Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:53:54 -0400
From:      jhell <jhell@DataIX.net>
To:        ??imun Mikecin <numisemis@gmail.com>
Cc:        "freebsd-fs@freebsd.org" <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>, Leroy van Logchem <leroy.vanlogchem@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: ZFS v28 for 8.2-STABLE
Message-ID:  <20110630025354.GB41789@DataIX.net>
In-Reply-To: <-8448816796365782292@unknownmsgid>
References:  <4DB8EF02.8060406@bk.ru> <1079311802.20110428070300@nitronet.pl> <BANLkTinOxuu40djjY66GSxWGcuyy3Fwqdw@mail.gmail.com> <loom.20110629T143119-823@post.gmane.org> <20110629213054.GA85818@icarus.home.lan> <-8448816796365782292@unknownmsgid>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help

--dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 12:10:33AM +0200, ??imun Mikecin wrote:
> 29. 6. 2011., u 23:31, Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> napisao:
>=20
> >>
> >
> > BTW, whenever you nuke src, you should probably nuke the csup (or cvsup
> > in your case; not sure why you're using that) CVS "database" as well.
> > For csup, this lives in /var/db/sup.  For cvsup, this lives in /usr/sup.
>=20
> Would using svn (svn.freebsd.org repository) instead of csup be a
> better solution?
> Which repository (svn or CVS) is master, and which one is replicated?
> >

CVS revisions are replicated from the cvs2svn[1] so backward
compatibility isn't broken for those that rely on programs like csup(1)
or cvsup(1) from ports.

If you can spare another ~500MB of disk space to use svn instead then I
would highly recommend it as benefits of using svn[2] to track sources
are much more than that of csup(1) or cvsup(1).

Anyway, not to cut you short but if your using 8.2-STABLE and YES...
that's "8.2-STABLE" meaning it is the stable branch after the
8.2-RELEASE! then you can safely checkout the sources from [3] and
ZFSv28 has already been merged no patching necessary.

For those that believe it really is "8-STABLE" sorry but that could
designate that branch anyway from 8.0 -> 8.3 and after. You should at
least have the diligence to specify branch at what period of release as
that is pertinent to where the sources were at that given time.

uname -a:
FreeBSD disbatch.dataix.net 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0 r223343M
352:951b1b185f19 Tue Jun 21 11:14:51 EDT 2011
jhell@DataIX.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DISBATCH  i386

1). http://svn.freebsd.org/base/cvs2svn/
2). ports/devel/subversion-freebsd
3). svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/8/ /usr/src/


Regards.

--dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD)
Comment: http://bit.ly/0x89D8547E

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOC+VBAAoJEJBXh4mJ2FR+o9wH/36NEGzhGzp2fXaKjwUK96WR
t+wKaRHIpDOxyKgdBbCEvgtXrQDYPmlgbr9V04vi9q8A3GhdqS+ZxcEcVYADxQiG
xKAlEPo5ccMm9AgXdKrblNUEqabJCFx4RTSxLDYOCp9DQ60ROAnUjYLXzSBWVN+R
dWjzGjgx6nNNuzrR03TTtzHyFqN3usiklsAAij9YoyClFQSIyghFHERHlBoQ01qo
CErYtLfALne7KLrBGBdCac8KZn5tUptZTVIUwTyY3aNzeyNX2cglaT/cpTA5qNrk
7zrttTsB+Ymctt7ApioaBkXoPan3xpkm8dyaIKBYDCQ+cmH6Nugtrs8U19t8W9g=
=XUYy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110630025354.GB41789>