Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 04:42:14 +1030 From: Greg Lewis <glewis@trc.adelaide.edu.au> To: Patrick Gardella <patrick@freebsd.org> Cc: Greg Lewis <glewis@trc.adelaide.edu.au>, freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New port: BugSeeker for Java 2 Message-ID: <20010105044214.A5802@ares.trc.adelaide.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <3A547469.1AAD5CBE@freebsd.org>; from patrick@freebsd.org on Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 08:02:33AM -0500 References: <20010104041430.A42481@c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl> <20010104195001.A2504@ares.trc.adelaide.edu.au> <3A547469.1AAD5CBE@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 08:02:33AM -0500, Patrick Gardella wrote: > Just to get things clear (for me at least), are you suggesting that > patchset 11 will have JPDA with it, or that it will be capable of > running the JPDA? I don't think there is such a thing as "running the JPDA". Its a specification which is either implemented or not :). So, I'm suggesting that patchset 11 will contain a JPDA implementation. We have SCSL'ed code for it, so there are no barriers to releasing it. This will mean that applications using the JPDA API for debugging will run with the native port. - Greg To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010105044214.A5802>