From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 14 08:54:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2420D16A41F for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 08:54:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41F3C43D60 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 08:53:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jBE8t5b05948; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 00:55:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: , "Cezar Fistik" , Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 00:51:52 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20051213190825.80186.qmail@web33302.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Cc: Subject: RE: Re[2]: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd ThemeSong) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 08:54:00 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Danial Thom >Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 11:08 AM >To: Cezar Fistik; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: Re[2]: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd >ThemeSong) > > > > >--- Cezar Fistik wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Just a remark. I'm using an "Intel PRO/1000 MT >> Dual Port Gigabit Copper >> CAT5 Server PCI express Adapter" in a box >> serving as router. Pumping 150Mbps >> through it with 99% idle CPU and 1% interrupts, >> polling enabled. It's >> a litle bit expensive, but it does its job >> perfectly. >> > >If you read my last post about polling with intel >cards, you're realize just how foolish your >analysis is. > Maybe he tried pumping the 150Mbps with polling turned off and the CPU utilization skyrocketed? Ted