Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:13:27 -0500
From:      D'Arcy Cain <darcy@druid.net>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Mailman's moderation checkbox?
Message-ID:  <842ac760-ae65-595c-9268-f395c5e9c025@druid.net>
In-Reply-To: <20200428112734.5028df19@bigus.dream-tech.com>
References:  <CAGBxaXk0Abwzk08aUFiNutTpADzAx4btFa0sWjuCoT_Awa=zuQ@mail.gmail.com> <6222c6ca-4709-d800-2d3a-59913bd2cf2a@gmail.com> <f5a0170f-a97d-c961-8a4f-95e1c1454dda@gmail.com> <CAGBxaXksjGrWJWXYzMg18sV7RAU8nsR1QRSPc6OJx7QdoiDvgw@mail.gmail.com> <20200425055723.00e6f974@archlinux> <CAGBxaX=baPYj__4scds27y+fZ0XcycYDwuZ8Qki-y0XuJVoocQ@mail.gmail.com> <20200425100348.3022f215@archlinux> <762afc18-324a-05ab-cf1b-68de2afea9ae@kicp.uchicago.edu> <slrnra8uff.14m6.mbj@gatsby.mbjnet.dk> <eefe0907-b14d-d368-2368-74a462c47539@kicp.uchicago.edu> <20200428112734.5028df19@bigus.dream-tech.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--Rhc3SyNIryahY4BWmNfLkXb9bZwZIozN3
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="YhxZ7pYjMwuBVosvyRviE0KRrnI63CjpK"

--YhxZ7pYjMwuBVosvyRviE0KRrnI63CjpK
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2020-04-28 13:27, Dave Hayes wrote:
> I personally find it quite difficult to glean complete information from=

> moderated mailing lists. What usually happens is that the human bias of=
 the
> moderator(s) prevents the dissemination of some information and the mai=
ling
> list becomes useless except as a window to the worldviews and informati=
on the
> moderators deem worthy.
I run a few lists, PyGreSQL for example, and I use moderation like this;
 Every person joining the list is moderated by default.  The first time
someone posts I get the email, decide if it is an abuser or spammer and,
if not, I approve the posting and remove the moderation bit.  If you are
on one of my lists you basically never see spam but users are posting
unimpeded.  It's very little work for me as most people don't post
anyway and I only have to deal with new posters once.

Sometimes I implement that on an existing list.  In that case I simply
leave everyone unmoderated and only block new users.  The assumption is
that if you are already on the list you are probably not a spammer.

--=20
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@druid.net>         |  Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/                |  and a sheep voting on
+1 416 788 2246     (DoD#0082)    (eNTP)   |  what's for dinner.
IM: darcy@VybeNetworks.com, VoIP: sip:darcy@druid.net


--YhxZ7pYjMwuBVosvyRviE0KRrnI63CjpK--

--Rhc3SyNIryahY4BWmNfLkXb9bZwZIozN3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYIAB0WIQQZ0YBgv7psnnP4U/HhAAd6d7lwwgUCXqiAVwAKCRDhAAd6d7lw
wkFpAQCuOirCcV6cUlkOQy9DJRcfABqzVZR6I3GQ6cgF9Of8qQD8Csnoy1jitCZa
IQIjilh3ugWFQoMKCngiy75R8WScYQc=
=5506
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Rhc3SyNIryahY4BWmNfLkXb9bZwZIozN3--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?842ac760-ae65-595c-9268-f395c5e9c025>