Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 8 May 2003 08:47:40 +0200
From:      Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl>
To:        "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: HP ProLiant DL360G3 rebuttal... ;-)
Message-ID:  <20030508064740.GA96609@freebie.xs4all.nl>
In-Reply-To: <20030507175104.A47906@hub.freebsd.org>
References:  <C50AB9511EE59B49B2A503CB7AE1ABD10440E4F6@cceexc19.americas.cpqcorp.net> <20030507175104.A47906@hub.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 05:51:05PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 08:31:17PM -0500, Cagle, John (ISS-Houston) wrote:
> > FreeBSD is not currently an officially supported operating system, but
> ...
> > To provide official "tier-one" support (drivers for advanced features,
> > management agents, deployment software, regression testing, customer
> > support, services, etc.) would be very costly, and, at this time, the
> > FreeBSD market share numbers don't support that level of investment.
> 
> This is open source -- you provide the docs we supply the drivers.  Or is
> the cost of the packets carring the PDF files too expensive?

Don't be nasty, I know from experience (when getting the SmartArray docs
out of HOU) how much fun it can be to get specs out of CPQ^WHP. That worked
only because I knew who to contact to get a foot between the door.

The tendency to plaster NDA/Company Confidential on next to everything is
an unfortunate development, but by no means exclusive to HP. All major
companies are suffering from it to a certain extent.

Having said all that: it would sure be nice to get specs ;)

-- 
|   / o / /_  _   		wilko@FreeBSD.org
|/|/ / / /(  (_)  Bulte				



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030508064740.GA96609>