Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 10 Feb 1999 14:40:55 -0600
From:      Nathan Ahlstrom <nrahlstr@winternet.com>
To:        coley@hybrid.com, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Y2K Compliance
Message-ID:  <19990210144055.D13430@winternet.com>
In-Reply-To: <36C1D33F.3516174B@hybrid.com>; from Ken Coley on Wed, Feb 10, 1999 at 10:43:12AM -0800
References:  <36C1D33F.3516174B@hybrid.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Ken Coley <coley@hybrid.com> wrote:
> There are a number of bugs listed in your Y2K compliance.  Some of them
> indicate that they have only been fixed in 3.0.  Is version 2.2.8 Y2K
> compliant?
>
> Are any of the previous releases compliant?  Are there patch files to
> bring previous versions upto compliance without replacing the underlining 
> OS version.

There will be a set of patches make 2.2.8-STABLE compliant.  Releases 
prior to the current releases (2.2.8 and 3.0) will need to be upgraded.

More information about the Y2K review can be found at
http://www.freebsd.org/~danny.

Nathan

-- 

Nathan Ahlstrom
nrahlstr@winternet.com
http://www.FreeBSD.org/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990210144055.D13430>