From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jun 13 17:32:30 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2279810209A3 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 17:32:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from va6bmj@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x22c.google.com (mail-vk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB39C6F7CB for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 17:32:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from va6bmj@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id o17-v6so2022797vka.2 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 10:32:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=djgehbNG2VKeJdyYj5P/zlAAFPjEmXx0TqYmcB0i+os=; b=eZixf67F74vnuOdg/h0zWxOhlT0e1naY87BFhP4HQ+f13guHBC6tPjj7gKgXdZOqk0 w4DM1XYGDKUb9q1or6Kyx2IVQuXV2DnDuV93NyrK3MNmeJ+7Jt8Qw2c/sfRCwuANnddk O3eoLmq+5IMVQxNSIx70pSGQ+lae3B6xjU8H8NfUcjJIkCFP+CmXY16UdgcgWXMRLBDM cobc+wFbqwCB7anzG8AmC2xKVF9SxUmV+lLhY2Ab0r82DyI7uFyxV+jt3Z8pR+zWyWKn CVFq5fs5D3TU4IHV+3fLmK4Rc/U0mpl6cccxr4svCqYxEvMeoFQ8Gp1idk1UJPDkyVLO 5A6g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=djgehbNG2VKeJdyYj5P/zlAAFPjEmXx0TqYmcB0i+os=; b=KM3HqGIXFbuN/yOOdZfVrGqLzki0ujL7efMPyzFy1bD7ISQLxw/xFK8VuQ9x+g5qDy U6/xO52V/159TiDHXHBlhV2iTZE132eqmZ2EpXrZm5tOVLPNxRTOero9DWpjGgsHPjL8 hWFRc+kXLEAk9Wv+wDBdThilHPBSB1IseMj/cwhx+5udlcuT96pNKkRruFGlWa9OOYMV 41W/ECSt9W9IfDyEIRgdWRv5HYEktdQqkcZPOHzYGaIZglzDi4eGmXepKZj+7q5onJFJ P+8c+maEJ1DkDTlcx4wuYau5ZSdU34Lx3CPkeGC8qA9/QgQIQCzHeuEhE6KbMrBLOghs kFkA== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E1LAusbrze8uq8PDmHTlrAJ/wqpV2gn5gk6INqfJWi63qqGJDJf MLyHjeqRMaTDIr2L3obUvX2QMQwBbS1kDyljD4w= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKIMUCL053NhCGBS4+Qe8RY650cUm9F4KCI03pDY8PYXmanjJDIg9QBaDsjXf1tmQOJrbkPP99vucNaCN6DODQk= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:60c5:: with SMTP id u188-v6mr3585864vkb.25.1528911148891; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 10:32:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:ab0:46e:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 10:32:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20180613162137.5cc6794a.freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com> References: <20180613102426.3874c581.freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com> <20180613162137.5cc6794a.freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com> From: B J Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 17:32:27 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Problems Connecting Laptop To Modem To: Erich Dollansky Cc: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 17:32:30 -0000 > doesn't look bad. Where does the IP address (192.168.0.12) come from? > Fixed? I believe that's the address of the router/modem that I'm using. > > What is > > netstat -rn > > saying? 257/1528/1785 mbufs in use (current/cache/total) 256/760/1016/185606 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 256/756 mbuf+clusters out of packet secondary zone in use (current/cache) 0/56/56/92803 4k (page size) jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 0/0/0/27497 9k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 0/0/0/15467 16k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 576K/2126K/2702K bytes allocated to network (current/cache/total) 0/0/0 requests for mbufs denied (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters) 0/0/0 requests for mbufs delayed (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters) 0/0/0 requests for jumbo clusters delayed (4k/9k/16k) 0/0/0 requests for jumbo clusters denied (4k/9k/16k) 0 sendfile syscalls 0 sendfile syscalls completed without I/O request 0 requests for I/O initiated by sendfile 0 pages read by sendfile as part of a request 0 pages were valid at time of a sendfile request 0 pages were requested for read ahead by applications 0 pages were read ahead by sendfile 0 times sendfile encountered an already busy page 0 requests for sfbufs denied 0 requests for sfbufs delayed I did the same with the tower I'm presently running and I got a similar response. BMJ