Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:54:34 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Graham Todd <gtodd@wawanesa.iciti.ca>
To:        "C. P. Ghost" <cpghost@cordula.ws>
Cc:        attilio@freebsd.org, FreeBSD FS <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Konstantin Belousov <kib@freebsd.org>, Peter Holm <pho@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: MPSAFE VFS -- update
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1210221344240.54085@wawanesa.iciti.ca>
In-Reply-To: <CADGWnjWSGegF=nEWhLMRJ=X_e3siBUxB-qq0DmKHcH%2Bx60A9kA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAJ-FndA8EeF87Op6XD2DVUtF6C8NVS2ebSDtHJ8z42s2LYcCEw@mail.gmail.com> <CADGWnjWSGegF=nEWhLMRJ=X_e3siBUxB-qq0DmKHcH%2Bx60A9kA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, C. P. Ghost wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> Following the plan reported here:
>> http://wiki.freebsd.org/NONMPSAFE_DEORBIT_VFS
>>
>> We are now at the state where all non-MPSAFE filesystems are
>> disconnected by the three.
>
> Sad to see PortalFS go. You've served us well here. :-(

It is kinda neat. How do/did you use it?

portalfs seems to have around a 10th of the LoC than MSDosFS and the 
changes made to make MSDosFS MPSAFE are documented on the above page: is 
it just that portalfs is too obscure to have a maintainer?

Thanks to all for the work on MPSAFE-ty ;-)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1210221344240.54085>