Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 10:11:09 +0100 From: Dominic Marks <dom@cus.org.uk> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@des.no> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenPAM dynamic module loading not working ? Message-ID: <20030713091109.GA93839@cus.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20030713084332.GB86012@des.no> References: <20030706224753.GA12877@cus.org.uk> <xzpr84y7uat.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20030710082642.GA17776@cus.org.uk> <20030713084332.GB86012@des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 13/07/2003 10:43, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 09:26:42AM +0100, Dominic Marks wrote: > > On 10/07/2003 08:46, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > > > Dominic Marks <dom@cus.org.uk> writes: > > > > Jul 7 22:10:40 bacon dovecot-auth: in openpam_load_module(): no pam_pgsql.so found > > > > Jul 7 22:10:40 bacon dovecot-auth: PAM: pam_start(example) failed: failed to load module > > > > > > The module probably lacks dependency information. I'll try to figure > > > it out later today. > > > > I rebuilt OpenPAM with debugging info and looked at what was happening. > > It turned out that it was not able to resolve pam_get_pass from the > > module > > pam_get_pass() doesn't exist in -CURRENT, it should use pam_get_authtok() > instead. Ok, can you explain why it was trying to find the pam_get_pass symbol which was removed from the module (by a port patch) and not mentioned in OpenPAM? I assume OpenPAM is looking in the module, catching a stray reference to it and then slipping up from here? > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav - des@des.no > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Thanks, -- Dominic <dom at cus.org.uk> <dominic.marks at npl.co.uk>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030713091109.GA93839>