Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 15:08:29 +0100 (CET) From: Harti Brandt <brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: help from a ports committer needed Message-ID: <20040106150717.Q66232@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> In-Reply-To: <20040106142308.1c4beda8@Magellan.Leidinger.net> References: <20040102224633.E97CC178EC@sirius.firepipe.net> <20040105150058.S13398@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <20040106142308.1c4beda8@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Alexander Leidinger wrote: AL>On Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:06:52 +0100 (CET) AL>Harti Brandt <brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote: AL> AL>> Is sysutils the correct category for this? There seems to be no AL> AL>% cat /usr/ports/sysutils/pkg/COMMENT AL>System utilities AL> AL>What about "misc", "devel", "net" or "benchmarks" (perhaps your AL>testsuite also produces some performance numbers)? Ok. I'll think "net" is best then (it does only conformance tests). AL>I suggest to let a ports committer add the port, as AL>/usr/ports/Tools/scripts/addport makes some assumptions about your ssh AL>setup and may fail in some cases (e.g. while adding an entry to AL>CVSROOT/modules). AL> AL>We're in a soft freeze mode ATM (no sweeping commits or major updates AL>which affect a lot of dependend ports), so the port can be added now. Ok. I'll do that. Thanks, harti -- harti brandt, http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/research/cc/cats/employees/hartmut.brandt/private brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de, harti@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040106150717.Q66232>