From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 1 19:57:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F24216A41F for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2006 19:57:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73A2443D53 for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2006 19:57:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so2399911nzo for ; Sun, 01 Jan 2006 11:57:44 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=O3LOGH5x//ZQKs62rrX6gjfWK8c9uHYOVSC1kKo2TAc2VtlxE9gTftVB4wFVwb+Gqh5qpYQ1FB2i7oG+m05fh0vvOozhtkkTD2VbH8PLx+IrBYeVSmitsQG9X0e+baUdi3olPE3hQljUrW7EYyOgbvHE8Te13nFpu0rXbz73PTg= Received: by 10.36.9.20 with SMTP id 20mr961390nzi; Sun, 01 Jan 2006 11:57:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from ringworm.mechee.com ( [71.102.13.196]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 16sm3112069nzo.2006.01.01.11.57.43; Sun, 01 Jan 2006 11:57:44 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael C. Shultz" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 11:57:41 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <20060101120052.3E1BC16A420@hub.freebsd.org> <200601011051.29946.ringworm01@gmail.com> <200601011343.43006.kirk@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <200601011343.43006.kirk@strauser.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200601011157.41766.ringworm01@gmail.com> Cc: Subject: Re: KDE 3.5 install probs (FBSD 5.4) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2006 19:57:46 -0000 On Sunday 01 January 2006 11:43, Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Sunday 01 January 2006 12:51 pm, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > There is a perfectly good version of KDE in the ports tree, why do this? > > In his defense, that's only true if you consider the "perfectly good > version" to be the one released last March, rather than the one released > just over a month ago. > > Still, as much as I want to play with 3.5, I'll wait until the ports come > along. People much better at building it than I am are having problems, so > there's not much point in me trying it. I understand impatience when a new version comes out and it isn't in the port's tree right away, but in the maintainer's defense: I remember just over a year ago when KDE used to crash rather regularly, now it is very stable, he is doing a great job at maintaining that very complex set of ports and deserves all of our patience and support. :) -Mike