Date: 18 Mar 1996 15:05:54 -0600 From: "Richard Wackerbarth" <rkw@dataplex.net> To: "stable@FreeBSD.org" <stable@FreeBSD.org>, "Wes Santee" <wsantee@wsantee.oz.net> Subject: Re: On commit messages for Stable... Message-ID: <n1384960931.55019@Richard Wackerbarth>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wes Santee wrote: > After writing up the original request for a CVS commit list for the > -stable branch only, and seeing the ensuing discussion on the pros and > cons of it all, I just wanted to add that if a -stable only mailing > list isn't going to happen, is there a line in the commit messages or > some other way of telling that a piece is being checked into the > -stable branch? > > I notice many commit messages I get don't say anything about what > branch the files are being checked into, while some I've received > recently say the branch is RELENG_2_1_0. > > If there is a surefire way to see if something is being checked into > -stable, I can write a procmail recipe to filter on the stuff I want > to see which may be a compromise that we all can agree on. But it is little effort to install that same procmail filter to cause the passed messages to be posted to a separate mailing list. This would have the advantage of reducing the mail traffic at the source rather than the destination.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?n1384960931.55019>