From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Nov 21 6:44:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from gw.nectar.com (gw.nectar.com [208.42.49.153]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E29E337B4C5 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 06:44:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by gw.nectar.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0379A193DF; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 08:44:38 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 08:44:38 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Max Khon Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: res_ functions thread safe? Message-ID: <20001121084438.B77911@spawn.nectar.com> References: <20001121070238.A19849@hand.dotat.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru on Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 01:31:06PM +0600 X-Url: http://www.nectar.com/ Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 01:31:06PM +0600, Max Khon wrote: > if I understand correctly nsswitch patches implement getxxx_r functions as > well Yes, but they have to live `on top of' the existing resolver. :-( -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message