From owner-freebsd-current Mon Oct 23 10:33:19 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost.chi.ameritech.net (mpdr0.chicago.il.ameritech.net [206.141.239.142]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 905A337B4C5 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2000 10:33:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bbs.dbsoft-consulting.com ([64.108.11.119]) by mailhost.chi.ameritech.net (InterMail v4.01.01.07 201-229-111-110) with SMTP id <20001023173312.CNER21118.mailhost.chi.ameritech.net@bbs.dbsoft-consulting.com> for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2000 12:33:12 -0500 From: "Brian Smith" To: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 12:51:17 -0500 (CDT) Reply-To: "Brian Smith" X-Mailer: PMMail 2.10.1999 for OS/2 Warp 4.05 In-Reply-To: <200010230336.e9N3aqo03591@curve.dellroad.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: PPP over ATM Message-Id: <20001023173312.CNER21118.mailhost.chi.ameritech.net@bbs.dbsoft-consulting.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 22 Oct 2000 20:36:52 -0700 (PDT), Archie Cobbs wrote: >> Ok, well if I were to netgraphify the ATM code, would mpd be sufficient >> to get PPP over ATM working? (I have a lot of reading up to do, but > >Mpd can do PPP over any netgraph hook, so unless there's some particular >weirdness to the framing of PPP frames over ATM, it should more or less >just work... Quoting from ng_ppp(4): > > These device-independent hooks transmit and receive full PPP > frames, which include the PPP protocol, address, control, and > information fields, but no checksum or other link-specific fields. Ok thanks, I am going to be working to add netgraph support to the ATM code, who would I contact about getting changes committed once I have the code working? Brian Smith To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message