From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 10 17:11:48 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4275993E for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 17:11:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nijmegen.renzel.net (mx1.renzel.net [195.243.213.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F29DF2C8C for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 17:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dublin.vkf.isb.de.renzel.net (unknown [10.0.0.80]) by nijmegen.renzel.net (smtpd) with ESMTP id ADE20141480D for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 19:11:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from asbach.renzel.net (unknown [10.2.0.7]) by dublin.vkf.isb.de.renzel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 927311A668E for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 19:11:38 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" From: Nils Beyer Organization: VKF Renzel GmbH Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 19:11:38 +0200 User-Agent: KNode/4.12.5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Subject: Re: Bheve: Slow linux syscalls on AMD To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org References: <5388B56D.1000501@digiware.nl> <20140530212900.6B74B6BF@hub.freebsd.org> <53891BC1.9050701@digiware.nl> <53891EAA.8040105@freebsd.org> <538927FC.3000903@digiware.nl> <53939AE2.80804@freebsd.org> <539434B6.6020804@digiware.nl> <5394817F.4030203@digiware.nl> <53948DA5.4040000@digiware.nl> <53962141.8070702@freebsd.org> <20140610103233.4C31D6C4@hub.freebsd.org> <53972572.80902@freebsd.org> <53973810.6060503@digiware.nl> Lines: 15 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98 at nijmegen.renzel.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5 required=7.0 tests=BAYES_00,MISSING_MID, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on nijmegen.renzel.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 17:11:48 -0000 Hi Willem, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > All Ubuntus I have installed in VMs give more or less perform the > same... (13.10, 12.04 LTS) > Although the overhead is just 5% and more evenly distibuted over both > vPCUs. I can confirm this. Just tested with an Ubuntu Server 12.04.3 ISO. Load on "vcpu 0" is now wobbling around 3% - 4%. Sum on all vcpus is around 5%. So, the Redhat clones do something different... Regards, Nils