From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 12:31:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id DBC5C1065673; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 12:31:57 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 12:31:57 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Michael Scheidell Message-ID: <20120108123157.GA25884@FreeBSD.org> References: <201201080120.q081Kdq3018820@repoman.freebsd.org> <4F08FDB1.7000607@FreeBSD.org> <4F0983DE.9030609@freebsd.org> <4F098926.7000903@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F098926.7000903@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Steve Wills , cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Gabor Kovesdan , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/emulators/open-vm-tools Makefile distinfo pkg-plist X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 12:31:58 -0000 On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 07:16:38AM -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote: > so, vote? > > revert with portepoch? or mark broken for now? PORTEPOCH bumps should usually be avoided, as they can never go back (unless you move the port to a different name). How hard/long do you expect to get the fix? Marking the port BROKEN for a short while is probably fine, since vendor (as you've mentioned in another email) supports FreeBSD, and should probably facilitate in fixing it. ./danfe