Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 3 Aug 2016 22:07:48 +0300
From:      Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
To:        "Andrey V. Elsukov" <ae@FreeBSD.org>, Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>, Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>
Cc:        "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: IPFW: more "orthogonal? state operations, push into 11?
Message-ID:  <11a5d41b-109a-434b-e8e0-7ed2826a8cc9@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <46d5cfde-c4ac-ebd0-3c13-2759037621f3@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <9229d4f7-8466-57b0-c954-117736102bd7@FreeBSD.org> <5755F0D3.9060909@FreeBSD.org> <5759DB79.10205@FreeBSD.org> <3d09497c-136c-e217-154c-ba00e6879c6f@freebsd.org> <20160616005016.A15883@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <d7bef617-70a4-f761-7d09-9413eb720b11@freebsd.org> <64d6bdea-fa32-f16f-2fdd-abd33d54d04e@freebsd.org> <46d5cfde-c4ac-ebd0-3c13-2759037621f3@FreeBSD.org>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--1vE69PTuddsF6K2aBLKHBXRWmR8MWOr01
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="UpTP060a5eFlaxGPseC2BTsTFfVxeNk0F"
From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org
To: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <ae@FreeBSD.org>, Julian Elischer
 <julian@freebsd.org>, Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>
Cc: "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <11a5d41b-109a-434b-e8e0-7ed2826a8cc9@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: IPFW: more "orthogonal? state operations, push into 11?
References: <9229d4f7-8466-57b0-c954-117736102bd7@FreeBSD.org>
 <5755F0D3.9060909@FreeBSD.org> <5759DB79.10205@FreeBSD.org>
 <3d09497c-136c-e217-154c-ba00e6879c6f@freebsd.org>
 <20160616005016.A15883@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
 <d7bef617-70a4-f761-7d09-9413eb720b11@freebsd.org>
 <64d6bdea-fa32-f16f-2fdd-abd33d54d04e@freebsd.org>
 <46d5cfde-c4ac-ebd0-3c13-2759037621f3@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <46d5cfde-c4ac-ebd0-3c13-2759037621f3@FreeBSD.org>

--UpTP060a5eFlaxGPseC2BTsTFfVxeNk0F
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 03.08.2016 21:03, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:

>> 1/ ability to use keep-state without an implicit check-state. <--- mos=
t
>> important for me. (store-state)?
>> 2/ ability to keep-state without actually doing it <---- less importan=
t
>> for me.
> So, if there are nobody against, I plan to commit this part in a severa=
l
> days.
 Which implementation? Just curious, I could live with any, really.

--=20
// Lev Serebryakov


--UpTP060a5eFlaxGPseC2BTsTFfVxeNk0F--

--1vE69PTuddsF6K2aBLKHBXRWmR8MWOr01
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=LZ5z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--1vE69PTuddsF6K2aBLKHBXRWmR8MWOr01--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?11a5d41b-109a-434b-e8e0-7ed2826a8cc9>