From owner-freebsd-smp  Fri Jan 31 04:05:44 1997
Return-Path: <owner-smp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id EAA19912
          for smp-outgoing; Fri, 31 Jan 1997 04:05:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kremvax.demos.su (kremvax.demos.su [194.87.0.20])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id EAA19906
          for <freebsd-smp@freebsd.org>; Fri, 31 Jan 1997 04:05:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by kremvax.demos.su (8.6.13/D) from 0@sinbin.demos.su [194.87.2.95]
          with ESMTP id PAA28052; Fri, 31 Jan 1997 15:04:41 +0300
Received: by sinbin.demos.su id PAA22033;
  (8.6.12/D) Fri, 31 Jan 1997 15:04:13 +0300
From: bag@sinbin.demos.su (Alex G. Bulushev)
Message-Id: <199701311204.PAA22033@sinbin.demos.su>
Subject: Re: troubles with smp kernel
To: smp@csn.net (Steve Passe)
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 1997 15:04:13 +0300 (MSK)
Cc: mishania@demos.su, freebsd-smp@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199701311000.DAA22229@clem.systemsix.com> from "Steve Passe" at Jan 31, 97 03:00:53 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME7a]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-smp@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> so for each of the 4 controllers (ahc0-3) we picked the correct APIC IRQs.
> now the $64k question, is the system running any better this way?
> 

no :( it reboots ... max working time ~1h
when runing with one CPU it works ...
i'l planing to test it with minimal needed number of cards

   Alex.