From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Aug 31 14:30:10 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB1137B405 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 14:30:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f7VLU4L70021; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 14:30:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 14:30:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200108312130.f7VLU4L70021@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Tammy Root Subject: Re: ports/30166: ports Reply-To: Tammy Root Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/30166; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Tammy Root To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, root@iaces.com Cc: Subject: Re: ports/30166: ports Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 16:25:53 -0500 I originally put it in as a separate port because I was having trouble downloading it and thought that maybe the copywrite was changing to be more specific. So just updating the original port is fine with me. Benchmarks sounds like a good place for it too. Since the old one is in net, perhaps it should stay there as well? I have no problem with it being in just benchmarks. Paul. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message