Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:52:10 -0700
From:      "Nikolas Britton" <nikolas.britton@gmail.com>
To:        "Nikolas Britton" <nikolas.britton@gmail.com>,  "Andy Reitz" <reitz@eecs.cwru.edu>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: migrating to 64-bit
Message-ID:  <ef10de9a0606211152o3be3e502y91264ed01ed39fe@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060621173253.GD7596@tigger.digitaltorque.ca>
References:  <20060620233551.GG11625@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> <Pine.SOL.4.53.0606201958420.14129@brak> <20060621011340.GI11625@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> <ef10de9a0606210342y67ff7c61le018aa6ffdd48313@mail.gmail.com> <20060621173253.GD7596@tigger.digitaltorque.ca>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/21/06, Michael P. Soulier <msoulier@digitaltorque.ca> wrote:
> On 21/06/06 Nikolas Britton said:
>
> > IA64 = Itanium, Itanium2 = FreeBSD/ia64
> > EM64T = Intel CPUs with AMD64 (P4, Xeon, etc.) = FreeBSD/amd64
> > AMD64 = Opteron, Athlon 64, Turion 64, Sempron 64 = FreeBSD/amd64
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EM64T
> >
> > Why do you need to run in 64-bit mode?
>
> I'm asking that myself. I'd like to do comparisons with and without 64-bit
> support.
>

The consensus seems to be that FreeBSD/amd64 is a tad slower then
FreeBSD/i386 because it has to deal with 32 extra bits. The primary
reason to use FreeBSD/amd64 seems to be if you need greater then 4GB
of RAM.

This should give you the speed boost your looking for:
CPUTYPE?=pentium2
CFLAGS+= -mtune=nocona
COPTFLAGS+= -mtune=nocona

Put that in /etc/make.conf and recompile ports/kern/world.


-- 
BSD Podcasts @:
http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/
http://freebsdforall.blogspot.com/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ef10de9a0606211152o3be3e502y91264ed01ed39fe>