Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:49:20 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To:        "Heiko Wundram (Beenic)" <wundram@beenic.net>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: X + WM != GUI? (Re: Convince me, please! - too much about "GUI")
Message-ID:  <20070810114813.K77848@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <200708101138.43372.wundram@beenic.net>
References:  <46BA9682.7020203@ix.netcom.com> <20070809185814.D71656@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <46bc2882.TI+Z9rtlEFmBGJQV%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <200708101138.43372.wundram@beenic.net>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
>> I am not following this.  If (X.org + some WM) is not a GUI,
>> how would you define
>
> He probably equates a desktop environment (such as KDE/Gnome/etc.) to a GUI.

most people exactly equates that and i stated i that such defined GUI is 
completely useless and actually takes over time and resources.

but you are right - of course

> Which is wrong, of course: GUI is just any form of "graphical user
> interface", which X fits nicely.
X+wm. X alone doesn't provide any GUI.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070810114813.K77848>