From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 14 13:02:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D4BC16A420 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:02:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lenzi@k1.com.br) Received: from netuno.levier.com.br (netuno.levier.com.br [201.47.3.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC0913C4EB for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:02:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lenzi@k1.com.br) Received: from levier.com.br (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netuno.levier.com.br (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m1EB10oL056630; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:35:56 -0200 (BRST) (envelope-from lenzi@k1.com.br) X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (levier.com.br) Received: from [192.168.32.172] (authenticated as lenzi) by levier.com.br (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 14 Feb 2008 12:35:56 -0000 From: sergio lenzi To: "E. J. Cerejo" , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" In-Reply-To: <47B3BABA.1090209@optonline.net> References: <47B3BABA.1090209@optonline.net> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:35:37 -0200 Message-Id: <1202992537.1249.2.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Evolution just sluggish, slow and slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:02:55 -0000 Em Qua, 2008-02-13 às 22:51 -0500, E. J. Cerejo escreveu: > I never had this problem before with evolution, but since upgrading to > FBSD 6.3 from 6.2, evolution just takes about a minute to start and > consumes 98% of my CPU. I recently rebuild it from source but still too > slow, no improvement. Any ideas? Second time posting this problem. > There are no errors when I start it from terminal. > It usually only took 3 seconds to start. > _______________________________________________ Humm.... interesting... can you please explain what do you mean from "start it from terminal" ??? I can trace the problem if I have a working situation Thanks for your attention, Sergio