Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 09:37:09 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?R3VzdGF1IFDDqXJleg==?= <gperez@entel.upc.edu> To: =?UTF-8?B?Um9nZXIgUGF1IE1vbm7DqQ==?= <roger.pau@citrix.com> Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Two issues with xen Message-ID: <552CC3A5.9060906@entel.upc.edu> In-Reply-To: <552CBD60.80802@citrix.com> References: <5528F578.2030908@entel.upc.edu> <552BAE1C.1090603@citrix.com> <97e3bb8b2ea7acfb89c861e21f1534c7@webmail.entel.upc.edu> <552BE23D.9030107@citrix.com> <b16e212cff0cac09e7da7b48a7d67998@webmail.entel.upc.edu> <552BFBD3.7060304@citrix.com> <552CACE1.8070101@entel.upc.edu> <552CBD60.80802@citrix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 14/04/2015 09:10, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > Hello, > > El 14/04/15 a les 8.00, Gustau Pérez ha escrit: >> this morning I was able to the patch, and apparently it fixes the >> reboots with PV domU guests. Right now I'm installing debian as PV with >> no problems. Thank you. >> >> As I'm using 4.5 from the ports tree on this laptop, I'd like to ask >> the port's maintainer (bapt) to integrate this patch. Do you think it >> would be safe to integrate the patch in the ports tree? > Since the patch is for the FreeBSD kernel itself it's not possible to > integrate it in the port. I have to rework it a little bit before > committing, will probably send you a new version later so you can test > the final version before I commit it, since I'm not able to reproduce > this problem on my boxes. > > My bad, I was thinking about the patch for the xen kernel and the IOMMU problems with the L5520 while I was writing the mail. Sorry for the noise, Gustau
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?552CC3A5.9060906>