Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 05:19:59 -0800 From: Vonleigh Simmons <nospam@illusionart.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not... Message-ID: <4AD4D76B-7F54-11D9-B357-000D93C7878E@illusionart.com> In-Reply-To: <20050215062758.C523816A4D4@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20050215062758.C523816A4D4@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> MSIE has traditionally followed HTML standards more closely than almost > any other browser. Firefox does pretty well, tough; Opera much less > so. You are _definitely_ not a web designer. MSIE is _hell_ with standards compliance. Mozilla is the best, followed by Opera, KHTML/Safari is also up there; MSIE is the _worst_ and has several glaring errors when it comes to supporting standards. It botches: * The box model. * Transparent PNGs. * Position: Fixed. etc. > Webmasters should probably be replaced if they design an open Web site > for any _specific_ browser. Internal web sites are a different story. In an ideal world. But in the real world you have to build your site using standards compliance, then do tricks to make it work in explorer. Don't believe? look through my website code. Or even look at the variety of projects and tutorials dedicated to getting around the flaws in explorer. An example: <http://dean.edwards.name/IE7/intro/>; Vonleigh Simmons <http://illusionart.com/>;
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4AD4D76B-7F54-11D9-B357-000D93C7878E>