From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Oct 11 23:30:21 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA01748 for questions-outgoing; Sat, 11 Oct 1997 23:30:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA01734 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 1997 23:30:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA07930; Sat, 11 Oct 1997 23:24:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from current1.whistle.com(207.76.205.22) via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpd007928; Sun Oct 12 06:24:08 1997 Date: Sat, 11 Oct 1997 23:22:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: Jamie Lawrence cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, Jamie Lawrence Subject: Re: IPFW and Routing Weirdness In-Reply-To: <199710120010.RAA01167@colonel.42inc.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sat, 11 Oct 1997, Jamie Lawrence wrote: > Hi all - > > I just recompiled the kernel on my gateway with the > ipfw options enabled (I'm still at 2.1.7). > > It seems to work fine, with the minor exception that my local > LAN can no longer see the the gateway or the rest of the world... > > I suspected, of course, my ruleset at first. But flushing the > rules and adding > > ipfw add allow all from any to any ipfw add 1 allow ip from any to any > > doesn't alter this behavior. If I drop back the the kernel without the IPFW > options, everything is fine. > > Aynone have a clue what's going on? > > Thanks. > > -j >