Date: Sun, 30 Jul 1995 21:56:21 +0400 (MSD) From: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= aka "Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage" <ache@astral.msk.su> To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> Cc: asami@cs.berkeley.edu, ports@freebsd.org, roberto@blaise.ibp.fr, tom@uniserve.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc inetd.conf Message-ID: <LX5Vy6m8c2@astral.msk.su> In-Reply-To: <199507300706.AAA05092@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>; from "Rodney W. Grimes" at Sun, 30 Jul 1995 00:06:52 -0700 (PDT) References: <199507300706.AAA05092@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199507300706.AAA05092@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> Rodney W. Grimes
writes:
>There is no binary /usr/libexec/uucp, that is a subdir (sick). uucico should
>not normally be called at command line, neither should uuxqt.
Really? It is many cases when uucico and uuxqt called from command line.
I run uucp sites for several years and trust me, it is common case.
On my home computer I often start uucico
manually when I want to deliver mail as soon as possible and often
start uuxqt when don't want to wait until all files becomes received.
Some aproximation f.e.:
uucico == sendmail -q -v for home computer.
(Does sendmail should no normally be called at command line too? Or what?)
--
Andrey A. Chernov : And I rest so composedly, /Now, in my bed,
ache@astral.msk.su : That any beholder /Might fancy me dead -
FidoNet: 2:5020/230.3 : Might start at beholding me, /Thinking me dead.
RELCOM Team,FreeBSD Team : E.A.Poe From "For Annie" 1849
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?LX5Vy6m8c2>