Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 12:40:53 -0600 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: heavy NFS writes lead to corrup summary in superblock Message-ID: <4489C0B5.3010902@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <200606091333.42619.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> References: <20060609065656.31225.qmail@web30313.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200606091313.04913.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> <4489AF86.2080901@centtech.com> <200606091333.42619.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mikhail Teterin wrote: > п'ятниця 09 червень 2006 13:27, Eric Anderson написав: > >>Just curious - what NFS mount options are being used, > > > The fs is accessed by the remote client machines (mostly -- Solaris) via > automounters -- with the default parameters. > > >>and are you changing any sysctl's (vfs/nfs related)? > > > No, should I? > > -mi Well, before we get too far off on tangents, would you mind running dumpfs on the filesystem and posting the first block of information? Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4489C0B5.3010902>