Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 00:35:52 +0100 From: Jens Rehsack <rehsack@liwing.de> To: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.ORG>, Mike Barcroft <mike@sparc64.style9.org>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure Message-ID: <3E5EA0D8.3080800@liwing.de> References: <200302272151.h1RLpIWv018756@sparc64.style9.org> <20030227142404.L8428@znfgre.tberna.bet> <20030227232931.GA84770@HAL9000.homeunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Schultz wrote: > Thus spake Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.ORG>: > >>I made the suggestion in another forum that we create subscription lists >>for these tinderbox messages so that those interested could see them, and >>those not interested would not need to filter them out. >> >>Is anyone else interested in doing it that way? Or is this a solution >>looking for a problem? > > > I think most people who track -CURRENT are subscribed to current@ > precisely because they want to know when things break. Similarly > for -STABLE, but that's a moot point because -STABLE doesn't break > very often. For people who don't agree with this, there's always > procmail; the reports aren't all that frequent that filtering is > some sort of burden. I do, however, like the idea of > consolidating them and providing more concise summaries. > I agree. Even sometimes I hate got tinderbox message, in most cases I'm very interested. Jens To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3E5EA0D8.3080800>