Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:38:03 -0800 (PST) From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Cc: des@des.no Subject: Re: How to deal with deletes between imports (suggestion) Message-ID: <20040226173639.H82318@root.org> In-Reply-To: <20040227001854.GA76036@nagual.pp.ru> References: <20040219174334.GA60017@nagual.pp.ru> <20040227001854.GA76036@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Andrey Chernov wrote: > Well, it looks like this discussion dies silently. > > To prevent conflicts I want to inform all interested parties that I plan > to do it again, now with binutils libiberty (because I add > getopt_long_only()). I plan to do it in the old way, i.e. removing from > HEAD, unless I'll hear _constructive_ objections, explaining what to do > with orphaned vendor files in the previous releases (in case removing from > VENDOR instead). I suggest someone talk to the TRB or cvs@ to get an understanding of our preferred methods of dealing with the cvs tree. I raised an objection because your approach differs from what I think is best to reduce maintenance overhead for future importers but if it fits some larger FreeBSD plan, I have no problems with it. -Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040226173639.H82318>