From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Nov 17 04:27:25 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id EAA07065 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 17 Nov 1997 04:27:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from server.local.sunyit.edu (A-T34.rh.sunyit.edu [150.156.210.241]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA07060 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 1997 04:27:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perlsta@cs.sunyit.edu) Received: from localhost (perlsta@localhost) by server.local.sunyit.edu (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id IAA02324 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 1997 08:32:33 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: server.local.sunyit.edu: perlsta owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 08:32:32 -0500 (EST) From: Alfred Perlstein X-Sender: perlsta@server.local.sunyit.edu To: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Status of patch? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk i'm about to do a 'make world' and remake my kernel too, i was wondering if and what has been done to the kernel to fix the 'f00f' bug? i don't want to rebuild everything if there has been no fix for the 'f00f' bug. what kind of performance impact are we talking about with the fix? i was also wondering if any of the alternative fixes people have brought up seem to work? thank you, .________________________________________________________________________ __ _ |Alfred Perlstein - Programming & SysAdmin --"Have you seen my FreeBSD tatoo?" |perlsta@sunyit.edu --"who was that masked admin?" |http://www.cs.sunyit.edu/~perlsta : '