc=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:X-Received:MIME-Version:Received:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:Cc:Content-Type; b=mmdffAMVRuyGFoq9YhgZ3/QNnYJlinGQUd/8ySk3kYW1d17L5SaHSa11ZlSeHvOT56FkIcq+EJ5BNqcxQhu5m8S2ySMOVkB+rNm5o1GLuZzavYfW7m02Nqm/jWoYswPLtXHfQfgberqD5QtUAx4ZJl8+TjVXl5xLBbjIZtzcy5M= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 356206.53821.bm@smtp121.mail.ir2.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: ApgcO5IVM1k_ev6RvKBO5cPgTDWidGAPq15MhDH.1gBSB4g vWyAa3SF3MeAAkWz4ENM4sgGMyexIctjdmPNMnID7zro2S9f6DsgrI1f9oeb UsfaHEmhchmMCCg3VPk6pSBicfaciPRhSSBptOs.JX_ldnj67_Ll7dN27oji tyXF1YXQ8fH6i54waqrKPB2xFG1aQ7j74fVKYHGAuu30_j0cOWNAikAIE74p CiCf9tEZnUTYjAYw5JGfw4nAue9EI2hztbLTRyts5MKyPMB821eybPuOJtVi PeTFCA5vfLP9USQK3qbu_Rt_sihgzxPgf.TFC4Q72Yu8IU0coQh0PBGOMgmW V5pF0F_dF.sPz7OtSw7xlQq0zo7CQMZORA2SSntjGTXUO5T7gcl5Abn9J5ql sU8SzUAZU1QAsfyp.uvgPh47xKJY8sqddhHTCLnf2hH3SgS5V.rb7gKxIh1H O7nURrsXhyD_8RgLV5sWEXuvhku7IhQCWMlliI2bwRNRay6WZtK7iDmuupC0 e5bAIXS27I0UIth2d_fNie_SaWstG5I0cPb37Iw.5HJgbqSN0MFVlSxx2JNK _VIwfjbzjDCfCT7tYwYgnoSXNrY4VCkhSOCYmhms2vrwM6zXz38tq0K3K8kE FnwkJgEC5C2t2ZwZXgK7spBSi2g-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: S65s63SswBDjU54Gjqw2GSWlZmfgiEU_X3tN1_9u Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id x13so8867021wgg.19 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 12:30:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.103.200 with SMTP id fy8mr1965071wjb.123.1411932641076; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 12:30:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.27.137.130 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 12:30:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <23187F4C-0413-4F84-9C86-6EC1084C794C@btinternet.com> <50282.76.192.184.214.1411925201.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> From: Axel Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 21:30:20 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: freebsd-update question To: "firmdog@gmail.com" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , galtsev , FF , Dave X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 19:33:45 -0000 On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 9:04 PM, firmdog@gmail.com wrote: > OK. I will try that. Found these notes from 10 years ago. Gonna give > this a try, not sure if cvsup will work anymore.... > > > cvsup -g -L 2 update-file > > The update-file contains this: > > *default host=3Dcvsup11.us.FreeBSD.org > *default base=3D/var/db > *default prefix=3D/usr > *default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_8 > *default delete use-rel-suffix > src-all > ports-all tag=3D. > doc-all tag=3D. > > cd /usr/src > > make buildworld > > make buildkernel > > make installkernel > > mergemaster > > make installworld > > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 2:36 PM, FF wrote: > > So your kernel won't be updated because you are running a custom kernel= . > > Your uname is based on the running kernel. > > > > If you want to confirm that you've in fact updated, you can reboot to t= he > > GENERIC kernel which will confirm you are at 8.4 or whatever. FreeBSD > update > > is a binary update based on the release versions -- deviate from them > and it > > doesn't break, but it can't touch those files. > > > > Since you know enough to put a custom kernel on there, you should follo= w > the > > source rebuild instructions which would be basically be to svn down the > > whole 8.4 source tree, make the world, make the kernel and install it, > > reboot, and install the world. > > > > I think the directions are in the FreeBSD handbook. > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Valeri Galtsev < > galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu> > > wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Sun, September 28, 2014 10:01 am, firmdog@gmail.com wrote: > >> > I just installed a brand new 8.3 box and got the same behavior. I se= e > >> > in my output below that I have to build or update my own kernel? > >> > > >> > > >> > # uname -a > >> > FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0: Tue Apr 10 17:33:58 UTC > >> > 2012 root@mynewhost:/usr/obj/i386/usr/src/sys/XENHVM i386 > >> > # > >> > > >> > Starting the upgrade attempt: > >> > > >> > # freebsd-update -r 8.4-RELEASE upgrade > >> > Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. > >> > Fetching public key from update6.freebsd.org... done. > >> > Fetching metadata signature for 8.3-RELEASE from > update6.freebsd.org... > >> > done. > >> > Fetching metadata index... done. > >> > Fetching 2 metadata files... done. > >> > Inspecting system... done. > >> > > >> > WARNING: This system is running a "xenhvm" kernel, which is not a > >> > kernel configuration distributed as part of FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE. > >> > This kernel will not be updated: you MUST update the kernel manually > >> > before running "/usr/sbin/freebsd-update install". > >> > > >> > The following components of FreeBSD seem to be installed: > >> > src/base src/bin src/cddl src/contrib src/crypto src/etc src/games > >> > src/gnu src/include src/krb5 src/lib src/libexec src/release > src/rescue > >> > src/sbin src/secure src/share src/sys src/tools src/ubin src/usbin > >> > world/base world/dict world/doc world/games world/info world/manpage= s > >> > world/proflibs > >> > > >> > The following components of FreeBSD do not seem to be installed: > >> > kernel/generic world/catpages > >> > > >> > Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y > >> > > >> > Fetching metadata signature for 8.4-RELEASE from > update6.freebsd.org... > >> > done. > >> > Fetching metadata index... done. > >> > Fetching 1 metadata patches. done. > >> > Applying metadata patches... done. > >> > Fetching 1 metadata files... done. > >> > Inspecting system... done. > >> > Fetching files from 8.3-RELEASE for merging... done. > >> > Preparing to download files... > >> > done. > >> > Fetching 32149 > >> > > >> > > patches.....10....20....30....40....50....60....70....80....90....100....= 110....120....130....140....150....160....170....180.... > >> > SNIP=E2=80=A6. > >> > done. > >> > Applying patches... > >> > Fetching 778 files... done. > >> > Attempting to automatically merge changes in files... done. > >> > > >> > The following file could not be merged automatically: > >> > /etc/mail/freebsd.cf > >> > Press Enter to edit this file in vi and resolve the conflicts > >> > manually... > >> > > >> > Then a bunch more of /etc/mail files and also a merge of > >> > /etc/master.passwd: > >> > > >> > Then this: > >> > > >> > The following files will be updated as part of updating to > >> > 8.4-RELEASE-p16: > >> > > >> > Then I run this: > >> > > >> > # freebsd-update install > >> > Installing updates... > >> > Kernel updates have been installed. Please reboot and run > >> > "/usr/sbin/freebsd-update install" again to finish installing update= s. > >> > > >> > # reboot > >> > > >> > >> In last message before reboot it instructed to "reboot then run > >> > >> /usr/sbin/freebsd-update install > >> > >> again". Did you run "freebsd-update install" after reboot? > >> > >> Valeri > >> > >> > > >> > #uname -a > >> > FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0: Tue Apr 10 17:33:58 UTC > >> > 2012 root@mynewhost:/usr/obj/i386/usr/src/sys/XENHVM i386 > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 5:06 AM, FF wrote: > >> >> Can you provide the output of those commands? Freebsd-update is > usually > >> >> pretty good about telling you what's wrong. > >> >> > >> >> Thanks > >> >> > >> >> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 3:02 PM, firmdog@gmail.com < > firmdog@gmail.com> > >> >> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> Yes I ran freebsd-update install. Then I rebooted. Then I did it > >> >>> again. > >> >>> Still at 8.3 > >> >>> On Sep 27, 2014 2:37 PM, "Dave" > wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> > On 27 September 2014 18:22:15 BST, "firmdog@gmail.com" > >> >>> > > >> >>> > wrote: > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> Hi, > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> Trying to use freebsd-update to go from 8.3 to 8.4 and I am doi= ng > >> >>> this: > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> # freebsd-update -r 8.4-RELEASE upgrade > >> >>> >> # freebsd-update install > >> >>> >> # reboot > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> After reboot I am still at 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0 > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> What am I doing wrong? > >> >>> >> ------------------------------ > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> >>> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> >>> >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >> >>> >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> > Don't you need run rub "freebsd-update install"? > >> >>> > -- > >> >>> > Dave > >> >>> > > >> >>> > GPG/PGP ID: CDB94DA1 > >> >>> > > >> >>> _______________________________________________ > >> >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >> >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> FF > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >> > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >> > >> > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> Valeri Galtsev > >> Sr System Administrator > >> Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics > >> Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics > >> University of Chicago > >> Phone: 773-702-4247 > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > > > > > -- > > FF > Hi, CVS is now deprecated. Please use SVN instead if you prefer to follow the manual upgrade process [1] FreeBSD-update tool upgrades (binary upgrades) your base system and GENERIC kernel only. It syncs sources too. So you need to rebuild your custom kernel after the process. [2] Kind regards. Alexandre [1] http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/svn.html [2] http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 20:59:14 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 099947C2 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 20:59:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-x232.google.com (mail-ob0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE4596CD for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 20:59:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f178.google.com with SMTP id uy5so1361225obc.9 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 13:59:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=tpzawyTWzzcIai4yGe7b5aaWdZu+nEZXPgBZIL5RHQQ=; b=vyiWf+GwhpiIoSxsywk+uxCoPSqsJyvY1CUJ4Z+hQnqaTqkwFVeMdRy0mT2ngsA+rI J5COU2S8rzMMbz0KcvyncvVwAo31sE3AMTPRem7VJ1/WE31lIQZtM+YU4kU3DLNQy7R4 dUgukIRrU4vVzcEefbQGyL5slVX5i7VcROoablC2apobk85oBUwSJYNmo2jIz1IPWbRf 4XlFfYu40HKNol/uxLOgXuZmkmKGI+UUvv8r4HB2H5XJNRS7hR8az+fMyCfCq2Jcic59 fRq09N02x/9Ta7R2InElUjyF8Tz9UFBxWclN7+t8QSZDl/sMLgIbrr+r8InidnFPEX+o u2RA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.80.66 with SMTP id p2mr4738826obx.77.1411937953189; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 13:59:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.188.72 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 13:59:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 13:59:13 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: BASH Shellshock and FreeBSD 4.X From: Everett Batey To: Questions at FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 20:59:14 -0000 Severely stuck in Time - OLD FBSD .. any bright ideas around /bin/bash risks AND NOT DONT TELL ME UPDATE FBSD .. - Dependencies I can NOT escape .. On other hand for FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p7 is there an equivalent of yum update bash? -- Thnx / Everett (Flames PLEASE, I old and Cold) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 21:04:46 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D80108F7 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 21:04:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-f46.google.com (mail-la0-f46.google.com [209.85.215.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F7DD7F4 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 21:04:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f46.google.com with SMTP id gi9so6604338lab.5 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 14:04:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=0jAw1iLaIyUj4XlpuHWgKwNQbsQujZQvAu+xrw2DV8M=; b=VouZSwLu7TrAH+7NCMlCVM2r1VpWX/EsxJN1tErqo3bor1URcLXuXEhbQouzxeRRi1 gIaDZAIXqFiPyqIUjwA+wwzNn1yFNgOjbLZrVxnmnKDXz/1NhNR5LdKaQj3ly/tHAFgE R3IarmpAcSDaOTUwC8AcVtjRxtW5C7ZMpk4iKHV9rMLT42pCUrJXhPxDKbSDs61K421v QlAj2f4+awYTO96jOpf9weiZYdY62JaWaCEJxus6i47mqMANT37T7AoUDs6pKiEhYJiV KTmDjxFp2POo8AZZOYt2TFU6pXTLtkVLwd5r5brtGezQnLCUmzQAtVAGnQ6KhLUnTVIA V3Eg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnyoJo1I8a/P5IPBSFwC1RiRlYVIlvxzhV0v3+BZmIq5mt5IDbNsNBV9aYf+NhjypmlH1HI MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.6.228 with SMTP id e4mr4870553laa.12.1411938277814; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 14:04:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.20.159 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 14:04:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [70.209.203.3] Received: by 10.25.20.159 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 14:04:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 14:04:37 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: BASH Shellshock and FreeBSD 4.X From: "Brian W." To: Everett Batey Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: Questions at FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 21:04:47 -0000 Re the bash query do you use portsnap? Presuming the old package system the easiest answer is portsnap fetch update and then portupgrade -P bash. Brian On Sep 28, 2014 1:59 PM, "Everett Batey" wrote: > Severely stuck in Time - OLD FBSD .. any bright ideas around /bin/bash > risks AND NOT DONT TELL ME UPDATE FBSD .. - Dependencies I can NOT > escape .. > > On other hand for FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p7 is there an equivalent of yum > update bash? > > > -- > Thnx / Everett (Flames PLEASE, I old and Cold) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 21:05:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D002697B for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 21:05:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from new1-smtp.messagingengine.com (new1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FE7F7FE for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 21:05:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by gateway2.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5290FF50 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 17:04:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 28 Sep 2014 17:04:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:x-sasl-enc:from:to :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to :references:subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=kQIX9iIrAfEdZZY0atmVQ1K3 hpw=; b=Py2zq+35W1+4gotps0yNQZWVDntXLobKpJTYN926E8w8JLbFN7TbOLY3 xLW6dZPpPJYLGkiWqsejOl82hTDzn3nMhIM6NNr7U2nAy2FlvV2DreMcSaVa5KDf KSboJzjNV+kGZfmMQoSpeKxBL1tKMS+fJgd3xR6BnRsQiIVZHd8= Received: by web3.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 1C29211C978; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 17:04:55 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1411938295.1187673.172706457.3022C573@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: 0lZT8EsThjAijO2BU0KlF3LukpbOgCd/KHnqITgDv+/K 1411938295 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-cad53418 In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: BASH Shellshock and FreeBSD 4.X Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 16:04:55 -0500 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 21:05:02 -0000 On Sun, Sep 28, 2014, at 15:59, Everett Batey wrote: > Severely stuck in Time - OLD FBSD .. any bright ideas around /bin/bash > risks AND NOT DONT TELL ME UPDATE FBSD .. - Dependencies I can NOT > escape .. > Is bash the default shell of the system? The default shell of any users running exposed services? If not, it's not exploitable. Just having bash installed doesn't make you vulnerable. > On other hand for FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p7 is there an equivalent of yum > update bash? > pkg upgrade bash From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 21:40:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7CEFC29 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 21:40:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-f174.google.com (mail-lb0-f174.google.com [209.85.217.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D119BB1 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 21:40:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f174.google.com with SMTP id l4so16826618lbv.19 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 14:40:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=oC/2KaknqqrJ8MQhoJpb3L8LcHbkUqZ2Q7gR3Xt0pYU=; b=HnN3tS9CR03Lyu3K9Kgw6+c53C7J5MUFZ2DiUw6H+TTojD5aKhW62gFO6O8pFuBw1B l0mp/oCdG2KTT0ELBCBUpXa1Nb/DngUGw6su0thfmFVSIwdJNxQ6UlLzn2xtc6Ph7j12 EJrxMsv0fosZOd+Rs9tr0ijaZ29YwMeVTt5ocJCepVK4uV9wgXw8Q4QS4mqY6sIgW3S3 tFoQRkFpuIQhFmz48HQqeQRNpa1Bhw0taL/rGigvEiQk9VwFapqIcEQPajakl/KoqrSK rVKXjN+aSIf/N53spEcYlxQC5+9IUQAQMCwqo2I+Hdea7cngWlbiPMciW14oMqCRvVzJ z7RQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk4GsPzkdZnYFgWj43Us+OhYxGKbOckV0KJeNwnE8PSJDFH7KE1D1WRNMXtU7xmWKHsFBwl MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.16.129 with SMTP id g1mr32948420lbd.19.1411940400934; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 14:40:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.20.159 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 14:40:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [70.209.203.3] Received: by 10.25.20.159 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 14:40:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 14:40:00 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: BASH Shellshock and FreeBSD 4.X From: "Brian W." To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 21:40:09 -0000 For your ancient system I would do 2 things. 1 Run one of the well publicized ways to check your system and see if it is vulnerable. The ancientness of your system suggests someone doesn't care honestly. 2 If it is then try to get the bash using users to another shell. On Sep 28, 2014 2:28 PM, "Everett Batey" wrote: > For SO OLD an FBSD .. will this try to immediately move me up over a > decade and maybe crash my very highly depended OLDBSD server ??? > > > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Brian W. wrote: > > Re the bash query do you use portsnap? Presuming the old package system > the > > easiest answer is portsnap fetch update and then portupgrade -P bash. > > > > Brian > > > > On Sep 28, 2014 1:59 PM, "Everett Batey" wrote: > >> > >> Severely stuck in Time - OLD FBSD .. any bright ideas around /bin/bash > >> risks AND NOT DONT TELL ME UPDATE FBSD .. - Dependencies I can NOT > >> escape .. > >> > >> On other hand for FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p7 is there an equivalent of yum > >> update bash? > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Thnx / Everett (Flames PLEASE, I old and Cold) > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > -- > R/ Everett Batey / Skype: wa6cre-10 / efbatey@gmail.com > or efbarc@cotdazr.org or wa6cre@rabbitradio.org or lioneverett@gmail.com > Auxiliary Lions 4-A3 Web Lions 4-A3 Calendar / CrisisLinks > http://bit.ly/cw95Um > (805) 616-2471 / G-Talk/Twitter: efbatey / CrisisLinks > http://bit.ly/cw95Um > Please visit So Calif Linux Expo http://www.socallinuxexpo.org > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 29 00:07:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD52C7A0 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 00:07:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DD07AA2 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 00:07:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8T079lc001982 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 28 Sep 2014 18:07:09 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id s8T078rS001979; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 18:07:09 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 18:07:08 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Rob Rati Subject: Re: Freebsd 9.3-RELEASE and Virtualbox In-Reply-To: <57884ABE-A0AB-4EC1-8B94-8998389196CB@midsummerdream.org> Message-ID: References: <57884ABE-A0AB-4EC1-8B94-8998389196CB@midsummerdream.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 28 Sep 2014 18:07:09 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 00:07:11 -0000 On Sun, 28 Sep 2014, Rob Rati wrote: > On a related note, how difficult is it to build the kernel module? I > have never built it from source in the past and don't even have kernel > sources installed. I use stock kernels from the releases. Are there > ways this build can get screwed up if options/packages aren't correct? It's easy. Install source, then build emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 29 00:13:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A71B862 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 00:13:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF74BB58 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 00:13:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8T0DZT7003596 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 28 Sep 2014 18:13:35 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id s8T0DZ9W003589; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 18:13:35 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 18:13:35 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Carmel NY Subject: Re: update to linux_base-c6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 28 Sep 2014 18:13:35 -0600 (MDT) Cc: User questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 00:13:37 -0000 On Sun, 28 Sep 2014, Carmel NY wrote: > Sun, 28 Sep 2014 12:30:18 -0400 > > I want to update to emulators/linux_base-c6. According to UPDATING, I should > remove all linux-f10 ports. In my case, that would be: > ... > However, in addition to them, I have the following ports that depend on > linux_base-f10: > > acroread9-9.5.5_1 > acroreadwrapper-0.0.20130208 > linux-libgtkembedmoz-0.0.20100806 > nspluginwrapper-1.4.4_4 > nvidia-driver-331.67_1 > > My question is, after removing the linux-f10 ports and the linux_base-f10, > making the necessary changes to the /etc/makefile, etcetera and then > installing linux_base-c6, do I have to then install the corresponding c6 > ports for the f10 ports that have deleted or is that done automatically I > assume, that I have to rebuild the remaining ports that use to depend on > linux_base-f10? Of those, I only use nspluginwrapper, and had to manually reinstall it after updating the linux ports. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 29 00:29:05 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CE3BA87 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 00:29:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org [192.94.73.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.sdf.org", Issuer "SDF.ORG" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C365C40 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 00:29:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sdf.org (IDENT:bennett@sdf.lonestar.org [192.94.73.15]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.8/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s8T0T0kE017771 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Mon, 29 Sep 2014 00:29:00 GMT Received: (from bennett@localhost) by sdf.org (8.14.8/8.12.8/Submit) id s8T0T0KY029472; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 19:29:00 -0500 (CDT) From: Scott Bennett Message-Id: <201409290029.s8T0T0KY029472@sdf.org> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 19:29:00 -0500 To: wblock@wonkity.com Subject: Re: ZFS and 2 TB disk drive technology :-( References: <201409281030.s8SAU8dR027634@sdf.org> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 00:29:05 -0000 On Sun Sep 28 14:59:43 2014 Warren Block wrote: > On Sun, 28 Sep 2014, Scott Bennett wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 11:24:35 -0400 Paul Kraus > > wrote: > > Thanks for chiming in, Paul. > > > >> On 9/24/14 7:08, Scott Bennett wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> What version of FreeBSD are you running ? > > > > FreeBSD hellas 9.2-STABLE FreeBSD 9.2-STABLE #1 r264339: Fri Apr 11 05:16:25 CDT 2014 bennett@hellas:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/hellas i386 > > > >> What hardware are you running it on ? > > > > The CPU is a Q6600 running on a PCIE2 Gigabyte motherboard, whose model > > number I did have written down around here somewhere but can't lay hands on > > at the moment. > > sysutils/dmidecode will show that without having to open the case. I had no idea, so thanks for that. I'll have to install it once I have stable space for a ports tree again in case it also shows other good stuff. In any case, I was pretty sure I had seen it somewhere else, and it turns out that the motherboard manufacturer and model number show up in a couple of places in the output of kenv(1). :-) BTW, your message showed up without a Date: header, so I used the date and timestamp from the From line of the envelope. Must be something weird about your mail interface. Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ********************************************************************** * Internet: bennett at sdf.org *xor* bennett at freeshell.org * *--------------------------------------------------------------------* * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * * -- a standing army." * * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * ********************************************************************** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 29 02:17:12 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A65DB384 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 02:17:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61B30805 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 02:17:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XYQWM-0006pG-GM for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 04:17:02 +0200 Received: from 49-156-16-16.rdns.orionvm.com.au ([49.156.16.16]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 04:17:02 +0200 Received: from newsgroups by 49-156-16-16.rdns.orionvm.com.au with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 04:17:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ruben Schade Subject: Re: pkg must be version 1.3.8 or greater Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 12:16:49 +1000 Lines: 46 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 49-156-16-16.rdns.orionvm.com.au User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.7.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 02:17:12 -0000 On 23/09/14 16:44, Ruben Schade wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Running FreeBSD amd64 10.0-RELEAESE-p9. Installed everything from pkg, > very nice system. > > Prefer building nginx from ports, so portsnapped the latest tree and did > the usual: > > > # cd /usr/ports/www/nginx > > # make install clean > > Got the following error: > > ===> nginx-1.6.2,2 pkg(8) must be version 1.3.8 or greater, but you > have 1.3.7. You must upgrade pkg(8) first. > > Running pkg update however: > > > FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. > > All repositories are up-to-date. > > And pkg upgrade: > > > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > > FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. > > All repositories are up-to-date. > > Checking for upgrades (1 candidates): 100% > > Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) > > Your packages are up to date. > > Fairly new to pkgng, could that "1 candidates" line be the updated pkg I > need in waiting? > > Thanks, > Ruben > Just an update for those interested, ran pkg update this morning and 1.3.8_1 just came in. Can build nginx now without problem :) -- Ruben Schade VM chap in s/Singapore/Sydney/ Site: http://rubenschade.com/ Blog: http://rubenerd.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 29 02:21:57 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED05443E for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 02:21:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-x248.google.com (mail-pd0-x248.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C57A08BD for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 02:21:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f200.google.com with SMTP id p10so36030811pdj.11 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 19:21:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=y4Eiqs3faP3S8Pr9aF7DJorz9tDT0QDxXuAel6WBmYw=; b=OTHUSA4uJB9+T/ZlM2dErSa8U6Vw7Oacqq+uUwIxw/2lTYrkWZxQri+PQig7umI5/p kGjsTLCQp9325fhWHXzWDvFv/3zvaDjAAxi18Z2xffCTf5tVak57qLdFrM/VWOJmtW7Y R7GplnrUO1AQHdRTDgvY0aYhXEfduQpzX6ry60gWaWHdAkZEcqE8Fk+WPQB4upaw0OxP r7fDcGBbDsOnKKsOqm5yfDi38n/OSwtuIokioCzJsA0n7tTx5rWCshEGfQAvD1AWHD9K r8tOazCZJ6skVbr+uJ+L7101lZe0xqMHIkReDBty1LxXkqPxe0wToYq9ISVDl+rH73Ad TNSg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.156.100 with SMTP id wd4mr31588250pab.31.1411957317149; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 19:21:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <047d7bacc10653a73805042aeeca@google.com> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 02:21:57 +0000 Subject: Idea for getting more traffic: hk4u.com :RS From: Alex Luees To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 02:21:58 -0000 Hi Hk4u Team, Hope you are great and everything fine at your end. I have gone through your website and I felt its well built but can be improved in several ways to get better sales and revenue from the site. If you would like me to send you complete list of upgrading and improvements we could do to your site then kindly let me know so that I can send you the brief quotation for your website. After in-depth research about your website and analyzing the targeted market for your business to prevail, we also execute effective online marketing campaigns by targeting not only local markets but as well as provincial and international markets as well. So you will be getting *all-in-one services* when contacting us. It's only search engine tricks that need to keep changing when the ranking algorithm changes. We will help you to increase your visibility in all the major search engines by *improving keyword rankings* and *boosting your real time website traffic* with lots of back links which are always done through *White Hat* techniques, indeed you position your website properly to be found at the most critical points in the buying process or when people need your site. Our aim is to provide you with complete web marketing solutions to help your website rank high on the search engines. Before moving on further, we will have a consultation phase where we will discuss what your website goals are and how we can accomplish them. In addition, we may ask you certain questions that may be concerning on the website structure and strategic foundation for your social media marketing. Should you have any questions, please let us know. To improve the search engine visibility of your website, we will look forward to hear from you when you've time after reading our proposal. *Sincerely,* *Alex Luees* *Senior SEO Advisor* ........................................SS ...................................... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 29 08:19:16 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D94959D3 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 08:19:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C49A2A9 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 08:19:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-3-171.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.3.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 704BD3CBDE; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 10:09:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s8T89baP001959; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 10:09:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 10:09:37 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Everett Batey Subject: Re: BASH Shellshock and FreeBSD 4.X Message-Id: <20140929100937.0527cbae.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Questions at FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 08:19:17 -0000 On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 13:59:13 -0700, Everett Batey wrote: > Severely stuck in Time - OLD FBSD .. any bright ideas around /bin/bash > risks AND NOT DONT TELL ME UPDATE FBSD .. - Dependencies I can NOT > escape .. Even if you actually have /bin/bash (in the root file system), it's not the system's scripting shell, standard subshell or standard interactive shell - except you made that change which usually is a Very Bad Idea(TM). Just because bash is installed doesn't imply your system is vulnerable to shellshock. If you have read about the construction of the exploit, you will know if you have vulnerable services running. But if you're just using bash as an interactive shell for a user, it shouldn't be a problem. :-) Updating a 3rd party shell does _not_ require updating your whole operating system. It _might_ be possible that you will encounter dependency problems (programs that depend on a specific version of bash, or bash itself that will require specific versions of other ports), but that should be a minimal problem and easily be solved. Note that bash is _not_ partof the FreeBSD operating system and therefore only lives in "/usr/local space". FreeBSD's standard scripting shell (and process subshell) is not bash, it's sh, a Bourne shell descendant in its implementation ash (Almquist shell) which is _not_ affected by shellshock. The C shell, FreeBSD's standard dialog shell, also doesn't care. > On other hand for FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p7 is there an equivalent of yum > update bash? That depends on if you're using pkgng or pkg_ tools - or ports. The "impolite" method with (old) pkg_ tools: # pkg_delete -f /var/db/pkg/bash-x.y.z # pkg_add -r bash You can use tab completition to get the version number right. If you're using ports: # portsnap fetch update # cd /usr/ports/shells/bash # make deinstall # make # make reinstall You should now have the current (patched) version installed from source. Additionally, you can set custom options for bash if you need to (for example WITH_STATIC_BASH) - you only _have_ to do this if the default options (from which the packages are built) do not fit your requirements. Do you use a port management tool like portupgrade or portmaster? You can do it with one command: # portupgrade bash or # portmaster shells/bash Use the -P option if you don't want to compile from source, but use the binary package (similar to pkg_add mentioned above). See the manual of the program for reference. But if you're already using pkgng on your system, it's easier: # pkg upgrade bash This also uses a binary updating method. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 29 12:26:44 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DBCBF8A; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 12:26:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-187.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "webmail2.dweimer.local", Issuer "webmail2.dweimer.local" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 590BF180; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 12:26:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.dweimer.net (webmail [192.168.5.2]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s8TCQaau060542 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 29 Sep 2014 07:26:37 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 07:26:36 -0500 From: dweimer To: Warren Block Subject: Re: update to =?UTF-8?Q?linux=5Fbase-c=36?= Organization: dweimer.net Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.2 Cc: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Carmel NY , User questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 12:26:44 -0000 On 09/28/2014 7:13 pm, Warren Block wrote: > On Sun, 28 Sep 2014, Carmel NY wrote: > >> Sun, 28 Sep 2014 12:30:18 -0400 >> >> I want to update to emulators/linux_base-c6. According to UPDATING, I >> should >> remove all linux-f10 ports. In my case, that would be: >> > ... >> However, in addition to them, I have the following ports that depend >> on >> linux_base-f10: >> >> acroread9-9.5.5_1 >> acroreadwrapper-0.0.20130208 >> linux-libgtkembedmoz-0.0.20100806 >> nspluginwrapper-1.4.4_4 >> nvidia-driver-331.67_1 >> >> My question is, after removing the linux-f10 ports and the >> linux_base-f10, >> making the necessary changes to the /etc/makefile, etcetera and then >> installing linux_base-c6, do I have to then install the corresponding >> c6 >> ports for the f10 ports that have deleted or is that done >> automatically I >> assume, that I have to rebuild the remaining ports that use to depend >> on >> linux_base-f10? > > Of those, I only use nspluginwrapper, and had to manually reinstall it > after updating the linux ports. I upgraded my laptop on Saturday, I also had to rebuild nspluginwrapper, I am also using the nvidia-driver, and didn't rebuild it, all appears to be working fine this morning. -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 29 12:59:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D68387A for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 12:59:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E596C1 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 12:59:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ppp118-210-82-160.lns20.adl2.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([118.210.82.160]) by ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 29 Sep 2014 22:29:07 +0930 Message-ID: <5429579A.7030501@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 22:29:06 +0930 From: Shane Ambler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Everett Batey Subject: Re: BASH Shellshock and FreeBSD 4.X References: <20140929100937.0527cbae.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20140929100937.0527cbae.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Questions at FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 12:59:17 -0000 On 29/09/2014 17:39, Polytropon wrote: > On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 13:59:13 -0700, Everett Batey wrote: >> Severely stuck in Time - OLD FBSD .. any bright ideas around /bin/bash >> risks AND NOT DONT TELL ME UPDATE FBSD .. - Dependencies I can NOT >> escape .. > If you're using ports: > > # portsnap fetch update > # cd /usr/ports/shells/bash > # make deinstall > # make > # make reinstall > I'm not 100% certain that the current ports tree will work on 4.x I'd keep a copy of your current tree before trying updates. If you have trouble with the current ports then put the old version back in place and look at the changes made to fix the issue and incorporate them into your tree. https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/shells/bash/ -- FreeBSD - the place to B...Serving Data Shane Ambler From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 29 13:04:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 786EF934 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:04:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eu1sys200aog127.obsmtp.com (eu1sys200aog127.obsmtp.com [207.126.144.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA6E17CC for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:04:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f180.google.com ([74.125.82.180]) (using TLSv1) by eu1sys200aob127.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP ID DSNKVClY1jC/upui427jg7HhGN020zj6IjAS@postini.com; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:04:24 UTC Received: by mail-we0-f180.google.com with SMTP id x48so2143706wes.39 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 06:04:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to; bh=Yx5+O+ufdhmtpvtnSG0EUCcika+cmnqoamDCUgp/AWw=; b=UqLV7FQRam03+LQibGW/to/qeX2Lx+FrIIrW6lZMzsXX3yjLGNFaCvvZ98XqdJ1IE5 AoAsdyzG/snwJbGNHUu4MsDfiTJj4nKfebQVqgyCnMQN0uWfzERZTNzp/iD5ZRFJTzK+ 2SumDzpYMT6YRZbH/lKN8aVW7vqZcW/mlhOaM3S1g866GIM3YVisYzleJmpXXAPlIJDf vMbrHynXz1NRqpFqvz8wEFTZZtXFbIvVwO64QRJgCRewyUHEEHWUmwvxADVSmWViodmc WtduuG5+RyI+7OFdCVtz82RzXYc1Z7PDxBWkg/ORnVIW8/95h598epo4pWk3Jb+JIz2s EDYg== X-Received: by 10.194.94.165 with SMTP id dd5mr43007036wjb.75.1411994203196; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 05:36:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkHOGx4o0UwQBHqX0CG2n2KR8ATyRQk775M1iAFWTJ1XydDfxM70Jz7rKy9MVVBC22VUBVICqcYYhA0zE7/aHKZIKBpdv7IJJg06aZT426l7g5ymaxSyy9YPijuSWPPwOaFv7rFx+U81nMD5HnI+NVvkBN67Ymm+lsrxgUuF7fT2g03XZo= X-Received: by 10.194.94.165 with SMTP id dd5mr43006968wjb.75.1411994202536; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 05:36:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.187.221]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ll20sm11548642wic.14.2014.09.29.05.36.41 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Sep 2014 05:36:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8TCabj8096964 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:36:37 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id s8TCablW096962 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:36:37 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:36:37 +0100 (BST) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201409291236.s8TCablW096962@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: two hosts sharing the same data fia SAN? Reply-To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:04:25 -0000 Hello I've 2 separate freebsd boxes, each connected vi fibre to a disk array. I'd like to have a set of disk units to be read/write accessible to both boxes. Seems this is not allowed with just UFS. If one box mounts the disk units, then the other box cannot mount them, i.e. seems the disks cannot be mounted on both boxes simultaneously. How can this be achived? I've had a quick look at HAST, but it seems the model their is different. Thanks Anton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 29 13:06:52 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C30A9F7 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:06:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E3B77F8 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:06:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-71.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.71]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s8TD6h8v008944 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 08:06:44 -0500 Message-ID: <54295ADA.6020007@hiwaay.net> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 08:12:58 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: two hosts sharing the same data fia SAN? References: <201409291236.s8TCablW096962@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <201409291236.s8TCablW096962@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:06:52 -0000 On 09/29/14 07:36, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > Hello > > I've 2 separate freebsd boxes, each connected > vi fibre to a disk array. I'd like to have > a set of disk units to be read/write accessible > to both boxes. Seems this is not allowed with just > UFS. If one box mounts the disk units, then the > other box cannot mount them, i.e. seems the > disks cannot be mounted on both boxes simultaneously. > How can this be achived? > > I've had a quick look at HAST, but it seems the > model their is different. > > Thanks > > Anton > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > NFS ? -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 29 13:38:15 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F12821B for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:38:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sbg-out.inti.gob.ar (sbg-out.inti.gov.ar [200.10.161.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14049B8A for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:38:13 +0000 (UTC) X-AuditID: c80aa145-f790b6d000003bd1-7f-54295d390a89 Received: from [200.10.161.55] (jb.inti.gov.ar [200.10.161.55]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by sbg-out.inti.gob.ar (SMTP_INTI) with SMTP id C6.BA.15313.93D59245; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 10:23:06 -0300 (ART) Message-ID: <54295D32.4020908@inti.gob.ar> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 10:22:58 -0300 From: Juan Bernhard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: two hosts sharing the same data fia SAN? References: <201409291236.s8TCablW096962@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> <54295ADA.6020007@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: <54295ADA.6020007@hiwaay.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFupnluLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42I5wbXQXNcqVjPE4ORiJouXXzexODB6zPg0 nyWAMYrLJiU1J7MstUjfLoEr4+7uD8wFvzkqZje/YWpgnMnexcjJISFgIrH0+RFmCFtM4sK9 9WxdjFwcQgJdTBIts28wgiR4BbQkpp97xAZiswioSkx9uYoFxGYTUJP4euYUK4gtKhAlcWF+ D1S9oMTJmU/AakQEFCXOnGkEqxEWMJX4v+kU0DIOoAWJEgf3BIGEOYHGL5j3Fmw8s4COxLu+ B8wQtrxE89bZzBMY+WYhmToLSdksJGULGJlXMQoXJ6Xr5peW6AGDKFMvPT9JL7FoEyMkmFx3 MO5dp36IUYCDUYmH1+C0RogQa2JZcWXuIUYJDmYlEV47W80QId6UxMqq1KL8+KLSnNTiQ4zS HCxK4rz7l74OFhJITyxJzU5NLUgtgskycXBKNTDapDkpJfy0eZjKOCda7XPkrcbZJ/l8Khcs Wxl6cO41mckyvg+AIokizr53+qrmn5Q5VmSm0H2Kc4nwmdbuLzeVG1/zPA1x7l27tO6V4/mL C2eYbu3IfJlgfutzeE6UPrOxtPe61AcNafrqj//1CK3/zOB792V8UYMGd/AFKyEW7eMakQf7 lViKMxINtZiLihMBUW3u7SICAAA= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:38:15 -0000 El 29/09/2014 10:12 a.m., William A. Mahaffey III escribió: > On 09/29/14 07:36, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >> Hello >> >> I've 2 separate freebsd boxes, each connected >> vi fibre to a disk array. I'd like to have >> a set of disk units to be read/write accessible >> to both boxes. Seems this is not allowed with just >> UFS. If one box mounts the disk units, then the >> other box cannot mount them, i.e. seems the >> disks cannot be mounted on both boxes simultaneously. >> How can this be achived? >> >> I've had a quick look at HAST, but it seems the >> model their is different. >> >> Thanks >> >> Anton >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > NFS ? You need a clustered file system, like GFS for linux. At the moment I dont know if there are any working on freebsd. NFS is for sharind disk at file level, but if you want to share a disk al block level, you need a clustered fs. Saludos, Juan. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 29 13:41:14 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAC912DB for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:41:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31EE1BAF for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:41:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.news4all.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id s8TDVYQA048205 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 15:31:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Message-ID: <54295F36.5080001@bananmonarki.se> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 15:31:34 +0200 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "f >> questions FreeBSD" Subject: Problems with pkg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:41:14 -0000 Hello list! I want to install kicad but getting this error: root@kw:/usr/ports # make clean Child process pid=41973 terminated abnormally: Segmentation fault: 11 "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 1222: warning: "/usr/local/sbin/pkg-static ver sion -t 1.3.8 1.3.8" returned non-zero status Child process pid=41987 terminated abnormally: Segmentation fault: 11 "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 1222: warning: "/usr/local/sbin/pkg-static ver sion -t 1.3.8 1.3.8" returned non-zero status Child process pid=42001 terminated abnormally: Segmentation fault: 11 "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 1222: warning: "/usr/local/sbin/pkg-static ver sion -t 1.3.8 1.3.8" returned non-zero status Child process pid=42015 terminated abnormally: Segmentation fault: 11 "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 1222: warning: "/usr/local/sbin/pkg-static ver sion -t 1.3.8 1.3.8" returned non-zero status From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 29 13:51:48 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C28DD757 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:51:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eu1sys200aog113.obsmtp.com (eu1sys200aog113.obsmtp.com [207.126.144.135]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2029ED58 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:51:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com ([209.85.212.173]) (using TLSv1) by eu1sys200aob113.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP ID DSNKVClj1UBY0vkxJeZsn50MQs6W5rcq4wz8@postini.com; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:51:48 UTC Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id bs8so1979525wib.12 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 06:51:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to :in-reply-to; bh=GuIMQqSSh/PkwjuPQNyvpW/C+DCeoEe2YhnpJDeQhiM=; b=Oqjg1fHoj/27XoB/CJfKa7qBqAV34YWOPxHsQSDZ4gvCchebl9JuBWKlYrgTQygjMp SWq+1A+2zW1pyzN5H1BfwLFmtHIW+q75h+hBc6b4xiTqyYdN13SeI45HICJ14FTKP3qz bwBPDOiXk39yC6AI2p8RDCUT45VTuyTPll8wQvefcYXOvp2XffCb9EysuYzQnAADfPjV jUo4iqVEYiqFPeab5IguNntXqX/CcYtIvhXHIyscj/NRN8Zuya//3wWHOk2kY+FgN+jG YOVKaUec4SlaFaZ1qLTgSEH+x5Qlh9YJDMGtOudBZWE8lLsFYpVIMeh0uZmkzr9Gq0OY /mKg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm3hHq9NwonnmD6qgBMQEp8MyTv0jjLBz5r2+Qw7GaUa0KqOfsqpKyCCXtBDT8pzfbj1GpuQFOMQRts1r5RrV1RzJeD9C8rBSAtgTitX5Kg7+YYrMpEbFkKcPO6BfhjGbqHxWbMmapgg1R/Pori/2Y1pD73/DSiElIr4/MpIgMoC+cp1EQ= X-Received: by 10.194.237.9 with SMTP id uy9mr2961257wjc.132.1411998677831; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 06:51:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.237.9 with SMTP id uy9mr2961249wjc.132.1411998677744; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 06:51:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.187.221]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q2sm11741927wiy.23.2014.09.29.06.51.16 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Sep 2014 06:51:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8TDpF2a052014 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 29 Sep 2014 14:51:16 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id s8TDpFPY052009; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 14:51:15 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 14:51:15 +0100 (BST) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201409291351.s8TDpFPY052009@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, juan@inti.gob.ar Subject: Re: two hosts sharing the same data fia SAN? Reply-To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk In-Reply-To: <54295D32.4020908@inti.gob.ar> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:51:48 -0000 >> On 09/29/14 07:36, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >>> Hello >>> >>> I've 2 separate freebsd boxes, each connected >>> vi fibre to a disk array. I'd like to have >>> a set of disk units to be read/write accessible >>> to both boxes. Seems this is not allowed with just >>> UFS. If one box mounts the disk units, then the >>> other box cannot mount them, i.e. seems the >>> disks cannot be mounted on both boxes simultaneously. >>> How can this be achived? >>> >>> I've had a quick look at HAST, but it seems the >>> model their is different. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Anton >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> >> NFS ? > >You need a clustered file system, like GFS for linux. At the moment I >dont know if there are any working on freebsd. NFS is for sharind disk >at file level, but if you want to share a disk al block level, you need >a clustered fs. > >Saludos, Juan. cluster file system...? How do I get one in FreeBSD. >From looking in the archives, many people ask for one periodically, but it seems it's not there. NFS, HAST and iSCSI all seem do something different from what I need. In my case both nodes (actually I have more than two, but it's perhaps easier to explain with just two) have direct fibre access to the storage, no network required. Also, it makes no sense to delegate one node a server and another a client in my setup. I'd like them to be identical, so that access to the data is equally possible if either node fails. The disk array alreay provides multiple levels of RAID, so I don't need this. So is something like this really does not exist on FreeBSD (yet) ? Thanks Anton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 29 14:03:23 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1984DBFB for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 14:03:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-f169.google.com (mail-pd0-f169.google.com [209.85.192.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF7F9E74 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 14:03:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f169.google.com with SMTP id p10so5354837pdj.14 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 07:03:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=XU9LCjB9cOUA2YdDXE716AYHPE9KE2fyY0r15f2kDEw=; b=f0MRSa19RoPCEORheNmhMUl5rgEGSJLxut2buK0wJKG7p0R8niYAi/VRZkfYNaYQH9 QL5x2xRDLU9Q0k3EeZ/BgaqM7iUNgwWLxrlnmPOTYyt0VJii5p2tc9qLdwqOV/7D3IwT /E5mB6H26ss7sOfEHZ+iI4IoElJN8L89ZbpPh4ylIpZf6+vQGvo2rwAKmZm3P+RjHWqJ dTc82YCzjPcXfYp1j37sQxFO5gWL3JKL7CHEQqLAoA+pn7yRbx/xaqVVP+ABwuuKQR7q z20rzo7SqyVZlnE7D2MojDKzjKybEYT4IWhHrXmwGW7Cv/tlxaR9UWfsB0h/ZRk4jnQz tC+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlBopb74VvI7Mp3W6aCnvZEIwD8yjqfQQKP37jblaXnqhX0A7aMwcVLi+lciduzCVzIrf8t X-Received: by 10.68.103.4 with SMTP id fs4mr61343804pbb.58.1411999396719; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 07:03:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wide.rdtan.net ([175.136.182.168]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id xf9sm3203504pab.2.2014.09.29.07.03.13 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Sep 2014 07:03:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (1000@localhost [local]); by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id bb9a1ef3; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 22:03:09 +0800 (MYT) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 22:03:09 +0800 From: Edward To: kpneal@pobox.com Subject: Re: pkg_delete bash, logged out by accident, can't ssh back in (not good) Message-ID: <20140929140309.GC19085@wide.rdtan.net> References: <20140927030810.GC23533@wide.rdtan.net> <20140929133329.GA83452@neutralgood.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140929133329.GA83452@neutralgood.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Cc: "firmdog@gmail.com" , Edward , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 14:03:23 -0000 On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 09:33:29AM -0400, kpneal@pobox.com wrote: > On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 11:08:11AM +0800, Edward wrote: > > After a few times stepping on this problem when upgrading ports, picked > > up a habit. Leave /bin/{k}sh as default shell and always "tmux new" > > after remote login. > > FreeBSD does not ship with /bin/ksh, so I suggest not using it as the > default shell for either root or the account you use to log in remotely. Thanks for pointing that out. The default shells are /bin/{tc}sh, mentioned[1] in handbook. [1]https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/shells.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 29 15:23:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94DDCCE0 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 15:23:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56B33A64 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 15:23:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-99-5.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.99.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AFBB2766E; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 17:23:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s8TFNTrB002144; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 17:23:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 17:23:29 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Shane Ambler Subject: Re: BASH Shellshock and FreeBSD 4.X Message-Id: <20140929172329.08163a41.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <5429579A.7030501@ShaneWare.Biz> References: <20140929100937.0527cbae.freebsd@edvax.de> <5429579A.7030501@ShaneWare.Biz> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Questions at FreeBSD , Everett Batey X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 15:23:39 -0000 On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 22:29:06 +0930, Shane Ambler wrote: > On 29/09/2014 17:39, Polytropon wrote: > > On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 13:59:13 -0700, Everett Batey wrote: > >> Severely stuck in Time - OLD FBSD .. any bright ideas around /bin/bash > >> risks AND NOT DONT TELL ME UPDATE FBSD .. - Dependencies I can NOT > >> escape .. > > > If you're using ports: > > > > # portsnap fetch update > > # cd /usr/ports/shells/bash > > # make deinstall > > # make > > # make reinstall > > > > I'm not 100% certain that the current ports tree will work on 4.x > > I'd keep a copy of your current tree before trying updates. If you have > trouble with the current ports then put the old version back in place > and look at the changes made to fix the issue and incorporate them into > your tree. Yes, _that_ might be a problem... On the other hand, maybe it would even be possible to check out the current source for bssh (and maybe its dependencies) and build them "off the track", i. e., not using the ports infrastructure at all, and then manually copying the resulting binary to the required place, as well as its libraries (unless static linking has been enabled). It's worth having a look at ./configure's options to tune this approach. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 29 21:36:42 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94505A77 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 21:36:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-x233.google.com (mail-qc0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B33AB5C for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 21:36:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id x3so2541529qcv.10 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 14:36:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsd.com.br; s=capeta; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:organization :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1wcphf5c80J2wVr9Q/NvsYZ9CMGyWtEAs/KOXut39EI=; b=Dv7CNuvzWUX59HJ4YgJHrqTARmsTVf4JiVFNG7BEPc1HdQvxjTG0Mu2yy/CXH0bs37 Qygk5KGQfGBHLkNV/e4b21y1OXG3Y/IRJSe3Q7NP5b3D80vRAldnwtmYj61Ya1tiBzCx Wn9JcGLEQknv0JmSXVokh3Yc7Jvn6keGIwLlc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1wcphf5c80J2wVr9Q/NvsYZ9CMGyWtEAs/KOXut39EI=; b=Z+0iwRYrhmv/GXJhQ4yCsiD19ZqTXAcPydlDEQaOgxrHiLtob6hBM4mmnoioSXuWGI 6fQHx6D32IVPO7AeePFT4q9ZO4fRfxRcgEhTUEpSH/9ypxCkkVwNg7W764BP8Kwzv+SW a/hX+//k6UiRASE6TORweRhaJ54QVhBB3uHODkDMjPJIzjn7yWKd6pdaLdwaD86WQzj0 1jWeHQ95R2XQIoLLbKxuxFWqBoZNIoVi2amCM5lslY33pvS/nlyQlZ6xy/xUIA5vKkua OpjU2rw37yWCY66W7DDoZykTBtKU9gEb3fve29rP8EmzW7rJh9P+to44m44FG4H6u64O FK1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl/E/y6ze1X6wJUlaf4xuJO0TnhWvvuHCD1XIe6o7GufYJW/vPqF3ObG1f5ZVnwpQN29P3O X-Received: by 10.224.86.68 with SMTP id r4mr33724024qal.0.1412026600066; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 14:36:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Papi ([177.43.10.42]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 4sm12220866qax.48.2014.09.29.14.36.39 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Sep 2014 14:36:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 18:36:55 -0300 From: Mario Lobo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BASH Shellshock and FreeBSD 4.X Message-ID: <20140929183655.361534e8@Papi> In-Reply-To: <20140929172329.08163a41.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20140929100937.0527cbae.freebsd@edvax.de> <5429579A.7030501@ShaneWare.Biz> <20140929172329.08163a41.freebsd@edvax.de> Organization: BSD X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 21:36:42 -0000 On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 17:23:29 +0200 Polytropon wrote: > On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 22:29:06 +0930, Shane Ambler wrote: > > On 29/09/2014 17:39, Polytropon wrote: > > > On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 13:59:13 -0700, Everett Batey wrote: > > >> Severely stuck in Time - OLD FBSD .. any bright ideas > > >> around /bin/bash risks AND NOT DONT TELL ME UPDATE FBSD .. - > > >> Dependencies I can NOT escape .. > > > > > If you're using ports: > > > > > > # portsnap fetch update > > > # cd /usr/ports/shells/bash > > > # make deinstall > > > # make > > > # make reinstall > > > > > > > I'm not 100% certain that the current ports tree will work on 4.x > > > > I'd keep a copy of your current tree before trying updates. If you > > have trouble with the current ports then put the old version back > > in place and look at the changes made to fix the issue and > > incorporate them into your tree. > > Yes, _that_ might be a problem... > > On the other hand, maybe it would even be possible to check > out the current source for bssh (and maybe its dependencies) > and build them "off the track", i. e., not using the ports > infrastructure at all, and then manually copying the resulting > binary to the required place, as well as its libraries (unless > static linking has been enabled). It's worth having a look at > ./configure's options to tune this approach. > > Everett; Why don't you give this a try: #--------------------------- #cat bash_bsd_fix.sh mkdir src cd src fetch http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/bash/bash-4.3.tar.gz for i in $(jot -w %03d 25); do fetch http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/bash/bash-4.3-patches/bash43-$i; done tar zxvf bash-4.3.tar.gz cd bash-4.3 for i in $(jot -w %03d 25);do patch -p0 < ../bash43-$i; done ./configure && make #--------------------------- If it compiles without errors, then: #--------------------------- make install cd .. cd .. rm -r src #--------------------------- I got this script from a colleague in the Brazilian BSD list. He used it to update his old servers. It was tested only on 8.1 and up but I don't see why you can't give it a spin. I used it withou any problems on all my 8.x servers. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) "UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 00:56:30 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20C3DAC1 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 00:56:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smarthost.sentex.ca", Issuer "smarthost.sentex.ca" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDA16E7 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 00:56:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a] (saphire3.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8U0uOWn055118; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 20:56:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-ID: <5429FFA3.7030200@sentex.net> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 20:56:03 -0400 From: Mike Tancsa Organization: Sentex Communications User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mario Lobo , freebsd-questions Subject: Re: BASH Shellshock and FreeBSD 4.X References: <20140929100937.0527cbae.freebsd@edvax.de> <5429579A.7030501@ShaneWare.Biz> <20140929172329.08163a41.freebsd@edvax.de> <20140929183655.361534e8@Papi> In-Reply-To: <20140929183655.361534e8@Papi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 00:56:30 -0000 On 9/29/2014 5:36 PM, Mario Lobo wrote: > for i in $(jot -w %03d 25); do > for i in $(jot -w %03d 25);do patch -p0 < ../bash43-$i; done Hi, there are 27 patches now. ---Mike -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 01:32:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06885FC0 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 01:32:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x22a.google.com (mail-la0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BA202DD for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 01:32:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f42.google.com with SMTP id mk6so2944067lab.1 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 18:32:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3Nml9R8eoN5skUhYFC5jj1dbD615Rr84iKTAFEZfQ3U=; b=mOqnwayZ0ZuAQzu2a6CBa49D2UeZjxjCF63Mcw7hRxDpQmD/p9aFqRe9yvDBCkt2Hc E8cznFj5H4FgaENV7VJVIk784vsCv/yI2xNFFDgHFnZrRQoj3MUVAkHfDNEaOklaXzqf 72jjwWVo6ltzjWxr8euXOdf9RTF6qvWRn2kPvdSzUXzv1oWkk8yGnz5tfMX13aSVD+cG hUl/UViTng9eJ3NYV/4ZZwjmD0Hem6V/EWOqJ5JttraYzKsg+O4Z+TM3IFVbeOhGHCm1 8Nbg0OS5OTlAw4N3JVkKTtp5yF8AWNqMZItb9SHWf6CXFf4zodbMIqQ4yU0BKZdO4w7H oYzg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.21.168 with SMTP id w8mr44254469lae.59.1412040743226; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 18:32:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.19.6 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 18:32:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <23187F4C-0413-4F84-9C86-6EC1084C794C@btinternet.com> <50282.76.192.184.214.1411925201.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 21:32:23 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: freebsd-update question From: "firmdog@gmail.com" To: Axel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , galtsev , FF , Dave X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 01:32:26 -0000 Thanks. My freebsd server is on Amazon AWS using http://www.daemonology.net/freebsd-on-ec2/ A bit nervous because there is no local console. Just installed a new test/obsolete 8.3 box and will try the upgrade to 8.4 using these commands: svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/8 /usr/src cd /usr/src make buildworld make kernel make installworld mergemaster -Ui reboot On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Axel wrote: > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 9:04 PM, firmdog@gmail.com > wrote: >> >> OK. I will try that. Found these notes from 10 years ago. Gonna give >> this a try, not sure if cvsup will work anymore.... >> >> >> cvsup -g -L 2 update-file >> >> The update-file contains this: >> >> *default host=3Dcvsup11.us.FreeBSD.org >> *default base=3D/var/db >> *default prefix=3D/usr >> *default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_8 >> *default delete use-rel-suffix >> src-all >> ports-all tag=3D. >> doc-all tag=3D. >> >> cd /usr/src >> >> make buildworld >> >> make buildkernel >> >> make installkernel >> >> mergemaster >> >> make installworld >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 2:36 PM, FF wrote: >> > So your kernel won't be updated because you are running a custom kerne= l. >> > Your uname is based on the running kernel. >> > >> > If you want to confirm that you've in fact updated, you can reboot to >> > the >> > GENERIC kernel which will confirm you are at 8.4 or whatever. FreeBSD >> > update >> > is a binary update based on the release versions -- deviate from them >> > and it >> > doesn't break, but it can't touch those files. >> > >> > Since you know enough to put a custom kernel on there, you should foll= ow >> > the >> > source rebuild instructions which would be basically be to svn down th= e >> > whole 8.4 source tree, make the world, make the kernel and install it, >> > reboot, and install the world. >> > >> > I think the directions are in the FreeBSD handbook. >> > >> > Best, >> > >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Valeri Galtsev >> > >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, September 28, 2014 10:01 am, firmdog@gmail.com wrote: >> >> > I just installed a brand new 8.3 box and got the same behavior. I s= ee >> >> > in my output below that I have to build or update my own kernel? >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > # uname -a >> >> > FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0: Tue Apr 10 17:33:58 UTC >> >> > 2012 root@mynewhost:/usr/obj/i386/usr/src/sys/XENHVM i386 >> >> > # >> >> > >> >> > Starting the upgrade attempt: >> >> > >> >> > # freebsd-update -r 8.4-RELEASE upgrade >> >> > Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. >> >> > Fetching public key from update6.freebsd.org... done. >> >> > Fetching metadata signature for 8.3-RELEASE from >> >> > update6.freebsd.org... >> >> > done. >> >> > Fetching metadata index... done. >> >> > Fetching 2 metadata files... done. >> >> > Inspecting system... done. >> >> > >> >> > WARNING: This system is running a "xenhvm" kernel, which is not a >> >> > kernel configuration distributed as part of FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE. >> >> > This kernel will not be updated: you MUST update the kernel manuall= y >> >> > before running "/usr/sbin/freebsd-update install". >> >> > >> >> > The following components of FreeBSD seem to be installed: >> >> > src/base src/bin src/cddl src/contrib src/crypto src/etc src/games >> >> > src/gnu src/include src/krb5 src/lib src/libexec src/release >> >> > src/rescue >> >> > src/sbin src/secure src/share src/sys src/tools src/ubin src/usbin >> >> > world/base world/dict world/doc world/games world/info world/manpag= es >> >> > world/proflibs >> >> > >> >> > The following components of FreeBSD do not seem to be installed: >> >> > kernel/generic world/catpages >> >> > >> >> > Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y >> >> > >> >> > Fetching metadata signature for 8.4-RELEASE from >> >> > update6.freebsd.org... >> >> > done. >> >> > Fetching metadata index... done. >> >> > Fetching 1 metadata patches. done. >> >> > Applying metadata patches... done. >> >> > Fetching 1 metadata files... done. >> >> > Inspecting system... done. >> >> > Fetching files from 8.3-RELEASE for merging... done. >> >> > Preparing to download files... >> >> > done. >> >> > Fetching 32149 >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > patches.....10....20....30....40....50....60....70....80....90....1= 00....110....120....130....140....150....160....170....180.... >> >> > SNIP=E2=80=A6. >> >> > done. >> >> > Applying patches... >> >> > Fetching 778 files... done. >> >> > Attempting to automatically merge changes in files... done. >> >> > >> >> > The following file could not be merged automatically: >> >> > /etc/mail/freebsd.cf >> >> > Press Enter to edit this file in vi and resolve the conflicts >> >> > manually... >> >> > >> >> > Then a bunch more of /etc/mail files and also a merge of >> >> > /etc/master.passwd: >> >> > >> >> > Then this: >> >> > >> >> > The following files will be updated as part of updating to >> >> > 8.4-RELEASE-p16: >> >> > >> >> > Then I run this: >> >> > >> >> > # freebsd-update install >> >> > Installing updates... >> >> > Kernel updates have been installed. Please reboot and run >> >> > "/usr/sbin/freebsd-update install" again to finish installing >> >> > updates. >> >> > >> >> > # reboot >> >> > >> >> >> >> In last message before reboot it instructed to "reboot then run >> >> >> >> /usr/sbin/freebsd-update install >> >> >> >> again". Did you run "freebsd-update install" after reboot? >> >> >> >> Valeri >> >> >> >> > >> >> > #uname -a >> >> > FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0: Tue Apr 10 17:33:58 UTC >> >> > 2012 root@mynewhost:/usr/obj/i386/usr/src/sys/XENHVM i386 >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 5:06 AM, FF wrote: >> >> >> Can you provide the output of those commands? Freebsd-update is >> >> >> usually >> >> >> pretty good about telling you what's wrong. >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 3:02 PM, firmdog@gmail.com >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Yes I ran freebsd-update install. Then I rebooted. Then I did it >> >> >>> again. >> >> >>> Still at 8.3 >> >> >>> On Sep 27, 2014 2:37 PM, "Dave" >> >> >>> wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > On 27 September 2014 18:22:15 BST, "firmdog@gmail.com" >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> Hi, >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> Trying to use freebsd-update to go from 8.3 to 8.4 and I am >> >> >>> >> doing >> >> >>> this: >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> # freebsd-update -r 8.4-RELEASE upgrade >> >> >>> >> # freebsd-update install >> >> >>> >> # reboot >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> After reboot I am still at 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0 >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> What am I doing wrong? >> >> >>> >> ------------------------------ >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> >> >>> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> >> >>> >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> >> >>> >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> > Don't you need run rub "freebsd-update install"? >> >> >>> > -- >> >> >>> > Dave >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > GPG/PGP ID: CDB94DA1 >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> >> >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> >> >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> >> >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> FF >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> >> > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> >> >> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> >> Valeri Galtsev >> >> Sr System Administrator >> >> Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics >> >> Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics >> >> University of Chicago >> >> Phone: 773-702-4247 >> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > FF > > > Hi, > CVS is now deprecated. Please use SVN instead if you prefer to follow the > manual upgrade process [1] > FreeBSD-update tool upgrades (binary upgrades) your base system and GENER= IC > kernel only. It syncs sources too. > So you need to rebuild your custom kernel after the process. [2] > > Kind regards. > Alexandre > > [1] http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/svn.html > [2] > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 02:30:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CD23A08 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 02:30:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com (mail-qc0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18A49923 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 02:30:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id i17so3211136qcy.13 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 19:29:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=m/KN3P3a+XPhdy6rVm/CHHMwCUT07qguDZkeDc/th80=; b=cbNwLEC7SJODlmKlmsbiC2mr3f8RdelP8DAJCL/LI/sg44s7GzrKLWzlUdi7Yoitdn bIHf+zaN/JiKo5/Y0+eaYzMFV5TjJcp//RiLICPNGyGBQtIyGtb13ykKckLYjUWABC05 vpYr8gP9arfSI9BO4iAddjwv1aEkwrxxvisClGL7zMUWjMlfU4B1/g+MTvYj5NXHIyKT 9AZRFyIa770gWmFGRVIvYujvsQCX8faOIMlr0MW6XuS5l8rJ5s1ic02YcjlFdKzPnrYu E5vdLt+5oJ6UFYYLYqKoicG8h1L8t4FpYXwfYGIQcj99ZvXFArcGyGlthLHwFnzieRQl XUkQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlkl70LxvKeNR6+a/IVZ+C5/3i/y3yQYiuxP5PZySNjVG4Z5m14bcou7ZOCNzsoyO8Yy4fi X-Received: by 10.224.89.67 with SMTP id d3mr8029767qam.95.1412044193898; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 19:29:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from MBP-1.local ([96.236.21.80]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 75sm12792395qgg.25.2014.09.29.19.29.52 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Sep 2014 19:29:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <542A159F.3070801@kraus-haus.org> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 22:29:51 -0400 From: Paul Kraus User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Bennett , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS and 2 TB disk drive technology :-( References: <201409281030.s8SAU8dR027634@sdf.org> In-Reply-To: <201409281030.s8SAU8dR027634@sdf.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 02:30:01 -0000 On 9/28/14 6:30, Scott Bennett wrote: > On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 11:24:35 -0400 Paul Kraus > wrote: > Thanks for chiming in, Paul. > >> On 9/24/14 7:08, Scott Bennett wrote: >> >> >> >> What version of FreeBSD are you running ? > > FreeBSD hellas 9.2-STABLE FreeBSD 9.2-STABLE #1 r264339: Fri Apr 11 05:16:25 CDT 2014 bennett@hellas:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/hellas i386 I asked this specifically because I have seen lots of issues with hard drives connected via USB on 9.x. In some cases the system hangs (silently, with no evidence after a hard reboot), in some cases just flaky I/O to the drives that caused performance issues. And _none_ of the attached drives were over 1TB. There were three different 1TB drives (one IOmega and 2 Seagate) and 1 500GB (Seagate drive in a Gigaware enclosure). These were on three different systems (two SuperMicro dual Quad-Xeon CPU and one HP MicroProliant N36L). These were all USB2, I would expect more problems and weirder problems with USB3 as it (tries to) goes much faster. Skipping lots ... > Okay, laying aside the question of why no drive out of four in a mirror > vdev can provide the correct data, so that's why a rebuild wouldn't work. > Couldn't it at least give a clue about drive(s) to be replaced/repaired? > I.e., the drive(s) and sector number(s)? Otherwise, one would spend a lot > of time reloading data without knowing whether a failure at the same place(s) > would just happen again. You can probably dig that out of the zpool using zdb, but I am no zdb expert and refer you to the experts on the ZFS list (find out how to subscribe at the bottom of this list http://wiki.illumos.org/display/illumos/illumos+Mailing+Lists ). >> As an anecdotal note, I have not had terribly good luck with USB >> attached drives under FreeBSD, especially under 9.x. I suspect that the >> USB stack just can't keep up and ends up dropping things (or hanging). I >> have had better luck with the 10.x release but still do not trust it for >> high traffic loads. I have had no issues with SAS or SATA interfaces > > Okay. I'll keep that in mind for the future, but for now I'm stuck > with 9.2 until I can get some stable disk space to work with to do the > upgrades to amd64 and then to later releases. The way things have been > going, I may have to relegate at least four 2 TB drives to paperweight > supply and then wait until I can replace them with smaller capacity drives > that will actually work. Also, I have four 2 TB drives in external cases > that have only USB 3.0 interfaces on them, so I have no other way to > connect them (except USB 2.0, of course), so I'm stuck with (some) USB, > too. While I have had nothing but trouble every single time I tried using a USB attached drive for more than a few MB at a time under 9.x, I have had no problems with Marvell based JBOD SATA cards under 9.x or 10.0. > >> (using supported chipsets, I have had very good luck with any of the >> Marvell JBOD SATA controllers), _except_ when I was using a SATA port >> multiplier. Over on the ZFS list the consensus is that port multipliers >> are problematic at best and they should be avoided. > > What kinds of problems did they mention? Also, how are those Marvell > controllers connected to your system(s)? I'm just wondering whether > I would be able to use any of those models of controllers. I've not dealt > with SATA port multipliers. Would an eSATA card with two ports on it be > classed as a port multiplier? I do not recall specifics, but I do recall a variety of issues, mostly around SATA buss resets. The problem _I_ had was that if one of the four drives in the enclosure (behind the port multiplier) failed it knocked all four off-line. The cards were PCIE 1X and PCIE 2X. All of the Marvell cards I have seen have been one logical port per physical port. The chipsets in the add-on cards seem to be in sets of 4 ports (although the on-board chipsets seem to be sets of 6). I currently have one 4 port card (2 internal, 2 external) and one 8 port card (4 internal, 4 external) with no problems. They are in an HP MicroProliant N54L with 16 GB RAM. Here is the series of cards that I have been using: http://www.sybausa.com/productList.php?cid=142¤tPage=0 Specifically the SI-PEX40072 and SI-PEX40065, stay away from the RAID versions and just go for the JBOD. The Marvell JBOD chips were recommended over on the ZFS list. > At the moment, all of my ZFS devices are connected by either USB 3.0 > or Firewire 400. Are the USB drives directly attached or via hubs ? The hubs may be introducing more errors (I have not had good luck finding USB hubs that are reliable in transferring data ... on my Mac, I have never tried using external hubs on my servers). > I now have an eSATA card with two ports on it that I > plan to install at some point, which will let me move the Firewire 400 > drive to eSATA. Should I expect any new problem for that drive after the > change? I would expect a decrease in error counts for the eSATA attached drive. I have been running LOTS of scrubs against my ~1.6TB of data recently, both on a 2-way 2-column mirror of 2TB drives or the current config of 2-way 3-column mirror of 1TB drives. I have seen no errors of any kind. [ppk@FreeBSD2 ~]$ zpool status pool: KrausHaus state: ONLINE scan: scrub repaired 0 in 1h49m with 0 errors on Fri Sep 26 13:51:21 2014 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM KrausHaus ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 diskid/DISK-Seaagte ES.3 ONLINE 0 0 0 diskid/DISK-Seaagte ES.2 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 diskid/DISK-WD-SE ONLINE 0 0 0 diskid/DISK-HGST UltraStar ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 diskid/DISK-WD-SE ONLINE 0 0 0 diskid/DISK-Seaagte ES.2 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares diskid/DISK-Seaagte ES.3 AVAIL errors: No known data errors Note: Disk serial numbers replaced with type of drive. All are 1TB. >> >> It sounds like you are really pushing this system to do more than it >> reasonably can. In a situation like this you should really not be doing >> anything else at the same time given that you are already pushing what >> the system can do. >> > It seems to me that the only places that could fail to keep up would > be the motherboard's chip(set) or one of the controller cards. The > motherboard controller knows the speed of the memory, so it will only > cycle the memory at that speed. The CPU, of course, should be at a lower > priority for bus cycles, so it would just use whatever were left over. There > is no overclocking involved, so that is not an issue here. The machine goes > as fast as it goes and no faster. If it takes longer for it to complete a > task, then that's how long it takes. I don't see that "pushing this system > to do more than it reasonably can" is even possible for me to do. It does > what it does, and it does it when it gets to it. Would I like it to do > things faster? Of course, I would, but what I want does not change physics. > I'm not getting any machine check or overrun messages, either. So you deny that race states can exist in a system as complex as a modern computer running a modern OS ? The OS is an integral part of all this, including all the myriad device drivers. And with multiple CPUs the problem may be even worse. > Further, because one of the drives is limited to 50 MB/s (Firewire 400) > transfer rates, ZFS really can't go any faster than that drive. Most of the > time, a systat vmstat display during the scrubs showed the MB/s actually > transferred for all four drives as being about the same (~23 - ~35 MB/s). What does `iostat -x -w 1` show ? How many drives are at 100 %b ? How many drives have a qlen of 10 ? For how many samples in a row ? That is the limit of what ZFS will dispatch, once there are 10 outstanding I/O requests for a given device, ZFS does not dispatch more I/O requests until the qlen drops below 10. This is tunable (look through sysctl -a | grep vfs.zfs). On my system with the port multiplier I had to tune this down to 4 (found empirically) or I would see underlying SATA device errors and retries. I find it useful to look at 1 second as well as 10 seconds samples (to see both peak load on the drives as well as more average). Here is my system with a scrub running on the above zpool and 10 second sample time (iostat -x -w 10): extended device statistics device r/s w/s kr/s kw/s qlen svc_t %b ada0 783.8 3.0 97834.2 15.8 10 10.4 84 ada1 792.8 3.0 98649.5 15.8 4 3.7 49 ada2 789.9 3.0 98457.0 15.8 4 3.6 47 ada3 0.1 13.1 0.0 59.0 0 6.1 0 ada4 0.8 13.1 0.4 59.0 0 5.8 0 ada5 794.0 3.0 98703.7 15.8 0 4.1 62 ada6 785.9 3.0 98158.3 15.8 10 11.2 98 ada7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 ada8 791.4 3.0 98458.2 15.8 0 3.0 53 In the above, ada0 and ada6 have hit their outstanding I/O limit (in zfs), both are slower than the others, with both longer service time (svc_t) and % busy (%b). These are the oldest drives in the zpool, Seagate ES.2 series and are 5 years old (and just out of warranty). So it is not surprising that they are the slowest. They are the limiting factor on how fast the scrub can progress. > The scrubs took from 5% to 25% of one core's time, Because they are limited by the I/O stack between the kernal and the device. > and associated > kernel functions took from 0% to ~9% (combined) from other cores. cmp(1) > took 25% - 35% of one core with associated kernel functions taking 5% - 15% > (combined) from other cores. I used cpuset(1) to keep cmp(1) from bothering > the mprime thread I cared about the most. (Note that mprime runs niced > to 18, so its threads should not slow any of the testing I was doing.) It > really doesn't look to me like an overload situation, but I can try moving > the three USB 3.0 drives to USB 2.0 to slow things down even further. Do you have a way to look at errors directly on the USB buss ? > That > leaves still unexplained ZFS's failure to make use of multiple copies for > error correction during the reading of a file or to fix in one scrub > everything that was fixable. >>> >>> Script started on Wed Sep 17 01:37:38 2014 >>> [hellas] 101 % time nice +12 cpuset -l 3,0 cmp -z -l /backups/s2C/save/backups.s2A /backups/testmirror/backups.s2A >> >> This is the file the ZFS told you was corrupt, all bets are off. >> > There should be only one bad block because the scrubs fixed everything > else, right? Not necessarily, I have not looked at the ZFS code (feel free to, it is all open source), so I do not know for certain whether it gives up on a file once it finds corruption. > And that bad block is bad on all four drives, right? Or the I/O to all four drives was interrupted at the same TIME ... I have seen that before when it was a device driver stack that was having trouble (which is what I suspect here). >> The fact that you have TWO different drives from TWO different vendors >> exhibiting the same problem (and to the same degree) makes me think that >> the problem is NOT with the drives but elsewhere with your system. I >> have started tracking usage an failure statistics for my personal drives >> (currently 26 of them, but I have 4 more coming back from Seagate as > > Whooweee! That's a heap of drives! IIRC, for a chi^2 distribution, > 30 isn't bad for a sample size. How many of those drives are of larger > capacity than 1 TB? Not really, I used to manage hundreds of drives. When I have 2 out of 4 Seagate ES.2 1TB drives and 1 out of 2 HGST UltraStar 1TB drives fail under warranty I am still not willing to say that overall both Seagate and HGST have a 50% failure rate ... specifically because I do not consider 4 (or worse 2) drives a statistically significant sample :-) In terms of drive sizes, a little over 50% are 1TB or over (not counting the 4 Seagate 1TB warranty replacement drives that arrived today). Of the 11 1TB drives in the sample (not counting the ones that arrived today), 3 have failed under warranty (so far). The 4 2TB drives in the sample set none have failed yet, but they are all less than 1 year old. >> The system you are trying to use ZFS on may just not be able to handle >> the throughput (both memory and disk I/O) generated by ZFS without >> breaking. This may NOT just be a question of amount of RAM, but of the >> reliability of the motherboard/CPU/RAM/device interfaces when stressed. > > I did do a fair amount of testing with mprime last year and found no > problems. From the brief research I did, it looks like mprime is a computational program and will test only limited portions of a system (CPU and RAM mostly). > I monitor CPU temperatures frequently, especially when I'm > running a test like the ones I've been doing, and the temperatures have > remained reasonable throughout. (My air-conditioning bill has not been > similarly reasonable, I'm sorry to say.) > That having been said, though, between your remarks and Andrew Berg's, > there does seem cause to run another scrub, perhaps two, with those three > drives connected via USB 2.0 instead of USB 3.0 to see what happens when > everything is slowed down drastically. I'll give that a try when I find > time. That won't address the ZFS-related questions or the differences > in error rates on different drives, but might reveal an underlying system > hardware issue. > Maybe a PCIE2 board is too slow for USB 3.0, although the motherboard > controller, BIOS, USB 3.0 controller, and kernel all declined to complain. > If it is, then the eSATA card I bought (SATA II) would likely be useless > as well. :-< > >> In the early days of ZFS it was noticed that ZFS stressed the CPU and >> memory systems of a server harder than virtually any other task. >> > When would that have been, please? (I don't know much ZFS history.) > I believe this machine dates to 2006 or more likely 2007, although the > USB 3.0 card was new last year. The VIA Firewire card was installed at > the same time as the USB 3.0 card, but it was not new at that time. That would have been the 2005-2007 timeframe. A Sun SF-V240 could be brought to it's knees by a large ZFS copy operation. Both CPUs would peg and memory bandwidth would all be consumed by the I/O operations. The Sun T-2000 was much better as it had (effectively) 32 logical CPUs (8 cores each with 4 execution threads) and ZFS really likes multiprocessor environments. -- -- Paul Kraus paul@kraus-haus.org Co-Chair Albacon 2014.5 http://www.albacon.org/2014/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 08:44:18 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42AC5460 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:44:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from e28smtp02.in.ibm.com (e28smtp02.in.ibm.com [122.248.162.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e28smtp02.in.ibm.com", Issuer "GeoTrust SSL CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB3ED2EB for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:44:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from /spool/local by e28smtp02.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:03:57 +0530 Received: from d28dlp02.in.ibm.com (9.184.220.127) by e28smtp02.in.ibm.com (192.168.1.132) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:03:54 +0530 Received: from d28relay01.in.ibm.com (d28relay01.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.58]) by d28dlp02.in.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E87D3940043 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:03:54 +0530 (IST) Received: from d28av02.in.ibm.com (d28av02.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.64]) by d28relay01.in.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id s8U8XLet54329416 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:03:21 +0530 Received: from d28av02.in.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d28av02.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id s8U8XqgX017549 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:03:52 +0530 Received: from d23ml193.in.ibm.com (pulsar.in.ibm.com [9.182.8.45]) by d28av02.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id s8U8Xq7Y017533 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:03:52 +0530 Subject: Bash Shellshock Bug X-KeepSent: BBD12885:C6A08B7B-65257D63:002E6EFF; type=4; name=$KeepSent To: questions@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: IBM Notes Release 9.0.1 October 14, 2013 Message-ID: From: Sandeep Gangadharan1 Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 19:31:21 +1100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on d23ml193/23/M/IBM(Release 8.5.3FP6|November 21, 2013) at 30/09/2014 14:01:21 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 14093008-0005-0000-0000-0000013F4471 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:44:18 -0000 Hi Team I am a Free BSD user and using Free BSD 6.2 user. root@exi-data ~ # uname -a FreeBSD exi-data.telstra.net 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Thu Oct 9 15:46:16 EST 2008 root@exi-data:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HP_DL380G5_EXI i386 3:06pm root@exi-data ~ # It seems my server has Bash Shellshock Bug issue. 3:02pm root@exi-data ~ # env x='() { :;}; echo vulnerable' bash -c "echo this is a test" vulnerable this is a test 3:03pm root@exi-data ~ # Can you please confirm where I can get the latest Bash RPM to fix this Bug. I don't have a direct internet connection to my server. Can you please tell me where I download and how to install the latest bash version. Regards, Sandeep Gangadharan Linux System Administrator Red Hat Certified Engineer, ITIL V3 Foundation ITD GD, India Mobile: 91-9866-859808 | Phone: 91-40-4457-6849 (Embedded image moved to file: E-mail: sandegan@in.ibm.com pic07785.gif)IBM B4 Survey No 66/1 Raidurga Vil Hyderabad, AP 500032 India From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 08:52:57 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACDC476D for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:52:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1bon0135.outbound.protection.outlook.com [157.56.111.135]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 592F55ED for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:52:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2601:2:4780:2fd:3cfa:1b41:db29:34df] (2601:2:4780:2fd:3cfa:1b41:db29:34df) by CY1PR0301MB0841.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.163.147) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1039.15; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:52:48 +0000 Message-ID: <542A6F5B.7080508@my.hennepintech.edu> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 03:52:43 -0500 From: Andrew Berg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subject: Re: Bash Shellshock Bug References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [2601:2:4780:2fd:3cfa:1b41:db29:34df] X-ClientProxiedBy: DM2PR00CA0018.namprd00.prod.outlook.com (25.160.243.28) To CY1PR0301MB0841.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.163.147) X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:; X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CY1PR0301MB0841; X-Forefront-PRVS: 0350D7A55D X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(51704005)(189002)(24454002)(199003)(89122001)(107046002)(87266999)(65816999)(21056001)(87976001)(64126003)(110136001)(77096002)(65956001)(107886001)(95666004)(54356999)(80316001)(83506001)(42186005)(86362001)(106356001)(33656002)(101416001)(76176999)(2351001)(105586002)(50986999)(88552001)(97736003)(85306004)(59896002)(75432002)(23676002)(85852003)(31966008)(20776003)(4396001)(92566001)(64706001)(99396003)(50466002)(47776003)(102836001)(46102003)(92726001)(76482002)(120916001)(10300001)(80022003)(89472002)(3826002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CY1PR0301MB0841; H:[IPv6:2601:2:4780:2fd:3cfa:1b41:db29:34df]; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:0; LANG:en; X-OriginatorOrg: my.hennepintech.edu X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:52:57 -0000 On 2014.09.30 03:31, Sandeep Gangadharan1 wrote: > I am a Free BSD user and using Free BSD 6.2 user. > > Can you please confirm where I can get the latest Bash RPM to fix this Bug. > I don't have a direct internet connection to my server. Can you please tell > me where I download and how to install the latest bash version. Support for FreeBSD 6.2 was dropped years ago. If you can't update to a supported version, you will have to try to compile a new version of bash from source yourself. I would also strongly suggesting getting a better understanding of FreeBSD so that you can maintain it. The website explains the release schedule and lists end-of-life dates, and the handbook goes over how to manage installation of third-party software. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 09:00:44 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A52039E0 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:00:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68DCE664 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:00:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-99-5.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.99.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAE123CD44; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 11:00:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s8U90YH6002548; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 11:00:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 11:00:34 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Sandeep Gangadharan1 Subject: Re: Bash Shellshock Bug Message-Id: <20140930110034.a637ab6d.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:00:44 -0000 On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 19:31:21 +1100, Sandeep Gangadharan1 wrote: > Can you please confirm where I can get the latest Bash RPM to fix this Bug. FreeBSD does not use RPM (Red Hat Package Manager), it provides its own software management system (i, e., the ports collection and, for your 6.2 system, the pkg_ tools). However, your system seems rather old, so "today's methods" probably won't work. > I don't have a direct internet connection to my server. Can you please tell > me where I download and how to install the latest bash version. If you can, upgrade your server. FreeBSD 6 isn't supported anymore. But it should be possible to fix the problem. Please see the thread "BASH Shellshock and FreeBSD 4.X" for further instructions: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2014-September/261423.html Check which approach might work for you. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 09:23:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6EC1E3A for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:23:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from e28smtp09.in.ibm.com (e28smtp09.in.ibm.com [122.248.162.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e28smtp09.in.ibm.com", Issuer "GeoTrust SSL CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AFA896B for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:23:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from /spool/local by e28smtp09.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:43:22 +0530 Received: from d28dlp02.in.ibm.com (9.184.220.127) by e28smtp09.in.ibm.com (192.168.1.139) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:43:21 +0530 Received: from d28relay05.in.ibm.com (d28relay05.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.62]) by d28dlp02.in.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 675933940043 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:43:19 +0530 (IST) Received: from d28av06.in.ibm.com (d28av06.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.48]) by d28relay05.in.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id s8U9DmoW26345610 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:43:48 +0530 Received: from d28av06.in.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d28av06.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id s8U9DIbw003959 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:43:18 +0530 Received: from d23ml193.in.ibm.com (pulsar.in.ibm.com [9.182.8.45]) by d28av06.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id s8U9DIuY003956 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:43:18 +0530 In-Reply-To: <20140930110034.a637ab6d.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20140930110034.a637ab6d.freebsd@edvax.de> Subject: Re: Bash Shellshock Bug X-KeepSent: C03B0588:4C96789C-65257D63:00324F6D; type=4; name=$KeepSent To: Polytropon X-Mailer: IBM Notes Release 9.0.1 October 14, 2013 Message-ID: From: Sandeep Gangadharan1 Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:10:47 +1100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on d23ml193/23/M/IBM(Release 8.5.3FP6|November 21, 2013) at 30/09/2014 14:40:46 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 14093009-2674-0000-0000-0000020DE3E5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:23:34 -0000 Hi Team Is there anyway to get patch for my FreeBSD 6.2 . If I enable internet connection is it possible. I cannot upgrade the version right now. Can you please share the method of upgrading the package. Regards, Sandeep Gangadharan Linux System Administrator Red Hat Certified Engineer, ITIL V3 Foundation ITD GD, India Mobile: 91-9866-859808 | Phone: 91-40-4457-6849 (Embedded image moved to file: E-mail: sandegan@in.ibm.com pic20855.gif)IBM B4 Survey No 66/1 Raidurga Vil Hyderabad, AP 500032 India From: Polytropon To: Sandeep Gangadharan1/India/IBM@IBMIN Cc: questions@freebsd.org Date: 09/30/2014 06:59 PM Subject: Re: Bash Shellshock Bug On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 19:31:21 +1100, Sandeep Gangadharan1 wrote: > Can you please confirm where I can get the latest Bash RPM to fix this Bug. FreeBSD does not use RPM (Red Hat Package Manager), it provides its own software management system (i, e., the ports collection and, for your 6.2 system, the pkg_ tools). However, your system seems rather old, so "today's methods" probably won't work. > I don't have a direct internet connection to my server. Can you please tell > me where I download and how to install the latest bash version. If you can, upgrade your server. FreeBSD 6 isn't supported anymore. But it should be possible to fix the problem. Please see the thread "BASH Shellshock and FreeBSD 4.X" for further instructions: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2014-September/261423.html Check which approach might work for you. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 10:06:13 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5194C1D for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 10:06:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CA47F3D for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 10:06:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com (no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8UA5slb004617 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 11:06:01 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=freebsd.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk s8UA5slb004617 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/s8UA5slb004617; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none; dkim-atps=neutral X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged) claimed to be ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com Message-ID: <542A807B.6040107@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 11:05:47 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bash Shellshock Bug References: <20140930110034.a637ab6d.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="I8BnkXCcPmhOVPAG4OnaGUqtLUOghuW2q" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,RDNS_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 10:06:14 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --I8BnkXCcPmhOVPAG4OnaGUqtLUOghuW2q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 09/30/14 10:10, Sandeep Gangadharan1 wrote: > Is there anyway to get patch for my FreeBSD 6.2 . If I enable internet= > connection is it possible. > I cannot upgrade the version right now. >=20 > Can you please share the method of upgrading the package. You're using a version of FreeBSD that is long out of support and that itself has a number of known security problems. Not only that, it is so old that you can't use a recent version of the ports tree on it. Therefore your only options are: 1) Upgrade or reinstall the machine using a recent and supported version of FreeBSD. This is what I would choose unless there was a very good reason why not.[*] 2) Build bash manually from sources outside of the ports system. This will screw up your ability to manage updating it cleanly in future. 3) Delete bash entirely and force all your users to use a different shell. Converting shell scripts from bash to sh is frequently trivial, but may involve some significant refactoring depending on what code constructs are in use. Cheers, Matthew --I8BnkXCcPmhOVPAG4OnaGUqtLUOghuW2q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUKoCCXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTnKrAQAK7kg2M++GmDTtMdhtNOGm2O /Mf92sTcfUwnhdPbAlyRbf18Wv1bg4d4g6Ikec3bqs0o6yTxqeLfahjwiioXl+fz qg1+KTvE0BHfKgYaseCoN+BMmbL79tP+xfjxUki1qEpEJlo/Uqscjse717ewnfXv FEWPd0hZD3XF/rmoqjR8IJC6bIuNeqvuCTFbKBCBGoOnezeJ8bE1LhYvATMrL4ob D6WK3yzdc3F4hx62DT7QdMXmj21GA/dRwNgneeW6lkPj6iGWs863vs0Qvlbr+3jh kKB5GwEp37TYfOsyiesgaIBDPbE1dofmbQ+SwFQdzO02hEDZga91C11NCUQ6h9PM qDC97ivttW2h/JrO4snA38nsqTAn6A0pRftnLEmssiV0e3ODHbB66a4TQzniqbRm WNXfuJZC/GR+A9ZN54eUXe1mgX7x8d4E1FB2/vIhIFuWhI23tWroGIHk8PiZ4vRn ZSrlENjglaDASOJABZccH5Ocfcwz+GtdNpfXX5BRBPsJCVwt/WYUbxGfPSGxJGjX YbUWClRbUCVL/ye6IEUPOQmTNemFQSCPYBt7qvdASoH9xiOR0r1Vf1kW2dYH2bVi +A22yNCc7HN978ewIABBhYLFGvduYit5Y5uJKwk9p0p0us2/lNEj/DnkAA6OasEC NrMYZo9o5V2yyOUpm8pG =XpPK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --I8BnkXCcPmhOVPAG4OnaGUqtLUOghuW2q-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 11:12:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28F9DBD0 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 11:12:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from forward4l.mail.yandex.net (forward4l.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1819::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Certum Level IV CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDBB88F5 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 11:12:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp13.mail.yandex.net (smtp13.mail.yandex.net [95.108.130.68]) by forward4l.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 6732D1441322; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:12:28 +0400 (MSK) Received: from smtp13.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp13.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id D7AEEE4006B; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:12:27 +0400 (MSK) Received: from 78.108.204.68.tel.ru (78.108.204.68.tel.ru [78.108.204.68]) by smtp13.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id PYhs7MjU70-CRTeKFOJ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:12:27 +0400 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) X-Yandex-Uniq: 5507f757-3213-4929-b24d-c2e2309325a3 Message-ID: <542A901B.90002@passap.ru> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:12:27 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov Organization: =?UTF-8?B?0JfQkNCeICLQktCQ0KDQoiI=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patrick Gibson , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: ZFS root failure after 9.2 -> 9.3 ugprade References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 11:12:41 -0000 28.09.2014 21:49, Patrick Gibson ŠæŠøŃŠµŃ‚: > I just did a freebsd-update upgrade on a 9.2 system with zfsroot and now > when it boots, I get: > > Booting from Hard Disk... > / > Can't find /boot/zfsloader This file is 'zfsloader'. > FreeBSD/x86 boot > Default: disk0:/boot/kernel/kernel > boot: > \ > Can't find /boot/kernel/kernel > > I've tried booting from a 9.3 install disc and going into the LiveCD and > reinstalling the bootloader with: > > gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr -p /boot/gptzfsboot -i 1 ada0 This one is 'gptzfsboot'. > Which says it's installed correctly, but still won't boot. Any advice would > be greatly appreciated. Here is what I have at my system: ----- % ls -l /boot/*zfs* -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 42024 30 ŃŠµŠ½ 14:46 /boot/gptzfsboot -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 66048 30 ŃŠµŠ½ 14:46 /boot/zfsboot -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 299008 30 ŃŠµŠ½ 14:46 /boot/zfsloader /boot/zfs: total 5 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1096 8 ŠøѡŠ» 16:48 zpool.cache ----- -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 13:28:05 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 984EDB58 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 13:28:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47DF1B37 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 13:28:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-18-143.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.18.143]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 407013CEA6; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:28:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s8UDS1Ia001875; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:28:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:28:01 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Sandeep Gangadharan1 Subject: Re: Bash Shellshock Bug Message-Id: <20140930152801.cd7a2a5e.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20140930110034.a637ab6d.freebsd@edvax.de> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 13:28:05 -0000 On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:10:47 +1100, Sandeep Gangadharan1 wrote: > Hi Team > > Is there anyway to get patch for my FreeBSD 6.2 . If I enable internet > connection is it possible. It is possible, but not trivial. The thread mentioned should give you an impression of the _different_ ways that exist to perform the bash update. However, _you_ need to decide which approach you want to try. Keep in mind either way might work, or might not (simply because FreeBSD 6 isn't supported anymore, and things have changed, especially the package management and the ports infra- structure). > I cannot upgrade the version right now. That should not be the primary problem, even though you should consider upgrading to a supported FreeBSD version (v9 and v10 currently). :-) > Can you please share the method of upgrading the package. Read the mentioned ways before you start. This is not a "follow step by step" procedure - it involves decisions and is a little bit of "trial & error". ;-) I'll simply quote parts from the discussion thread, if this is okay for you. Still you need to check which works for you. Make a backup (!) first (at least of the installed bash package). Before you do _anything_ to your current ports tree, do this: # cd /usr/ports/shells/bash # make package This will make a backup package in /usr/ports/packages of your _current_ bash (the _working_ one), in case anything should go wrong. You can then later on re-install bash with # pkg_add /usr/ports/packages/All/bash-x.y.z.tbz (where x.y.z reflects the version number of bash prior to your upgrade attempts). If you can still access FreeBSD 6 packages (note that you might point $PACKAGESITE at the _archives_ section of the FreeBSD FTP server; see "man pkg_add" for details. # setenv PACKAGESITE=ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/old-releases/i386/6.2-RELEASE/packages/Latest # pkg_delete -f /var/db/pkg/bash-x.y.z # pkg_add -r bash Use the [Tab] key to autocomplete the correct version number in the 2nd command. Probably that won't work; bash-3.2.25 seems the last version available here. So you'll probably have to build from source. That might be a problem due to the architectural difference between FreeBSD 6 and the current build system... so the "obvious" # pkg upgrade bash doesn't work for you, because FreeBSD 6 doesn't have pkgng yet. Again note: Make a backup (!) of your current /usr/ports tree before you start! Updating the ports tree is possible, but probably you don't even have portsnap on FreeBSD 6 yet. I'm not sure when it has been introduced, but I assume it was somewhere betweeen FreeBSD 7 and 8... This is how you would do it: # portsnap fetch update # cd /usr/ports/shells/bash # make deinstall # make # make reinstall If you have any other means to update your ports tree (CVS was the standard at FreeBSD 6, I don't know if this is still supported, as FreeBSD now uses Subversion), you could also try the equivalent with binary packages: # portsnap fetch update # portupgrade -P bash or # portsnap fetch update # portmaster -P shells/bash depending on your use of a port management tool. Omit -P to try to build from source. I'd like to emphasize the advice I've provided in the thread mentioned, after being informed that building _with_ the ports tree will probably be problematic: ''On the other hand, maybe it would even be possible to check out the current source for bssh (and maybe its dependencies) and build them "off the track", i. e., not using the ports infrastructure at all, and then manually copying the resulting binary to the required place, as well as its libraries (unless static linking has been enabled). It's worth having a look at ./configure's options to tune this approach.'' This is probably the "easiest" way to try. You don't mess up things with your ports collection here. Again, please note: Make a backup copy of your working bash version, as I said above. You can find the full source here: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2014-September/261423.html Take your time to read, and to think about the problem. I'm sure you'll be successful once you've figured out which way works for you. Also note that I haven't tested _anything_ of the methods mentioned here, so I can't promise they'll work. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 14:25:35 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82A68A5F for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:25:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from asav21.altibox.net (asav21.altibox.net [109.247.116.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F925250 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:25:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by asav21.altibox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66CF800A5 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:16:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from asav21.altibox.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (asav21.lysetele.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id mbMM2Q3Wx4GZ for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:16:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from europa (129.81-166-80.customer.lyse.net [81.166.80.129]) by asav21.altibox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FBEC8008A for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:16:11 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: update to linux_base-c6 References: Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:16:11 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Kenneth Hatteland" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:25:35 -0000 Installing nspluginwrapper with c6 replacing f-10 is not possible on my machine as nspluginwrapper demands f-10 and this ends in conflict. Any solution to that ? Kenneth Hatteland, Norway n Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:00:02 +0200, wrote: > Re: update to linux_base-c6 -- Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 14:54:03 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5C7F76F; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:54:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-187.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "webmail2.dweimer.local", Issuer "webmail2.dweimer.local" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91AF5813; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:54:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.dweimer.net (webmail [192.168.5.2]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s8UErtW2071085 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:53:55 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:53:55 -0500 From: dweimer To: Kenneth Hatteland Subject: Re: update to =?UTF-8?Q?linux=5Fbase-c=36?= Organization: dweimer.net Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <9e6b9502ba9292e68de94878bf405409@dweimer.net> X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.3 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:54:03 -0000 On 09/30/2014 9:16 am, Kenneth Hatteland wrote: > Installing nspluginwrapper with c6 replacing f-10 is not possible on > my machine as nspluginwrapper demands f-10 and this ends in conflict. > Any solution to that ? > > > Kenneth Hatteland, Norway > Did you do steps 2 and 4 from the /usr/ports/UPDATING entry? 20140922: AFFECTS: users of emulators/linux_base-f10 and emulators/linux_base-c6 AUTHOR: xmj@FreeBSD.org The complete drop-in replacement linux-c6 port infrastructure is in ports and will shortly replace the current linux-f10- ports as default. To switch to the linux-c6 infrastructure you should: 0. Backup all your vital information! 1. Remove the current linux base port and all linux-f10- ports. 2. Add the following lines to /etc/make.conf: OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=c6 OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS=c6 3. Make sure no linux application is running. 4. Set appropriate sysctl (compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.18). 5. Install emulators/linux-c6. That should be enough in most circumstances. If you experience difficulties, please be sure to expand step 1 to: 1a. Remove all ports which depend on linux base port. 1b. Remove linux base port. 1c. Clean /compat/linux/ directory. Should you encounter any other difficulties not fixed by these extended steps, please submit an issue report in Bugzilla and send an email to FreeBSD's emulation@ mailing list.date to linux_base-c6 -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 15:02:55 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D08F7AE5 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:02:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76C7994A for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:02:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com (no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8UF2ivB009914 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:02:46 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=freebsd.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk s8UF2ivB009914 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/s8UF2ivB009914; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none; dkim-atps=neutral X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged) claimed to be ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com Message-ID: <542AC600.1090600@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:02:24 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bash Shellshock Bug References: <20140930110034.a637ab6d.freebsd@edvax.de> <20140930152801.cd7a2a5e.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20140930152801.cd7a2a5e.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nAuWlbGLFb4pBJXkoijSbU2LkeA50oVgV" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:02:56 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --nAuWlbGLFb4pBJXkoijSbU2LkeA50oVgV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 09/30/14 14:28, Polytropon wrote: > Again note: Make a backup (!) of your current /usr/ports > tree before you start! Updating the ports tree is possible, > but probably you don't even have portsnap on FreeBSD 6 yet. > I'm not sure when it has been introduced, but I assume it > was somewhere betweeen FreeBSD 7 and 8... >=20 > This is how you would do it: >=20 > # portsnap fetch update > # cd /usr/ports/shells/bash > # make deinstall > # make > # make reinstall >=20 > If you have any other means to update your ports tree (CVS > was the standard at FreeBSD 6, I don't know if this is still > supported, as FreeBSD now uses Subversion), you could also > try the equivalent with binary packages: >=20 > # portsnap fetch update > # portupgrade -P bash Neither of these approaches will work with the current ports tree on anything older than FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE. You'll get syntax errors while trying to parse the Makefiles used in the ports certainly because of a change in the way you tell make to map strings to upper or lower case (eg. ${VAR:L} changed to ${VAR:tl}) and quite possibly for other reasons.= Nor will the current ports tree work with anything other than pkg(8). We haven't tried compiling pkg(8) on anything that old -- it might work, but I sincerely doubt it. Cheers, Matthew --nAuWlbGLFb4pBJXkoijSbU2LkeA50oVgV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUKsYTXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTnQDYQAIcuRxXDpfhDTKRFofUd8Ygf zuoK9ZDVGdhX8wUREVnCTN02YNWBWaALtBQYivd5/4toS8vVk/Wn11nMVmSe35xB HheB9zuEpU7/Jm4j1UtBysQzY1JYM5xPpULB0FYevDUjbifVdMLUuu22bFVoUXvn ShV8rmvC/A3EifBx1pTdr4XLPuxX966blYiRXFT35i3cWNQWSta87cLhb4Gq68TQ aeXh9AcRO5ACuAMM0W/WIELNU04f6IP1ZXNHfBOMBkKVzcHpXcvMBSplEqwTGO3A pLItpmFNHtZApz5jtSMMgBdEDK3ExC1+n54FVOB7koK0mt8CHWkvo42w3uWjCwGl as293iUDRIf3D8uR8Y1RaiMdUI5Dnji3Fcpr2KwOzGEF5alIGAHY+9zNGyxjLVkx PgSSc9B32IeqlcW46nUr3WGejFgHjbem80hVjoiz4IaAQTnIA66hdt4mC7Cy8HQn auMS1m2LTUIfkBvCsYgLJ73QTwdffYTwBcEfdObZOXDVeBOJ7GSPOJzP2qCjIvCs X0M7dAGmTDBMrzewnbJsMHVRboQjsKPp4umnt9coysPmo70tW8nc0QjAaNGRCDIW n0iz6Ctc5o6OLosyjfJPrTb7n216LqYAiyEJivR9FzhFaJcJX0W5POUBfkN2xOoS 09IHZXenECy3DLAqV0/w =cy7E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nAuWlbGLFb4pBJXkoijSbU2LkeA50oVgV-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 15:27:49 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EAC99B8; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:27:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C34FFC23; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.news4all.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id s8UFRbWh077443; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:27:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Message-ID: <542ACBE9.4090304@bananmonarki.se> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:27:37 +0200 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bash Shellshock Bug References: <20140930110034.a637ab6d.freebsd@edvax.de> <20140930152801.cd7a2a5e.freebsd@edvax.de> <542AC600.1090600@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <542AC600.1090600@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:27:49 -0000 On 2014-09-30 17:02, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 09/30/14 14:28, Polytropon wrote: >> Again note: Make a backup (!) of your current /usr/ports >> tree before you start! Updating the ports tree is possible, >> but probably you don't even have portsnap on FreeBSD 6 yet. >> I'm not sure when it has been introduced, but I assume it >> was somewhere betweeen FreeBSD 7 and 8... >> >> This is how you would do it: >> >> # portsnap fetch update >> # cd /usr/ports/shells/bash >> # make deinstall >> # make >> # make reinstall >> >> If you have any other means to update your ports tree (CVS >> was the standard at FreeBSD 6, I don't know if this is still >> supported, as FreeBSD now uses Subversion), you could also >> try the equivalent with binary packages: >> >> # portsnap fetch update >> # portupgrade -P bash > > > Neither of these approaches will work with the current ports tree on > anything older than FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE. You'll get syntax errors while > trying to parse the Makefiles used in the ports certainly because of a > change in the way you tell make to map strings to upper or lower case > (eg. ${VAR:L} changed to ${VAR:tl}) and quite possibly for other reasons. > > Nor will the current ports tree work with anything other than pkg(8). > We haven't tried compiling pkg(8) on anything that old -- it might work, > but I sincerely doubt it. > > Cheers, > > Matthew I want to install kicad but getting this error: root@kw:/usr/ports # make clean Child process pid=41973 terminated abnormally: Segmentation fault: 11 "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 1222: warning: "/usr/local/sbin/pkg-static ver sion -t 1.3.8 1.3.8" returned non-zero status pkkng is crap From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 15:32:51 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 173F1D28; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:32:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D61ECD03; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:32:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-76-150.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.150]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s8UFJZkM022642 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Sep 2014 10:19:36 -0500 Message-ID: <542ACB7E.4000206@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 10:25:50 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: update to linux_base-c6 References: <9e6b9502ba9292e68de94878bf405409@dweimer.net> In-Reply-To: <9e6b9502ba9292e68de94878bf405409@dweimer.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:32:51 -0000 On 09/30/14 09:53, dweimer wrote: > On 09/30/2014 9:16 am, Kenneth Hatteland wrote: >> Installing nspluginwrapper with c6 replacing f-10 is not possible on >> my machine as nspluginwrapper demands f-10 and this ends in conflict. >> Any solution to that ? >> >> >> Kenneth Hatteland, Norway >> > > Did you do steps 2 and 4 from the /usr/ports/UPDATING entry? > > > 20140922: > AFFECTS: users of emulators/linux_base-f10 and emulators/linux_base-c6 > AUTHOR: xmj@FreeBSD.org > > The complete drop-in replacement linux-c6 port infrastructure is in > ports > and will shortly replace the current linux-f10- ports as default. > > To switch to the linux-c6 infrastructure you should: > > 0. Backup all your vital information! > 1. Remove the current linux base port and all linux-f10- ports. > 2. Add the following lines to /etc/make.conf: > OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=c6 > OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS=c6 > 3. Make sure no linux application is running. > 4. Set appropriate sysctl (compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.18). > 5. Install emulators/linux-c6. > > That should be enough in most circumstances. If you experience > difficulties, > please be sure to expand step 1 to: > > 1a. Remove all ports which depend on linux base port. > 1b. Remove linux base port. > 1c. Clean /compat/linux/ directory. > > Should you encounter any other difficulties not fixed by these extended > steps, please submit an issue report in Bugzilla and send an email > to FreeBSD's > emulation@ mailing list.date to linux_base-c6 > > I will be following the same upgrade path, & as a guaranteed noob, I have a question about step 1 above. I noticed no clean/clear/remove entries in /usr/ports/Makefile, what do I do, just 'rm -fr' the offending directory ? Please advise .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 16:30:58 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B487F34C for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:30:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from new1-smtp.messagingengine.com (new1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84BC3644 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:30:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by gateway2.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B10E334D4 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 12:30:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web6 ([10.202.2.216]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 30 Sep 2014 12:30:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:x-sasl-enc:from:to :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to :references:subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=XGNHAgiJYNK9/Fos6xOBQN00 4sQ=; b=tJSeHlp1P1bRi6GwpTF/ppn9VgXFy0Z8H9ZU5qerGYPve5ZDetB12q/K S81W2i2jc2a6lpn50EloWHuPgumW9Cc+1RkGDWuRflDJZ+cnOpTWllHYx5O/oPc0 tkSMS4fZKGXKuCSVTQr10jP5N35ipeeLO6Y4G8XqfBfmlCyS7Ms= Received: by web6.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 794F65BC40; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 12:30:56 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1412094656.1674816.173521569.0D7E38F8@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: lzF5l1KL7u9ou13gb9V+NiqSuHZIPqQpvLcpPNiPAVb9 1412094656 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-3bf5bee3 In-Reply-To: <542ACBE9.4090304@bananmonarki.se> References: <20140930110034.a637ab6d.freebsd@edvax.de> <20140930152801.cd7a2a5e.freebsd@edvax.de> <542AC600.1090600@freebsd.org> <542ACBE9.4090304@bananmonarki.se> Subject: Re: Bash Shellshock Bug Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 11:30:56 -0500 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:30:58 -0000 On Tue, Sep 30, 2014, at 10:27, Bernt Hansson wrote: > I want to install kicad but getting this error: > > root@kw:/usr/ports # make clean > Child process pid=41973 terminated abnormally: Segmentation fault: 11 > "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 1222: warning: > "/usr/local/sbin/pkg-static ver > sion -t 1.3.8 1.3.8" returned non-zero status > > pkkng is crap > That's not a pkgng error. That's a make error. What FreeBSD version are you running? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 16:37:21 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DEFD6B1; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:37:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DB646A1; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:37:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8UGbJ4j069839 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Sep 2014 10:37:19 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id s8UGbJwk069836; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 10:37:19 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 10:37:19 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Subject: Re: update to linux_base-c6 In-Reply-To: <542ACB7E.4000206@hiwaay.net> Message-ID: References: <9e6b9502ba9292e68de94878bf405409@dweimer.net> <542ACB7E.4000206@hiwaay.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 30 Sep 2014 10:37:19 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:37:21 -0000 On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > I will be following the same upgrade path, & as a guaranteed noob, I have a > question about step 1 above. I noticed no clean/clear/remove entries in > /usr/ports/Makefile, what do I do, just 'rm -fr' the offending directory ? No, never do that. Let pkg manage those files, that is what it does. pkg delete -f linux_base-f10 linux-f10-\* From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 17:29:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E15CA9F for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:29:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-x229.google.com (mail-qa0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB3B0D88 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:29:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id v10so1561692qac.14 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 10:29:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsd.com.br; s=capeta; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=eMkbdpYRZCDRwFQQuwG0lCls7u1te/4NbyofouOVWxQ=; b=II93tmSvp1UUj/8/8GI8rCTtMUwziPCvktANnLi9ofhix61I5noZ4UQmJAH0576mh1 DfNMZNGImk1W1ApEqdbbIPKw5PkXCUHSQnKmGg6aXDFXK26DMrwYBYkcdxDRh0xh8DjC syaSeilJ+cvV7RI+0tpZiD1rBlWxhQWr7aRRI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=eMkbdpYRZCDRwFQQuwG0lCls7u1te/4NbyofouOVWxQ=; b=l8odcIBKqfoapnkM7IeAqLjADiNTG1IBoUxifJTEMFz2hf1PPpsmjvkum47KkEKNML fDN+h3V2TGF6aRvCSEGGVjJN2H/Q1G0KkMDJig1v/CpZgzF1G8bHMlCjSzZL/uXkfrug 5kRN/bag9pXbn++bWg7V722o0Iw/jOYJSHWgdN2zmLSMkt1j3viPgqaTEPWbQCnIzNKa MEqyn/ORUbsrR28fEZj1qxI75jIcV4TH703XuCHXDUPxrfV4t0v7X8vkmocWJ8ZYk/dy 7thSttqy/lCC5oUGZgTG4SAZeyTzFSZLLl9TuHwt1ufWTQO/A/FzulxJJo5eDaKT8DSk X+rQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkcKvDDkqlHV7hFehElSPoqkcVmdisSCrlZuWQDsYbVmUD7HBkSARRELYRg94iZqUnibL8+ MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.51.104 with SMTP id t95mr77534559qga.31.1412098174639; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 10:29:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.109.129 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 10:29:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5429FFA3.7030200@sentex.net> References: <20140929100937.0527cbae.freebsd@edvax.de> <5429579A.7030501@ShaneWare.Biz> <20140929172329.08163a41.freebsd@edvax.de> <20140929183655.361534e8@Papi> <5429FFA3.7030200@sentex.net> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:29:34 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: BASH Shellshock and FreeBSD 4.X From: Mario Lobo To: Mike Tancsa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: freebsd-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:29:39 -0000 Thanks :) ! 2014-09-29 21:56 GMT-03:00 Mike Tancsa : > On 9/29/2014 5:36 PM, Mario Lobo wrote: > >> for i in $(jot -w %03d 25); do >> for i in $(jot -w %03d 25);do patch -p0 < ../bash43-$i; done >> > > Hi, > there are 27 patches now. > > ---Mike > > -- > ------------------- > Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 > Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net > Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net > Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ > -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since version 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99,7% winfoes FREE) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 17:44:45 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 074A0546; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:44:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD4E5F6F; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:44:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-75-189.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.75.189]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40DC13CD64; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 19:44:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s8UHieiK002068; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 19:44:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 19:44:40 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Matthew Seaman Subject: Re: Bash Shellshock Bug Message-Id: <20140930194440.5f2cdb44.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <542AC600.1090600@freebsd.org> References: <20140930110034.a637ab6d.freebsd@edvax.de> <20140930152801.cd7a2a5e.freebsd@edvax.de> <542AC600.1090600@freebsd.org> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:44:45 -0000 On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:02:24 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 09/30/14 14:28, Polytropon wrote: > > Again note: Make a backup (!) of your current /usr/ports > > tree before you start! Updating the ports tree is possible, > > but probably you don't even have portsnap on FreeBSD 6 yet. > > I'm not sure when it has been introduced, but I assume it > > was somewhere betweeen FreeBSD 7 and 8... > > > > This is how you would do it: > > > > # portsnap fetch update > > # cd /usr/ports/shells/bash > > # make deinstall > > # make > > # make reinstall > > > > If you have any other means to update your ports tree (CVS > > was the standard at FreeBSD 6, I don't know if this is still > > supported, as FreeBSD now uses Subversion), you could also > > try the equivalent with binary packages: > > > > # portsnap fetch update > > # portupgrade -P bash > > > Neither of these approaches will work with the current ports tree on > anything older than FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE. You'll get syntax errors while > trying to parse the Makefiles used in the ports certainly because of a > change in the way you tell make to map strings to upper or lower case > (eg. ${VAR:L} changed to ${VAR:tl}) and quite possibly for other reasons. That was my initial fear - the ports infrastructure has changed in a way that it probably won't work on older versions. Thanks for confirming this fear. So working with the ports tree is out of scope, and probably there won't be most recent binary packages (for use with pkg_add) available... So it seems that building from source "off the track" might be the only solution here. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 19:07:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19C55474; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 19:07:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFEC0BBF; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 19:07:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-76-150.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.150]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s8UJ7Nux021155 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:07:23 -0500 Message-ID: <542B00E2.8030609@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:13:38 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: update to linux_base-c6 References: <9e6b9502ba9292e68de94878bf405409@dweimer.net> <542ACB7E.4000206@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 19:07:26 -0000 On 09/30/14 11:37, Warren Block wrote: > On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > >> I will be following the same upgrade path, & as a guaranteed noob, I >> have a question about step 1 above. I noticed no clean/clear/remove >> entries in /usr/ports/Makefile, what do I do, just 'rm -fr' the >> offending directory ? > > No, never do that. Let pkg manage those files, that is what it does. > > pkg delete -f linux_base-f10 linux-f10-\* > I'm talking about the ports versions, particularly the flash plugin, which is handled by ports, not pkg .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 19:27:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8AF7B54 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 19:27:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from new1-smtp.messagingengine.com (new1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7868BE04 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 19:27:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by gateway2.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D6EE3CE for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:27:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web6 ([10.202.2.216]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:27:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:x-sasl-enc:from:to :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to :references:subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=zg0byX70Lt448fMudBGPfc24 3xQ=; b=s9yUp4OxAgLv/cAP1cFYN0MnLXQfMZsXNvnLCOc3qKxk5ItKplNuqZyw iONCIblHldXkN/Nd7oD9eSETB/JHD8EzHx0AI32EiGevyRfrq7QmdZE7VMcDK9rt wsyoGcSRKH1/6kYLwwuj9CJ9io+sNhaLRKwCQ0y1EtLbE2a3bFw= Received: by web6.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id E6C125C0B2; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:27:37 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1412105257.1725323.173592133.6054EA5E@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: qn3Soyp2bK+4wwbAzIjE/wPf2gtHsexM4T3Tb5cRvMGZ 1412105257 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-3bf5bee3 In-Reply-To: <20140930194440.5f2cdb44.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20140930110034.a637ab6d.freebsd@edvax.de> <20140930152801.cd7a2a5e.freebsd@edvax.de> <542AC600.1090600@freebsd.org> <20140930194440.5f2cdb44.freebsd@edvax.de> Subject: Re: Bash Shellshock Bug Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:27:37 -0500 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 19:27:39 -0000 On Tue, Sep 30, 2014, at 12:44, Polytropon wrote: > > That was my initial fear - the ports infrastructure has > changed in a way that it probably won't work on older > versions. Thanks for confirming this fear. So working > with the ports tree is out of scope, and probably there > won't be most recent binary packages (for use with pkg_add) > available... > > So it seems that building from source "off the track" > might be the only solution here. > > FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE has been EoL since July 31, 2012. Were you unaware that the ports tree will change to use new features and break for EoL releases? Were you unaware 8.2-RELEASE is completely EoL? Is there anything the project can do to better communicate these changes and timelines? I don't think anyone likes seeing end users stuck in these situations; your feedback will be appreciated. FYI -- whatever your're using the server for should* work if you simply bump the kernel and world to 8.4-RELEASE. If you just go that far you can use the modern ports tree after converting to pkgng with the pkg2ng tool. * Never say never, but anything that ran on older 8.x should run just fine on newer 8.x. This is not just a goal, but a rule the developers strive to uphold. If a change broke compatibility it wouldn't be permitted in a newer RELEASE of the same major version. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 20:12:12 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52558848; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:12:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04E1468F; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:12:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8UKC3Mv020130 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:12:03 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id s8UKC3Io020127; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:12:03 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:12:03 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Subject: Re: update to linux_base-c6 In-Reply-To: <542B00E2.8030609@hiwaay.net> Message-ID: References: <9e6b9502ba9292e68de94878bf405409@dweimer.net> <542ACB7E.4000206@hiwaay.net> <542B00E2.8030609@hiwaay.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:12:04 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:12:12 -0000 On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > On 09/30/14 11:37, Warren Block wrote: >> On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> >>> I will be following the same upgrade path, & as a guaranteed noob, I have >>> a question about step 1 above. I noticed no clean/clear/remove entries in >>> /usr/ports/Makefile, what do I do, just 'rm -fr' the offending directory ? >> >> No, never do that. Let pkg manage those files, that is what it does. >> >> pkg delete -f linux_base-f10 linux-f10-\* >> > > > I'm talking about the ports versions, particularly the flash plugin, which is > handled by ports, not pkg .... pkg is responsible for installing and deinstalling ports (which are, after they have been built, packages). If you mean directories like /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f10, that is handled by whatever tool is used to update the ports tree, svn or portsnap. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 20:15:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04A67CBE; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:15:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C097B6D7; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:15:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-76-150.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.150]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s8UKFNku005212 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:15:24 -0500 Message-ID: <542B10D2.6040107@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:21:38 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warren Block Subject: Re: update to linux_base-c6 References: <9e6b9502ba9292e68de94878bf405409@dweimer.net> <542ACB7E.4000206@hiwaay.net> <542B00E2.8030609@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:15:26 -0000 On 09/30/14 15:12, Warren Block wrote: > On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > >> On 09/30/14 11:37, Warren Block wrote: >>> On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >>> >>>> I will be following the same upgrade path, & as a guaranteed noob, >>>> I have a question about step 1 above. I noticed no >>>> clean/clear/remove entries in /usr/ports/Makefile, what do I do, >>>> just 'rm -fr' the offending directory ? >>> >>> No, never do that. Let pkg manage those files, that is what it does. >>> >>> pkg delete -f linux_base-f10 linux-f10-\* >>> >> >> >> I'm talking about the ports versions, particularly the flash plugin, >> which is handled by ports, not pkg .... > > pkg is responsible for installing and deinstalling ports (which are, > after they have been built, packages). > > If you mean directories like /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f10, that > is handled by whatever tool is used to update the ports tree, svn or > portsnap. > Hmmmmm .... OK .... Remember, *noob*, *noob*, *noob* !!!! -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 20:27:14 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1A0D37A; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:27:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB6DF8D3; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:27:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-76-150.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.150]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s8UKRCJ6013310 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:27:12 -0500 Message-ID: <542B1397.2050504@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:33:27 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: update to linux_base-c6 References: <9e6b9502ba9292e68de94878bf405409@dweimer.net> <542ACB7E.4000206@hiwaay.net> <542B00E2.8030609@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:27:14 -0000 On 09/30/14 15:12, Warren Block wrote: > On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > >> On 09/30/14 11:37, Warren Block wrote: >>> On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >>> >>>> I will be following the same upgrade path, & as a guaranteed noob, >>>> I have a question about step 1 above. I noticed no >>>> clean/clear/remove entries in /usr/ports/Makefile, what do I do, >>>> just 'rm -fr' the offending directory ? >>> >>> No, never do that. Let pkg manage those files, that is what it does. >>> >>> pkg delete -f linux_base-f10 linux-f10-\* >>> >> >> >> I'm talking about the ports versions, particularly the flash plugin, >> which is handled by ports, not pkg .... > > pkg is responsible for installing and deinstalling ports (which are, > after they have been built, packages). > > If you mean directories like /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f10, that > is handled by whatever tool is used to update the ports tree, svn or > portsnap. > Well .... after a bit of messing around, I determined that I couldn't find any linux-c6 packages for FBSD 9.3, so I went the ports route: [root@kabini1, /etc, 3:30:43pm] 588 % (cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-c6; make install clean); cd . ===> linux_base-c6-6.5 compat.linux.osrelease: 2.6.16 is not supported, please use 2.6.18, BEWARE this is highly experimental. *** [install] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-c6. [root@kabini1, /etc, 3:30:59pm] 589 % .... & didn't get very far :-/ .... Any clues for me ? TIA .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 22:27:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEFBFCA7 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 22:27:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63A99CFC for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 22:27:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-76-150.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.150]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s8UMRN0P022849 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:27:23 -0500 Message-ID: <542B2FC1.1040108@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:33:37 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: htop busted after recent pkg upgrade .... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 22:27:25 -0000 .... I did a 'pkg upgrade' yesterday, & now whenever I invoke htop from the XFCE desktop menu, it pops up (*very*) briefly, then disappears. No info in /var/log/'messages, no other clues .... FBSD 9.3, XFCE desktop: [root@kabini1, /etc, 5:30:20pm] 593 % uname -a FreeBSD kabini1.local 9.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE #0 r268512: Thu Jul 10 23:44:39 UTC 2014 root@snap.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 [root@kabini1, /etc, 5:32:38pm] 594 % grep xfce\- LIST.installed.txt gtk-xfce-engine-3.0.1_1 Xfce gtk theme engine xfce-4.10_6 The "meta-port" for the Xfce Desktop Environment [root@kabini1, /etc, 5:32:54pm] 595 % Any help appreciated .... TIA .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 23:59:29 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50602172 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 23:59:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29CF889F for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 23:59:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=RnqthGLM4JYALtinMZsKaqrjoV+d3xMZMCwllYwEHt0=; b=JlexZ/iREt4yDdtHdxPo+t9s9vlsGjP9QC9GkyXHIoxffa2+M2nf5PmFuOzEreXxYyAWEU5MJwsZo62Ki+lgY4mZSnXpRWE7zP1CTcU+OyKCml2b6bMwTs4e7vJ7b6kILco7G3JfBfB5UOivhJD+hmA/KvR8fGKqRB0hBEgyXyQ=; Received: from [182.1.53.165] (port=32660 helo=X220.alogt.com) by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (SSLv3:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1XZ7KJ-00141T-O2; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:59:28 -0600 Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 07:59:17 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Subject: Re: htop busted after recent pkg upgrade .... Message-ID: <20141001075917.6df8388f@X220.alogt.com> In-Reply-To: <542B2FC1.1040108@hiwaay.net> References: <542B2FC1.1040108@hiwaay.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id: erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: FreeBSD Questions !!!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 23:59:29 -0000 Hi, what happens when you start htop directly from a xterm & co? Erich On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:33:37 -0500 "William A. Mahaffey III" wrote: > > > .... I did a 'pkg upgrade' yesterday, & now whenever I invoke htop > from the XFCE desktop menu, it pops up (*very*) briefly, then > disappears. No info in /var/log/'messages, no other clues .... FBSD > 9.3, XFCE desktop: > > [root@kabini1, /etc, 5:30:20pm] 593 % uname -a > FreeBSD kabini1.local 9.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE #0 r268512: Thu > Jul 10 23:44:39 UTC 2014 > root@snap.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > [root@kabini1, /etc, 5:32:38pm] 594 % grep xfce\- LIST.installed.txt > gtk-xfce-engine-3.0.1_1 Xfce gtk theme engine > xfce-4.10_6 The "meta-port" for the Xfce Desktop > Environment > [root@kabini1, /etc, 5:32:54pm] 595 % > > Any help appreciated .... TIA .... > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 1 00:23:12 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68B7553E for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 00:23:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34A04B6A for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 00:23:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-76-150.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.150]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s910NAjV011021 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 19:23:10 -0500 Message-ID: <542B4AE5.3020906@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 19:29:25 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: Re: htop busted after recent pkg upgrade .... References: <542B2FC1.1040108@hiwaay.net> <20141001075917.6df8388f@X220.alogt.com> In-Reply-To: <20141001075917.6df8388f@X220.alogt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 00:23:12 -0000 On 09/30/14 18:59, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > what happens when you start htop directly from a xterm & co? > > Erich > > On Tue, 30 > Sep 2014 17:33:37 -0500 "William A. Mahaffey III" > wrote: > >> >> .... I did a 'pkg upgrade' yesterday, & now whenever I invoke htop >> from the XFCE desktop menu, it pops up (*very*) briefly, then >> disappears. No info in /var/log/'messages, no other clues .... FBSD >> 9.3, XFCE desktop: >> >> [root@kabini1, /etc, 5:30:20pm] 593 % uname -a >> FreeBSD kabini1.local 9.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE #0 r268512: Thu >> Jul 10 23:44:39 UTC 2014 >> root@snap.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 >> [root@kabini1, /etc, 5:32:38pm] 594 % grep xfce\- LIST.installed.txt >> gtk-xfce-engine-3.0.1_1 Xfce gtk theme engine >> xfce-4.10_6 The "meta-port" for the Xfce Desktop >> Environment >> [root@kabini1, /etc, 5:32:54pm] 595 % >> >> Any help appreciated .... TIA .... >> >> from an rxvt shell: [root@kabini1, /etc, 6:47:30pm] 597 % htop Error: could not read procfs (compiled to look in /compat/linux/proc). [root@kabini1, /etc, 7:25:54pm] 598 % which explains it .... I am midstroke on (trying to) shift from linux-f10 to linux-c6 ports/pkgs for linux compatibility, & I deinstalled all of the linux-f10 stuff (which recommended removing the above dir as well as the linuxprocfs) :-) .... problem solved, thx. Now if I could just get some resolution on my linux-c6 problem :-/ .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 1 00:33:36 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47F45722 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 00:33:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8879C47 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 00:33:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s910XYW4084957 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Sep 2014 18:33:34 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id s910XYCO084954; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 18:33:34 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 18:33:34 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Subject: Re: update to linux_base-c6 In-Reply-To: <542B1397.2050504@hiwaay.net> Message-ID: References: <9e6b9502ba9292e68de94878bf405409@dweimer.net> <542ACB7E.4000206@hiwaay.net> <542B00E2.8030609@hiwaay.net> <542B1397.2050504@hiwaay.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 30 Sep 2014 18:33:34 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 00:33:36 -0000 On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > Well .... after a bit of messing around, I determined that I couldn't find > any linux-c6 packages for FBSD 9.3, so I went the ports route: > > [root@kabini1, /etc, 3:30:43pm] 588 % (cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-c6; > make install clean); cd . > ===> linux_base-c6-6.5 compat.linux.osrelease: 2.6.16 is not supported, > please use 2.6.18, BEWARE this is highly experimental. > *** [install] Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-c6. > [root@kabini1, /etc, 3:30:59pm] 589 % > > .... & didn't get very far :-/ .... Any clues for me ? TIA .... Always, yes *always*, read /usr/ports/UPDATING before updating or installing new ports. The 20140922 entry pertains to the c6 ports. There is more, but this particular problem means to run # sysctl compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.18 and add compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.18 to /etc/sysctl.conf. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 1 00:35:40 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04ECB7BE for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 00:35:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C15D3C5B for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 00:35:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-76-150.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.150]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s910Za2a015282 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Sep 2014 19:35:38 -0500 Message-ID: <542B4DCF.9030800@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 19:41:51 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warren Block Subject: Re: update to linux_base-c6 References: <9e6b9502ba9292e68de94878bf405409@dweimer.net> <542ACB7E.4000206@hiwaay.net> <542B00E2.8030609@hiwaay.net> <542B1397.2050504@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 00:35:40 -0000 On 09/30/14 19:33, Warren Block wrote: > On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> Well .... after a bit of messing around, I determined that I couldn't >> find any linux-c6 packages for FBSD 9.3, so I went the ports route: >> >> [root@kabini1, /etc, 3:30:43pm] 588 % (cd >> /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-c6; make install clean); cd . >> ===> linux_base-c6-6.5 compat.linux.osrelease: 2.6.16 is not >> supported, please use 2.6.18, BEWARE this is highly experimental. >> *** [install] Error code 1 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-c6. >> [root@kabini1, /etc, 3:30:59pm] 589 % >> >> .... & didn't get very far :-/ .... Any clues for me ? TIA .... > > Always, yes *always*, read /usr/ports/UPDATING before updating or > installing new ports. The 20140922 entry pertains to the c6 ports. > There is more, but this particular problem means to run > > # sysctl compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.18 > > and add > > compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.18 > > to /etc/sysctl.conf. > Thx, I had added it to my sysctl.conf, but forgot to run the command :-/ .... Noobs .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 1 05:27:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EECE61A85; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 05:27:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70C9B3B4; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 05:27:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.news4all.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id s915RLFu093681; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 07:27:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Message-ID: <542B90B9.6020204@bananmonarki.se> Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 07:27:21 +0200 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Felder , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bash Shellshock Bug References: <20140930110034.a637ab6d.freebsd@edvax.de> <20140930152801.cd7a2a5e.freebsd@edvax.de> <542AC600.1090600@freebsd.org> <542ACBE9.4090304@bananmonarki.se> <1412094656.1674816.173521569.0D7E38F8@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <1412094656.1674816.173521569.0D7E38F8@webmail.messagingengine.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 05:27:27 -0000 On 2014-09-30 18:30, Mark Felder wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014, at 10:27, Bernt Hansson wrote: >> I want to install kicad but getting this error: >> >> root@kw:/usr/ports # make clean >> Child process pid=41973 terminated abnormally: Segmentation fault: 11 >> "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 1222: warning: >> "/usr/local/sbin/pkg-static ver >> sion -t 1.3.8 1.3.8" returned non-zero status >> >> pkkng is crap >> > > That's not a pkgng error. That's a make error. What FreeBSD version are > you running? 9.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.3-PRERELEASE #1 r266465 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 1 06:43:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2636C82; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 06:43:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A347FE5E; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 06:43:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-75-189.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.75.189]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE1B13CD86; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 08:43:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s916h8U5002041; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 08:43:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 08:43:08 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Mark Felder Subject: Re: Bash Shellshock Bug Message-Id: <20141001084308.9fe29bbc.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <1412105257.1725323.173592133.6054EA5E@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <20140930110034.a637ab6d.freebsd@edvax.de> <20140930152801.cd7a2a5e.freebsd@edvax.de> <542AC600.1090600@freebsd.org> <20140930194440.5f2cdb44.freebsd@edvax.de> <1412105257.1725323.173592133.6054EA5E@webmail.messagingengine.com> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 06:43:12 -0000 On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:27:37 -0500, Mark Felder wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014, at 12:44, Polytropon wrote: > > > > That was my initial fear - the ports infrastructure has > > changed in a way that it probably won't work on older > > versions. Thanks for confirming this fear. So working > > with the ports tree is out of scope, and probably there > > won't be most recent binary packages (for use with pkg_add) > > available... > > > > So it seems that building from source "off the track" > > might be the only solution here. > > > > > > FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE has been EoL since July 31, 2012. Were you unaware > that the ports tree will change to use new features and break for EoL > releases? The initial question was about 6.2, not 8.2, and earlier, even a 4.x question regarding the same problem has been asked. :-) For example, with pkg becoming the default, I knew that there would be problems, as older build systems cannot satisfy the new needs (Makefile changes, new database). Additionally, the options framework also has been adjusted, so that would also cause incompatibilities... > I don't think anyone likes seeing end users stuck in these situations; > your feedback will be appreciated. I haven't tested building bash "off the track", but it seems to be the only (at least) possible thing to try, it _could_ work. Using the system's means (ports, packages) probably won't work at all. So I hope the OP will be successful getting the current bash version, even though with "nonstandard means". :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 1 11:56:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D28926C2 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 11:56:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x22c.google.com (mail-la0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4722C931 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 11:56:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f44.google.com with SMTP id gb8so165815lab.17 for ; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 04:56:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2mm0lwJEEfTdtgaaOhh76VQEgvMQjoCwLsxqDExdiVw=; b=wxirpzWZw7rU2k9mWsZpyZw5cq7QbhtYw+wkGk6gfM8GJ21SOdcxD2G2eZfLybt7uN M8B1qaRp59I1PCNy0lObKUcxmXKvKITL4NSeQU1xAfSpkgyf6qLa1Ij+KCkiGDK9G76S hf4CGp5xxb3A4+xJU5t1XYut2hVVa/HMfb3wqxPprn5hU0jPgq7h9b6mjH3EDYvUlXdd e6ebVAqMGnDiWZJzlJ75C/jCBL8J68iaeDU0D/5WaVbHO8UsJcrpPMZEj9t0yozfHPPk qVyuktQSmV4N0ORZ2UWa8i+2SBMNN3+qx0ghhDsoZZoYI6G4iIZN2L0TaIqFYBA6UWzV /dIA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.203.167 with SMTP id kr7mr54832513lac.9.1412164594615; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 04:56:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.19.6 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 04:56:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <23187F4C-0413-4F84-9C86-6EC1084C794C@btinternet.com> <50282.76.192.184.214.1411925201.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 07:56:34 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: freebsd-update question From: "firmdog@gmail.com" To: Axel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , galtsev , FF , Dave X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 11:56:38 -0000 I am confused now. Here is what I did to try and upgrade from 8.3 to 8.4 on Amazon AWS where the freebsd AMI's use XENHVM: setenv PACKAGESITE ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-stable/Latest/ pkg_add -r subversion svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/8 /usr/src svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head /usr/ports svn up /usr/src && svn up /usr/ports cd /usr/src make buildworld make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DXENHVM make installkernel KERNCONF=3DXENHVM make installworld mergemaster -Ui reboot BEFORE: 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0 AFTER: 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0 r272337M What am I doing wrong?? On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 9:32 PM, firmdog@gmail.com wrot= e: > Thanks. My freebsd server is on Amazon AWS using > http://www.daemonology.net/freebsd-on-ec2/ > > A bit nervous because there is no local console. Just installed a new > test/obsolete 8.3 box and will try the upgrade to 8.4 using these > commands: > > > svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/8 /usr/src > cd /usr/src > make buildworld > make kernel > make installworld > mergemaster -Ui > reboot > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Axel wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 9:04 PM, firmdog@gmail.com >> wrote: >>> >>> OK. I will try that. Found these notes from 10 years ago. Gonna give >>> this a try, not sure if cvsup will work anymore.... >>> >>> >>> cvsup -g -L 2 update-file >>> >>> The update-file contains this: >>> >>> *default host=3Dcvsup11.us.FreeBSD.org >>> *default base=3D/var/db >>> *default prefix=3D/usr >>> *default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_8 >>> *default delete use-rel-suffix >>> src-all >>> ports-all tag=3D. >>> doc-all tag=3D. >>> >>> cd /usr/src >>> >>> make buildworld >>> >>> make buildkernel >>> >>> make installkernel >>> >>> mergemaster >>> >>> make installworld >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 2:36 PM, FF wrote: >>> > So your kernel won't be updated because you are running a custom kern= el. >>> > Your uname is based on the running kernel. >>> > >>> > If you want to confirm that you've in fact updated, you can reboot to >>> > the >>> > GENERIC kernel which will confirm you are at 8.4 or whatever. FreeBSD >>> > update >>> > is a binary update based on the release versions -- deviate from them >>> > and it >>> > doesn't break, but it can't touch those files. >>> > >>> > Since you know enough to put a custom kernel on there, you should fol= low >>> > the >>> > source rebuild instructions which would be basically be to svn down t= he >>> > whole 8.4 source tree, make the world, make the kernel and install it= , >>> > reboot, and install the world. >>> > >>> > I think the directions are in the FreeBSD handbook. >>> > >>> > Best, >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Valeri Galtsev >>> > >>> > wrote: >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Sun, September 28, 2014 10:01 am, firmdog@gmail.com wrote: >>> >> > I just installed a brand new 8.3 box and got the same behavior. I = see >>> >> > in my output below that I have to build or update my own kernel? >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > # uname -a >>> >> > FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0: Tue Apr 10 17:33:58 UT= C >>> >> > 2012 root@mynewhost:/usr/obj/i386/usr/src/sys/XENHVM i386 >>> >> > # >>> >> > >>> >> > Starting the upgrade attempt: >>> >> > >>> >> > # freebsd-update -r 8.4-RELEASE upgrade >>> >> > Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. >>> >> > Fetching public key from update6.freebsd.org... done. >>> >> > Fetching metadata signature for 8.3-RELEASE from >>> >> > update6.freebsd.org... >>> >> > done. >>> >> > Fetching metadata index... done. >>> >> > Fetching 2 metadata files... done. >>> >> > Inspecting system... done. >>> >> > >>> >> > WARNING: This system is running a "xenhvm" kernel, which is not a >>> >> > kernel configuration distributed as part of FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE. >>> >> > This kernel will not be updated: you MUST update the kernel manual= ly >>> >> > before running "/usr/sbin/freebsd-update install". >>> >> > >>> >> > The following components of FreeBSD seem to be installed: >>> >> > src/base src/bin src/cddl src/contrib src/crypto src/etc src/games >>> >> > src/gnu src/include src/krb5 src/lib src/libexec src/release >>> >> > src/rescue >>> >> > src/sbin src/secure src/share src/sys src/tools src/ubin src/usbin >>> >> > world/base world/dict world/doc world/games world/info world/manpa= ges >>> >> > world/proflibs >>> >> > >>> >> > The following components of FreeBSD do not seem to be installed: >>> >> > kernel/generic world/catpages >>> >> > >>> >> > Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y >>> >> > >>> >> > Fetching metadata signature for 8.4-RELEASE from >>> >> > update6.freebsd.org... >>> >> > done. >>> >> > Fetching metadata index... done. >>> >> > Fetching 1 metadata patches. done. >>> >> > Applying metadata patches... done. >>> >> > Fetching 1 metadata files... done. >>> >> > Inspecting system... done. >>> >> > Fetching files from 8.3-RELEASE for merging... done. >>> >> > Preparing to download files... >>> >> > done. >>> >> > Fetching 32149 >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > patches.....10....20....30....40....50....60....70....80....90....= 100....110....120....130....140....150....160....170....180.... >>> >> > SNIP=E2=80=A6. >>> >> > done. >>> >> > Applying patches... >>> >> > Fetching 778 files... done. >>> >> > Attempting to automatically merge changes in files... done. >>> >> > >>> >> > The following file could not be merged automatically: >>> >> > /etc/mail/freebsd.cf >>> >> > Press Enter to edit this file in vi and resolve the conflicts >>> >> > manually... >>> >> > >>> >> > Then a bunch more of /etc/mail files and also a merge of >>> >> > /etc/master.passwd: >>> >> > >>> >> > Then this: >>> >> > >>> >> > The following files will be updated as part of updating to >>> >> > 8.4-RELEASE-p16: >>> >> > >>> >> > Then I run this: >>> >> > >>> >> > # freebsd-update install >>> >> > Installing updates... >>> >> > Kernel updates have been installed. Please reboot and run >>> >> > "/usr/sbin/freebsd-update install" again to finish installing >>> >> > updates. >>> >> > >>> >> > # reboot >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >> In last message before reboot it instructed to "reboot then run >>> >> >>> >> /usr/sbin/freebsd-update install >>> >> >>> >> again". Did you run "freebsd-update install" after reboot? >>> >> >>> >> Valeri >>> >> >>> >> > >>> >> > #uname -a >>> >> > FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0: Tue Apr 10 17:33:58 UT= C >>> >> > 2012 root@mynewhost:/usr/obj/i386/usr/src/sys/XENHVM i386 >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 5:06 AM, FF wrote: >>> >> >> Can you provide the output of those commands? Freebsd-update is >>> >> >> usually >>> >> >> pretty good about telling you what's wrong. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Thanks >>> >> >> >>> >> >> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 3:02 PM, firmdog@gmail.com >>> >> >> >>> >> >> wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Yes I ran freebsd-update install. Then I rebooted. Then I did it >>> >> >>> again. >>> >> >>> Still at 8.3 >>> >> >>> On Sep 27, 2014 2:37 PM, "Dave" >>> >> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > On 27 September 2014 18:22:15 BST, "firmdog@gmail.com" >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >>> > wrote: >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Hi, >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Trying to use freebsd-update to go from 8.3 to 8.4 and I am >>> >> >>> >> doing >>> >> >>> this: >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> # freebsd-update -r 8.4-RELEASE upgrade >>> >> >>> >> # freebsd-update install >>> >> >>> >> # reboot >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> After reboot I am still at 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0 >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> What am I doing wrong? >>> >> >>> >> ------------------------------ >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> >> >>> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> >> >>> >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> >> >>> >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> > Don't you need run rub "freebsd-update install"? >>> >> >>> > -- >>> >> >>> > Dave >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >>> > GPG/PGP ID: CDB94DA1 >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >> >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> >> >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> >> >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> >> >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> -- >>> >> >> FF >>> >> > _______________________________________________ >>> >> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> >> > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> >> Valeri Galtsev >>> >> Sr System Administrator >>> >> Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics >>> >> Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics >>> >> University of Chicago >>> >> Phone: 773-702-4247 >>> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > FF >> >> >> Hi, >> CVS is now deprecated. Please use SVN instead if you prefer to follow th= e >> manual upgrade process [1] >> FreeBSD-update tool upgrades (binary upgrades) your base system and GENE= RIC >> kernel only. It syncs sources too. >> So you need to rebuild your custom kernel after the process. [2] >> >> Kind regards. >> Alexandre >> >> [1] http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/svn.html >> [2] >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.htm= l From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 1 12:15:43 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19C9DC36 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 12:15:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from forward1l.mail.yandex.net (forward1l.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1819::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Certum Level IV CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF87ABB9 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 12:15:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp12.mail.yandex.net (smtp12.mail.yandex.net [95.108.131.191]) by forward1l.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 0AE4115214FF for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 16:15:39 +0400 (MSK) Received: from smtp12.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp12.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id A3C8616A0097 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 16:15:39 +0400 (MSK) Received: from 78.108.204.68.tel.ru (78.108.204.68.tel.ru [78.108.204.68]) by smtp12.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id XCqvnxQvrx-Fdo4hLAj; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 16:15:39 +0400 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) X-Yandex-Uniq: b06fcde3-39e7-4fe5-b322-b3858029a134 Message-ID: <542BF06B.1070603@passap.ru> Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 16:15:39 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov Organization: =?UTF-8?B?0JfQkNCeICLQktCQ0KDQoiI=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: User and vendor packages (for pkg_* tools) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 12:15:43 -0000 Hi All, A user has License to use an App and uses pkgng. The vendor has only packages for pkg_* tools. What the user should do? Is there a tool to convert old packages to new format? Thank you. -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 1 12:33:36 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D5EBF12 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 12:33:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x230.google.com (mail-wg0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19396D9F for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 12:33:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id n12so269483wgh.19 for ; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 05:33:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:from:subject:to:content-type:mime-version:reply-to :organization:date; bh=TSa34KqG/4HOp5MuPxHDgJiQvIDDM+9JC0WrCNhua4c=; b=ag+Vq7RM9zuxnFHZi8BPxlO5YO+RUow6gD0zEa5REaFjgoK95jstsxr2u/AD2E5ag0 hm9hAD+dm6Zg2AtKo6x3HTKddku7MOQLU7BMKfHhYCdMXbXmdSHoVkbC0EqCdV39Kksq Udfgv+NYxtBlcTGfTVaZjx3hZiG/ilM2S4B5Tli5qsttnpQ1/YIFMua9o4NPXE+lzeqM WIKQUYMAt/qZTWm0fCncj8ZFOtcTo7mRwyHc0l7r+DKzMM0Mz0BPN/poNO13gnn3gun4 t16HxhFTrfLkWao2kuetiRia/nPCb9I/z183K4s4oayHu+Sl3WewFDvUE2KsnXqG/kJE wjFQ== X-Received: by 10.194.177.226 with SMTP id ct2mr60881402wjc.20.1412166813736; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 05:33:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from IGLD-84-229-32-170.inter.net.il (IGLD-84-229-32-170.inter.net.il. [84.229.32.170]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id s1sm18445562wiw.6.2014.10.01.05.33.31 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Oct 2014 05:33:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <542bf49c.814db40a.1588.ffff894c@mx.google.com> From: "Rotem Hecht" Subject: Music composer for Tv commercials video games and films To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: "info@rotemmusic.com" Organization: Rotem Hecht Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 14:33:36 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 12:33:36 -0000 =EF=BB=BFHi=20 =20 How are you?=20 My Name is Rotem Hecht and I am a professional music composer and soun= d designer. I'm based in Israel but currently work from Los Angeles CA and deliver= projects to production companies from all parts of the world. I composing original music for movies ,Tv commercials , video games ,e= vents, corporate films etc.=20 In my portfolio you will find projects I did for Microsoft, Hershey's,= Kre-O, Hasbro, Mercedes, Audi, Nickelodeon, Hop! TV Channel and many = more. I=E2=80=99m capable of delivering high quality products at decent rate= s and in short period of time. I would be glad to offer my music services and experience. Please take a look at my portfolio website. www.rotemmusic.com Looking forward to hear from you soon. Sincerely , =20 =20 Rotem Hecht rotem@rotemmusic.com 972-528227726 Skype: rhecht1282 29/3 Uziel St. Ramat Gan Israel=20 =20 Please unsubscribe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 1 12:33:59 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C11DFFA9 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 12:33:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from new1-smtp.messagingengine.com (new1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93C56DAE for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 12:33:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by gateway2.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F06A196A for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 08:33:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web6 ([10.202.2.216]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 01 Oct 2014 08:33:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:x-sasl-enc:from:to :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to :references:subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=PwB2XMS8r673yWRcZEk7G/Z/ srU=; b=Vd5FylfUO9c44f2uJm5v9b3V39A3YfBL5xCp5c8deB42Rab2Sm0vIYnV V3MfSfkBpNniXDOXNOdWTBxQmzSW7qBWRPApVbgjtNgqCKfZ1LjYZkimcrNiaDTK GHTl6XvEQOgq5olszABMTxqAxkFcVqdmDlFT3KvZHsJ7DsNhusg= Received: by web6.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id F2DC25CF77; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 08:33:57 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1412166837.1994524.173874785.5FEDC463@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: KQqUA3QMfV6ERzjdOfeyzasUR03JyXQEBMDK4msPDvjj 1412166837 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-3bf5bee3 In-Reply-To: <542BF06B.1070603@passap.ru> References: <542BF06B.1070603@passap.ru> Subject: Re: User and vendor packages (for pkg_* tools) Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 07:33:57 -0500 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 12:33:59 -0000 On Wed, Oct 1, 2014, at 07:15, Boris Samorodov wrote: > Hi All, > > A user has License to use an App and uses pkgng. The vendor has > only packages for pkg_* tools. > > What the user should do? Is there a tool to convert old packages to > new format? > There is no such tool. You would have to manually convert it to the new package format by making a port for it. I think a skeleton port that asked the user a few questions could do this automatically. I will consider taking a stab at this, but I will have to locate an example to test with. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 1 14:11:36 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11690559 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 14:11:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DUB004-OMC2S1.hotmail.com (dub004-omc2s1.hotmail.com [157.55.1.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9528BC6E for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 14:11:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DUB408-EAS408 ([157.55.1.136]) by DUB004-OMC2S1.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22724); Wed, 1 Oct 2014 07:10:26 -0700 X-TMN: [j5oeCaWdhBPNwTC9WIN5GaoSAjKZp6qe] X-Originating-Email: [allenat1@live.co.uk] Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 From: allen harris To: "=?utf-8?Q?freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org?=" Subject: =?utf-8?Q?log_in_and_password.?= Importance: Normal Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 13:54:37 +0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Oct 2014 14:10:26.0211 (UTC) FILETIME=[72B66730:01CFDD81] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 14:11:36 -0000 DQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQpTZW50IGZyb20gV2luZG93cyBNYWlsDQoNCmltIGEgbmV3YmllIGF0IHRo aXMgc29ydCBvZiBjb21wdXRpbmcgLCBidXQgd2lsbGluZyB0byBsZWFybiB0aHJvdWdoIHRyaWFs IGFuZCBlcnJvciwgYnV0IHRoZXNlIGRhbW4gaW1hZ2VzIGFyZSBkcml2aW5nIG1lIG1hZC4gSSBm b2xsb3cgYWxsIHRoZSBpbnN0cnVjdGlvbnMgd29yZCBmb3Igd29yZCwgZXZlcnl0aGluZyBnb2Vz IHNtb290aCB1bnRpbCBpdCBhc2tzIGZvciBhIGxvZ2luIGFmdGVyIGl0IHJlYm9vdHMgLHRvIGtl ZXAgdGhpbmdzIGVhc3kgaWQgdXNlZCB0aGUgc2FtZSB3b3JkIGZvciBsb2dpbiBhbmQgcGFzc3dv cmQgYW5kIHJvb3QgcGFzc3dvcmQgc28gSSB0aG91Z2h0IEkgY291bGRuJ3QgZ28gd3JvbmcgYnkg Zm9yZ2V0dGluZyB3aGljaCB3YXMgd2hpY2jigKYuLiBjbGV2ZXIgSSB0aG91Z2h0IHJpZ2h0IHVw IHRvIHRoZSBwb2ludCBvZiBlbnRlcmluZyBpdCBhbmQgYmVpbmcgcmVmdXNlZCB3aXRoIGFuIGlu Y29ycmVjdCBsb2dpbiByZW1hcmssIEkganVzdCBjYW50IHNlZSB0aGUgcG9pbnQgb2YgaW5zdGFs bGluZyBwYXNzd29yZCBwcm90ZWN0aW9uIG9mIG15IG93biBjaG9vc2luZyBpZiBpdHMgbm90IGdv aW5nIHRvIGdyYW50IG1lIGFjY2VzcyBhbnl3YXkgLCBzbyBpdmUgc2luY2UgdXNlZCBkaWZmZXJl bnQgd29yZHMgZm9yIHBhc3MgbG9naW4gZXRjIGJ1dCBhbHdheXMgdGhlIHNhbWUgcHJvYmxlbSBs b2dpbiBpbmNvcnJlY3QgLCB3aGF0IGFuZCB3aGVyZSBhbSBJIGdvaW5nIHdyb25nIGltIGF0IG15 IHdpdHMgZW5kIHBsZWFzZSBoZWxwIGJ1dCBkb24ndCBnZXQgdG8gdGVjaG5pY2FsIG9yIGVsc2Ug aXRsbCBnbyBvdmVyIG15IGhlYWQgLg== From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 1 14:23:08 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C381B4C for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 14:23:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D494DDE0 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 14:23:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-78-222.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.78.222]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F49527694; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 16:22:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s91EMvAG003195; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 16:22:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 16:22:57 +0200 From: Polytropon To: allen harris Subject: Re: log in and password. Message-Id: <20141001162257.9f9e0d70.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 14:23:08 -0000 On Wed, 1 Oct 2014 13:54:37 +0000, allen harris wrote: > Sent from Windows Mail Nice ad. How much do they pay you? ;-) > im a newbie at this sort of computing , but willing to > learn through trial and error, but these damn images > are driving me mad. I follow all the instructions word > for word, everything goes smooth until it asks for a > login after it reboots ,to keep things easy id used > the same word for login and password and root password > so I thought I couldn't go wrong by forgetting which > was whichā€¦.. clever I thought right up to the point of > entering it and being refused with an incorrect login > remark, I just cant see the point of installing password > protection of my own choosing if its not going to grant > me access anyway , so ive since used different words > for pass login etc but always the same problem login > incorrect , what and where am I going wrong im at my > wits end please help but don't get to technical or else > itll go over my head . Your question doesn't state clearly if you have forgotten your root password or a user password. In case it's about a user password, and you still have root access, you can reset the user's password by the command # passwd Enter a new password (twice). Remember that password, and you'll be able to login with that username again. But in case you lost the system administrator's password (root's password), things are a bit more complicated, which is intended though the security model of UNIX. In order to reset the root password, you need to switch your system to single user mode, either by entering # shutdown now from multi user mode (as root), _or_ starting the system with Boot: boot -s and _then_, after having arrived in single user mode (some- times called maintenance mode or maintenance shell) perform the following operation: # passwd root This will allow you to reset root's password without having to know it beforehand. NB: This is only possible if your console is set as "secure" (which is the default). See the FAQ entry here: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/faq/admin.html#idp59717152 As you can see, it's not complicated. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 1 15:19:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25036585 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 15:19:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from new1-smtp.messagingengine.com (new1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E879F692 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 15:19:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by gateway2.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F902777 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 11:19:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web6 ([10.202.2.216]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 01 Oct 2014 11:19:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:x-sasl-enc:from:to :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to :references:subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=dhGdeGIRx3tn7iGJVqkLCTKM iec=; b=sfZzHrWzndy4lTFRx7hSw4kUcy7GzKr2kFGUHI5ttGF7ATdA+e1am47S RCvNhCdq3k/EqzWtddQNsTtmZdSSpykhBh8YLUUxn9ShrD7sLM89FMaNyUK4sFsi AZmwWYt1xhgqyS1WtJDnqDTFB+f5zs80PBXoJG4oDF63ZXk2I44= Received: by web6.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 476A15A8F6; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 11:19:09 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1412176749.2422568.173948777.13E04B10@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: e5TezHVpx0kglaxU0i685Q6tbl+iaq7YSKjBnqJP3PVI 1412176749 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-3bf5bee3 In-Reply-To: <1412094656.1674816.173521569.0D7E38F8@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <20140930110034.a637ab6d.freebsd@edvax.de> <20140930152801.cd7a2a5e.freebsd@edvax.de> <542AC600.1090600@freebsd.org> <542ACBE9.4090304@bananmonarki.se> <1412094656.1674816.173521569.0D7E38F8@webmail.messagingengine.com> Subject: Re: Bash Shellshock Bug Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 10:19:09 -0500 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 15:19:17 -0000 On Tue, Sep 30, 2014, at 11:30, Mark Felder wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014, at 10:27, Bernt Hansson wrote: > > I want to install kicad but getting this error: > > > > root@kw:/usr/ports # make clean > > Child process pid=41973 terminated abnormally: Segmentation fault: 11 > > "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 1222: warning: > > "/usr/local/sbin/pkg-static ver > > sion -t 1.3.8 1.3.8" returned non-zero status > > > > pkkng is crap > > > > That's not a pkgng error. That's a make error. What FreeBSD version are > you running? Upon re-reading, that *is* possibly a pkg error. Does it always return non-zero? # /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static version -t 1.3.8 1.3.8 # echo $? Does that output 0 or something else? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 1 15:25:27 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF70995A for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 15:25:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91B5B7DF for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 15:25:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com (no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s91FPJBk042268 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 16:25:20 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=infracaninophile.co.uk DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk s91FPJBk042268 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1412177120; bh=FSILmEL1k5NCTh7RNuNcY6WGyxKKhFrxuh4MOAJhGS4=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; z=Date:=20Wed,=2001=20Oct=202014=2016:25:12=20+0100|From:=20Matthew =20Seaman=20|To:=20freebsd-questi ons@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20User=20and=20vendor=20packages=20 (for=20pkg_*=20tools)|References:=20<542BF06B.1070603@passap.ru>=2 0<1412166837.1994524.173874785.5FEDC463@webmail.messagingengine.co m>|In-Reply-To:=20<1412166837.1994524.173874785.5FEDC463@webmail.m essagingengine.com>; b=MVemnJhZDtN7cSkXG0zAfa0Eju5VwZ+q/vgdYsggeEfQCmdG/H1CoCFIFDDyReFc7 NQPN3/iGjbQy3aDBNMcSRuutIRuRYjuGR5e8eNesPuIhAIxD0DenzzCuPib3Jjlymv EmkqOHNNyHtu4FwZL5CLgDbuYG43rIY4UPb+1etg= X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged) claimed to be ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com Message-ID: <542C1CD8.4030907@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 16:25:12 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: User and vendor packages (for pkg_* tools) References: <542BF06B.1070603@passap.ru> <1412166837.1994524.173874785.5FEDC463@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <1412166837.1994524.173874785.5FEDC463@webmail.messagingengine.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Apxodr6ffcSoNrDID3CtQXrQOR6SxAfQX" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RDNS_NONE,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 15:25:28 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --Apxodr6ffcSoNrDID3CtQXrQOR6SxAfQX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10/01/14 13:33, Mark Felder wrote: > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014, at 07:15, Boris Samorodov wrote: >> > Hi All, >> >=20 >> > A user has License to use an App and uses pkgng. The vendor has >> > only packages for pkg_* tools. >> >=20 >> > What the user should do? Is there a tool to convert old packages to >> > new format? >> >=20 > There is no such tool. You would have to manually convert it to the new= > package format by making a port for it. I think a skeleton port that > asked the user a few questions could do this automatically. I will > consider taking a stab at this, but I will have to locate an example to= > test with. Actually there kind-of is such a tool. pkg-convert(8) It's not ideal, in that you have to install the old-style package *before* converting it. Making pkg-convert able to read either old- or new- style package tarballs and output to the alternate format tarball would be an interesting project. Nagging the vendor to produce new style packages likely to be more productive in the long run. Cheers, Matthew --Apxodr6ffcSoNrDID3CtQXrQOR6SxAfQX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ7BAEBCgBmBQJULBzfXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTnErsP93ln+LQTtPY9yUbe2oZdsM2B ff99eCdP5xjBrVI5cXHqsghrdc12cNMSZ5W6Id5lLw7EIqaJ1iQtudj/dHsxN2yD n0N9pJwenbskklZkYxRd2ceiqfOwYz+EmLhanbzHuY9KrpL/QVJaMvMRVLAtLMJ4 OmLuLZjt3l6EgfRg6GYmXKoAxdJbhQ/pYhVvBFdeh62RgAeYlDPJVWlMNNpuQKWk wbQmpaJdxrTYgnF2kyrcYJAqqKm8hfKXQe8ylzgcO5iT62p95v9s+Nf8Km8MQF2W qCmZ3PdoNmv6MCSAbGU95fb7Ev5ZbHqGrJCP0+P/kSjues5ueJqr5+YN6hGoptpA QX2zdxSyFrHZRFTDgKNfqVD3v05aDlwbgWMfp9fNPxVn/Iv8WDydDBe0RmwCyjk2 7pJSRfjyCgZed2KrKIX5C5/Ne7NCljyj/zbrEWEhZ0R1CVkL4NYwMP/xZYnt6Q3E lQb3aZPFIwkpB0C+5J6MFxbMxQuHks6b5AlMi+vXGkALc4CmS8tMQhbywoFmszox 4PR0Acu3CpfrdSTclKPYw1lqedTZnsBW//dGmGKZLyzq6fgHy17QIXyRYCHxcCwa DBLxlKAo095OqJzQlXxsQm/x6HfFQljW2yBFQNQRp9KHYdYFSXTma+3tzMFCgSGx TrbTbQzjkgUzP397nUs= =iTrd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apxodr6ffcSoNrDID3CtQXrQOR6SxAfQX-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 1 16:35:35 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 022B29E9 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 16:35:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x234.google.com (mail-lb0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 678A116D for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 16:35:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f180.google.com with SMTP id f15so695510lbj.11 for ; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 09:35:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=je3FIq62vYgHmeKXGhbL3clR7NToW8e0KU+g458vo+o=; b=XxG3jHcZSg4FIwx2eW206aBUOC7rJLJzNql36XZ2GzM/d1y+cREy92qTPgqhwFILH3 TLUZCcTBoaXqzWbKxrwoXS5DbqX13f7qxamYHQ3Hs2hqvTo0XC36o5nivT6u1Sd40n/Y pjL+31eR2j0ihUS9xkd0giJjeQDKPciFWPtBB76GdfL/J9OH/8gOqL/ivs4qf4tXAX/X e8KXbdw3PctR6rPRsb/7vGz/6nTdND76FQZ86KTs+fjYsXVGV9u9GtyXrotd3eD0sJp4 Lo+JMF57k8bKlYqE9Mj5w3Kmg8aJqT8ySmrmI4gwTgYVy7RQCiyR7RSFvDo6Zgn52EbK ueKQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.209.2 with SMTP id mi2mr24709132lbc.51.1412181332285; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 09:35:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.19.6 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 09:35:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <23187F4C-0413-4F84-9C86-6EC1084C794C@btinternet.com> <50282.76.192.184.214.1411925201.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 12:35:32 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: freebsd-update question From: "firmdog@gmail.com" To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 16:35:35 -0000 Should I use "head" instead of "8" here: svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/8 /usr/src On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 7:56 AM, firmdog@gmail.com wrote= : > I am confused now. Here is what I did to try and upgrade from 8.3 to > 8.4 on Amazon AWS where the freebsd AMI's use XENHVM: > > setenv PACKAGESITE > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-stable/Latest/ > pkg_add -r subversion > svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/8 /usr/src > svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head /usr/ports > svn up /usr/src && svn up /usr/ports > cd /usr/src > make buildworld > make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DXENHVM > make installkernel KERNCONF=3DXENHVM > make installworld > mergemaster -Ui > reboot > > > BEFORE: 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0 > > AFTER: 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0 r272337M > > What am I doing wrong?? > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 9:32 PM, firmdog@gmail.com wr= ote: >> Thanks. My freebsd server is on Amazon AWS using >> http://www.daemonology.net/freebsd-on-ec2/ >> >> A bit nervous because there is no local console. Just installed a new >> test/obsolete 8.3 box and will try the upgrade to 8.4 using these >> commands: >> >> >> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/8 /usr/src >> cd /usr/src >> make buildworld >> make kernel >> make installworld >> mergemaster -Ui >> reboot >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Axel wrote: >>> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 9:04 PM, firmdog@gmail.com >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> OK. I will try that. Found these notes from 10 years ago. Gonna give >>>> this a try, not sure if cvsup will work anymore.... >>>> >>>> >>>> cvsup -g -L 2 update-file >>>> >>>> The update-file contains this: >>>> >>>> *default host=3Dcvsup11.us.FreeBSD.org >>>> *default base=3D/var/db >>>> *default prefix=3D/usr >>>> *default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_8 >>>> *default delete use-rel-suffix >>>> src-all >>>> ports-all tag=3D. >>>> doc-all tag=3D. >>>> >>>> cd /usr/src >>>> >>>> make buildworld >>>> >>>> make buildkernel >>>> >>>> make installkernel >>>> >>>> mergemaster >>>> >>>> make installworld >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 2:36 PM, FF wrote: >>>> > So your kernel won't be updated because you are running a custom ker= nel. >>>> > Your uname is based on the running kernel. >>>> > >>>> > If you want to confirm that you've in fact updated, you can reboot t= o >>>> > the >>>> > GENERIC kernel which will confirm you are at 8.4 or whatever. FreeBS= D >>>> > update >>>> > is a binary update based on the release versions -- deviate from the= m >>>> > and it >>>> > doesn't break, but it can't touch those files. >>>> > >>>> > Since you know enough to put a custom kernel on there, you should fo= llow >>>> > the >>>> > source rebuild instructions which would be basically be to svn down = the >>>> > whole 8.4 source tree, make the world, make the kernel and install i= t, >>>> > reboot, and install the world. >>>> > >>>> > I think the directions are in the FreeBSD handbook. >>>> > >>>> > Best, >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Valeri Galtsev >>>> > >>>> > wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> On Sun, September 28, 2014 10:01 am, firmdog@gmail.com wrote: >>>> >> > I just installed a brand new 8.3 box and got the same behavior. I= see >>>> >> > in my output below that I have to build or update my own kernel? >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > # uname -a >>>> >> > FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0: Tue Apr 10 17:33:58 U= TC >>>> >> > 2012 root@mynewhost:/usr/obj/i386/usr/src/sys/XENHVM i386 >>>> >> > # >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Starting the upgrade attempt: >>>> >> > >>>> >> > # freebsd-update -r 8.4-RELEASE upgrade >>>> >> > Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. >>>> >> > Fetching public key from update6.freebsd.org... done. >>>> >> > Fetching metadata signature for 8.3-RELEASE from >>>> >> > update6.freebsd.org... >>>> >> > done. >>>> >> > Fetching metadata index... done. >>>> >> > Fetching 2 metadata files... done. >>>> >> > Inspecting system... done. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > WARNING: This system is running a "xenhvm" kernel, which is not a >>>> >> > kernel configuration distributed as part of FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE. >>>> >> > This kernel will not be updated: you MUST update the kernel manua= lly >>>> >> > before running "/usr/sbin/freebsd-update install". >>>> >> > >>>> >> > The following components of FreeBSD seem to be installed: >>>> >> > src/base src/bin src/cddl src/contrib src/crypto src/etc src/game= s >>>> >> > src/gnu src/include src/krb5 src/lib src/libexec src/release >>>> >> > src/rescue >>>> >> > src/sbin src/secure src/share src/sys src/tools src/ubin src/usbi= n >>>> >> > world/base world/dict world/doc world/games world/info world/manp= ages >>>> >> > world/proflibs >>>> >> > >>>> >> > The following components of FreeBSD do not seem to be installed: >>>> >> > kernel/generic world/catpages >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Fetching metadata signature for 8.4-RELEASE from >>>> >> > update6.freebsd.org... >>>> >> > done. >>>> >> > Fetching metadata index... done. >>>> >> > Fetching 1 metadata patches. done. >>>> >> > Applying metadata patches... done. >>>> >> > Fetching 1 metadata files... done. >>>> >> > Inspecting system... done. >>>> >> > Fetching files from 8.3-RELEASE for merging... done. >>>> >> > Preparing to download files... >>>> >> > done. >>>> >> > Fetching 32149 >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > patches.....10....20....30....40....50....60....70....80....90...= .100....110....120....130....140....150....160....170....180.... >>>> >> > SNIP=E2=80=A6. >>>> >> > done. >>>> >> > Applying patches... >>>> >> > Fetching 778 files... done. >>>> >> > Attempting to automatically merge changes in files... done. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > The following file could not be merged automatically: >>>> >> > /etc/mail/freebsd.cf >>>> >> > Press Enter to edit this file in vi and resolve the conflicts >>>> >> > manually... >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Then a bunch more of /etc/mail files and also a merge of >>>> >> > /etc/master.passwd: >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Then this: >>>> >> > >>>> >> > The following files will be updated as part of updating to >>>> >> > 8.4-RELEASE-p16: >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Then I run this: >>>> >> > >>>> >> > # freebsd-update install >>>> >> > Installing updates... >>>> >> > Kernel updates have been installed. Please reboot and run >>>> >> > "/usr/sbin/freebsd-update install" again to finish installing >>>> >> > updates. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > # reboot >>>> >> > >>>> >> >>>> >> In last message before reboot it instructed to "reboot then run >>>> >> >>>> >> /usr/sbin/freebsd-update install >>>> >> >>>> >> again". Did you run "freebsd-update install" after reboot? >>>> >> >>>> >> Valeri >>>> >> >>>> >> > >>>> >> > #uname -a >>>> >> > FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0: Tue Apr 10 17:33:58 U= TC >>>> >> > 2012 root@mynewhost:/usr/obj/i386/usr/src/sys/XENHVM i386 >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 5:06 AM, FF wrote: >>>> >> >> Can you provide the output of those commands? Freebsd-update is >>>> >> >> usually >>>> >> >> pretty good about telling you what's wrong. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Thanks >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 3:02 PM, firmdog@gmail.com >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> wrote: >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> Yes I ran freebsd-update install. Then I rebooted. Then I did i= t >>>> >> >>> again. >>>> >> >>> Still at 8.3 >>>> >> >>> On Sep 27, 2014 2:37 PM, "Dave" >>>> >> >>> wrote: >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> > On 27 September 2014 18:22:15 BST, "firmdog@gmail.com" >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > wrote: >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> Hi, >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> Trying to use freebsd-update to go from 8.3 to 8.4 and I am >>>> >> >>> >> doing >>>> >> >>> this: >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> # freebsd-update -r 8.4-RELEASE upgrade >>>> >> >>> >> # freebsd-update install >>>> >> >>> >> # reboot >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> After reboot I am still at 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #= 0 >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> What am I doing wrong? >>>> >> >>> >> ------------------------------ >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> >> >>> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>> >> >>> >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>> >> >>> >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> > Don't you need run rub "freebsd-update install"? >>>> >> >>> > -- >>>> >> >>> > Dave >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > GPG/PGP ID: CDB94DA1 >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >>>> >> >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> >> >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>> >> >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>> >> >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> -- >>>> >> >> FF >>>> >> > _______________________________________________ >>>> >> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>> >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>> >> > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> >> Valeri Galtsev >>>> >> Sr System Administrator >>>> >> Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics >>>> >> Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics >>>> >> University of Chicago >>>> >> Phone: 773-702-4247 >>>> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > FF >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> CVS is now deprecated. Please use SVN instead if you prefer to follow t= he >>> manual upgrade process [1] >>> FreeBSD-update tool upgrades (binary upgrades) your base system and GEN= ERIC >>> kernel only. It syncs sources too. >>> So you need to rebuild your custom kernel after the process. [2] >>> >>> Kind regards. >>> Alexandre >>> >>> [1] http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/svn.html >>> [2] >>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.ht= ml From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 1 16:42:38 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F157C3D for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 16:42:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x235.google.com (mail-la0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4524251 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 16:42:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f53.google.com with SMTP id gq15so730638lab.26 for ; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 09:42:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MPBrs0J7DsXBiFNBypvHtmWxSqycHxYK5Q5gPwm0vRo=; b=LA9NYE4D6TT1N48uyB6MsoP4dBtc5yR2Tje5yM3Ph9CcJvpCgerQw38j1keVXxDlu+ n+4GGJ2cK2VrDgCjugy+b2AZ6nO4KAAVg/6pLjMuMi09J0sAD3RZcxgLolEvQcPaPjTn xYx0eANh5pW1UPM1HpO99ixLFjJ+xYZpflN9VM+En3BHNfe3Pbn0BD5l5rjHg8RlsXrK rwYninVfApb8tY0OBLCO+9CmJF0bYgYwzojlk9PKlXuQcFF5TbeDbokF/Y9/qmeu5gdR 7n6XuR6YJw6MJQtybHcq3vHa3Cpur0Xqs31v1YMTiJoUv8mSJ6sHm71K1IEEoe+8RokU vYqw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.209.2 with SMTP id mi2mr24752126lbc.51.1412181755703; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 09:42:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.19.6 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 09:42:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <23187F4C-0413-4F84-9C86-6EC1084C794C@btinternet.com> <50282.76.192.184.214.1411925201.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 12:42:35 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: freebsd-update question From: "firmdog@gmail.com" To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 16:42:38 -0000 Looks like "8" is the only option: # svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/head /usr/src svn: E170000: URL 'svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/head' doesn't exist # svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/8.4 /usr/src svn: E170000: URL 'svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/8.4' doesn't exist On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 12:35 PM, firmdog@gmail.com wrot= e: > Should I use "head" instead of "8" here: > > svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/8 /usr/src > > > > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 7:56 AM, firmdog@gmail.com wro= te: >> I am confused now. Here is what I did to try and upgrade from 8.3 to >> 8.4 on Amazon AWS where the freebsd AMI's use XENHVM: >> >> setenv PACKAGESITE >> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-stable/Latest/ >> pkg_add -r subversion >> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/8 /usr/src >> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head /usr/ports >> svn up /usr/src && svn up /usr/ports >> cd /usr/src >> make buildworld >> make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DXENHVM >> make installkernel KERNCONF=3DXENHVM >> make installworld >> mergemaster -Ui >> reboot >> >> >> BEFORE: 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0 >> >> AFTER: 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0 r272337M >> >> What am I doing wrong?? >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 9:32 PM, firmdog@gmail.com w= rote: >>> Thanks. My freebsd server is on Amazon AWS using >>> http://www.daemonology.net/freebsd-on-ec2/ >>> >>> A bit nervous because there is no local console. Just installed a new >>> test/obsolete 8.3 box and will try the upgrade to 8.4 using these >>> commands: >>> >>> >>> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/8 /usr/src >>> cd /usr/src >>> make buildworld >>> make kernel >>> make installworld >>> mergemaster -Ui >>> reboot >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Axel wrote: >>>> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 9:04 PM, firmdog@gmail.com >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> OK. I will try that. Found these notes from 10 years ago. Gonna give >>>>> this a try, not sure if cvsup will work anymore.... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> cvsup -g -L 2 update-file >>>>> >>>>> The update-file contains this: >>>>> >>>>> *default host=3Dcvsup11.us.FreeBSD.org >>>>> *default base=3D/var/db >>>>> *default prefix=3D/usr >>>>> *default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_8 >>>>> *default delete use-rel-suffix >>>>> src-all >>>>> ports-all tag=3D. >>>>> doc-all tag=3D. >>>>> >>>>> cd /usr/src >>>>> >>>>> make buildworld >>>>> >>>>> make buildkernel >>>>> >>>>> make installkernel >>>>> >>>>> mergemaster >>>>> >>>>> make installworld >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 2:36 PM, FF wrote: >>>>> > So your kernel won't be updated because you are running a custom ke= rnel. >>>>> > Your uname is based on the running kernel. >>>>> > >>>>> > If you want to confirm that you've in fact updated, you can reboot = to >>>>> > the >>>>> > GENERIC kernel which will confirm you are at 8.4 or whatever. FreeB= SD >>>>> > update >>>>> > is a binary update based on the release versions -- deviate from th= em >>>>> > and it >>>>> > doesn't break, but it can't touch those files. >>>>> > >>>>> > Since you know enough to put a custom kernel on there, you should f= ollow >>>>> > the >>>>> > source rebuild instructions which would be basically be to svn down= the >>>>> > whole 8.4 source tree, make the world, make the kernel and install = it, >>>>> > reboot, and install the world. >>>>> > >>>>> > I think the directions are in the FreeBSD handbook. >>>>> > >>>>> > Best, >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Valeri Galtsev >>>>> > >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Sun, September 28, 2014 10:01 am, firmdog@gmail.com wrote: >>>>> >> > I just installed a brand new 8.3 box and got the same behavior. = I see >>>>> >> > in my output below that I have to build or update my own kernel? >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > # uname -a >>>>> >> > FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0: Tue Apr 10 17:33:58 = UTC >>>>> >> > 2012 root@mynewhost:/usr/obj/i386/usr/src/sys/XENHVM i386 >>>>> >> > # >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > Starting the upgrade attempt: >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > # freebsd-update -r 8.4-RELEASE upgrade >>>>> >> > Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. >>>>> >> > Fetching public key from update6.freebsd.org... done. >>>>> >> > Fetching metadata signature for 8.3-RELEASE from >>>>> >> > update6.freebsd.org... >>>>> >> > done. >>>>> >> > Fetching metadata index... done. >>>>> >> > Fetching 2 metadata files... done. >>>>> >> > Inspecting system... done. >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > WARNING: This system is running a "xenhvm" kernel, which is not = a >>>>> >> > kernel configuration distributed as part of FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE. >>>>> >> > This kernel will not be updated: you MUST update the kernel manu= ally >>>>> >> > before running "/usr/sbin/freebsd-update install". >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > The following components of FreeBSD seem to be installed: >>>>> >> > src/base src/bin src/cddl src/contrib src/crypto src/etc src/gam= es >>>>> >> > src/gnu src/include src/krb5 src/lib src/libexec src/release >>>>> >> > src/rescue >>>>> >> > src/sbin src/secure src/share src/sys src/tools src/ubin src/usb= in >>>>> >> > world/base world/dict world/doc world/games world/info world/man= pages >>>>> >> > world/proflibs >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > The following components of FreeBSD do not seem to be installed: >>>>> >> > kernel/generic world/catpages >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > Fetching metadata signature for 8.4-RELEASE from >>>>> >> > update6.freebsd.org... >>>>> >> > done. >>>>> >> > Fetching metadata index... done. >>>>> >> > Fetching 1 metadata patches. done. >>>>> >> > Applying metadata patches... done. >>>>> >> > Fetching 1 metadata files... done. >>>>> >> > Inspecting system... done. >>>>> >> > Fetching files from 8.3-RELEASE for merging... done. >>>>> >> > Preparing to download files... >>>>> >> > done. >>>>> >> > Fetching 32149 >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > patches.....10....20....30....40....50....60....70....80....90..= ..100....110....120....130....140....150....160....170....180.... >>>>> >> > SNIP=E2=80=A6. >>>>> >> > done. >>>>> >> > Applying patches... >>>>> >> > Fetching 778 files... done. >>>>> >> > Attempting to automatically merge changes in files... done. >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > The following file could not be merged automatically: >>>>> >> > /etc/mail/freebsd.cf >>>>> >> > Press Enter to edit this file in vi and resolve the conflicts >>>>> >> > manually... >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > Then a bunch more of /etc/mail files and also a merge of >>>>> >> > /etc/master.passwd: >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > Then this: >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > The following files will be updated as part of updating to >>>>> >> > 8.4-RELEASE-p16: >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > Then I run this: >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > # freebsd-update install >>>>> >> > Installing updates... >>>>> >> > Kernel updates have been installed. Please reboot and run >>>>> >> > "/usr/sbin/freebsd-update install" again to finish installing >>>>> >> > updates. >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > # reboot >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> >>>>> >> In last message before reboot it instructed to "reboot then run >>>>> >> >>>>> >> /usr/sbin/freebsd-update install >>>>> >> >>>>> >> again". Did you run "freebsd-update install" after reboot? >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Valeri >>>>> >> >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > #uname -a >>>>> >> > FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0: Tue Apr 10 17:33:58 = UTC >>>>> >> > 2012 root@mynewhost:/usr/obj/i386/usr/src/sys/XENHVM i386 >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 5:06 AM, FF wrote= : >>>>> >> >> Can you provide the output of those commands? Freebsd-update is >>>>> >> >> usually >>>>> >> >> pretty good about telling you what's wrong. >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> Thanks >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 3:02 PM, firmdog@gmail.com >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> wrote: >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> Yes I ran freebsd-update install. Then I rebooted. Then I did = it >>>>> >> >>> again. >>>>> >> >>> Still at 8.3 >>>>> >> >>> On Sep 27, 2014 2:37 PM, "Dave" >>>>> >> >>> wrote: >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> > On 27 September 2014 18:22:15 BST, "firmdog@gmail.com" >>>>> >> >>> > >>>>> >> >>> > wrote: >>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> Hi, >>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> Trying to use freebsd-update to go from 8.3 to 8.4 and I am >>>>> >> >>> >> doing >>>>> >> >>> this: >>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> # freebsd-update -r 8.4-RELEASE upgrade >>>>> >> >>> >> # freebsd-update install >>>>> >> >>> >> # reboot >>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> After reboot I am still at 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE = #0 >>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> What am I doing wrong? >>>>> >> >>> >> ------------------------------ >>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>> >> >>> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>>> >> >>> >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>>> >> >>> >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >>> > Don't you need run rub "freebsd-update install"? >>>>> >> >>> > -- >>>>> >> >>> > Dave >>>>> >> >>> > >>>>> >> >>> > GPG/PGP ID: CDB94DA1 >>>>> >> >>> > >>>>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> >> >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>> >> >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>>> >> >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>>> >> >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> -- >>>>> >> >> FF >>>>> >> > _______________________________________________ >>>>> >> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>> >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>>> >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>>> >> > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>> >> Valeri Galtsev >>>>> >> Sr System Administrator >>>>> >> Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics >>>>> >> Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics >>>>> >> University of Chicago >>>>> >> Phone: 773-702-4247 >>>>> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > -- >>>>> > FF >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> CVS is now deprecated. Please use SVN instead if you prefer to follow = the >>>> manual upgrade process [1] >>>> FreeBSD-update tool upgrades (binary upgrades) your base system and GE= NERIC >>>> kernel only. It syncs sources too. >>>> So you need to rebuild your custom kernel after the process. [2] >>>> >>>> Kind regards. >>>> Alexandre >>>> >>>> [1] http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/svn.html >>>> [2] >>>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.h= tml From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 1 16:54:35 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8BE1347 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 16:54:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x229.google.com (mail-la0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59F213BB for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 16:54:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id pn19so772081lab.14 for ; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 09:54:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sCCVbkS/i6qB5nm4+eR7EV6/mzJGYxbdAPuA3t5bxqU=; b=Mwx5c10gE/4Sr9S9VR4cSbgcpMKsQ4xlwYG6QCRE8rmUloiwwTZwA7l4f2ix3q47LJ aVneHWpH57OSBjV+cyK+bwnb0HGo7wyYa2bFYEld5obn9pXzd5lKkfE2LwhX+NM+rnm7 K3g09TE25krzh56uYg62OLCiRsvl20U4cD1ZKSbJO8Maq4w7pra6Nb05UIqLvsGCG2/J TB+HgxXDthG52HyDguJ7bzDvlpYCvVH+buAE3KXoXeUGL7Vir/U/XGwbR5b0l9ZY1jkR 8mODQOZAsyIG/6gj9BLnuR/s4eOBhtiMToSKU/tmyviOheq35DF5LJzz44EySxsNxZB1 YQqA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.42.194 with SMTP id q2mr44019560lal.75.1412182472655; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 09:54:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.19.6 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 09:54:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <23187F4C-0413-4F84-9C86-6EC1084C794C@btinternet.com> <50282.76.192.184.214.1411925201.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 12:54:32 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: freebsd-update question From: "firmdog@gmail.com" To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 16:54:36 -0000 I read the subversion primer page at freebsd.org :-) Looks like this is what I am supposed to use to get the proper checkout code for 8.4: svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/8.4 /usr/src On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 12:42 PM, firmdog@gmail.com wrot= e: > Looks like "8" is the only option: > > # svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/head /usr/src > svn: E170000: URL 'svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/head' doesn't exist > > # svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/8.4 /usr/src > svn: E170000: URL 'svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/8.4' doesn't exist > > > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 12:35 PM, firmdog@gmail.com wr= ote: >> Should I use "head" instead of "8" here: >> >> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/8 /usr/src >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 7:56 AM, firmdog@gmail.com wr= ote: >>> I am confused now. Here is what I did to try and upgrade from 8.3 to >>> 8.4 on Amazon AWS where the freebsd AMI's use XENHVM: >>> >>> setenv PACKAGESITE >>> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-stable/Latest/ >>> pkg_add -r subversion >>> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/8 /usr/src >>> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head /usr/ports >>> svn up /usr/src && svn up /usr/ports >>> cd /usr/src >>> make buildworld >>> make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DXENHVM >>> make installkernel KERNCONF=3DXENHVM >>> make installworld >>> mergemaster -Ui >>> reboot >>> >>> >>> BEFORE: 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0 >>> >>> AFTER: 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0 r272337M >>> >>> What am I doing wrong?? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 9:32 PM, firmdog@gmail.com = wrote: >>>> Thanks. My freebsd server is on Amazon AWS using >>>> http://www.daemonology.net/freebsd-on-ec2/ >>>> >>>> A bit nervous because there is no local console. Just installed a new >>>> test/obsolete 8.3 box and will try the upgrade to 8.4 using these >>>> commands: >>>> >>>> >>>> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/8 /usr/src >>>> cd /usr/src >>>> make buildworld >>>> make kernel >>>> make installworld >>>> mergemaster -Ui >>>> reboot >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Axel wrote: >>>>> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 9:04 PM, firmdog@gmail.com >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> OK. I will try that. Found these notes from 10 years ago. Gonna give >>>>>> this a try, not sure if cvsup will work anymore.... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> cvsup -g -L 2 update-file >>>>>> >>>>>> The update-file contains this: >>>>>> >>>>>> *default host=3Dcvsup11.us.FreeBSD.org >>>>>> *default base=3D/var/db >>>>>> *default prefix=3D/usr >>>>>> *default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_8 >>>>>> *default delete use-rel-suffix >>>>>> src-all >>>>>> ports-all tag=3D. >>>>>> doc-all tag=3D. >>>>>> >>>>>> cd /usr/src >>>>>> >>>>>> make buildworld >>>>>> >>>>>> make buildkernel >>>>>> >>>>>> make installkernel >>>>>> >>>>>> mergemaster >>>>>> >>>>>> make installworld >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 2:36 PM, FF wrote: >>>>>> > So your kernel won't be updated because you are running a custom k= ernel. >>>>>> > Your uname is based on the running kernel. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > If you want to confirm that you've in fact updated, you can reboot= to >>>>>> > the >>>>>> > GENERIC kernel which will confirm you are at 8.4 or whatever. Free= BSD >>>>>> > update >>>>>> > is a binary update based on the release versions -- deviate from t= hem >>>>>> > and it >>>>>> > doesn't break, but it can't touch those files. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Since you know enough to put a custom kernel on there, you should = follow >>>>>> > the >>>>>> > source rebuild instructions which would be basically be to svn dow= n the >>>>>> > whole 8.4 source tree, make the world, make the kernel and install= it, >>>>>> > reboot, and install the world. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I think the directions are in the FreeBSD handbook. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Best, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Valeri Galtsev >>>>>> > >>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> On Sun, September 28, 2014 10:01 am, firmdog@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>> >> > I just installed a brand new 8.3 box and got the same behavior.= I see >>>>>> >> > in my output below that I have to build or update my own kernel= ? >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > # uname -a >>>>>> >> > FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0: Tue Apr 10 17:33:58= UTC >>>>>> >> > 2012 root@mynewhost:/usr/obj/i386/usr/src/sys/XENHVM i386 >>>>>> >> > # >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > Starting the upgrade attempt: >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > # freebsd-update -r 8.4-RELEASE upgrade >>>>>> >> > Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. >>>>>> >> > Fetching public key from update6.freebsd.org... done. >>>>>> >> > Fetching metadata signature for 8.3-RELEASE from >>>>>> >> > update6.freebsd.org... >>>>>> >> > done. >>>>>> >> > Fetching metadata index... done. >>>>>> >> > Fetching 2 metadata files... done. >>>>>> >> > Inspecting system... done. >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > WARNING: This system is running a "xenhvm" kernel, which is not= a >>>>>> >> > kernel configuration distributed as part of FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE= . >>>>>> >> > This kernel will not be updated: you MUST update the kernel man= ually >>>>>> >> > before running "/usr/sbin/freebsd-update install". >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > The following components of FreeBSD seem to be installed: >>>>>> >> > src/base src/bin src/cddl src/contrib src/crypto src/etc src/ga= mes >>>>>> >> > src/gnu src/include src/krb5 src/lib src/libexec src/release >>>>>> >> > src/rescue >>>>>> >> > src/sbin src/secure src/share src/sys src/tools src/ubin src/us= bin >>>>>> >> > world/base world/dict world/doc world/games world/info world/ma= npages >>>>>> >> > world/proflibs >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > The following components of FreeBSD do not seem to be installed= : >>>>>> >> > kernel/generic world/catpages >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > Fetching metadata signature for 8.4-RELEASE from >>>>>> >> > update6.freebsd.org... >>>>>> >> > done. >>>>>> >> > Fetching metadata index... done. >>>>>> >> > Fetching 1 metadata patches. done. >>>>>> >> > Applying metadata patches... done. >>>>>> >> > Fetching 1 metadata files... done. >>>>>> >> > Inspecting system... done. >>>>>> >> > Fetching files from 8.3-RELEASE for merging... done. >>>>>> >> > Preparing to download files... >>>>>> >> > done. >>>>>> >> > Fetching 32149 >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > patches.....10....20....30....40....50....60....70....80....90.= ...100....110....120....130....140....150....160....170....180.... >>>>>> >> > SNIP=E2=80=A6. >>>>>> >> > done. >>>>>> >> > Applying patches... >>>>>> >> > Fetching 778 files... done. >>>>>> >> > Attempting to automatically merge changes in files... done. >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > The following file could not be merged automatically: >>>>>> >> > /etc/mail/freebsd.cf >>>>>> >> > Press Enter to edit this file in vi and resolve the conflicts >>>>>> >> > manually... >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > Then a bunch more of /etc/mail files and also a merge of >>>>>> >> > /etc/master.passwd: >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > Then this: >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > The following files will be updated as part of updating to >>>>>> >> > 8.4-RELEASE-p16: >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > Then I run this: >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > # freebsd-update install >>>>>> >> > Installing updates... >>>>>> >> > Kernel updates have been installed. Please reboot and run >>>>>> >> > "/usr/sbin/freebsd-update install" again to finish installing >>>>>> >> > updates. >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > # reboot >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> In last message before reboot it instructed to "reboot then run >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> /usr/sbin/freebsd-update install >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> again". Did you run "freebsd-update install" after reboot? >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Valeri >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > #uname -a >>>>>> >> > FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0: Tue Apr 10 17:33:58= UTC >>>>>> >> > 2012 root@mynewhost:/usr/obj/i386/usr/src/sys/XENHVM i386 >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 5:06 AM, FF wrot= e: >>>>>> >> >> Can you provide the output of those commands? Freebsd-update i= s >>>>>> >> >> usually >>>>>> >> >> pretty good about telling you what's wrong. >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> Thanks >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 3:02 PM, firmdog@gmail.com >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> wrote: >>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >>> Yes I ran freebsd-update install. Then I rebooted. Then I did= it >>>>>> >> >>> again. >>>>>> >> >>> Still at 8.3 >>>>>> >> >>> On Sep 27, 2014 2:37 PM, "Dave" >>>>>> >> >>> wrote: >>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >>> > On 27 September 2014 18:22:15 BST, "firmdog@gmail.com" >>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>> >> >>> > wrote: >>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>> >> Hi, >>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>> >> Trying to use freebsd-update to go from 8.3 to 8.4 and I a= m >>>>>> >> >>> >> doing >>>>>> >> >>> this: >>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>> >> # freebsd-update -r 8.4-RELEASE upgrade >>>>>> >> >>> >> # freebsd-update install >>>>>> >> >>> >> # reboot >>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>> >> After reboot I am still at 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE= #0 >>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>> >> What am I doing wrong? >>>>>> >> >>> >> ------------------------------ >>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>> >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>>> >> >>> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-question= s >>>>>> >> >>> >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>>>> >> >>> >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>> > Don't you need run rub "freebsd-update install"? >>>>>> >> >>> > -- >>>>>> >> >>> > Dave >>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>> >> >>> > GPG/PGP ID: CDB94DA1 >>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> >> >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>>> >> >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>>>> >> >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>>>> >> >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> -- >>>>>> >> >> FF >>>>>> >> > _______________________________________________ >>>>>> >> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>>> >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>>>> >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>>>> >> > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>> >> Valeri Galtsev >>>>>> >> Sr System Administrator >>>>>> >> Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics >>>>>> >> Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics >>>>>> >> University of Chicago >>>>>> >> Phone: 773-702-4247 >>>>>> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > -- >>>>>> > FF >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> CVS is now deprecated. Please use SVN instead if you prefer to follow= the >>>>> manual upgrade process [1] >>>>> FreeBSD-update tool upgrades (binary upgrades) your base system and G= ENERIC >>>>> kernel only. It syncs sources too. >>>>> So you need to rebuild your custom kernel after the process. [2] >>>>> >>>>> Kind regards. >>>>> Alexandre >>>>> >>>>> [1] http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/svn.html >>>>> [2] >>>>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.= html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 1 18:11:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B626DDFD for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 18:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ds5155.dreamservers.com (ds5155.dreamservers.com [64.90.57.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 885D3F7A for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 18:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds5155.dreamservers.com (Postfix, from userid 13833499) id 2BACF482A1; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 10:50:53 -0700 (PDT) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Warning! Paypal Security Measures !!! X-PHP-Originating-Script: 13833499:x.php From: Paypal Reply-To: webmaster@zelmamusic.com Message-Id: <20141001180318.2BACF482A1@ds5155.dreamservers.com> Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 10:50:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 18:11:47 -0000 PayPal Notice ofPolicy Updates Warning! Your PayPal account is limited! As part of our security measures, we regularly check the work of the screen PayPal. So we need yousome following information to ensure that you are the real Paypal account holderfor the following reason: Our system has detected unusual charges to a credit card linked to your PayPal account. Reference Number: PP-249-787-691 This is the last reminder to log into PayPal, as soon as possible. Once you connect. PayPal will provide measures to restore access to your account. Please use the link given below andfollow the steps to activate your account. We appreciate your understanding as we work to ensure security. [1]Update Account Information Note:Please note that in 50% of cases you will receive this e-mail in the spam box, it is because of the increased security emailing services you use. Please do not reply to this email. We are unable to respond to inquiries sent to this address. For immediate answers to your questions, visit our Help Center by clicking "Help" at the top of any PayPal page. Copyright 2014 paypal Inc. All rights reserved. paypal is located at 2211 N. First St., San Jose, CA 95131 References 1. http://www.gpsforwealth.com/wp-content/themes/Gateway/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 1 19:12:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1514935A for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 19:12:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from forward8l.mail.yandex.net (forward8l.mail.yandex.net [84.201.143.141]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Certum Level IV CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C484493A for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 19:12:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp2h.mail.yandex.net (smtp2h.mail.yandex.net [84.201.187.145]) by forward8l.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 8C41D1A410B7 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 23:12:34 +0400 (MSK) Received: from smtp2h.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2h.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 2A1881705931 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 23:12:34 +0400 (MSK) Received: from 78.108.204.68.tel.ru (78.108.204.68.tel.ru [78.108.204.68]) by smtp2h.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id B2X8ivGGUO-CXlCVKjK; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 23:12:33 +0400 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) X-Yandex-Uniq: 7c5e7300-1eed-42f4-a0de-5a908b6b13b8 Message-ID: <542C5221.4060407@passap.ru> Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 23:12:33 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov Organization: =?UTF-8?B?0JfQkNCeICLQktCQ0KDQoiI=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: User and vendor packages (for pkg_* tools) References: <542BF06B.1070603@passap.ru> <1412166837.1994524.173874785.5FEDC463@webmail.messagingengine.com> <542C1CD8.4030907@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <542C1CD8.4030907@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 19:12:41 -0000 01.10.2014 19:25, Matthew Seaman ŠæŠøŃŠµŃ‚: > On 10/01/14 13:33, Mark Felder wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014, at 07:15, Boris Samorodov wrote: >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> A user has License to use an App and uses pkgng. The vendor has >>>> only packages for pkg_* tools. >>>> >>>> What the user should do? Is there a tool to convert old packages to >>>> new format? >>>> >> There is no such tool. You would have to manually convert it to the new >> package format by making a port for it. I think a skeleton port that >> asked the user a few questions could do this automatically. I will >> consider taking a stab at this, but I will have to locate an example to >> test with. > > Actually there kind-of is such a tool. pkg-convert(8) > > It's not ideal, in that you have to install the old-style package > *before* converting it. Cool. Thanks! > Making pkg-convert able to read either old- or > new- style package tarballs and output to the alternate format tarball > would be an interesting project. Agreed. > Nagging the vendor to produce new style packages likely to be more > productive in the long run. Unfortunately, it may be a very long way for a vendor. -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 1 20:26:43 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FD07FDF for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 20:26:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from new1-smtp.messagingengine.com (new1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 500C41AE for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 20:26:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by gateway2.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BD0734AF for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 16:26:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web6 ([10.202.2.216]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 01 Oct 2014 16:26:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:x-sasl-enc:from:to :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to :references:subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=+DxQ4R8sp/gbcT33Da3QurYk nhk=; b=ODOtuoRcV8PbSHqV1bjW1T91PE0DFFdVToKXlQn0mdRsiqgqeeiwJbv4 +JFxykTU3w32z4WfVdMO5dHJquOlcfbqRWruBS7+vIZGm5i0dz5eEuAEh1LwQUmG k2+3k42dvdXtZwN9+UR0PTFYPi8masK4/yl1ASTT2FpWT/mSiRQ= Received: by web6.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id E9B6E5D6A2; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 16:26:40 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1412195200.2514522.174078689.53C09F5F@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: GQu8BE4OG8nnFgGHsH0YWIf90I571sPrpD5ppKtTveXG 1412195200 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-3bf5bee3 In-Reply-To: <542C1CD8.4030907@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <542BF06B.1070603@passap.ru> <1412166837.1994524.173874785.5FEDC463@webmail.messagingengine.com> <542C1CD8.4030907@infracaninophile.co.uk> Subject: Re: User and vendor packages (for pkg_* tools) Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 15:26:40 -0500 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 20:26:43 -0000 On Wed, Oct 1, 2014, at 10:25, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 10/01/14 13:33, Mark Felder wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014, at 07:15, Boris Samorodov wrote: > >> > Hi All, > >> > > >> > A user has License to use an App and uses pkgng. The vendor has > >> > only packages for pkg_* tools. > >> > > >> > What the user should do? Is there a tool to convert old packages to > >> > new format? > >> > > > There is no such tool. You would have to manually convert it to the new > > package format by making a port for it. I think a skeleton port that > > asked the user a few questions could do this automatically. I will > > consider taking a stab at this, but I will have to locate an example to > > test with. > > Actually there kind-of is such a tool. pkg-convert(8) > > It's not ideal, in that you have to install the old-style package > *before* converting it. Making pkg-convert able to read either old- or > new- style package tarballs and output to the alternate format tarball > would be an interesting project. > You can't install the old-style package if you don't have pkg_tools. They were also removed from the ports tree. This is now a wild goose chase if you aren't on an OS that natively came with pkg_tools. If a vendor supplied an old pkg that would run fine on FreeBSD 10 with compat4x and you want to run on a modern kernel/OS this is now a very high learning curve. I hope we can fix this in the near future. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 1 20:46:31 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA05A773 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 20:46:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A2C5679 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 20:46:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.news4all.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id s91KkK9W010905 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 22:46:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Message-ID: <542C681C.7090704@bananmonarki.se> Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 22:46:20 +0200 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bash Shellshock Bug References: <20140930110034.a637ab6d.freebsd@edvax.de> <20140930152801.cd7a2a5e.freebsd@edvax.de> <542AC600.1090600@freebsd.org> <542ACBE9.4090304@bananmonarki.se> <1412094656.1674816.173521569.0D7E38F8@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1412176749.2422568.173948777.13E04B10@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <1412176749.2422568.173948777.13E04B10@webmail.messagingengine.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 20:46:32 -0000 On 2014-10-01 17:19, Mark Felder wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014, at 11:30, Mark Felder wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014, at 10:27, Bernt Hansson wrote: >>> I want to install kicad but getting this error: >>> >>> root@kw:/usr/ports # make clean >>> Child process pid=41973 terminated abnormally: Segmentation fault: 11 >>> "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 1222: warning: >>> "/usr/local/sbin/pkg-static ver >>> sion -t 1.3.8 1.3.8" returned non-zero status >>> >>> pkkng is crap >>> >> >> That's not a pkgng error. That's a make error. What FreeBSD version are >> you running? > > Upon re-reading, that *is* possibly a pkg error. Does it always return > non-zero? > > # /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static version -t 1.3.8 1.3.8 > # echo $? > > Does that output 0 or something else? $ /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static version -t 1.3.8 1.3.8 = % echo $? 0 I found the remedy. Removing pkg.conf fixed the problem. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 1 20:50:34 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1558D896 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 20:50:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from new1-smtp.messagingengine.com (new1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D71ED6B9 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 20:50:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by gateway2.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAFC339D1 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 16:50:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web6 ([10.202.2.216]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 01 Oct 2014 16:50:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:x-sasl-enc:from:to :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to :references:subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=btMzu5Im26NVTA2cn+p1iUh0 COs=; b=SiQz3R9JJ4DCqclid/vOkaNXGSveABsK/CaRNrztTsdCGtxt+smaajKt ncjpdMjUq/oXoKrECfBS8aPAmJz/z4DxwGC9zi1MPaBTUCv2D5yyUA9HKK9ySAiJ SU6SYSNk9+JhkKIsOOeohIu4/e+fVsCQS5NSH+0fnoNcsWiUY7M= Received: by web6.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 8C5025D708; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 16:50:32 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1412196632.2520433.174087973.0E0B0D33@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: 8efPwcOZifDzmjv5gp5ssDMg/VKr5xr34eg5f3KQbTzR 1412196632 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-3bf5bee3 In-Reply-To: <542C681C.7090704@bananmonarki.se> References: <20140930110034.a637ab6d.freebsd@edvax.de> <20140930152801.cd7a2a5e.freebsd@edvax.de> <542AC600.1090600@freebsd.org> <542ACBE9.4090304@bananmonarki.se> <1412094656.1674816.173521569.0D7E38F8@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1412176749.2422568.173948777.13E04B10@webmail.messagingengine.com> <542C681C.7090704@bananmonarki.se> Subject: Re: Bash Shellshock Bug Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 15:50:32 -0500 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 20:50:34 -0000 On Wed, Oct 1, 2014, at 15:46, Bernt Hansson wrote: > > I found the remedy. Removing pkg.conf fixed the problem. > Nice catch. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 1 20:59:34 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18098FA4 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 20:59:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-x235.google.com (mail-yk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D056C85D for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 20:59:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yk0-f181.google.com with SMTP id q200so398331ykb.26 for ; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 13:59:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=8Z1tXkx+tUfBxOrnsxgGYqzy20UT2pwvtO88CdBXLxw=; b=iqaEOxDR49rhppPpKckZkQgZiwBNvcCK5xbSCHGF2FOFPVCVYr9UTVvninOoH6IFsL CLgYjMICAYf8ZHhC7u85DQgaYgzYt58ElcQtzk7CFBEg0e5VR422pAl9IRZBrrU+do6d 3GeOla5vxyX4PMHfGdfi+LuWgoqLswV0Vjin2HaP03mSD17NfvaSaULGLAn6Wp4xYvM0 9nqD+e1WJOa3/f5CqEigK3vw9It8LUy7ZzcPeo4+TU4oil2KNuNvnZm+zVySOOF3/Z53 MyigMW5ffDHORYuA9EeZXwyVPu+u4QWcHuNIAsv7ITUVfck4Ju/NzZPlPSfMtv5hmeon 3Bjg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.227.162 with SMTP id d32mr29476336yhq.100.1412197172769; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 13:59:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.170.126.213 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 13:59:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20140929100937.0527cbae.freebsd@edvax.de> <5429579A.7030501@ShaneWare.Biz> <20140929172329.08163a41.freebsd@edvax.de> <20140929183655.361534e8@Papi> <5429FFA3.7030200@sentex.net> Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 22:59:32 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: BASH Shellshock and FreeBSD 4.X From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBKxJlkcnplamN6YWs=?= Cc: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 20:59:34 -0000 Hi Thanks for info about compiling bash on old systems. I have compiled newest bash on FreeBSD 6.3/7.3 with 28 patches now.. But on FreeBSD 6.1 I have this bug http://pastebin.com/rD1uAute , maby anybody can help ? FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p10 pkg_info |egrep "bash|libic" bash-3.1.10_1 The GNU Project's Bourne Again SHell libiconv-1.9.2_2 A character set conversion library Regards 2014-09-30 19:29 GMT+02:00 Mario Lobo : > Thanks :) ! > > > 2014-09-29 21:56 GMT-03:00 Mike Tancsa : > >> On 9/29/2014 5:36 PM, Mario Lobo wrote: >> >>> for i in $(jot -w %03d 25); do >>> for i in $(jot -w %03d 25);do patch -p0 < ../bash43-$i; done >>> >> >> Hi, >> there are 27 patches now. >> >> ---Mike >> >> -- >> ------------------- >> Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 >> Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net >> Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net >> Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ >> > > > > -- > Mario Lobo > http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br > FreeBSD since version 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99,7% winfoes FREE) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 1 21:23:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02ED6873 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 21:23:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org [192.94.73.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.sdf.org", Issuer "SDF.ORG" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C104DC27 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 21:23:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from otaku.freeshell.org (IDENT:case@otaku.freeshell.org [192.94.73.9]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.8/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s91LNHcO017396 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256 bits) verified NO) for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 21:23:20 GMT Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 21:23:17 +0000 (UTC) From: John Case X-X-Sender: case@faeroes.freeshell.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Locked out of FreeBSD EC2 image - trying to figure out why ... Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 21:23:33 -0000 I added this ipfw line to my ec2 image and then rebooted it, and am unable to connect over the network now: deny ip from 10.0.0.0/8,172.16.0.0/12,192.168.0.0/16 to any deny ip from 0.0.0.0/8,169.254.0.0/16,192.0.2.0/24,224.0.0.0/4,240.0.0.0/4 to any The private IP that my instance uses is in the 172.31.xx.xx block, so is it my blocking of 172.16.0.0/12 that is causing the problem ? I assigned a fixed "elastic" Ip to the instance in the hopes that amazon would fire up the instance and give it that *real* IP when it dhcp'd an address, but that doesn't seem to be the case. Is there any way to force amazon to give it a real IP so I can log into this system ? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 1 22:04:00 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FE799CB for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 22:04:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-f173.google.com (mail-ob0-f173.google.com [209.85.214.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E17EB1D9 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 22:03:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f173.google.com with SMTP id wp4so1149558obc.18 for ; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 15:03:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=PENtL7XOlkITYwqlBxe4vpOZ7qNOFPT0bsE5Kv9m8CM=; b=emOUrVPdx4bdWMU6tTJXYzvPUxLKCkDXYukaRV7BmxtMBRTz1uO3UkQqAtHG0VGvzo IMUWJ7q8P2s468Jy6quemIb4EcDsVLRAlnL9S408b/DXH4P4vYr0rF3kFD76gKFQP9/1 GgPgnZuz5I5UdAUFZRmJ52mNJg1KBJtX5sQtvM7ECPu+bsTjYGEy+jtb8SOfn3+IXMSb xr4U8YYxhhvolysAwAbliDmoN41PpCoON+xsfXxFLl8OApSw6N1pNjBuT4kbRdDt6EyT faqe4H5OxfIUfELqyEoSi4L8fG389weHSNLUCwseDq9hIHQ5rYRtnrFoOO9xD1RTtvWf bh5A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl8pwqcE5sMhBD+d8qQk36IldUkVHpXiCNW3gMYIvd9e+b/NbiTKZvHIjSOPp5RIPNbomEZ MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.175.228 with SMTP id cd4mr16570159oec.83.1412201033348; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 15:03:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.220.134 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 15:03:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 15:03:53 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Locked out of FreeBSD EC2 image - trying to figure out why ... From: Michael Sierchio To: John Case Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 22:04:00 -0000 On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 2:23 PM, John Case wrote: > > I added this ipfw line to my ec2 image and then rebooted it, and am unable > to connect over the network now: > > > deny ip from 10.0.0.0/8,172.16.0.0/12,192.168.0.0/16 to any > deny ip from 0.0.0.0/8,169.254.0.0/16,192.0.2.0/24,224.0.0.0/4,240.0.0.0/4 > to any > > > The private IP that my instance uses is in the 172.31.xx.xx block, so is it > my blocking of 172.16.0.0/12 that is causing the problem ? Yes. DHCP responses will come from an RFC1918 network, for example. This is naive and really unnecessary - just use an appropriate EC2 security policy. If you insist on using ipfw, you'll need to improve your understanding of how things work. Also - an elastic IP will not persist across stopping and starting an instance, and you should associate it using a script inside the instance when it starts. - M From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 1 22:12:30 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C919CF3F for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 22:12:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org [192.94.73.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.sdf.org", Issuer "SDF.ORG" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA4D7313 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 22:12:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from otaku.freeshell.org (IDENT:case@otaku.freeshell.org [192.94.73.9]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.8/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s91MCJdl018973 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256 bits) verified NO); Wed, 1 Oct 2014 22:12:19 GMT Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 22:12:19 +0000 (UTC) From: John Case X-X-Sender: case@faeroes.freeshell.org To: Michael Sierchio Subject: Re: Locked out of FreeBSD EC2 image - trying to figure out why ... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 22:12:30 -0000 On Wed, 1 Oct 2014, Michael Sierchio wrote: > Yes. DHCP responses will come from an RFC1918 network, for example. > This is naive and really unnecessary - just use an appropriate EC2 > security policy. If you insist on using ipfw, you'll need to improve > your understanding of how things work. > > Also - an elastic IP will not persist across stopping and starting an > instance, and you should associate it using a script inside the > instance when it starts. Ok, so the only way for me to rescue this instance (I did not make a snapshot prior to the firewall) is to snapshot it now, and then mount that snapshot on another instance and edit the conf file ... Anything faster and easier than that, or is that my only option ? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 1 22:52:18 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29AC4602 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 22:52:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail48.atl71.mcdlv.net (mail48.atl71.mcdlv.net [198.2.129.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5A09A77 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 22:52:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=mail48.atl71.mcdlv.net; h=Subject:From:Reply-To:To:Date:Message-ID:List-Unsubscribe:Sender:Content-Type:MIME-Version; i=team=3Dpivotpointresearch.com@mail48.atl71.mcdlv.net; bh=v+Vh3aSvAwArI67pVGz+x0jj4SM=; b=h37cepzyqpEKs8vBxy42GQGcnI54eF8DEpbM1qdgaFtDCQgs28ATzSgOhcTtXop1mB6Cd20SjBEf mcne6dQKnepxdLOBkvfpkcTf/pzQW+GSbYvN8gNw5oYLsbVYqoutJ2FbyPJCrS102Uw70xvUB91x VT3YJ/hc8ZyEbzFiFLw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=mail48.atl71.mcdlv.net; b=V9MX/YU8Axrfyui/IFo8RDsP5WTWIMyDx7YsjxQYv5VA9jm04o9HsgDN99veM8vpgtZMVnxgDvZR ir8GQ8yHc1hNn1TEnxVWCQxJjruEcR+7sAMbwsQeVuOR3/lQpuLZmPc8ECcZAI31CXX2vgFiKzqK tq4pmsqe/HEeeeZk4pI=; Received: from (127.0.0.1) by mail48.atl71.mcdlv.net id h5i2q2174f4l for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 22:37:09 +0000 (envelope-from ) Subject: =?utf-8?Q?Pivotal=20Perspectives=20Newsletter=2D=20September=202014=2D=20Is=20there=20really=20a=20need=20for=20Swift=20as=20a=20programming=20language=3F?= From: =?utf-8?Q?Pivot=20Point?= Reply-To: =?utf-8?Q?Pivot=20Point?= To: =?utf-8?Q?*|FNAME|*?= Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 22:37:09 +0000 Message-ID: X-Mailer: MailChimp Mailer - **CID9ee7a53fbb81b96126c3** X-Campaign: mailchimpca43e8b1f0e9c72628074f775.9ee7a53fbb X-campaignid: mailchimpca43e8b1f0e9c72628074f775.9ee7a53fbb X-Report-Abuse: Please report abuse for this campaign here: http://www.mailchimp.com/abuse/abuse.phtml?u=ca43e8b1f0e9c72628074f775&id=9ee7a53fbb&e=81b96126c3 X-MC-User: ca43e8b1f0e9c72628074f775 X-Feedback-ID: 31346347:31346347.761293:us8:mc X-Accounttype: pd Sender: "Pivot Point" x-mcda: FALSE MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="fixed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 22:52:18 -0000 View this email in your browser (http://us8.campaign-archive1.com/?u=3Dca4= 3e8b1f0e9c72628074f775&id=3D9ee7a53fbb&e=3D81b96126c3) ** Pivotal Perspectives Newsletter- focus on Swift ------------------------------------------------------------ ** Developer Michael Demetriou wanted to hear other developer's perspectives= on Swift=2C the new programming language from Apple. Michael wanted to= know "Do we need yet another programming language?" ------------------------------------------------------------ The answer? Most of you said no! Comments: Yes: I think apple is on the right path. A new=2C improved=2C more "modern" pro= gramming language was much needed. For me Swift is the reason to start iOS development Swift is what modern C++14 could be with the ugly bits cut off and the dan= gerous C backwards-compatibility removed. I think apple is on the right path. A new=2C improved=2C more "modern" pro= gramming language was much needed. No: The part of not having to add brackets around conditions within if=2C whil= e=2C for and switch controls makes me feel uncomfortable to program in. Typical Apple hype=2C you can't trust their statements about performance While it's great that Apple realizes people aren't happy with the oddball= specialty language Objective C=2C creating yet another oddball specialty= language is not the right answer. How does Swift compare to Objective C? A lot more dynamic and just the change we need to continue the world of iO= S development More ideas taken from modern scripting and functional languages compared t= o objective c which didn't advance much further than c/c++ This programming language like Objective C=2C but easier. This programming= language like scripting language. Way better than objc. The syntax is great and modern. it combines almost a= ll the best things from other existing languages. It is less consistent and semantically buggy. Just based to the free ebook. It is more like Ruby than OBJC. Yes its nota= tion is pretty short=2C but there is nothing wrong with readable OBJC nota= tion. Quite different. Muti-paradigm (generics=2C OOP=2C functional). Compiler-t= ime checking=2C type inference=2C tuples... A modern language at last! I l= ove ObjC but also wanted to learn a new language Better=2C very different but still inspired by objective c. A lot of rules= to keep things clean=2C sometimes seem arbitrary. Very feature rich but c= ompletely different feel. Still learning Better readability. Code is much easier to understand It is big difference is its dynamic way of not taking care of the memory. Swift is dramatically safer both from offering type-safety and better func= tional programming. It has the potential to be a much faster language. It is simpler. It reduces the amount of files. But also makes you lazy wit= h parentheses and semicolons which is problematic when switching to anothe= r language (platform). Terse. Optional types are a big plus. Some changes seem to reduce the numb= er of keystrokes at the risk of introducing confusion=2C i.e. break; now i= mplied in switch statements. The big risk is that Apple can't deliver. Alr= eady in the Xcode beta process we have seen Swift changed=2C Introducing t= his at WWDC was probably premature and should have been kept until the lan= guage spec was nailed down. I know lots of developers who are interested i= n Swift but who would laugh at the idea of doing real work in it. And nobo= dy I know thinks Apple can make it a serious mainstream language in under= six months. Here is Chris Gibbs from Apple talking about the value of role of Swift. (= click on the image to play the youtube video clip) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DVv2zJErQt84 Thank you for participating in the Pivotal Perspectives Panel program. We= hold a drawing for $100 USD each month among the developers who participa= te. Congratulations to our recent drawing winners and good luck to all of= you in the drawing which is tomorrow! Good luck to all and thank you for= sharing your pivotal perspectives! =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Copyright =C2=A9 2014 Pivot Point Research Group=2C All rights reserved. You registered for the Pivotal Perspectives program Our mailing address is: Pivot Point Research Group 40 Lake Bellevue Drive Suite 100 Bellevue=2C WA 98005 USA ** unsubscribe from this list (http://pivotpointresearch.us8.list-manage2.= com/unsubscribe?u=3Dca43e8b1f0e9c72628074f775&id=3D43183e145a&e=3D81b96126c3= &c=3D9ee7a53fbb) ** update subscription preferences (http://pivotpointresearch.us8.list-man= age1.com/profile?u=3Dca43e8b1f0e9c72628074f775&id=3D43183e145a&e=3D= 81b96126c3) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 1 23:06:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 904A8A4C for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 23:06:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-x229.google.com (mail-qc0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45897BE5 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 23:06:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id i8so1364780qcq.0 for ; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 16:06:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsd.com.br; s=capeta; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:organization :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=j+gOewmilhcJ0pNG1sA04a8YYr28G3GV3+yDPtsJ+MU=; b=eECfheS3UJazFFR3DMd1SAF9tGjJ61iiuItsTTiC2xy7mkPwV72ubhzdXzOXXpLKYs eEdDYlDalnkpapJMqlG2ZbYb9g/SY72ldCNRPFABpdXr0/QXtIs7EvkCMocZ4OsuBvvg 7hv/mkshCgdOVrnorF1zNf31sf8bvnJ6UVf0Q= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=j+gOewmilhcJ0pNG1sA04a8YYr28G3GV3+yDPtsJ+MU=; b=PZ87Msi8om5qLv7qw8lv1NjhqeXZ561uehMspZr6EB0x0o67vB5+UhyMWaI3VB7RhR 1q0yClgAkeZSFHiqeIfu2d8Xgq1kP6NESL2sjeVVaUTUPVQnLm2hH+SHdjsMMtzKnZ8V 3Lh5zTKlQaSWwwootG37qqZUHrWu37Sv6/2egRWYCuo9jOiBnQ4wfSTzhRUW/Z8HvO2z 5UzPrHJQd8UAvvRKcq2GXevicA4ww5GJ338gpEy5+wglEH7hg1/7Bu4E0CsY/rury6Ek m+TkW3NB2ZHgjkLYWoDv6T3Ieijbit5RzONimGhgpLEm60TH8vYDT9GgaIcPOPdpYivE R4sw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmT9vnPx9ORZ7sCE37EzzZWodclq9V4xjrYs82SfdOV5lo2g1LEvsjP0ymkmF/v8UU7gSGM X-Received: by 10.140.20.3 with SMTP id 3mr25703453qgi.33.1412204775761; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 16:06:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Papi ([177.98.157.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id e7sm1835295qab.34.2014.10.01.16.06.14 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Oct 2014 16:06:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 20:06:31 -0300 From: Mario Lobo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BASH Shellshock and FreeBSD 4.X Message-ID: <20141001200631.4ae5fd3d@Papi> In-Reply-To: References: <20140929100937.0527cbae.freebsd@edvax.de> <5429579A.7030501@ShaneWare.Biz> <20140929172329.08163a41.freebsd@edvax.de> <20140929183655.361534e8@Papi> <5429FFA3.7030200@sentex.net> Organization: BSD X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 23:06:17 -0000 On Wed, 1 Oct 2014 22:59:32 +0200 Micha=C5=82 J=C4=99drzejczak wrote: > Hi >=20 > Thanks for info about compiling bash on old systems. > I have compiled newest bash on FreeBSD 6.3/7.3 with 28 patches now.. >=20 > But on FreeBSD 6.1 I have this bug http://pastebin.com/rD1uAute , > maby anybody can help ? >=20 > FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p10 > pkg_info |egrep "bash|libic" > bash-3.1.10_1 The GNU Project's Bourne Again SHell > libiconv-1.9.2_2 A character set conversion library >=20 >=20 > Regards >=20 > 2014-09-30 19:29 GMT+02:00 Mario Lobo : > > Thanks :) ! > > > > > > 2014-09-29 21:56 GMT-03:00 Mike Tancsa : > > > >> On 9/29/2014 5:36 PM, Mario Lobo wrote: > >> > >>> for i in $(jot -w %03d 25); do > >>> for i in $(jot -w %03d 25);do patch -p0 < ../bash43-$i; done > >>> > >> > >> Hi, > >> there are 27 patches now. > >> > >> ---Mike > >> > >> -- > >> ------------------- > >> Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 > >> Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net > >> Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net > >> Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Mario Lobo > > http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br > > FreeBSD since version 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99,7% > > winfoes FREE) _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Humm ... looks like bash is importing functions that do not exist on probably on the 6.1's libiconv. What I would try to do is to copy the port directory for libiconv from one of the 6.x machines where the compilation of bash worked and try to build it on the 6.1 machine. --=20 Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) =20 "UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things,=20 because that would also stop you from doing clever things." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 2 01:13:21 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6564B5C for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 01:13:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-x22f.google.com (mail-yk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FAE1AF7 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 01:13:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yk0-f175.google.com with SMTP id 19so676349ykq.34 for ; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 18:13:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2wsqqqu5OLaZC4iB8NZDaJnDZkJEzPxsLzfWybiuY+U=; b=mdbiwCYh4aGqzqLxCxDYuicBnJkCAkKT/IM9jHj1DKP//+CXDAuScjtJmgRY2YaoiM wRJeeaRAxwCBlwhpHfSfC1I3ZQy6Xb7VJYYBd0YNk4jxKbXhEuDHvvTf6+KCDd69FHns h0vbjaQmYYz6Oox/flOwNWPjMI+dBbYCI1GWrJWBI5LeHvFB0L3V2u0PA3n/S+ydwuV7 ekn9woRCugWhvV29wlLa2kedawSgZzw5PPHFh0bMPxONkIM8XSuf2IBYco4bX4IplYbR rkEYwl4QPmGklEwyqGdhFe5kb6rc/qrO11W1kFI+qmPviHy9X5nK0HDSo+l+sFiBNG0h +b+w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.137.2 with SMTP id qe2mr38395604vdb.11.1412212400566; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 18:13:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.31.52.6 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 18:13:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <23187F4C-0413-4F84-9C86-6EC1084C794C@btinternet.com> <50282.76.192.184.214.1411925201.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 21:13:20 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: freebsd-update question From: "firmdog@gmail.com" To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 01:13:22 -0000 Finally figured it out. Been a long time since upgrading Freebsd. This set of commands successfully upgrades a Freebsd server from 8.3 to 8.4 up on Amazon AWS: svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/8.4 /usr/src svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head /usr/ports svn up /usr/src && svn up /usr/ports cd /usr/src make buildworld make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DXENHVM make installkernel KERNCONF=3DXENHVM make installworld mergemaster -Ui (choose option [Leave it for later] on everything to be safe, at least in my case...) reboot On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 12:54 PM, firmdog@gmail.com wrot= e: > I read the subversion primer page at freebsd.org :-) > > Looks like this is what I am supposed to use to get the proper > checkout code for 8.4: > > svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/8.4 /usr/src > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 12:42 PM, firmdog@gmail.com wr= ote: >> Looks like "8" is the only option: >> >> # svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/head /usr/src >> svn: E170000: URL 'svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/head' doesn't exist >> >> # svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/8.4 /usr/src >> svn: E170000: URL 'svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/8.4' doesn't exist >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 12:35 PM, firmdog@gmail.com w= rote: >>> Should I use "head" instead of "8" here: >>> >>> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/8 /usr/src >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 7:56 AM, firmdog@gmail.com w= rote: >>>> I am confused now. Here is what I did to try and upgrade from 8.3 to >>>> 8.4 on Amazon AWS where the freebsd AMI's use XENHVM: >>>> >>>> setenv PACKAGESITE >>>> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-stable/Latest/ >>>> pkg_add -r subversion >>>> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/8 /usr/src >>>> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head /usr/ports >>>> svn up /usr/src && svn up /usr/ports >>>> cd /usr/src >>>> make buildworld >>>> make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DXENHVM >>>> make installkernel KERNCONF=3DXENHVM >>>> make installworld >>>> mergemaster -Ui >>>> reboot >>>> >>>> >>>> BEFORE: 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0 >>>> >>>> AFTER: 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0 r272337M >>>> >>>> What am I doing wrong?? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 9:32 PM, firmdog@gmail.com = wrote: >>>>> Thanks. My freebsd server is on Amazon AWS using >>>>> http://www.daemonology.net/freebsd-on-ec2/ >>>>> >>>>> A bit nervous because there is no local console. Just installed a new >>>>> test/obsolete 8.3 box and will try the upgrade to 8.4 using these >>>>> commands: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/8 /usr/src >>>>> cd /usr/src >>>>> make buildworld >>>>> make kernel >>>>> make installworld >>>>> mergemaster -Ui >>>>> reboot >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Axel wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 9:04 PM, firmdog@gmail.com >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> OK. I will try that. Found these notes from 10 years ago. Gonna giv= e >>>>>>> this a try, not sure if cvsup will work anymore.... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> cvsup -g -L 2 update-file >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The update-file contains this: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *default host=3Dcvsup11.us.FreeBSD.org >>>>>>> *default base=3D/var/db >>>>>>> *default prefix=3D/usr >>>>>>> *default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_8 >>>>>>> *default delete use-rel-suffix >>>>>>> src-all >>>>>>> ports-all tag=3D. >>>>>>> doc-all tag=3D. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> cd /usr/src >>>>>>> >>>>>>> make buildworld >>>>>>> >>>>>>> make buildkernel >>>>>>> >>>>>>> make installkernel >>>>>>> >>>>>>> mergemaster >>>>>>> >>>>>>> make installworld >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 2:36 PM, FF wrote: >>>>>>> > So your kernel won't be updated because you are running a custom = kernel. >>>>>>> > Your uname is based on the running kernel. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > If you want to confirm that you've in fact updated, you can reboo= t to >>>>>>> > the >>>>>>> > GENERIC kernel which will confirm you are at 8.4 or whatever. Fre= eBSD >>>>>>> > update >>>>>>> > is a binary update based on the release versions -- deviate from = them >>>>>>> > and it >>>>>>> > doesn't break, but it can't touch those files. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Since you know enough to put a custom kernel on there, you should= follow >>>>>>> > the >>>>>>> > source rebuild instructions which would be basically be to svn do= wn the >>>>>>> > whole 8.4 source tree, make the world, make the kernel and instal= l it, >>>>>>> > reboot, and install the world. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > I think the directions are in the FreeBSD handbook. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Best, >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Valeri Galtsev >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> On Sun, September 28, 2014 10:01 am, firmdog@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>> >> > I just installed a brand new 8.3 box and got the same behavior= . I see >>>>>>> >> > in my output below that I have to build or update my own kerne= l? >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > # uname -a >>>>>>> >> > FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0: Tue Apr 10 17:33:5= 8 UTC >>>>>>> >> > 2012 root@mynewhost:/usr/obj/i386/usr/src/sys/XENHVM i386 >>>>>>> >> > # >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > Starting the upgrade attempt: >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > # freebsd-update -r 8.4-RELEASE upgrade >>>>>>> >> > Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. >>>>>>> >> > Fetching public key from update6.freebsd.org... done. >>>>>>> >> > Fetching metadata signature for 8.3-RELEASE from >>>>>>> >> > update6.freebsd.org... >>>>>>> >> > done. >>>>>>> >> > Fetching metadata index... done. >>>>>>> >> > Fetching 2 metadata files... done. >>>>>>> >> > Inspecting system... done. >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > WARNING: This system is running a "xenhvm" kernel, which is no= t a >>>>>>> >> > kernel configuration distributed as part of FreeBSD 8.3-RELEAS= E. >>>>>>> >> > This kernel will not be updated: you MUST update the kernel ma= nually >>>>>>> >> > before running "/usr/sbin/freebsd-update install". >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > The following components of FreeBSD seem to be installed: >>>>>>> >> > src/base src/bin src/cddl src/contrib src/crypto src/etc src/g= ames >>>>>>> >> > src/gnu src/include src/krb5 src/lib src/libexec src/release >>>>>>> >> > src/rescue >>>>>>> >> > src/sbin src/secure src/share src/sys src/tools src/ubin src/u= sbin >>>>>>> >> > world/base world/dict world/doc world/games world/info world/m= anpages >>>>>>> >> > world/proflibs >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > The following components of FreeBSD do not seem to be installe= d: >>>>>>> >> > kernel/generic world/catpages >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > Fetching metadata signature for 8.4-RELEASE from >>>>>>> >> > update6.freebsd.org... >>>>>>> >> > done. >>>>>>> >> > Fetching metadata index... done. >>>>>>> >> > Fetching 1 metadata patches. done. >>>>>>> >> > Applying metadata patches... done. >>>>>>> >> > Fetching 1 metadata files... done. >>>>>>> >> > Inspecting system... done. >>>>>>> >> > Fetching files from 8.3-RELEASE for merging... done. >>>>>>> >> > Preparing to download files... >>>>>>> >> > done. >>>>>>> >> > Fetching 32149 >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > patches.....10....20....30....40....50....60....70....80....90= ....100....110....120....130....140....150....160....170....180.... >>>>>>> >> > SNIP=E2=80=A6. >>>>>>> >> > done. >>>>>>> >> > Applying patches... >>>>>>> >> > Fetching 778 files... done. >>>>>>> >> > Attempting to automatically merge changes in files... done. >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > The following file could not be merged automatically: >>>>>>> >> > /etc/mail/freebsd.cf >>>>>>> >> > Press Enter to edit this file in vi and resolve the conflicts >>>>>>> >> > manually... >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > Then a bunch more of /etc/mail files and also a merge of >>>>>>> >> > /etc/master.passwd: >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > Then this: >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > The following files will be updated as part of updating to >>>>>>> >> > 8.4-RELEASE-p16: >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > Then I run this: >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > # freebsd-update install >>>>>>> >> > Installing updates... >>>>>>> >> > Kernel updates have been installed. Please reboot and run >>>>>>> >> > "/usr/sbin/freebsd-update install" again to finish installing >>>>>>> >> > updates. >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > # reboot >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> In last message before reboot it instructed to "reboot then run >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> /usr/sbin/freebsd-update install >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> again". Did you run "freebsd-update install" after reboot? >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> Valeri >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > #uname -a >>>>>>> >> > FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0: Tue Apr 10 17:33:5= 8 UTC >>>>>>> >> > 2012 root@mynewhost:/usr/obj/i386/usr/src/sys/XENHVM i386 >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 5:06 AM, FF wro= te: >>>>>>> >> >> Can you provide the output of those commands? Freebsd-update = is >>>>>>> >> >> usually >>>>>>> >> >> pretty good about telling you what's wrong. >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> Thanks >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 3:02 PM, firmdog@gmail.com >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> wrote: >>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>> >> >>> Yes I ran freebsd-update install. Then I rebooted. Then I di= d it >>>>>>> >> >>> again. >>>>>>> >> >>> Still at 8.3 >>>>>>> >> >>> On Sep 27, 2014 2:37 PM, "Dave" >>>>>>> >> >>> wrote: >>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>> >> >>> > On 27 September 2014 18:22:15 BST, "firmdog@gmail.com" >>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>>> >> >>> > wrote: >>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>> >> Hi, >>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>> >> Trying to use freebsd-update to go from 8.3 to 8.4 and I = am >>>>>>> >> >>> >> doing >>>>>>> >> >>> this: >>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>> >> # freebsd-update -r 8.4-RELEASE upgrade >>>>>>> >> >>> >> # freebsd-update install >>>>>>> >> >>> >> # reboot >>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>> >> After reboot I am still at 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEAS= E #0 >>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>> >> What am I doing wrong? >>>>>>> >> >>> >> ------------------------------ >>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>> >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>>>> >> >>> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questio= ns >>>>>>> >> >>> >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>>>>> >> >>> >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>> > Don't you need run rub "freebsd-update install"? >>>>>>> >> >>> > -- >>>>>>> >> >>> > Dave >>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>>> >> >>> > GPG/PGP ID: CDB94DA1 >>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> >> >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>>>> >> >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>>>>> >> >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>>>>> >> >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> -- >>>>>>> >> >> FF >>>>>>> >> > _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> >> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>>>> >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>>>>> >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>>>>> >> > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>>> >> Valeri Galtsev >>>>>>> >> Sr System Administrator >>>>>>> >> Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics >>>>>>> >> Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics >>>>>>> >> University of Chicago >>>>>>> >> Phone: 773-702-4247 >>>>>>> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > -- >>>>>>> > FF >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> CVS is now deprecated. Please use SVN instead if you prefer to follo= w the >>>>>> manual upgrade process [1] >>>>>> FreeBSD-update tool upgrades (binary upgrades) your base system and = GENERIC >>>>>> kernel only. It syncs sources too. >>>>>> So you need to rebuild your custom kernel after the process. [2] >>>>>> >>>>>> Kind regards. >>>>>> Alexandre >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/svn.html >>>>>> [2] >>>>>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate= .html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 2 02:27:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F9476AD for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 02:27:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5317216A for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 02:27:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-76-4.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s922Qs8w019103 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 21:26:54 -0500 Message-ID: <542CB964.7050003@hiwaay.net> Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 21:33:08 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: bash/shellshock question .... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 02:27:01 -0000 .... Which version of FBSD 9.3 bash fixes the shellshock problem ? I did a 'pkg upgrade' Monday & my bash got upgraded from 4.3.24 ---> 4.3.25_1 .... does that version fix the problem ? TIA .... [root@kabini1, /etc, 9:28:22pm] 628 % uname -a FreeBSD kabini1.local 9.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE #0 r268512: Thu Jul 10 23:44:39 UTC 2014 root@snap.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 [root@kabini1, /etc, 9:32:30pm] 629 % ... BTW .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 2 06:09:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C94A377A for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 06:09:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 719379CD for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 06:09:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s9269Qjn070929 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 07:09:27 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk s9269Qjn070929 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/s9269Qjn070929; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none; dkim-atps=neutral Message-ID: <542CEC15.8010307@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 07:09:25 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bash/shellshock question .... References: <542CB964.7050003@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: <542CB964.7050003@hiwaay.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NRUO6T4Ht07A0gVevkUpoBHgEpBgXDXqg" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 06:09:38 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --NRUO6T4Ht07A0gVevkUpoBHgEpBgXDXqg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/10/2014 03:33, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >=20 > .... Which version of FBSD 9.3 bash fixes the shellshock problem ? I di= d > a 'pkg upgrade' Monday & my bash got upgraded from 4.3.24 ---> 4.3.25_1= > .... does that version fix the problem ? TIA .... There's more than just the original shellshock bug: there has been a whole series of related bugs. This is the latest: http://www.vuxml.org/freebsd/512d1301-49b9-11e4-ae2c-c80aa9043978.html Right now, you want the latest available version of bash installed, which is bash-4.3.28 at the moment. Keep an eye out for new advisories and updates to the shells/bash port. I think the latest round of patches to bash have probably fixed the underlying problems, but that can only be established properly if they pass the test of time. Otherwise, consider how you are using bash on your systems. If you're only using it as the login shell for some trusted users then you aren't really exposed and don't need to worry very much. If you've got a bunch of web-facing CGI scripts written in bash, or you've configured SSH forced commands using bash then you need to take action. Ultimately switching to /bin/sh for those roles is a very good idea (since /bin/sh is not bash on FreeBSD, for which we may all be sincerely thankful.) Sometimes that's as easy as changing the #! line at the top of the script, but it can involve some significant reprogramming. If you can't make that switch in a timely fashion, then firewall off or disable the vulnerable services. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --NRUO6T4Ht07A0gVevkUpoBHgEpBgXDXqg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJULOwVXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATTv8QAJllj3TF6E0vl7LYXH0d/GMM hLpLJ6bn8ZHOk+kZ4heFdm2eKiimfWp8x+nLjVCv3t2ecyU+Sox3RLHvXlhQd/Ma S5Pp1DQroP0lz9BZwHRzP94erpR0xtZ1D186wBG+Oc6qu+jtYu7bDDkvat4UZWtC EvNjUrSEAUB4doYOfbAc96wS2ivIeYSzcnqRriQD0RwcGHzIUAMSWgJSefpngKAB KBokA85MQ8u78TxP0ePtXV86Zp+Fqi4F15h+2NVB/ma+jeIojJt11eRaP/xDREUE pGxeKYpZF9VVx/Gc85cm9cBMXiZ9PP0QdPSZtEuVv2Oz9FTtWKaHa8oYaiBowx0O 6x8iRGxEMfBdu//JqTte/DLjU4pV4FmEYn+6tH+/QIIQWeAH8hSCJbx99B8JqWuY OTmijXXcyOexntZ4JiOETMPPX5491CO/IUVGQv8CQebjsGsPjTtLj7UcEDbVe2Zi Iee83oSrrE7aYq2loRHQwbXYjsh4QaYK6lcWKHu/fFVoJwYcEjdfhXMx3P6i27aR VkPf+v9o41ISfoS7avX+SNrx7yjOAOzHeXZzCRYiEaqPgvenumgYwfrBN6MsaOa6 Yt2SJE1oM4RNtJhqsiAVLOFAwNAgAWnlsb00zKWB/Q+OZ5mkJ51NsuLI2LB8uEVS LW/FZRfgVu2c3k9k/gSI =z3ov -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NRUO6T4Ht07A0gVevkUpoBHgEpBgXDXqg-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 2 06:16:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B763E9CA for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 06:16:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-x232.google.com (mail-oi0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 849E2ADC for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 06:16:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f50.google.com with SMTP id i138so1405593oig.23 for ; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 23:16:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=k+kIMGNtosNaezFx3Pgh3U3/hgLzmH2PnMiZC0gDrFw=; b=rx6sYf4NC/4b5g77zfVwHzHEDMLCny5VwD/tsOowPV7X09hvAczJkGWI2okbAQsPpL E/3p4aOVm0GE0GdiBDtSmtc+AZWM63onrFcPv5udSOe6Ex0BU9iSPGjoM3jFsVVEEEoq lB8TjEbT51hC7mBdnZo/rY36xs7MZwadUhaee7pP8xjrDLMmnNzZC7xg8dqVzouGbjWh DyI78GFVEdFFNIKRD23GzCON590iJk96xkbRsJ6bM6XEBJj9QsKPFSREHkNMzkS4tuTQ O9U9zPtWzRIn9K4JmQ3mBKRl7XaKppEDb7XJeM/gJ39O35hEe0fm9s0p7aYgCOvP5axB /8uA== X-Received: by 10.60.145.143 with SMTP id su15mr62517245oeb.58.1412230596820; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 23:16:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.76.178.39 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 23:16:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Amitabh Kant Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 11:46:16 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: make package-recursive not installing port To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 06:16:37 -0000 Hi I am trying to create packages from ports (with non default options). The packages get created, but the root port does get installed on the machine where the package is created. The related/dependent ports though get installed and packages created. For example on a freshly installed and patched system with latest ports tree: root@test_pkg:~ # uname -a FreeBSD test_pkg 9.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE #0 r268512: Thu Jul 10 23:44:39 UTC 2014 root@snap.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 root@test_pkg:~ # mkdir -p /usr/ports/packages/All root@test_pkg:~ # cd /usr/ports/databases/postgresql92-server root@test_pkg:/usr/ports/databases/postgresql92-server # make config-recursive root@test_pkg:/usr/ports/databases/postgresql92-server # make package-recursive command output (last couple of lines) ====> Compressing man pages (compress-man) ===> Building package for pkg-1.3.8_2 ===> Building package for gmake-3.82_2 ===> Building package for libxml2-2.9.1_1 ===> Building package for postgresql92-client-9.2.9 ===> Building package for gettext-0.18.3.1_1 ===> Building package for libiconv-1.14_4 ===> Building package for indexinfo-0.2 ===> Building package for pkgconf-0.9.7 The package has been created for all ports including postgresql92-server root@test_pkg:/usr/ports/databases/postgresql92-server # ls -lh /usr/ports/packages/All/ total 11248 -rw-r--r-- 2 root wheel 2.0M Oct 2 11:18 gettext-0.18.3.1_1.txz -rw-r--r-- 2 root wheel 333k Oct 2 11:18 gmake-3.82_2.txz -rw-r--r-- 2 root wheel 4.8k Oct 2 11:18 indexinfo-0.2.txz -rw-r--r-- 2 root wheel 587k Oct 2 11:18 libiconv-1.14_4.txz -rw-r--r-- 2 root wheel 752k Oct 2 11:18 libxml2-2.9.1_1.txz -rw-r--r-- 2 root wheel 2M Oct 2 11:18 pkg-1.3.8_2.txz -rw-r--r-- 2 root wheel 22k Oct 2 11:18 pkgconf-0.9.7.txz -rw-r--r-- 2 root wheel 1.9M Oct 2 11:18 postgresql92-client-9.2.9.txz -rw-r--r-- 2 root wheel 3.2M Oct 2 11:16 postgresql92-server-9.2.9.txz But postgresql92-server has not been installed on the system root@test_pkg:/usr/ports/databases/postgresql92-server # pkg info dialog4ports-0.1.5_2 Console Interface to configure ports gettext-0.18.3.1_1 GNU gettext package gmake-3.82_2 GNU version of 'make' utility indexinfo-0.2 Utility to regenerate the GNU info page index libiconv-1.14_4 Character set conversion library libxml2-2.9.1_1 XML parser library for GNOME pkg-1.3.8_2 Package manager pkgconf-0.9.7 Utility to help to configure compiler and linker flags postgresql92-client-9.2.9 PostgreSQL database (client) I have now tested this with multiple ports (postgresql server, pgbouncer, nginx) with the same results. It seems even 10-RELEASE has the same behaviour. Is this how it is meant to behave, because earlier creating packages from ports used to install all the ports? Running in virtualbox (host OS X Mavericks) . Fully patched using freebsd-update. Latest ports tree fetched through "portsnap fetch extract" . Amitabh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 2 06:29:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49131F42 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 06:29:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C78EFBED for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 06:29:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s926Td8l071387 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 07:29:39 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=infracaninophile.co.uk DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk s926Td8l071387 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1412231380; bh=ZmWgUBLSVuUrs9pQRLsUbnxxAfdq3xdMnHa3NF5/eJ0=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; z=Date:=20Thu,=2002=20Oct=202014=2007:29:38=20+0100|From:=20Matthew =20Seaman=20|To:=20freebsd-questi ons@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20make=20package-recursive=20not=20 installing=20port|References:=20|In-Reply-To:=20; b=R4rZ1yobhQ/U6wsdjG3vDvdqgZ2VTauoWKX14taUim/RqAMQ2/mEwF/vKt33QqFq7 is479y33ky//UuPHY0LEbE5Em1p3UeVtG1ZYjwIpVeAVU3keayggSOIpsicp7FW3x0 9dyqsZZAkreaQzMeUL5mejMQOEgWpbkD1625KNmc= Message-ID: <542CF0D2.9090209@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 07:29:38 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make package-recursive not installing port References: In-Reply-To: OpenPGP: id=E1ECF9BB Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XtLRkimft0kaofJS3f1lgaR2LpH3MDfal" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 06:29:47 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --XtLRkimft0kaofJS3f1lgaR2LpH3MDfal Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/10/2014 07:16, Amitabh Kant wrote: > But postgresql92-server has not been installed on the system > root@test_pkg:/usr/ports/databases/postgresql92-server # pkg info > dialog4ports-0.1.5_2 Console Interface to configure ports > gettext-0.18.3.1_1 GNU gettext package > gmake-3.82_2 GNU version of 'make' utility > indexinfo-0.2 Utility to regenerate the GNU info page = index > libiconv-1.14_4 Character set conversion library > libxml2-2.9.1_1 XML parser library for GNOME > pkg-1.3.8_2 Package manager > pkgconf-0.9.7 Utility to help to configure compiler an= d > linker flags > postgresql92-client-9.2.9 PostgreSQL database (client) >=20 >=20 > I have now tested this with multiple ports (postgresql server, pgbounce= r, > nginx) with the same results. It seems even 10-RELEASE has the same > behaviour. Is this how it is meant to behave, because earlier creating > packages from ports used to install all the ports? It's expected that postgresql92-server will not be installed as a dependency of anything using postgresql92-client -- after all, the postgresql database instance you're using could easily be situated on a completely different machine. It's also the case that 'make package' nowadays does not install the package being built. This is a result of the switch to staging and is generally a very good thing. Basically, if you want to use that package, then explicitly install it rather than relying on side-effects of the now outmoded and distinctly sub-optimal behaviour the ports used to have. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk --XtLRkimft0kaofJS3f1lgaR2LpH3MDfal Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJULPDSXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkAT/UoP/0kZeM9r3Nq8GyDv7I6uutDT SBcvT7raOHa9RaPJmKJfhM6Rr/BgJcbc3IyHMYbwXuswBeMdmRGRnBekwLUdgY6i afDr8yT5fj4oTayWf41+2qSmObKnHgW7nYdmYsn+NpFOPmvzhuj8w0XrahS+kr9s /5qXxavw9rW+m+inVzyrNDoksjCgdy/c6jVLPRupA+WjZl3JcaRF8nizc5KrRRf9 VUsrH4liZhOL/vT4tcIsNRDHnkpKzn+tRcd+9sJTHaNHz2Xxig8z4Na83izy50Yc EA6lAbbLTYdwXfaFbAmf+m6l2cSXV8+aD2/+3xadg/97Qs5Bfsnec/Cf0xw6Aq9O 754cFRIXETJMRH3buXUCX8u+6mqstH4W6kThjKkqNA33IBiI9HDvqdjcONNIi6if x+yhjkMGEHBmq8o5a0vKdS6185czR5JnzhPF9WJSH7y7RSzRRNBWeb2r0u9f2ZsW HRc5ABXLTif25gdbsvAq9gciZsGA7dECvdSZJOGQG2Eb48XrKokai0VIM6T+qT7d ztMxmWBsTKMtjrZ25PcFXjjlEPGqmlWrEjqk4b/5psvPVjn8tj9NYGoX9cXDiU84 xS7ig0N6b9yh8BISWiL79iqw+ex/Y07fX+ambX7XkFB+8Oifzn9I/j1R0lI4SFHH HIGRQSAbbGpS9eRjRxt6 =EMRz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XtLRkimft0kaofJS3f1lgaR2LpH3MDfal-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 2 06:37:46 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFF6F307 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 06:37:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-x231.google.com (mail-oi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA532CE3 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 06:37:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f49.google.com with SMTP id e131so1421037oig.36 for ; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 23:37:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=Z1iUt+YnTKOGG1Ne/DthzKREvTmJr1IMZbF1s+ZJNaw=; b=xD5l5iYellNFcRV2biWTSx9DnrpHuL8cNZOxu6QVk6enzJPVKGMmySh79DtH3brqNC JfGvdXaljiGt2ZZMdtJhs/B0v+6YBlPMmjx2gu+OQeyHFCH56wLT9pbSnIi7lmSII+6q kPS31LZOONkkGbfQJYVJKw8q/cjt4Hx79/nWQyhUdT9OnIdCDRtYk9YZDRyNfeh5G8Kq hQUG+jUDgVVXj+YGUO1tkbgnnyW0hNvNexhxvZ1M1e8VLeyKpfiY3ShbPH4ON1DCBxOw l20ozE55FUoMmkLz1t3B6+IROqGHzh/DvgmCWTWQRYu3aPnDR3vUk4bswhU3BYFEVXOf S2uA== X-Received: by 10.60.145.143 with SMTP id su15mr62620004oeb.58.1412231866071; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 23:37:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.76.178.39 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 23:37:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <542CF0D2.9090209@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <542CF0D2.9090209@infracaninophile.co.uk> From: Amitabh Kant Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 12:07:26 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: make package-recursive not installing port To: Matthew Seaman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 06:37:47 -0000 Thanks Mathew for clearing that up. The last time I created package was still under the pkg_* tools mode, so was carrying old baggages. On a related note, if I use "pkg repo" command, I should be able to create a complete repo for local use right? (I know I have poudriere, but I am just clearing up the basics here) . Amitabh On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Matthew Seaman < m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote: > On 02/10/2014 07:16, Amitabh Kant wrote: > > But postgresql92-server has not been installed on the system > > root@test_pkg:/usr/ports/databases/postgresql92-server # pkg info > > dialog4ports-0.1.5_2 Console Interface to configure ports > > gettext-0.18.3.1_1 GNU gettext package > > gmake-3.82_2 GNU version of 'make' utility > > indexinfo-0.2 Utility to regenerate the GNU info page > index > > libiconv-1.14_4 Character set conversion library > > libxml2-2.9.1_1 XML parser library for GNOME > > pkg-1.3.8_2 Package manager > > pkgconf-0.9.7 Utility to help to configure compiler and > > linker flags > > postgresql92-client-9.2.9 PostgreSQL database (client) > > > > > > I have now tested this with multiple ports (postgresql server, pgbouncer, > > nginx) with the same results. It seems even 10-RELEASE has the same > > behaviour. Is this how it is meant to behave, because earlier creating > > packages from ports used to install all the ports? > > It's expected that postgresql92-server will not be installed as a > dependency of anything using postgresql92-client -- after all, the > postgresql database instance you're using could easily be situated on a > completely different machine. > > It's also the case that 'make package' nowadays does not install the > package being built. This is a result of the switch to staging and is > generally a very good thing. Basically, if you want to use that > package, then explicitly install it rather than relying on side-effects > of the now outmoded and distinctly sub-optimal behaviour the ports used > to have. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. > > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey > JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 2 06:39:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 650903D5 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 06:39:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0722ACFA for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 06:39:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s926dVnl071645 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 2 Oct 2014 07:39:31 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=infracaninophile.co.uk DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk s926dVnl071645 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1412231971; bh=2Hr8YqPhZX2uGX/syr5qet+3o/rHXul0joardJywsiM=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; z=Date:=20Thu,=2002=20Oct=202014=2007:39:30=20+0100|From:=20Matthew =20Seaman=20|To:=20Amitabh=20Kant =20|CC:=20"freebsd-questions@freebsd.org"=2 0|Subject:=20Re:=20make=20package-r ecursive=20not=20installing=20port|References:=20=20<542CF0D2.90 90209@infracaninophile.co.uk>=20|In-Reply-To:=20; b=NaM4Zund8x0ZDsjp2azmuF9+H2MgBbq0cCnmgEAiJpHyOoYQgpsrQBhVdr08gCTco 7e9eqeOkvkEylPMJmORSKMVjrJE0di1BKnVV3rZj4h+Be5648n+S8FCzgwTwPf3kfs YL7ZfCA8XP/4b3leZc+x3NASZzBXr53oBS+46T3I= Message-ID: <542CF322.1000806@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 07:39:30 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Amitabh Kant Subject: Re: make package-recursive not installing port References: <542CF0D2.9090209@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: OpenPGP: id=E1ECF9BB Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="eUAraqrE5RGvhxbks7a6opg0N7E7mMbHv" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 06:39:39 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --eUAraqrE5RGvhxbks7a6opg0N7E7mMbHv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/10/2014 07:37, Amitabh Kant wrote: > On a related note, if I use "pkg repo" command, I should be able to cre= ate > a complete repo for local use right? (I know I have poudriere, but I am= > just clearing up the basics here) . Yes. --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk --eUAraqrE5RGvhxbks7a6opg0N7E7mMbHv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJULPMiXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATfc4P/jUL/9sBHtVRi88kHNCBKGq9 KYAQ+rIUsKRizkcA+rlxKE2zREHgKrG6fHsjdvQ4QBtN8eLX2B0hxcXbZmtfUj4C DHDlyrBBDciJIMeuaqTupBUhlLY+qmYVQL3PPUoSiXF4rCJ9Z6UayDq6/eKGYpWG ayjiaR1oA3ULmesJabyFUJQ4H41BHmNwHaKlropqJr9jZ1LqZfpig47nP8c+okYE CUt8RodGfa8slAP9tJvVFFL6tWN9XkEu0lr9WmgMA6+mr9+lqEesegJ6A8KZRMgS vnR9xQSOrGbfFuP60536YGNtUZ5oSkDgwYje8PI+glREjZGz5RzuhXHH4f4dEBeY JwPTtfpeFWtyP9UHCIt31SLf5RpSo4BEVUOHk9fttdrRDscQ5DHNBpaHN+EAgZiV 8Hg6ZmpvkbmT2y6ZQ5XUFiVMzkhdDPBURULczq+SAo9BrbLe9xjbIgyniSjdC/Ga bl8reX7jmLKkKUY+Z7jtif+O5skfVXy/UYHd/D4Zbu6pnz9qPP1+GCCYzmUgNWEP VsrLs5b+MvjrEmebUPDEob8lwrDWBNzHIwp9wUsxzKx9k6ugAWmNqCnSn8KJiVXu oA6PvKoPuqxeS5eFbMdxx7m+PHy32k+bUEzSa/3/RxTGQ4q+zY4o/lVZeEnNlAsb wnBeRL+FxduoCoTyOXFk =37pU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --eUAraqrE5RGvhxbks7a6opg0N7E7mMbHv-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 2 09:52:21 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C37D5A6D for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 09:52:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relaygateway02.edpnet.net (relaygateway02.edpnet.net [212.71.1.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FA607A5 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 09:52:20 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlkGAFofLVRNbXB9/2dsb2JhbABggw5TWYMCx1+IXRcBe4QtM18TDgIRBSWIeZcyjzuPR4ZZkEOCYoFTBZYphwkBlXODZTsvgkoBAQE X-IPAS-Result: AlkGAFofLVRNbXB9/2dsb2JhbABggw5TWYMCx1+IXRcBe4QtM18TDgIRBSWIeZcyjzuPR4ZZkEOCYoFTBZYphwkBlXODZTsvgkoBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,638,1406584800"; d="scan'208";a="267829497" Received: from 77.109.112.125.adsl.dyn.edpnet.net (HELO mordor.lan) ([77.109.112.125]) by relaygateway02.edpnet.net with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 02 Oct 2014 11:17:10 +0200 Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 11:52:06 +0200 From: Julien Cigar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Listen queue overflow: 8 already in queue awaiting acceptance Message-ID: <20141002095206.GG29361@mordor.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="U7PH6YjyT5379uVx" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 09:52:21 -0000 --U7PH6YjyT5379uVx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, I'm running 10-RELEASE on a HP Proliant DL160 Gen8 and I'm seeing the following in my kernel logs: sonewconn: pcb 0xfffff8010e561310: Listen queue overflow: 8 already in queue awaiting acceptance I already raised kern.ipc.soacceptqueue to 1024 and netstat -naA | grep "fffff8010e561310" returns nothing Any idea what could it be ..? I've put some statistics here https://dpaste.de/t8kJ/raw The machine is running Apache 2.4 (with accf_http/accf_data loaded), PF, some webapps (ruby on rails, php-fpm, python, ...), .. Thanks, Julien --=20 Julien Cigar Belgian Biodiversity Platform (http://www.biodiversity.be) PGP fingerprint: EEF9 F697 4B68 D275 7B11 6A25 B2BB 3710 A204 23C0 No trees were killed in the creation of this message. However, many electrons were terribly inconvenienced. --U7PH6YjyT5379uVx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCgAGBQJULSBGAAoJEAi2KiTKQR5pFvwP/ipOiw8G9dUcwDu4IpXLgkLj VaQJHSQqGL9f6wbAYGYWwv3FtP46u46CixFBNbxa6jqscRiaFwIn2tlQxWhMQf0x iNEDmOsxIhRvO6YQcrEUJTogBnzXL8ZBwsXHWqNaTMD85SrD7sjIja3klAdpfW66 aXMuvoyOLUSNH0XP9okmshxSE+CDoiQN8au74B8ZkLdh6Oq1cr2fqZMBMVXegBML Hf+ijKwn5zydsxZCEZyqP/8e35n6HruzM728HbY8MdNYY4/Wa2WocFTk9okmM9sY msVRoFLPfnoeV0BzOBR4GFD4D8f6yI7u3vz6MtWV3Qz3xI7I2uXrzkE05d+zb5+U /X4N2jVNbXFVy3gzEhKVlWDew/Kw82L247ddOaHrJB+5JSOK+n4iM3dFqV/ISfIR AqlSPDPrvDvdzQZtsRrj9Jh0tFFNKcpdFQDdklzbr5xjPmBLJfppBWMBe+rJ7MCG 38Nbf900C0EY1kuEmH3XR9jFBgT7pJwa+6rfWCnU4FSouGTwz9gw1u//du7VUnuZ f8aXSx/D0cgdWiR8fA1FravBpzv7qKrAaLJGiMm+23Fkk3IPOcKvTQYzKK0iX4ix 0MyaWxqEVKhGYy17D2fr7axOMEVYkJ4PyRjhzpoo/D3mY0s2GxlWM5Jrmwm7BiNF uJ3TrJZzXm8bj4gCRzfy =pP5L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --U7PH6YjyT5379uVx-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 2 14:18:19 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64B98301 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 14:18:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 189BF9B3 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 14:18:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-76-179.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.179]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s92EIGsq005900 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 09:18:17 -0500 Message-ID: <542D601F.1030104@hiwaay.net> Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 09:24:31 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: pkg upgrade question .... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 14:18:19 -0000 .... I converted from using linux-f10 to using linux-c6 for linux compatibility earlier this week. There were no linux-c6 pkg's, so I used ports to do that install, & I also 'pkg delete'-ed all of linux-f10 in the process. I just did a 'pkg upgrade -y' & it deleted all of the installed linux-c6 stuff & reinstalled linux-f10 !!!! I would like to believe this was pilot error, but that is getting to be a bit of a stretch .... I can & will manually clean up the mess, but WTF is going on here w/ pkg ? That behavior is 100% counter-intuitive to me, bug ? -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 2 15:30:22 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 328F0EBB for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 15:30:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm23-vm9.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm23-vm9.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [216.39.62.70]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7B2B24F for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 15:30:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ameritech.net; s=s1024; t=1412263696; bh=+kG1xu9mza76tbUPaoJoAtdRKUshjHyalqW31ZmTlWs=; h=Received:Received:Received:DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language:Disposition-Notification-To:From:Subject; b=RAiIqGQEwRUAwSunNfE/SeFB/JatBK6qhnrPj2+QnKphSm5CF80PuqrXg/EElm7KPMbSvia1r+u2zVch4qTQoAGKJaath7pcGRjXJLob0tkTHX5FBPyy8eALQy5onaU+X4ZRyGgkkKTPyNtEvPvsFQGZ2yGqldd1YHaFtw1xSR0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=ameritech.net; b=z5jRP+jgVZv6n/fttHpAjPZW6YxKAvYztV0kPrTxhamXqxyPY2n5648A0+B/eWcr6xQQsUxnBqNMSgy6oiOZN/shpFlpcQ5o6KO6mK+P0mJ7dJf/biSg5Ja1XOosPg80GmilbVVHAKujVV9q3kERCFh8Ls7jVPMS7oSTTd2Ufgo=; Received: from [216.39.60.170] by nm23.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Oct 2014 15:28:16 -0000 Received: from [67.195.22.119] by tm6.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Oct 2014 15:28:16 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp114.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Oct 2014 15:28:16 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ameritech.net; s=s1024; t=1412263696; bh=+kG1xu9mza76tbUPaoJoAtdRKUshjHyalqW31ZmTlWs=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language:Disposition-Notification-To; b=o+VKmR4uYbR+z/bxMJ2nGffpaN7apu1h8Hx3OV7Vyd6yuFYoViBxZKqqOax5iJjbsUA1dzuXx7QuuZEr6pjwBY0J0dZqbR4HXnrfHzhZpN0Y09FtzZTjghSHa+ERSkeSvlcyuUEMGEMAMrnHTbp/owKYBJWVIb6s1VjORysbUcA= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 522374.66019.bm@smtp114.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: yERcRdoVM1mikRjLU9sEW2m_wsI7ZyT.lGg4xeIRSu1Mkqf nIeiXWIArwYakEE9yQN_6Le1MSJc0nVXaQ77H_IrEpIfA8LjOb6UQsGY4Zge p9NmfHY.FywjId3Bi_xdgAyPaP1i47PYe4Bdu3oQGEBGok.KHDRlH2oHvjLd UHA6P3.cKf709n_HUS8GfqAGBOnQZHTougD23HZ6L_uku0zaQxaANRhBmwto 8x7btV2tmaqG56S5c075tUOn1CHhuAsVewoTxCBtRfC5JkxjEJNBqZ5GsCQZ joAQ_K6or7UGOZcKwy7IYq.yoafbXBQelCIZ4LIuVqsH0pZ_tBGvtF4wRexp _.FaNnFOiygLGI64jn8hkkHvW3eF1Aseu0fTrDqHzUpFNaw6Drk43UaQOJqp tzUx1hdBz9JXFHEvfAN1wHBHGj0jYhtjrt4SIAUfhigLGn5TgORMm_Au4Cgz neSjq6eOw3L7As4qg6WVmiONaJycoPB3AEjOFcquvPBfX4g0abq40jpMyW3a jcK7KIJgz3mnwvk81iDsAW.luaSlWwJLXCD69ThylnQ4oLe8k6jcuU.r2 X-Yahoo-SMTP: 9V5Jq0uswBA1wWPWmQM4qiAvXIzRx_yK75rSzFvPq5smD7gB From: "Craig Masse" To: Subject: Mail List Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 10:28:20 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Ac/eVX8xRJSpoTg5S/K+onn3he34ag== Content-Language: en-us Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 15:30:22 -0000 Can you PLEASE remove me from your mail list !!!!!!!!!!! flycaster@ameritech.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 2 15:34:31 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86639108 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 15:34:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm35-vm3.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (nm35-vm3.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [212.82.97.126]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7BC933E for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 15:34:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rocketmail.com; s=s1024; t=1412264061; bh=eI2Q2tvUSRmN9SREG4oKzvnBgTUiZPPeWyCD7Uv0EPg=; h=Received:Received:Received:DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Subject; b=11u9xmeKZ2F6Go0ZMyUZVQvox8itj2svRkib5ItDbG8PaEqgW28PXuHxaS4I2n2OAd69TWLHTvH4blq7+htdGAvZnGsFXldtHCnJwAp2vNERx04FHcGxfEE3tueb65EiGB9r4Z45/rSsaQOyClXTyzlr/fjiieHtUkW0EUMb8B4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rocketmail.com; b=alWKi1d8rWzk7WphYjuI5iGH13ixSOCFX6RQPgJxHdto1eqScA/TcHr7D4sSr7I7FwU5S5u39w1F7dH7U9fnrAhHwjcMESpxNvRNH0HUlpFQkDTfQewv+8aev+rd0qQ1/CYasmypqboxCfZclLT7tMM1WPVU5lMPu9k3RJWPSN0=; Received: from [212.82.98.125] by nm35.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Oct 2014 15:34:21 -0000 Received: from [46.228.39.104] by tm18.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Oct 2014 15:34:21 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp141.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Oct 2014 15:34:21 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rocketmail.com; s=s1024; t=1412264061; bh=eI2Q2tvUSRmN9SREG4oKzvnBgTUiZPPeWyCD7Uv0EPg=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=gfpvgteqHrizOtAWbOs6GLW9olO5xDihIV8wNrXPkf8zEtT4cysMHm6bMAaHktL2JeJfZnbSn8Baml1V2l8+m6DuvTdRshxQwxqWdjGCjOuyS5eLLNDBfenST3y0TZFxlNUsjyjlBw8Mjp/+5y5t4TMv6/zZ1x/ml4oU1Lrt1Xc= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 659862.43171.bm@smtp141.mail.ir2.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: a9lpufoVM1lt.hVZaBs4tqcMY9gnqWvoZmZkUm.XK4i29uL gHRwlMAiMv1uAQgNp3ZVd6uw5wxGA8NR92GSEoGiye5pNrAWVee6IDDV31q2 3TePrvEt4upfq9USPXM9oTZcjPkUMm0jQtRTy5_bqGVE3NHa94NRcGwQb0L2 LYoV9WgVVPsN74DOZ5P1Z..EPpBIDRXhWOy0GMPMbJ2XyIFn3hprCav1PfGE qFjmlwavUuYR1L1OqVfqVyQX4FSrsbE.Pz.VaVqnnCjo3OKxnyUz6wtFU7A4 xGTnj6bPyvEYiYOKNa.rdm551ebNvYQleETrmUvOQgnym4Afg5p8r8aOpYo3 rOXvKfBCxEd3l99lOFXT09.xEGnR_5BKu9gT8W3E0cVDvgksfXun_fHJt1IB PgDuU4caJx2MBXtrL39RvApUUFSvsi3I2.yhrzgm0L8aP1bDiv_4Wf9MfKMI O.RbP4IWJQ67JIrePJ5nCBcRMShj2yFBtOJKv1bl2yQkHvkGHEUPMbuJ5BRx DKv8501WhmtKr6gsyHL.NTlLK4ohIvHgtyQ-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: BeMCPs2swBABTJ3kAeEiC_hE0mz8jRexLddJfD8pI2j32fOacjBmXg-- Message-ID: <1412264060.851.3.camel@rocketmail.com> Subject: Re: Mail List From: Ralf Mardorf To: Craig Masse Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 17:34:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 15:34:31 -0000 Really :D?! >From the bottom of each mail sent to this mailing list: To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 2 15:56:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19D79878 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 15:56:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail33.atl31.mcdlv.net (mail33.atl31.mcdlv.net [205.201.134.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D42407D4 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 15:56:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=mail33.atl31.mcdlv.net; h=Subject:From:Reply-To:To:Date:Message-ID:List-Unsubscribe:Sender:Content-Type:MIME-Version; i=pivotpointresearchgroup=3Dgmail.com@mail33.atl31.mcdlv.net; bh=2BX/B0VX7AnHSLCt7p+xsOUA1h8=; b=vOGRFzIjrcsgEgeuNuZq/Ea9uiRAOkqTo+NeDnjW62nAeuU7P34efCMoeyXwFtsuVjedRI05YLrg /Ds4/JRXfdKoT0GLbv+wBzKQBFcWN9oMkCAb6F0i7yHFZ5ookarN+KaxzabAltS1TYc068pih0gU 1YZPGWcOs1O/qveFGww= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=mail33.atl31.mcdlv.net; b=alRaNy/Hky0eFOc3w/xHnTwNQ+8BT8sfgCpHdRPnjgcy48jrutG6jcoiNDeGjcsqBOy1Nxa6UjJ+ uH0cu7rprEX4fWd2bMlX5BjikkrhhaIjYiJK5AC1iAQVmRa3lLsEFprNpYx0fbJXCCEqXkZ/gdht 6PhTb7xzIs14IiJibs4=; Received: from (127.0.0.1) by mail33.atl31.mcdlv.net id h5lqqi1mqrot for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 15:41:19 +0000 (envelope-from ) Subject: =?utf-8?Q?Action=20required=20today=3A=20Complete=20this=20server=20virtualization=20survey=20to=20support=20the=20CoderDojo=20Foundation?= From: =?utf-8?Q?Pivot=20Point?= Reply-To: =?utf-8?Q?Pivot=20Point?= To: =?utf-8?Q??= Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 15:41:19 +0000 Message-ID: X-Mailer: MailChimp Mailer - **CID042d4b9faa81b96126c3** X-Campaign: mailchimpca43e8b1f0e9c72628074f775.042d4b9faa X-campaignid: mailchimpca43e8b1f0e9c72628074f775.042d4b9faa X-Report-Abuse: Please report abuse for this campaign here: http://www.mailchimp.com/abuse/abuse.phtml?u=ca43e8b1f0e9c72628074f775&id=042d4b9faa&e=81b96126c3 X-MC-User: ca43e8b1f0e9c72628074f775 X-Feedback-ID: 31346347:31346347.763333:us8:mc X-Accounttype: pd Sender: "Pivot Point" x-mcda: FALSE MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="fixed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 15:56:26 -0000 View this email in your browser (http://us8.campaign-archive1.com/?u=3Dca4= 3e8b1f0e9c72628074f775&id=3D042d4b9faa&e=3D81b96126c3) ** If you work full time for a company where you have a role in making ser= ver virtualization solution decisions you can support the CoderDojo Founda= tion just by completing this survey today. ------------------------------------------------------------ This survey is important and will only be open today. Here is the link (http://survey.confirmit.com/wix/p3070738530.aspx?__useri= d=3DXXXXXXX) You will need this User Name ID to enter the survey: PPB01USxxtnqt6q Once you complete the survey we will make a $100 donation to the CoderDojo= Foundation which is dedicated to helping kids get exposed to and excited= about learning computer programming languages. Thank you in advance for your help! Click here for more information on the CoderDojo Foundation. (http://www.c= oderdojo.com) =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Copyright =C2=A9 2014 Pivot Point Research Group=2C All rights reserved. Pivotal Perspectives Panel Our mailing address is: Pivot Point Research Group 40 Lake Bellevue Drive Suite 100 Bellevue=2C Wa 98004 USA ** unsubscribe from this list (http://pivotpointresearch.us8.list-manage1.= com/unsubscribe?u=3Dca43e8b1f0e9c72628074f775&id=3D3a2827a867&e=3D81b96126c3= &c=3D042d4b9faa) ** update subscription preferences (http://pivotpointresearch.us8.list-man= age.com/profile?u=3Dca43e8b1f0e9c72628074f775&id=3D3a2827a867&e=3D81b96126c3= ) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 2 16:15:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C3714F2 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 16:15:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail33.atl31.mcdlv.net (mail33.atl31.mcdlv.net [205.201.134.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6F29A6C for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 16:15:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=mail33.atl31.mcdlv.net; h=Subject:From:Reply-To:To:Date:Message-ID:List-Unsubscribe:Sender:Content-Type:MIME-Version; i=pivotpointresearchgroup=3Dgmail.com@mail33.atl31.mcdlv.net; bh=mGnlzfzAlNAVlhcFaGlP0IqWcj4=; b=KNY948/qCelnNQeKi9V7cxrUHZNBTeV4S/qcwgPsH5X3Y+v/59DCdEsGeqEkKzEO1Xi4ibpfPgzZ aQat8SOR0VjUSkyVMRkLjytOR0o+acskTRWVkOWJMHdLZrslfHle5JBG+t/U8tbDS9OBNlsRJMCG i72xtVgITa4aRFc7M7Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=mail33.atl31.mcdlv.net; b=eLzMtMrfB+nRhE+GHFNs1TUEhquLT93M7mhXtNS37sVLGCbGrg7uOsE4W07gdJ0Yfj84/zjFtltN OP3d6Ym6mL22w9364Uo0qOnlXwORpPTlTWZvFHIjaYaIXoLrXjOFRiHdlNcsJHO+piJRLyZru86g tWGDeQapwVvN2x/ZGXk=; Received: from (127.0.0.1) by mail33.atl31.mcdlv.net id h5lt281mqroo for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 16:15:32 +0000 (envelope-from ) Subject: =?utf-8?Q?Action=20required=20today=3A=20Complete=20this=20server=20virtualization=20survey=20to=20support=20the=20CoderDojo=20Foundation?= From: =?utf-8?Q?Pivot=20Point?= Reply-To: =?utf-8?Q?Pivot=20Point?= To: =?utf-8?Q??= Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 16:15:32 +0000 Message-ID: X-Mailer: MailChimp Mailer - **CID7e70ccbacc81b96126c3** X-Campaign: mailchimpca43e8b1f0e9c72628074f775.7e70ccbacc X-campaignid: mailchimpca43e8b1f0e9c72628074f775.7e70ccbacc X-Report-Abuse: Please report abuse for this campaign here: http://www.mailchimp.com/abuse/abuse.phtml?u=ca43e8b1f0e9c72628074f775&id=7e70ccbacc&e=81b96126c3 X-MC-User: ca43e8b1f0e9c72628074f775 X-Feedback-ID: 31346347:31346347.763377:us8:mc X-Accounttype: pd Sender: "Pivot Point" x-mcda: FALSE MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="fixed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 16:15:33 -0000 View this email in your browser (http://us8.campaign-archive1.com/?u=3Dca4= 3e8b1f0e9c72628074f775&id=3D7e70ccbacc&e=3D81b96126c3) ** If you work full time for a company where you have a role in making ser= ver virtualization solution decisions you can support the CoderDojo Founda= tion just by completing this survey today. ------------------------------------------------------------ This survey is important and will only be open today. Here is the link (http://survey.confirmit.com/wix/p3070738530.aspx?__useri= d=3DXXXXXXX) You will need this User Name ID to enter the survey: PPB01USxxtnqt6q Once you complete the survey we will make a $100 donation to the CoderDojo= Foundation which is dedicated to helping kids get exposed to and excited= about learning computer programming languages. Thank you in advance for your help! Click here for more information on the CoderDojo Foundation. (http://www.c= oderdojo.com) =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Copyright =C2=A9 2014 Pivot Point Research Group=2C All rights reserved. Pivotal Perspectives Panel Our mailing address is: Pivot Point Research Group 40 Lake Bellevue Drive Suite 100 Bellevue=2C Wa 98004 USA ** unsubscribe from this list (http://pivotpointresearch.us8.list-manage.c= om/unsubscribe?u=3Dca43e8b1f0e9c72628074f775&id=3D3a2827a867&e=3D81b96126c3&= c=3D7e70ccbacc) ** update subscription preferences (http://pivotpointresearch.us8.list-man= age.com/profile?u=3Dca43e8b1f0e9c72628074f775&id=3D3a2827a867&e=3D81b96126c3= ) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 3 09:37:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AF73E0B for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 09:37:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from host202-129-static.10-188-b.business.telecomitalia.it (host202-129-static.10-188-b.business.telecomitalia.it [188.10.129.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9B8D132 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 09:37:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.60] (MAURIZIO-PC [192.168.0.60]) by host202-129-static.10-188-b.business.telecomitalia.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 649FA75A0 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 11:37:03 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <542E6E3F.9040405@cloverinformatica.it> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 11:37:03 +0200 From: Maurizio Vairani User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: User Questions Subject: Downgrade a pkg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 09:37:11 -0000 Hello, I need to downgrade VirtualBox to version 4.3.12_1. How can I do it ? Thanks in advance, Maurizio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 3 09:52:58 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5047C7B for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 09:52:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm20-vm6.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (nm20-vm6.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [212.82.96.248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 814D92FA for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 09:52:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rocketmail.com; s=s1024; t=1412329836; bh=tYXz+zmC2OAv9xMQUdvO60TPHWqLDV/4aOrBAGb6YYs=; h=Received:Received:Received:DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Subject; b=N5h5jb27aWglCuRC6hP28AkUmUmaZA1tdq658P1B5mN4niPC+5ahiqKVL66KaXd3W7kaLF/PWUAOn7TurWeVwUuGKWPBK/AKR+aKsxm24BPBuYDXFNQfi1FQ2CpUN1Qf79C8QD4z2NEy4XD+x5PADUQif4rAW0OXsYe/taUZB6w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rocketmail.com; b=LBLkkT2rCe/iP3VsJkBJcaRZocGEVX5mEWNJ9BzG8fPEZ8FZRmGs509qv0PyAdDwh+srMeL8Td+dH8WoKGuAqNGH7FNaixQd1wyq9A5GfrZ7zlCVYZ41scxIj0pGaU+rtTjwgArUGmLfVb5kucELCzQQarcq1SoxwNALdq8deAk=; Received: from [212.82.98.124] by nm20.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Oct 2014 09:50:36 -0000 Received: from [46.228.39.90] by tm17.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Oct 2014 09:50:36 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp127.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Oct 2014 09:50:36 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rocketmail.com; s=s1024; t=1412329836; bh=tYXz+zmC2OAv9xMQUdvO60TPHWqLDV/4aOrBAGb6YYs=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=WmNoDAik5jTooCNI8sb/HUdQB8D8Da2inGq/0JV/vv23bNkmXyBneT7NfIhErpTeZFpk+xUAb4gshjIFzfamwrEhDQtBynvmE5DI/+8YVrRSFrTRlMjSD/6fS4aWABBadMLvPoI8hD/p63WwmktUC/1/RzacG4xjnn/mPtvskgk= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 192080.44989.bm@smtp127.mail.ir2.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: mWFLPDAVM1kzq0a6xZ18gw9Ws95rwuQu3t5EimOqtnekDmq 8O9TcVhmg4D3oUfBikyrPrGGPIsOvNLtgHYjRJ_wNoLNSWNtwx7KYMwhZ.3. gN34zHnduQaOXL3BGtPFnpk_1jojYopUsuetI0_9CMJ_7o.Ab7RURaFAJADh p7lHBEPcVjjAiQzDD5.uuo.1XyyD1S2mhN.Z3zDseCuFYjLHiImo8mUlmw2f NZAUn4Gat.hcQA2ZjPjUKW09WcQK8g2Xd.LkhMgLheHMhDTCUxeuON_rYWwT .zP1d2jEQwhUORvWAI.Xxs5AqbOQvDJt8JArI7FOmBsjHJXuvt8Ifxnyns.E m5.Ug8zo1njWRGNci2F8FAfy0X6HjfLsVtyJFFDXaSubyParr6ovjDu_MblK bKz74l90t61tSWX5EBAgzq2s0r4ZsS5g06U238_iasVkQJINpyc48xS0kf6O E.M5ckXbbILjYiM0LAATO7vwE7hj5kJ8c1tcf8_h9vRtPOcvCwK9MzTrq3CE tkFIscDRkCPngTvbxgDu8ST1aSt1b8hl3kjNCfIKkWLofPxHB0Ltae2xVtlX pnvAzTJgqkbY.Xa5YWxGW4y87V3A5B0oWNJew1bL6RaqKegVmLjw2da4d.Wo KssBLGOAtBN2FCd5Kk4761stXiCU86s6CLOmbL2_SmPScWlUjVSooNrLfbtc nbLmfTTqOXOlHSaeNZa_r9wrn1s89W8rdpVOJ1rXVMO2l3hXP8KTKCd1VHXl fUyuJTa98s6xUDnLDjcOCM7xAfz9qVJBfJSmGDA4eKgrnqGUtP7AQvk20lmf ycxr0qL.V4EMHN3PSV1F3tyvqZCF.4Cd6T8bL84UE_vxN3.ks8fEoDyFy4BC D2YWK_.vONilBAL2ptvnmYW7u4x7RkS9jQgzsqFouVGeo7kjJkMY_SshPssh UczZxdNoz65kNiEOqi8PL6SBhkFkU9SGNBEKob1gk7A2Tlnxm6hEbLiz1joY oo.rEcjq93.N0Uq3TV4UjRYTx75kWEf_Km1thhe5yRwnkDRUEQGT1KDSiGdl FNh_AZWwvLNz5LYpmOdgG5szMsA9TIAPsIT4hnp14kmOFHX2GylHaZeFk5vI uqY5u0VIlNLLQIE3nXSRTeMdQcJTocMx86.IwOIUCDSMzg4C53N4BJxpLg49 iuPWpN.GBUe25Vqoi0gfrubB70P3Bx.62KLSQ_7UokqGo12GyfU4BICVwcFL rJGkE19SEXSQ8FDPN3aMBRi04vW3kxGnXam91n2ED7nh7AHolhKQ7YZBvzYS YwzZN1xDbxJkdf3HFKAyYwBJPKFzkHt05N.A2pY1FHMRB0UMdFUZdk862J.v EBj_HsyjdEYhB8rlFuFXuzfd3de2CgZqzbpBSQ8W4.Y1DITGjwqwtemYJz9s 6UYMxvbuSx4iSz372m5LQi5JPLFGd9_7cMBewOevrCHdyfsR_6nOsSNjxFE_ MV6dEkPiC7Y.N9quCBDsG4En7kZAu8ICA9h510QDui0eMxrUan.ZpWNTswIi qiv1RgebDgCkJW7dXMSbEcg768M7lFcMw6l0J0ipLNpMaoclVUSAvL05ssx3 VJDdsJGczHvhNWHXgyiIcrWU4XLmIMQIL69FA1U72Tq.SLVdenjUDpROwduV FoVTfB7mwDK0KcmqORVRbbX7sG742CHvNoyn9.GytvFDyodJ3k5fumjwA_mM .n4efvoDtIA_XsQkrvrOn7yQPzyjBYH0dRacf6bBeGYoNL9dkFT8cXWxs2IC BLY7uo3IEHxR6uoyJs1Ubr9w3FVw8mnD4ogR5WbIx7b1bk5E5yQuKefukWvX JQbCNE8Jgku3I9B2IpEqc5lU6nBzno4Tip0HzjTkBW23p0iL_AnOUNsIzhZ7 Mbluru7oROaZo3YN9r6MMDSkSKplgzDjJM0eTJTLj.zD7rerCLpfZfRMP94M Kb8D3pNYThHLHiK3sowwea0Vx7DrXx4juN_MWlwLj1tcNgQ-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: DA3qLniswBBZgRt2JJU8mgA5oHKX4bbYJ__UUAz6K3gYMeVbbg5Qkg-- Message-ID: <1412329836.851.9.camel@rocketmail.com> Subject: Re: [Bulk] Downgrade a pkg From: Ralf Mardorf To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 11:50:36 +0200 In-Reply-To: <542E6E3F.9040405@cloverinformatica.it> References: <542E6E3F.9040405@cloverinformatica.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 09:52:58 -0000 On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 11:37 +0200, Maurizio Vairani wrote: > I need to downgrade VirtualBox to version 4.3.12_1. > How can I do it ? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/downgrade/ [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ downgrade virtualbox Available packages: 1) virtualbox-4.3.16-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) 2) virtualbox-4.3.14-4-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) 3) virtualbox-4.3.14-3-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) 4) virtualbox-4.3.14-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) 5) virtualbox-4.3.14-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) 6) virtualbox-4.3.12-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) 7) virtualbox-4.3.10-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) 8) virtualbox-4.3.8-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) 9) virtualbox-4.3.8-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) 10) virtualbox-4.3.6-3-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) 11) virtualbox-4.3.6-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) 12) virtualbox-4.3.6-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) 13) virtualbox-4.3.4-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) 14) virtualbox-4.3.2-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) 15) virtualbox-4.3.0-3-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) 16) virtualbox-4.3.0-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) 17) virtualbox-4.3.0-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) 18) virtualbox-4.2.18-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) 19) virtualbox-4.2.18-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) 20) virtualbox-4.2.16-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) 21) virtualbox-4.2.16-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) Been there, done that. [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ pacman -Q virtualbox virtualbox 4.3.12-1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 3 09:57:58 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E924223 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 09:57:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm20-vm7.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (nm20-vm7.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [212.82.96.249]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE60C343 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 09:57:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rocketmail.com; s=s1024; t=1412330126; bh=jSh3FCy9WwCRiOKI4gvtTisPBIpHBPkKx15crdr6deM=; h=Received:Received:Received:DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Subject; b=mOCeJX8MzA0t8RlT/eFLajttp4cQ1nJDfKruVzBsJKHP1ka0K+7VkwXNZP9XkKUV4aXM3ScOvIgXx0RCxblyEvNQ82gmKSEoU5Vlx/hy0GVGqQamVf/GGrS/jMYZ2lbQf8R2kSPGJi5Yl72Mj0IrUuBzIzrnpxatM9281bmjpRY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rocketmail.com; b=w+OrQVCmQ7CAbiHwIbd0nIrsY3pBHhh7JEWfMBuYwzcf4N+Ktlk7f0pDO0D9RGCctWB8Vs7wr9ZSU8PGSOr8l+AUSXc3et+5WeDyS0rIz13KtOcFuT7bFvWmgmrfROLH2MVKa6OHmc3a8G+Exghiy5PZGosD0MdcWZsApkU0URQ=; Received: from [212.82.98.51] by nm20.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Oct 2014 09:55:26 -0000 Received: from [46.228.39.70] by tm4.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Oct 2014 09:55:26 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp107.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Oct 2014 09:55:26 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rocketmail.com; s=s1024; t=1412330126; bh=jSh3FCy9WwCRiOKI4gvtTisPBIpHBPkKx15crdr6deM=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=RHN4LKDBc96DNVjiafgHbh2h+UzwAGKjq1ChyceTPbV0jlDJVYKv34bRSJZgJ6GlPzObS4DCYFXxqBIw8TdQsi+ENCswr2BlhU8Hefsy0tuIY3bvBTwPCejvgsdkS6U6TnqlocfuRIBXo0j/VSrwwtGT3/XDojsPbq38D9oc7i8= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 639766.4422.bm@smtp107.mail.ir2.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: _KgclREVM1lohUsNh2xMoA.CkJoDLjxi85qLyI5qNfoler5 4ftLoJDAHgJpJCEuLJf7fTGnPlFTwDyYqbAD7.IFtV5tQeLDA8tRtQvVleC3 RCIBrrG.UdrR8i9O_EV2sVIdKphSkkE8xRee6ypZXrxQUs2Tsf8Nf9_auBij OejnhKWXHUsFvOrZIEONSHpdyVA1xufgPMd1Z_3LeG4xgMlhReth56Fz_yVz lzxUmzWzlxIlr9zWJbOJdITzG7SF2PfH7Bg65phaEVQzZHh4uzabXLL6LHy. y7bKBDCpZvGFcHpeK_iW4.2kj6cM7DmVbDRexyoxzdCpEpoiOtkFPSEZOY5t 2yIcNz4H0gRh2tcHoCmddTHjfegQWLKX_8qhy9UELgEbafCyJXOTBsd8mPDB tnv8VC2lKwV04BceCtnJjK8aDKJwMnU2d3nsF_kuU85EHVV0YmfYSIeVGPSg NCzzpEBCNtZcFcFwCTUPvJ1gDejVsp2s0xERbPir0a3_ZHBm7oDIcCQNXbB9 V.feZQusfC6xWCG9brgg786tbi3ENri0qyH9LWAMJEan7hpqyxnd7cum.N_i ed8DLkTdmvNkGaWZQO6oh0rYYzWK_cobyqg5g078km2vOx4CND1OsBfb_WSC QlB0qfFNcHvSQgKWCTM4RW3AZvIku1KCTlRFmK8gqhQXJvLVGSpqa4dSJ18C 5RXoke9a6Iil2kAaCNvukY4rBqUlaNtoRTK95d1f1C4AJBLvzcoTW8UID4Ie HMI5SaBrYY2G8r8UGe2ZXutSnrLshXC4c4QYQMAoQIq2HTL9HpqvVOChpmcu Sr8O2JbacAh2G7xcHfJAc.CwSlrPVFxGQo.paY3g0ZRb1k.9HCgVEF.jtvvv c8pOqgKRmk41c95XGF3B.JwLUVtTiis34ngYY4cHc_giRXqmXYHloE8Mo.W5 V7JEkZwigSef8WE4qTZvw2xRy4JfqjVpOJi.altdeAoza1W34DshuW7QlbD1 COnfTK4jMhwsUpT4lk2hJj.WcxjOrid.FPuviKFDhcfuQJYtLpIB5..Mnonp HX897y4JJyDDUORQi4PEqXsi_vCA.e00sKHJTvWDooJYHEHdm2PqLBHD1CFo hBGsnroxXK4PqiirnkgISTZCDVN7BqJvpbgO7f5ymf.snAnAdXobtDi2efa8 oYKl7eVFTHSIQyKg_qM0wRYKhr75y7Fn9brrx7a9HaV1KWh0cRpTGfcszXxS YLvpoflFUD4X79.XgRl2fJ22mO08.InEQNmaagLG.PpdJvX3R4FAg35rTS0y XvzRvc5syhW6x.6ypFe34ocfsavu9erlsngy22nH_ZmVzOzkLn12hWgFiku_ Q_RvR9ENgwOeEbSWHDwu3W20abqmcLyPOi0hbE84WPDhh8NX7A4lccs8EN7W AxilSGlvjTRZvZff2pbjGD9mIx_8uIBncvGPgC7MGUUW1gvPj5bDabvjabrP jmv1RbsFExVuFiRKiICbK5lejqNgu.MoSCw7R8scpDgn5cC_6tiTDYzMsqZm sWiMiaRRKSTSfwx_U7DmuxLJCQapbwl8x94gKw8n1NUE7hqFyEriNuPgUnLI sxiiRUX_MWqEt9LGsudFhhyLJnAHti0Ijxpl71XQJtypvDHvX_P6BB9emYEh sqHKD1cHyfzKajrRHVex0.UnNF8afMWSC9du9TAhhAYmSTW3axqXAy_lGrhH 1X3ILF9ZABpkL6KrnKJnnwy41aeRACwsByGBBbQ5YX3y3v1rKRTdK2k_wd9S xjGMjfg996bOERD76QVg7zh3FYTSxlcM7ERQt4Xk3C2pLcFu1FXwxz_Y_bkI 46RvQ3OzWB7fKyLhLZ0VULF7p5JvD7.PpYqZ1.cGCVukQubSq_EE2oBMqN.s pqMU6IImZSYc1cuJ.Ea0U.5fc68R4T283MR.LFU1RwsYeJ_o3PJtvp9Q6IqE 8m_LnBKJIl.UANqyd4QgXr1y6czkhsW8kNG_vAqYysliY9w-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: BeMCPs2swBABTJ3kAeEiC_hE0mz8jRexLddJfD8pI2j32fOacjBmXg-- Message-ID: <1412330126.851.11.camel@rocketmail.com> Subject: Re: Downgrade a pkg From: Ralf Mardorf To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 11:55:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1412329836.851.9.camel@rocketmail.com> References: <542E6E3F.9040405@cloverinformatica.it> <1412329836.851.9.camel@rocketmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 09:57:58 -0000 My apologies, wrong mailing list :D. I confused Arch Linux with FreeBSD. Sorry :) On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 11:50 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 11:37 +0200, Maurizio Vairani wrote: > > I need to downgrade VirtualBox to version 4.3.12_1. > > How can I do it ? > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/downgrade/ > > [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ downgrade virtualbox > Available packages: > > 1) virtualbox-4.3.16-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) > 2) virtualbox-4.3.14-4-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) > 3) virtualbox-4.3.14-3-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) > 4) virtualbox-4.3.14-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) > 5) virtualbox-4.3.14-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) > 6) virtualbox-4.3.12-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) > 7) virtualbox-4.3.10-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) > 8) virtualbox-4.3.8-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) > 9) virtualbox-4.3.8-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) > 10) virtualbox-4.3.6-3-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) > 11) virtualbox-4.3.6-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) > 12) virtualbox-4.3.6-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) > 13) virtualbox-4.3.4-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) > 14) virtualbox-4.3.2-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) > 15) virtualbox-4.3.0-3-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) > 16) virtualbox-4.3.0-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) > 17) virtualbox-4.3.0-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) > 18) virtualbox-4.2.18-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) > 19) virtualbox-4.2.18-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) > 20) virtualbox-4.2.16-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) > 21) virtualbox-4.2.16-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote) > > Been there, done that. > > [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ pacman -Q virtualbox > virtualbox 4.3.12-1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 3 10:08:50 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2848265F for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 10:08:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E016761D for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 10:08:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-26-235.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.26.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19AC027749; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 12:08:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s93A8e4V002007; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 12:08:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 12:08:40 +0200 From: Polytropon To: allen harris Subject: Re: log in and password. Message-Id: <20141003120840.348155b6.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 10:08:50 -0000 (Re-including list, hoe that's okay.) On Fri, 3 Oct 2014 00:29:06 +0000, allen harris wrote: > ive understood your reply and am now on top of what needs > doing but it still keeps asking me for a login which wasn't > set by me and am unaware of how to get around this, thankyou > for your patience I await your response. Please first make clear if you're missing a _user_ password or the _root_ password. There hasn't been a definite mentioning in your initial post. Having to deal with a system where someone else has set passwords that you don't know is always a bit problematic, but not impossible to solve. It requires that you try to tell as precisely as possible what's actually going on. When you enter single user mode, no password should be required. At the boot prompt, enter "boot -s", and then confirm /bin/sh as the default shell. Enter the command "mount -uw /" to access the root partition (where the password is stored). Then enter "passwd" (or "passwd root") to change root's password. You will not be asked for the previous password. Allow me to point you to the FAQ entry again, and check /etc/ttys if your console has been marked "insecure" which _might_ be a reason for still being prompted for the root password in single user mode: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/faq/admin.html#idp59717152 Do you have a FreeBSD live system (installation CD or DVD, or USB stick) available? You can use that to access the system's partitions and make changes independently from passwords restricting access therein (e. g., change "insecure" to "secure" console in /etc/ttys, if it should be needed). Is it possible for you to provide a screen transcript or screen capture of what you see? Please try to describe what steps you have taken and what results they ended in. This will make troubleshooting easier. At this time, it's just a WAG. ;-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 3 10:42:22 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68CD2BEE for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 10:42:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B6319AA for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 10:42:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com (no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s93Ag3Qj027741 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 11:42:10 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=freebsd.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk s93Ag3Qj027741 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/s93Ag3Qj027741; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none; dkim-atps=neutral X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged) claimed to be ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com Message-ID: <542E7D74.8040004@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 11:41:56 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Downgrade a pkg References: <542E6E3F.9040405@cloverinformatica.it> In-Reply-To: <542E6E3F.9040405@cloverinformatica.it> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OhOcvvS0gG2WArUIWKlwIgpBrfhUKLemO" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 10:42:22 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --OhOcvvS0gG2WArUIWKlwIgpBrfhUKLemO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10/03/14 10:37, Maurizio Vairani wrote: > I need to downgrade VirtualBox to version 4.3.12_1. > How can I do it ? Basically, you start by checking in /var/cache/pkg to find the pkg tarball of the version of VirtualBox you want. There may be several with the correct package version: ox-dell39:/var/cache/pkg:% ls -l virtualbox-ose-4.3.12_1* -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 88492156 Aug 6 00:57 virtualbox-ose-4.3.12_1-24f6bbc275.txz -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 88470756 Aug 16 05:07 virtualbox-ose-4.3.12_1-3508613e60.txz -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 88492848 Aug 13 01:57 virtualbox-ose-4.3.12_1-971aa33e9e.txz lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 38 Aug 20 11:55 virtualbox-ose-4.3.12_1.txz@ -> virtualbox-ose-4.3.12_1-3508613e60.txz Choose the most recent one -- these are just where the package has been rebuilt because of changes in the packages it depends on. You'll need to use pkg info -fF pkg-name.txz and check that you have all the right dependencies installed. If so, then you can pkg delete your current version of VirtualBox and then use pkg add pkgname.txz to reinstall from the pkg tarball. No guarantees that this process will produce a usable result though. Try at your own risk. Cheers, Matthew --OhOcvvS0gG2WArUIWKlwIgpBrfhUKLemO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJULn16XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTnHEEQAK4uMIHJOef4FLnxsdUnVs1O xpco0RKOfTBZkYQbkPjV9Y2m3INyEbpPO0WpUhZleYetDkXyk1u/LaFa1ZcleXQB JWy2gMuyigSDQpTAsRDDfGuvV5hfpHJ9YkQYhrho2khhlvaHSFbpAIi2t9SCFlp8 XrnqhJVmGGSe2XL5sEnFRTGJOhLz9z7T+RGkxdEgmhdLYpRFhk+Ez7CptSzuAECW RJfd96+/ncarm2//otAunpDL0A7qcrt2qvYisEALJ01NibOHHxUYJOEl4+2y7NoL r2hFQqVdSfFSjGtOXX4K9mMT+3obZRbEea0VIvHnhhE3AjZeMaarkD4hlH/bbSUq /h2No5Yuyf/o7DgxHwOP5pnJcYr9WC+criCR3kZ4EUMvM6VS8b4uHjmurHqRdzOb L2drOXJNskjI28PNhM8Yc1DKOY8Gg/lZiQAQE2rO6G1znjFzCqD3A+hYSdMYtavG j2251Ky7HaEMeQ1rWb61Mh2GwpPNd27XWYM2/cPOcNC6e9TxkHI+mBE+HxRsPVAK TBJzEQGt16OG/kzSuwVAPeu4HMyjDH3e+z29HlXwAdKxA75enThYW1jDInT3V9P6 +klo7CvDPm3pfmrLFFlM4UZEhL1yZNUmzSTMQks5R8aSagxkjTrjCOhx0BzRpSxT Zs1dAM7q6DtQrG8dUym4 =WXpu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OhOcvvS0gG2WArUIWKlwIgpBrfhUKLemO-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 3 11:01:08 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 898EBE52 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 11:01:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rgout03.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (rgout03.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk [65.20.0.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B975B7D for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 11:01:07 +0000 (UTC) X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A090201.542E806D.018D, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=28/50, refid=2.7.2:2014.10.3.94518:17:28.394, ip=31.50.55.86, rules=__HAS_FROM, __PHISH_FROM2, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL_FROM, FROM_NAME_ONE_WORD, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NO_NAME, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, __IN_REP_TO, __HAS_X_MAILER, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __CTE, __ANY_URI, __URI_NO_WWW, __URI_NO_PATH, __STOCK_PHRASE_7, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, __FORWARDED_MSG, BODY_SIZE_3000_3999, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, RDNS_GENERIC_POOLED, __URI_NS, SXL_IP_DYNAMIC[86.55.50.31.fur], HTML_00_01, HTML_00_10, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC, __PHISH_FROM, __PHISH_SPEAR_STRUCTURE_1, RDNS_SUSP, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown Received: from elena.home (31.50.55.86) by rgout03.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (8.6.122.06) (authenticated as afmcc) id 542DA2870018E6DE for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 11:54:37 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1412334068; bh=lP2J+wxMvVosT5GlzLd2WpupLMt/g3fiKVjKcUVbJVk=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:MIME-Version; b=kWhM6go7XtCZtUZ7Mw2Wn3o2EcyP/zxGIS+UUxiUAULSb07c9dPRF9NuS2ee8Jx/62IFrr0P/j0qT1SWY28WL0umuTd9bPqhA15O+aeYgSEQ/Jc+9+nHhC3EfdhivKmtF5dcnuDOTXKDPn4+WLupR1Bg3NBe0VYgxrnFKqqUTO0= Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 11:54:36 +0100 From: TonyMc To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg upgrade question .... Message-ID: <20141003115436.70a5446a@elena.home> In-Reply-To: <542D601F.1030104@hiwaay.net> References: <542D601F.1030104@hiwaay.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 11:01:08 -0000 On Thu, 02 Oct 2014 09:24:31 -0500 "William A. Mahaffey III" wrote: > > > .... I converted from using linux-f10 to using linux-c6 for linux > compatibility earlier this week. There were no linux-c6 pkg's, so I > used ports to do that install, & I also 'pkg delete'-ed all of > linux-f10 in the process. I just did a 'pkg upgrade -y' & it deleted > all of the installed linux-c6 stuff & reinstalled linux-f10 !!!! I > would like to believe this was pilot error, but that is getting to be > a bit of a stretch .... I can & will manually clean up the mess, but > WTF is going on here w/ pkg ? That behavior is 100% counter-intuitive > to me, bug ? > > Dear William, this was indeed pilot error. You should get into the habit of reading /usr/ports/UPDATING. The relevant entry states (22 Sep.): "The complete drop-in replacement linux-c6 port infrastructure is in ports and will shortly replace the current linux-f10- ports as default." The "will shortly" is key there. The ports system makes software available for you to compile and install. You can start using linux-c6 ports before they become the default, but you must understand that that is your decision, and by doing so you are departing from "the default". If you then try to "pkg upgrade" pkg will install the most recently available packages for the ports you have installed. Since there are no linux-c6 packages available yet (though presumably it will not be long), pkg resolved your software dependencies on linux emulation using linux-f10 packages, which were available. If you had waited until linux-c6 became the default, you would have been fine. I have read a number of your messages over the last few weeks and it seems to me you still have a problem grasping the relationship between ports and packages. (I hope I have not misunderstood you.) You need to understand that ports are recipes for configuring, building and installing software (usually involving compilation, linking and installation), while packages are recipes for adding already-configured-and-built software to your system. The "already" part of that description means that someone, somewhere has to have done the configuration, compilation and linking steps. That takes a finite time. When multiplied by the number of available ports (more than 20,000) you can see why the availability of packages lags behind the availability of the recipes in the ports tree. I hope that helps. I suggest you choose between ports and packages (there are exceptions for some programs, for which you really need non-default options). If you prefer to use the newest version as soon as it becomes available, and you can live with the work of choosing configuration options, building and installing, you need to use ports. But if you can wait a few days and accept the default options, pkg upgrade will make your life a lot easier. Just as an aside: you seem very keen to use linux emulation on FreeBSD. Why is that? What are you missing that requires the compatibility layer? Best, Tony From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 3 11:45:35 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB741990 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 11:45:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz (exchange.mail.starnet.cz [92.62.224.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz", Issuer "STARNET" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CE34F6D for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 11:45:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz ([fe80::d017:9e72:12a5:7bb4]) by EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz ([fe80::d017:9e72:12a5:7bb4%14]) with mapi; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 13:44:20 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Radek_Krej=E8a?= To: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 13:44:19 +0200 Subject: NTPD problem - a lot of interfaces Thread-Topic: NTPD problem - a lot of interfaces Thread-Index: Ac/e/195vpwahRjnSGe9J5QpMI+q+g== Message-ID: Accept-Language: cs-CZ Content-Language: cs-CZ X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: cs-CZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 11:45:35 -0000 Hello, I have problem on machines, where is a lot of network interfaces (about 100= ). On this machines ntpd wont start and if is runnig and critical count of = interfaces is reached, it falls. I can run ntpdate command from cron, but I need to have better solution. Radek From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 3 11:57:53 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24754C2D for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 11:57:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x22f.google.com (mail-wg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE6D4127 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 11:57:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id x13so1265874wgg.6 for ; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 04:57:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YwwPfWxAJ2CC1rwQOT05lsoOxuJV4T3BcfucpHsOOdE=; b=ySKjJP/aPO/klvF3rFH41+LIfkjS9Tj1+wqqbo7whcybQFQXlapUj4PPxcym+KORTK SXaUK9NPhpdjZlNaYTB+PEB0sudrpKxbz0e+/Ca8xwaFCwb+4nTnQwzAeg6tRsJsxZO1 /q0R+XT2FnrmIUv+vPCwCSEJBTjHGuvQqFpkG4v7mE4fZppizIflLAj9zDvpv2nyw39n rm8AQIj64kqrbtozzSPcZ1g3nJVzfcBacO3wSnhkfrrx0H7Uj1J6qdTNDUMi5mOfgZcj X9akOBKAHE06IDSshABRW6M3ePPu7arPpA3GNfOzW+cOMqsX0+ZOvs7wkXVjQb2NYGk0 2epw== X-Received: by 10.194.143.69 with SMTP id sc5mr6627648wjb.26.1412337470315; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 04:57:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from t510.bsoft-company.ro (ip5450aabf.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl. [84.80.170.191]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ky3sm7735994wjb.39.2014.10.03.04.57.49 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 03 Oct 2014 04:57:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <542E8F3C.5030408@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 13:57:48 +0200 From: Andrei Brezan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: allen harris Subject: Re: log in and password. References: <20141003120840.348155b6.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20141003120840.348155b6.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 11:57:53 -0000 On 10/03/14 12:08, Polytropon wrote: > (Re-including list, hoe that's okay.) > > On Fri, 3 Oct 2014 00:29:06 +0000, allen harris wrote: >> ive understood your reply and am now on top of what needs >> doing but it still keeps asking me for a login which wasn't >> set by me and am unaware of how to get around this, thankyou >> for your patience I await your response. > Please first make clear if you're missing a _user_ password > or the _root_ password. There hasn't been a definite mentioning > in your initial post. Having to deal with a system where someone > else has set passwords that you don't know is always a bit > problematic, but not impossible to solve. It requires that you > try to tell as precisely as possible what's actually going on. > > When you enter single user mode, no password should be required. > At the boot prompt, enter "boot -s", and then confirm /bin/sh > as the default shell. Enter the command "mount -uw /" to access > the root partition (where the password is stored). Then enter > "passwd" (or "passwd root") to change root's password. You will > not be asked for the previous password. If ZFS is used I would do a "zfs list" to see which fs has the rootfs and "zfs set readonly=off name/of/rootfs" Also it might help to "zfs mount -a" to mount all other filesystems as /usr. I never tried mount -uw in single user mode on zfs though. > Allow me to point you to the FAQ entry again, and check /etc/ttys > if your console has been marked "insecure" which _might_ be a > reason for still being prompted for the root password in single > user mode: > > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/faq/admin.html#idp59717152 > > Do you have a FreeBSD live system (installation CD or DVD, or > USB stick) available? You can use that to access the system's > partitions and make changes independently from passwords restricting > access therein (e. g., change "insecure" to "secure" console in > /etc/ttys, if it should be needed). > > Is it possible for you to provide a screen transcript or screen > capture of what you see? Please try to describe what steps you > have taken and what results they ended in. This will make > troubleshooting easier. At this time, it's just a WAG. ;-) > > > > -- Andrei From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 3 13:14:56 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C390F793; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 13:14:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F24AB87; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 13:14:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.82) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1Xa2hC-001gdF-GJ>; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 15:14:54 +0200 Received: from g225107160.adsl.alicedsl.de ([92.225.107.160] helo=thor.walstatt.dynvpn.de) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.82) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1Xa2hC-003NEc-EO>; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 15:14:54 +0200 Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 15:14:53 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" To: FreeBSD CURRENT , FreeBSD Questions Subject: [CURRENT] hostapd: WPA w/ EAP-TTLS or EAP-PEAP or EAP-TLS ? Message-ID: <20141003151453.620a1f2b.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Organization: FU Berlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/4dl7sMWzqIdduL=yCdhF.he"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Originating-IP: 92.225.107.160 X-ZEDAT-Hint: A X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 13:14:56 -0000 --Sig_/4dl7sMWzqIdduL=yCdhF.he Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Where is the support on WPA with EAP-TTLS or EAP-PEAP or EAP-TLS in hostap= d? Trying to circumvent FreeBSD's very poor documentation on the options of ho= stapd, I found lots of howtos for Linuxes of different flavours utilizing obviously the sa= me hostapd basis. But whenever I try to configure one of the above mentioned auth meth= ods for a gateway I try to configure (CURRENT, 10.1-PRE), I get an error. What is up here? Regards, Oliver --Sig_/4dl7sMWzqIdduL=yCdhF.he Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEbBAEBAgAGBQJULqFOAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8dIEH+LsvllZa5jcrwMZJ6Jumemek kJQKDHopvzZWooxJPoTJvDMVq/PwsE5ypeBrVeU4IgRtJ27J9zz8w+bZ2nKDQm86 tfVbRFcEAGP/6g8wk6Jag51wwz2aFky4BHkpNv6KbN31vlvwyZZNrXNqPHb8aX/Z IbQptkTOVT5ya72x9dU78TcEl9MQdLotEtehaKi/PyHYZEDgApALFWmfs6gE2LCz +guHs0o3TcNzk7G12R3hbE6Fnb9vLIGJDDz65c9tzWeUECb3t7m7N7QSjvljWPoF BqtOC9P1kddbmBiBRQ7cNe+CrQoihHr2gwn/Xx1T+NofPsuDhiMJqWX9SH6WZA== =8PFU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/4dl7sMWzqIdduL=yCdhF.he-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 3 13:16:55 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99C0393A for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 13:16:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6510CBAA for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 13:16:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-76-160.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.160]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s93DGl8n013790 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 08:16:48 -0500 Message-ID: <542EA336.1080709@hiwaay.net> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 08:23:02 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg upgrade question .... References: <542D601F.1030104@hiwaay.net> <20141003115436.70a5446a@elena.home> In-Reply-To: <20141003115436.70a5446a@elena.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 13:16:55 -0000 On 10/03/14 05:54, TonyMc wrote: > On Thu, 02 Oct 2014 09:24:31 -0500 > "William A. Mahaffey III" wrote: > >> >> .... I converted from using linux-f10 to using linux-c6 for linux >> compatibility earlier this week. There were no linux-c6 pkg's, so I >> used ports to do that install, & I also 'pkg delete'-ed all of >> linux-f10 in the process. I just did a 'pkg upgrade -y' & it deleted >> all of the installed linux-c6 stuff & reinstalled linux-f10 !!!! I >> would like to believe this was pilot error, but that is getting to be >> a bit of a stretch .... I can & will manually clean up the mess, but >> WTF is going on here w/ pkg ? That behavior is 100% counter-intuitive >> to me, bug ? >> >> > Dear William, > > this was indeed pilot error. You should get into the habit of > reading /usr/ports/UPDATING. The relevant entry states (22 Sep.): "The > complete drop-in replacement linux-c6 port infrastructure is in ports > and will shortly replace the current linux-f10- ports as default." > The "will shortly" is key there. The ports system makes software > available for you to compile and install. You can start using linux-c6 > ports before they become the default, but you must understand that that > is your decision, and by doing so you are departing from "the default". > If you then try to "pkg upgrade" pkg will install the most recently > available packages for the ports you have installed. Since there are > no linux-c6 packages available yet (though presumably it will not be > long), pkg resolved your software dependencies on linux emulation using > linux-f10 packages, which were available. If you had waited until > linux-c6 became the default, you would have been fine. > > I have read a number of your messages over the last few weeks and it > seems to me you still have a problem grasping the relationship between > ports and packages. (I hope I have not misunderstood you.) You need > to understand that ports are recipes for configuring, building and > installing software (usually involving compilation, linking and > installation), while packages are recipes for adding > already-configured-and-built software to your system. The "already" > part of that description means that someone, somewhere has to have done > the configuration, compilation and linking steps. That takes a finite > time. When multiplied by the number of available ports (more than > 20,000) you can see why the availability of packages lags behind the > availability of the recipes in the ports tree. 1st, thx for a thoughtful & detailed response. You are indeed correct that I am still a bit opaque on pkg/ports. I do understand the diff between ports compiling (probably very new) stuff up from scratch vs. pkg supplying already-compiled-&-packaged software. What I didn't expect was the behavior of pkg actually deleting already-compiled-&-installed linux-c6 ports packages (& reinstalling linux-f10 stuff that I had explicitly deleted). I didn't know that there was a cross-dependency (maybe bad word choice) such that linux-f10 pkg's could resolve other dependencies from other software on the linux-c6 ports package. > I hope that helps. I suggest you choose between ports and > packages (there are exceptions for some programs, for which you really > need non-default options). If you prefer to use the newest version as > soon as it becomes available, and you can live with the work of choosing > configuration options, building and installing, you need to use ports. > But if you can wait a few days and accept the default options, pkg > upgrade will make your life a lot easier. I definitely prefer pkg, I am only using ports for flash support for browsers (req'd by both opera & firefox), *nothing* else. I am striving to use only pkg to keep my userland packages updated. It's just that infernal flash coding that puts me into ports. I am also still a bit hazy on the cross interaction between ports-packages & pkg's, but hopefully that will come. I think I already understood most of the points you made above, but maybe not. > > Just as an aside: you seem very keen to use linux emulation on > FreeBSD. Why is that? What are you missing that requires the > compatibility layer? > > Best, > Tony > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I am only using the linux emulation for flash plugin for browsers, that's *it*, nothing else. -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 3 13:20:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2215AC2 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 13:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x246.google.com (mail-pa0-x246.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::246]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EECFBE7 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 13:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f70.google.com with SMTP id et14so9500395pad.9 for ; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 06:20:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=FjIGsUEJ/AyThEs9FsvB2bcNMO6SuE8h344qiPKgpV4=; b=RZf1v7HV+lxojhOqw7WkvI7RrQ4gk231Wx8ny6KhSvJ2yun/rKzKN/Rdn4NW17vwnu 7ahSdPXsz6m87p4pXPFhzEAFLMueCsVGIV32KuanMzo8JBE80QHiCy1xeChojW+nSIAp Ghm0XDJeOxCEsENX3PDFxIIWQK89SZbs/bZPPw9BfbyYTQ4Y6hrnQ+4wpwoSI3WGS1ty yBHHB1EL+0fGlknXheBYG4ue0c8xyqlo7rAq1Vr25iPgqQvNLbsibb5zPWxKR/LEEzdA W2kskMfm+YAfah5zVL3CbPvbYW72tJnflePRvqpoKQZgARGyn6LTQRHqIViubb6xFv5P hcJQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.66.136 with SMTP id f8mr4915068pat.7.1412342447239; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 06:20:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <001a1134b510de76c7050484999c@google.com> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 13:20:47 +0000 Subject: Your freebsd.org Merchant Services From: Cindy Smith To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 13:20:47 -0000 Hello, Credit card merchant service laws change frequently and current rates are looking better than ever! We would like to offer a free merchant account analysis for freebsd.org to see if we can lower your rates and fees to save you money. There is no cost to you! We evaluate rates, fees, services,pay distribution time, integration, etc. Our goal is to ensure you are getting the most out of your merchant service account. You have nothing to lose and can only gain by taking advantage of our free service. Please let me know if there is interest! Look forward to hearing from you. Cindy Smith Merchant Services Specialist From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 3 13:41:04 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 865BD334; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 13:41:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 407D8DDE; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 13:41:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Xa36O-000Ph9-AP; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 17:40:56 +0400 Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 17:40:56 +0400 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov To: "O. Hartmann" Subject: Re: [CURRENT] hostapd: WPA w/ EAP-TTLS or EAP-PEAP or EAP-TLS ? Message-ID: <20141003134056.GA96750@zxy.spb.ru> References: <20141003151453.620a1f2b.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141003151453.620a1f2b.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: FreeBSD CURRENT , FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 13:41:04 -0000 On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 03:14:53PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > > Where is the support on WPA with EAP-TTLS or EAP-PEAP or EAP-TLS in hostapd? > > Trying to circumvent FreeBSD's very poor documentation on the options of hostapd, I found > lots of howtos for Linuxes of different flavours utilizing obviously the same hostapd > basis. But whenever I try to configure one of the above mentioned auth methods for a > gateway I try to configure (CURRENT, 10.1-PRE), I get an error. > > What is up here? You need to recompile source. And patching some Makefiles, AFAIR. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 3 13:42:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 489D7570; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 13:42:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-187.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "webmail2.dweimer.local", Issuer "webmail2.dweimer.local" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 142AFE95; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 13:42:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.dweimer.net (webmail [192.168.5.2]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s93DgONB048892 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 3 Oct 2014 08:42:24 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 08:42:24 -0500 From: dweimer To: =?UTF-8?Q?Radek_Krej=C4=8Da?= Subject: Re: NTPD problem - a lot of interfaces Organization: dweimer.net Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.3 Cc: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" , owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 13:42:33 -0000 On 10/03/2014 6:44 am, Radek KrejĨa wrote: > Hello, > > I have problem on machines, where is a lot of network interfaces > (about 100). On this machines ntpd wont start and if is runnig and > critical count of interfaces is reached, it falls. > > I can run ntpdate command from cron, but I need to have better > solution. > > Radek > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Do you need it to listen on all interfaces? If not you could just limit it to the primary interface if using the freeBSD built in ntp, theres a listen directive in configuration file if using the newer ntpd from ports, it uses a -I flag to specify the listening IP address. -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 3 15:27:16 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1766C7C for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 15:27:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x234.google.com (mail-lb0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EC82C5A for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 15:27:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f180.google.com with SMTP id f15so1180028lbj.25 for ; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 08:27:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=DZLHqWlbYeaiAeMksd/zA1eLFU72E44rtq3FNe++LcU=; b=oRf8Mp2PsmeQ4Wv74xWb+Ky1IyBuVu9KqoXiSmt6yTV1m+yeQaRd/Jyuxkz2ppfpqK QqnSo9bJ4DQVQH5THErYlcbQ0xUvBF99IznlHF9oo80qELkuhIjf8rEZFdFiKJDexk6e 6nrAGfGFg76z8FaGgWBdGI0gziKLFuXu7Il44iVVHevOUUaqIjpnH9vaWdV79DwzRw5x iaLXzfbz5yQetviYErYegv6KQjp3WRVd14zHtD9v57LPt7WaBJCvUraJtUKgX1Z8NwXP GjwlTfqDj+Rj4EC8zpzQyeX4hw/rRKm4RHbt0RkP7WWDhYhMDcTsMcX4iidyxGhGAT15 OHaA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.142.33 with SMTP id rt1mr6202451lbb.69.1412350033862; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 08:27:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.155.80 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 08:27:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 11:27:13 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: postfix supported lookup table types (postconf -m) From: alexus To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 15:27:16 -0000 I'm trying to get "postfix-tls" package going on my system. Unfortunately package doesn't support mysql, so I'm out of luck in that regards unless I go "/usr/ports" route, which I dont really want to go as binary packages are a lot easier to maintain for me at least. [alexus@alexus ~]$ uname -a FreeBSD alexus.org 9.2-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE-p5 #0 r265974: Wed May 14 07:57:04 PDT 2014 root@jj3.myibay.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/R610 amd64 [alexus@alexus ~]$ postconf -m btree cidr environ fail hash internal memcache pcre proxy regexp socketmap static tcp texthash unix [alexus@alexus ~]$ I'm just _REALLY_ wish FreeBSD would comes with it as RHEL RPM package comes with "mysql" support. [alexus@wcmisdlin02 ~]$ uname -a Linux wcmisdlin02.uftmasterad.org 2.6.32-431.29.2.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Sep 9 13:45:55 CDT 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [alexus@wcmisdlin02 ~]$ postconf -m btree cidr environ hash ldap mysql nis pcre proxy regexp static unix [alexus@wcmisdlin02 ~]$ I wrote email to maintainer of postfix-tls, hopefully he'll reconsider or would create separate package with "mysql" support as well. mean while ... I guess my only option is "poudriere" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 3 19:23:00 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D8FC7D5; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 19:23:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com (mail-wi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 049F2ABC; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 19:22:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id fb4so3765485wid.0 for ; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 12:22:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=OhrWoFmSj0KWtQ8g/nWsEPSXW42GgPb8GcLmTETxsvI=; b=gknHwUfIqFyDGRdRsLKFvjXDr/XzTJ4JoT72TCJ30C5Mt8/XDUsOhz8bf0CWocCo4C yU6gfceWY1p4hlPH2hl7kdjn3XfMhBLQnb2iPv3nT+TJJeeJqHZD5+9JefsFxC9+rx/8 Y6SMrIQXckVD33X0LFvRXcjy62eQmo9K1MzBetNZlGLIlG/Gzc5/tlBe5L54SqOv3TLS nQV1upcG3yzVfvjT243pQ6HIDprRcFYDsmrROMuCcCAh1kIIh75Uog+paVbsC1kmM+rD c4ylkw1yyS/rQFdpZ265FRa6OvcsVup/0cM51KE4Oe/TeB3wt7rQjElUxdNujVm/xzVF +qMw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.80.98 with SMTP id q2mr697523wix.20.1412364178239; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 12:22:58 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.106.136 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 12:22:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20141003151453.620a1f2b.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <20141003151453.620a1f2b.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 12:22:58 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: uQLE3fjg-HJQRI2wKJdkClvJE4g Message-ID: Subject: Re: [CURRENT] hostapd: WPA w/ EAP-TTLS or EAP-PEAP or EAP-TLS ? From: Adrian Chadd To: "O. Hartmann" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD CURRENT , FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 19:23:00 -0000 Documentation updates to hostapd / wifi for the handbook and manpages are very, very welcome. -a On 3 October 2014 06:14, O. Hartmann wrote: > > Where is the support on WPA with EAP-TTLS or EAP-PEAP or EAP-TLS in hostapd? > > Trying to circumvent FreeBSD's very poor documentation on the options of hostapd, I found > lots of howtos for Linuxes of different flavours utilizing obviously the same hostapd > basis. But whenever I try to configure one of the above mentioned auth methods for a > gateway I try to configure (CURRENT, 10.1-PRE), I get an error. > > What is up here? > > Regards, > Oliver From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 3 19:33:04 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAA9FDB1 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 19:33:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80DEBBE5 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 19:33:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [89.204.135.64] (helo=unixarea.DDR.dd) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Xa7ZL-00061o-9u for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 20:27:07 +0200 Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 20:27:04 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: how to restart 'make buildkernel' Message-ID: <20141003182703.GA1060@unixarea.DDR.dd> Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r269739 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 89.204.135.64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 19:33:04 -0000 Hello, If I have to interrupt a 'make buildkernel', how I can restart it from the point of interrupt and not from scratch? Thanks matthias -- Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: E-mail: guru@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII_Ribbon_Campaign From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 3 20:20:59 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F5A26B3 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 20:20:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6FDBC0 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 20:20:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s93KKvY8067867 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 3 Oct 2014 14:20:57 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id s93KKuXk067863; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 14:20:57 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 14:20:56 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Matthias Apitz Subject: Re: how to restart 'make buildkernel' In-Reply-To: <20141003182703.GA1060@unixarea.DDR.dd> Message-ID: References: <20141003182703.GA1060@unixarea.DDR.dd> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 03 Oct 2014 14:20:57 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 20:20:59 -0000 On Fri, 3 Oct 2014, Matthias Apitz wrote: > If I have to interrupt a 'make buildkernel', how I can restart it from > the point of interrupt and not from scratch? # make -DNO_CLEAN buildkernel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 3 21:28:51 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BE59864 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 21:28:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-f49.google.com (mail-qa0-f49.google.com [209.85.216.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DD04941 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 21:28:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id f12so1419387qad.36 for ; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 14:28:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from :to:content-type; bh=GO+96HL9orpJQ4wlInUMyaE5H86cREilorhU2Kq3qvI=; b=Wg6c1P04QcrXx52szQ3VXgutSH4QDSLzwChUhbDPcf6nsw9xhxNIxhiWEE4i3JM8Vv g0P/oK/ZYU0R9a5D+wbTt+9+SM7fVOScc8GMAhpPLHuzYVzHM1jhMxurUCRdbHN7OXKy tOnhtmH2bpQJ+4UuA3H8y8SnN6KOiJ3OIyyqiU4x8YHq+ci2UhFH3a9aNbau8+z9/UcC KXkmq3x990mUUHDnuFS8EWTf/ml26IuPR8wV+dBo7DHBbHsfXD3eiiYfAec8KixmPygC aYX3N0VUS1RAJU2jvAj2uxyQo4Yo0lacxpAZJOUeK42t/RIPsHStT4sLIgRGRYoCCly9 e+1g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnBhSLKKTGqRGOrpP6GY50TBhCht0ihtr6kBdfKuff1ulifrdVfzDfVdVbvMkx2HOnzNl2s MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.46.6 with SMTP id h6mr11304426qaf.45.1412371724616; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 14:28:44 -0700 (PDT) Sender: daniel@otherware.org Received: by 10.140.20.248 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 14:28:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [216.207.42.140] Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 14:28:44 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: J5rtjAAIjisnHIM3t6gJvcyqTV4 Message-ID: Subject: geli not recognizing keyboard From: Daniel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 21:28:51 -0000 Hi, I did a fresh install with 10.1-BETA3 yesterday. I decided to encrypt the boot partition using geli (only option given). The keyboard i have is a USB keyboard. The keyboard works fine in all scenarios except for when prompted with the geli password. http://i.minus.com/ibbw2T5C7Oppp5.jpg I tried with multiple different keyboards connected. Here's an Apple keyboard and a standard PC Roswill keyboard. There's no response at all from geli. I tried installing FreeBSD without geli and I had no issues with the keyboard to login later during boot. It appears to be a problem with geli. I do want to have my boot drive encrypted. Does anyone have any ideas? Suggestions? Money to send me? Motherboard: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00FM4M7TQ -d From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 4 13:52:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0A3632F for ; Sat, 4 Oct 2014 13:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D8B86AB for ; Sat, 4 Oct 2014 13:52:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.197] ([95.91.231.150]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MSMKx-1Xg4fk0APr-00TRFr; Sat, 04 Oct 2014 15:52:39 +0200 Message-ID: <542FFBA6.5020508@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2014 15:52:38 +0200 From: "lokadamus@gmx.de" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maurizio Vairani , User Questions Subject: Re: Downgrade a pkg References: <542E6E3F.9040405@cloverinformatica.it> In-Reply-To: <542E6E3F.9040405@cloverinformatica.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Zosy3R6Ed/lr6gLA+sTGVbKwyARbZiigzhkP+barDEjw1q963l7 2SFzbfo3//aj8aSn2NdKJAg54hhcQ2GatEO5nSfG4yNNy19PP8H0zoMbwpQ2XLdA4OL0Q4B 2++MPqR951wpKIID5yBW5scLl3GbXUH8vgONED2XCykOmsqEtRIXkOUaJHSa0it5vXcJO+R 2SomWGe7Nvcs/8kQXg4ag== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2014 13:52:47 -0000 On 03.10.2014 11:37, Maurizio Vairani wrote: > Hello, > > I need to downgrade VirtualBox to version 4.3.12_1. > How can I do it ? > > Thanks in advance, > Maurizio > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > In the past was portdowngrade used for such things. http://cipitunk.wordpress.com/2012/01/16/ports-downgrade-in-freebsd/ It is in ports under ports-mgmt. Hope it is working. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 4 14:29:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCCD8763 for ; Sat, 4 Oct 2014 14:29:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8ECDBA02 for ; Sat, 4 Oct 2014 14:29:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-26-235.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.26.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DFA23CD3F; Sat, 4 Oct 2014 16:29:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s94ETGqM004795; Sat, 4 Oct 2014 16:29:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2014 16:29:16 +0200 From: Polytropon To: "lokadamus@gmx.de" Subject: Re: Downgrade a pkg Message-Id: <20141004162916.184709f7.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <542FFBA6.5020508@gmx.de> References: <542E6E3F.9040405@cloverinformatica.it> <542FFBA6.5020508@gmx.de> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Maurizio Vairani , User Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2014 14:29:26 -0000 On Sat, 04 Oct 2014 15:52:38 +0200, lokadamus@gmx.de wrote: > In the past was portdowngrade used for such things. > http://cipitunk.wordpress.com/2012/01/16/ports-downgrade-in-freebsd/ > > It is in ports under ports-mgmt. > > Hope it is working. I assume it will not work anymore... :-( The last time I was using it was on FreeBSD 8, I needed to downgrade the xzgv image viewer to the last usable version (which was 0.8_9). It worked like that: # portdowngrade graphics/xzgv -s :pserver:anoncvs@anoncvs.tw.FreeBSD.org:/home/ncvs Then the desired version would be selected, and the port would be downgraded accordingly, so it could then be built from source. With portdowngrade, CVS has been used to obtain the old package data, and as the ports collection does not use CVS now, ... I don't know if the maintainer of portdowngrade had success bringing the port version access mechanism into sync with the ability of SVN to check out specific revisions. On the other hand, it should be possible to manually check out a specific version of the whole ports tree where the port version reflects the required older version number. This is mainly a SVN thing. Of course this involves building from source, as pkg, with its binary package approach, emphasizes the use of release or most recent packages. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 4 16:14:55 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B179FC2 for ; Sat, 4 Oct 2014 16:14:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [198.74.231.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BCA56B3 for ; Sat, 4 Oct 2014 16:14:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [198.74.231.63]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E27F046B0C for ; Sat, 4 Oct 2014 12:14:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fledge.watson.org (doug@localhost.watson.org [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s94GErPv088433 for ; Sat, 4 Oct 2014 12:14:53 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) with ESMTP id s94GEr4h088430 for ; Sat, 4 Oct 2014 12:14:53 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) X-Authentication-Warning: fledge.watson.org: doug owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2014 12:14:53 -0400 (EDT) From: doug@safeport.com X-X-Sender: doug@fledge.watson.org Reply-To: doug@fledge.watson.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: checking out ports tree: was Downgrade a pkg In-Reply-To: <20141004162916.184709f7.freebsd@edvax.de> Message-ID: References: <542E6E3F.9040405@cloverinformatica.it> <542FFBA6.5020508@gmx.de> <20141004162916.184709f7.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (fledge.watson.org [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 04 Oct 2014 12:14:53 -0400 (EDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2014 16:14:55 -0000 On Sat, 4 Oct 2014, Polytropon wrote: > On the other hand, it should be possible to manually > check out a specific version of the whole ports tree > where the port version reflects the required older > version number. This is mainly a SVN thing. Of course > this involves building from source, as pkg, with its > binary package approach, emphasizes the use of release > or most recent packages. Will this get the old source? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 4 16:27:24 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6C82308 for ; Sat, 4 Oct 2014 16:27:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9938D80E for ; Sat, 4 Oct 2014 16:27:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-26-235.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.26.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FA113CCF4; Sat, 4 Oct 2014 18:27:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s94GRKvo005212; Sat, 4 Oct 2014 18:27:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2014 18:27:20 +0200 From: Polytropon To: doug@fledge.watson.org Subject: Re: checking out ports tree: was Downgrade a pkg Message-Id: <20141004182720.84dd9bf3.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <542E6E3F.9040405@cloverinformatica.it> <542FFBA6.5020508@gmx.de> <20141004162916.184709f7.freebsd@edvax.de> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: doug@safeport.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2014 16:27:24 -0000 On Sat, 4 Oct 2014 12:14:53 -0400 (EDT), doug@safeport.com wrote: > > On Sat, 4 Oct 2014, Polytropon wrote: > > > On the other hand, it should be possible to manually > > check out a specific version of the whole ports tree > > where the port version reflects the required older > > version number. This is mainly a SVN thing. Of course > > this involves building from source, as pkg, with its > > binary package approach, emphasizes the use of release > > or most recent packages. > > Will this get the old source? No, it will get the old _port_ which links to the old source archive. The question probably is: Will this source archive also be available? After obtaining the old port, a "make fetch" should reveal if the source is still available. Basically you can check out _any_ version of the ports tree, and probably you can restrict this method to a particular port only. The key is knowing which revision number (from the repository) corresponds to which port version. However, keep an eye on possible dependencies! https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/svn.html -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 4 19:27:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C69E47A1 for ; Sat, 4 Oct 2014 19:27:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x22c.google.com (mail-lb0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55035B27 for ; Sat, 4 Oct 2014 19:27:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id b6so2537989lbj.17 for ; Sat, 04 Oct 2014 12:27:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=0ll2i6HQPrXDWC/2QyvIV3tf2Y6EbOD3LPwUX3yBcLQ=; b=i6lR2Y9JbKVAtRmVbH84c9YIy+tf9DmvRn2JBBLUphV24goPpEWxFjKeXdjoO9Wgg4 XyTiyxIA+c28L6iwSA5jImLNOk0PxrETy1sdSkm4eADRO1JF5V4bnLYyqMHFcENJj155 IwjyD63dtnJm2rRsfgVqUmE6jgr+C0WYaiKm3bdMg6T05ALk3UZgMqRV/o1bg69yzQuQ 91DMDmRLtzHP4382OpZcuJk9DDAtSlcnjAna5KSakCrrleJR/YY4KPYNhktCxH38TJkF 5PsjYuX27KwMhj3clSGiYiTc1TPhTyM1TPXceGvNND98kT/j2Jja5K+gV54jZhuk9/sO JxTg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.7.145 with SMTP id j17mr4306455laa.67.1412450844198; Sat, 04 Oct 2014 12:27:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.4.3 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Oct 2014 12:27:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2014 14:27:24 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Trouble installing on uefi machine From: Brian Wood To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2014 19:27:26 -0000 I've tried installing Beta3 and RC1 FreeBSD-10.1-RC1-amd64-uefi-memstick.img on a machine, but in both cases it hangs. The last thing printed is: acpi0: on motherboard It's an HP desktop with quad core I5 cpu. What do you suggest? Thanks. Brian Ebenezer Enterprises - In G-d we trust. http://webEbenezer.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 4 19:51:50 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D9C0DF2 for ; Sat, 4 Oct 2014 19:51:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail128.atl101.mcdlv.net (mail128.atl101.mcdlv.net [198.2.130.128]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6891D70 for ; Sat, 4 Oct 2014 19:51:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=mail128.atl101.mcdlv.net; h=Subject:From:Reply-To:To:Date:Message-ID:List-ID:List-Unsubscribe:Sender:Content-Type:MIME-Version; i=team=3Dpivotpointresearch.com@mail128.atl101.mcdlv.net; bh=Ta3EixGhvRy8Q3sGpPH7gum9x4w=; b=HTalPKVouPM9L1KzBQy+JvcjWnTkkAbxchzTGYrFCL/LSAKzpvM6Okl5ad3pDX+v0LN2Xxvl+1FB FMmx+w5mFzYDRBdKbnHSkzVMQrT+0/zIIv8dx4Q7LLYrfc9rL/AfYnx53exS/+cd5sPVVgFn06rG lfsCA0Jpz8dLxYU60wU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=mail128.atl101.mcdlv.net; b=lZ+OCgUkyVQNMLZnF0vfesChoBgDLBfSxly1r04MBeJj1mu8CTN8ljqZgJKEekcLCCp+wdHG+iDz z9i9N5pLbmzTafnzM4+MYmDRklTdSV77bKnXCJJiDX5kQIRwYH6laqi/nm5hn/AaaBW+sybrXx/K urQbGuPyeG9lZjyKRSA=; Received: from (127.0.0.1) by mail128.atl101.mcdlv.net id h617ta1ohl8j for ; Sat, 4 Oct 2014 19:21:40 +0000 (envelope-from ) Subject: =?utf-8?Q?Pivotal=20Perspectives=20Newsletter=2D=20Microsoft=20developer=20evangelist=20responds=20to=20developer=20frustration?= From: =?utf-8?Q?Pivot=20Point?= Reply-To: =?utf-8?Q?Pivot=20Point?= To: =?utf-8?Q?*|FNAME|*?= Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2014 19:21:40 +0000 Message-ID: X-Mailer: MailChimp Mailer - **CID754e57ea3b81b96126c3** X-Campaign: mailchimpca43e8b1f0e9c72628074f775.754e57ea3b X-campaignid: mailchimpca43e8b1f0e9c72628074f775.754e57ea3b X-Report-Abuse: Please report abuse for this campaign here: http://www.mailchimp.com/abuse/abuse.phtml?u=ca43e8b1f0e9c72628074f775&id=754e57ea3b&e=81b96126c3 X-MC-User: ca43e8b1f0e9c72628074f775 X-Feedback-ID: 31346347:31346347.767341:us8:mc X-Accounttype: pd Sender: "Pivot Point" x-mcda: FALSE MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="fixed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2014 19:51:50 -0000 View this email in your browser (http://us8.campaign-archive1.com/?u=3Dca4= 3e8b1f0e9c72628074f775&id=3D754e57ea3b&e=3D81b96126c3) ** Microsoft exec addresses topic that is frustrating many software develo= pers ------------------------------------------------------------ ** ------------------------------------------------------------ Each month we encourage developers in the Pivotal Perspectives panel to po= se questions for other developers and industry leaders to respond to. Las= t month=E2=80=99s question came from US game developer Geoffrey Draper. http://www.pivotpointresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/geoff_draper.= jpg Geoffrey asked =E2=80=9CAre any other developers baffled by Microsoft= =E2=80=99s strategy? They say they want us to develop for their platform= =2C and then they deprecate XNA along with their System.Drawing API for 2= D graphics. The only supported options are to code the entire GUI in XAML= (too high level) or DirectX (too low level). Essentially they are making= it overly difficult for us to port our existing Android games to Windows= =2E Do any other developers feel my frustration? Or has everyone else figur= ed out a workaround?=E2=80=9D Geoffrey Draper- Software Developer We posed Geoffrey=E2=80=99s question to the Pivotal Perspectives panel th= is week and heard back from over 300 developers during the week of July 21= st 2014. According to Matt Foulon=2C Pivot Point Research Group analyst=2C =E2=80= =9Cthe poll results found that 37% of developers agreed that they share G= eoffrey=E2=80=99s frustration and 15% said they had figured out workaroun= ds; and 48% said they didn=E2=80=99t have enough experience to have an opi= nion one way or the other.=E2=80=9D http://www.pivotpointresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/poll-chart2.j= pg Comments from fellow frustrated developers: =E2=80=9CXAML is nice and declarative=2C and with better performance works= nice for some games=2C but doesn=E2=80=99t help with porting at all. Dire= ctX is way too level without using an engine.=E2=80=9D (United States =E2= =80=93 software architect =E2=80=93 game developer) =E2=80=9CI am working in a startup doing a new mobile messaging product wh= ich requires a very smooth reactive UI. We are baffled as to what to use o= n WinPhone so it=E2=80=99s coming a LOOOONG last on our roadmap.=E2=80=9D= (Australia =E2=80=93 start up developer) Comments from fellow developers who have figured out workarounds: =E2=80=9CDeveloping with HTML 5 & Javascript is the future. Device-indepen= dent=2C from Java Android to Javascript it=E2=80=99s not too far.=E2=80=9D= (Germany =E2=80=93 professional full time developer) =E2=80=9CI develop using marmalade sdk and don=E2=80=99t sweat the native= sdk=2C that=E2=80=99s my game engine providor=E2=80=99s problem.=E2=80=9D= (Canada =E2=80=93 game developer =E2=80=93 enterprise/business productivit= y developer) =E2=80=9CSeems now the only easy way to make games for Windows Phone is ei= ther Unity 3D or HTML 5.=E2=80=9D (United Kingdom =E2=80=93 freelance/cont= ract developer =E2=80=93 enterprise/business productivity developer) We then asked for a response from Microsoft=E2=80=99s developer relations= team and got the following perspective. http://www.pivotpointresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/derek-burney.= png Derek Burney- Microsoft GM=2C Technical Evangelism =E2=80=9COftentimes a big=2C long-term vision for a platform requires brea= king changes. With Windows Store apps=2C we cemented and refined our inve= stment for a secure=2C developer friendly=2C highly productive platform th= at will serve the needs of our customers for many years; we have a platfor= m that is touch first=2C mobile first=2C safe to deploy via our stores. W= ith games=2C we want a powerful platform that would meet the complexity of= today=E2=80=99s immersive games. Let me explain what I mean by that. We want the best games running on the= Microsoft platform =E2=80=93 inclusive of Phone=2C Windows=2C and Xbox. T= o accomplish that=2C we want to make available the best/most powerful APIs= and frameworks=2C and as much as possible we want to decrease the frictio= n to reuse (or port) existing games to Windows/Windows Phone/and Xbox. Here are a few examples on how we achieve these goals: * We are making investments to ensure all middleware engines like Unity=2C= Marmalade=2C Corona=2C etc. have a great offering on Windows. * We are contributing first hand to ANGLE=2C Cocos2DX=2C OpenCV and many o= ther OSS frameworks. All of these efforts make it easier to =E2=80=9Cport= to Windows=E2=80=9D from Android and iOS. These ports are built on top o= f DirectX technologies=2C so they offer unmatched graphics and media capab= ilities. Those frameworks access the power of DirectX without having to wr= ite against it directly. * Once you are on the Windows platform=2C we maximize your code reuse with= Universal apps that you can reuse on Windows=2C Phone=2C and in the futur= e=2C XBOX. I should mention that as part of the we are investing into all these middl= eware and framework offerings based on the demand we see in the market =E2= =80=93 if you think we should invest more elsewhere=2C let us know where (= and why). This leads to the XNA question. It is indeed not the focus of our future i= nvestments because today=E2=80=99s technology has outpaced the capabilitie= s of what XNA could ever expose. Today=E2=80=99s games are more complex= than what the XNA APIs were designed for (e.g. advanced shaders). Direct3= D and Direct2D have all the required capabilities =E2=80=93 which is why w= e are investing so much into offering a rich XAML UI platform for controls= =2C and seamless integration with DirectX in the same projects. While we a= re not investing actively on XNA=2C the evangelism team does work with Mon= ogame (the cross-platform=2C OSS implementation of XNA )=2C which itself= leverages the seamless integration of the UI platform referred to above.= For people that prefer to still use the XNA APIs=2C they can do so using= Monogame.=E2=80=9D We reached out to Geoffrey to get his reaction to Microsoft=E2=80=99s pers= pective: =E2=80=9CAt first I was surprised by Microsoft=E2=80=99s decision to inves= t in 3rd party tools=2C but as I think more about it=2C it makes sense. S= ince many of today=E2=80=99s popular game titles are written using Unity o= r Corona or other such tools=2C it follows naturally for Microsoft to ensu= re that Windows is supported by these tools =E2=80=94 rather than forcing= developers to port their titles to Windows from scratch. Personally=2C I= =E2=80=99ve always done all my development using each system=E2=80=99s pla= tform-specific APIs rather than 3rd party tools=2C but maybe it=E2=80=99s= time I give them a try!=E2=80=9D http://www.pivotpointresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/pivotal-persp= ectives-logo-with-trademark.png If you have not joined the Pivotal Perspectives advisory panel here is you= r chance! Just click below to register. http://www.pivotpointresearch.com/jointhepanel =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Copyright =C2=A9 2014 Pivot Point Research Group=2C All rights reserved. You registered for the Pivotal Perspectives program Our mailing address is: Pivot Point Research Group 40 Lake Bellevue Drive Suite 100 Bellevue=2C WA 98005 USA ** unsubscribe from this list (http://pivotpointresearch.us8.list-manage.c= om/unsubscribe?u=3Dca43e8b1f0e9c72628074f775&id=3D43183e145a&e=3D81b96126c3&= c=3D754e57ea3b) ** update subscription preferences (http://pivotpointresearch.us8.list-man= age.com/profile?u=3Dca43e8b1f0e9c72628074f775&id=3D43183e145a&e=3D81b96126c3= ) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 4 23:29:10 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CDAB372 for ; Sat, 4 Oct 2014 23:29:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C9FB3D8 for ; Sat, 4 Oct 2014 23:29:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.news4all.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id s94NSnhj095071; Sun, 5 Oct 2014 01:28:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Message-ID: <543082B1.10104@bananmonarki.se> Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2014 01:28:49 +0200 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: doug@fledge.watson.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: checking out ports tree: was Downgrade a pkg References: <542E6E3F.9040405@cloverinformatica.it> <542FFBA6.5020508@gmx.de> <20141004162916.184709f7.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2014 23:29:10 -0000 On 2014-10-04 18:14, doug@safeport.com wrote: > > On Sat, 4 Oct 2014, Polytropon wrote: > >> On the other hand, it should be possible to manually >> check out a specific version of the whole ports tree >> where the port version reflects the required older >> version number. This is mainly a SVN thing. Of course >> this involves building from source, as pkg, with its >> binary package approach, emphasizes the use of release >> or most recent packages. > > Will this get the old source? Old sources is here http://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/old-releases/