Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 11:20:08 +0100 From: Craig Edwards <brain@winbot.co.uk> To: Andrew McNaughton <andrew@scoop.co.nz>, freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Survey Message-ID: <44743358.2020304@winbot.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20060524220703.K62075@a2.scoop.co.nz> References: <20060523120100.37D2B16A54F@hub.freebsd.org> <20060523083944.H96736@eboyr.pbz> <f34ca13c0605240233t1b3555dbn39f34b4d598d5bb7@mail.gmail.com> <20060524220703.K62075@a2.scoop.co.nz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Come to that, gentoo's emerge system is pretty good, having learnt a lot > from FreeBSD's ports system, and then gone a few steps further. > > Andrew > I agree, however, i do not like the gentoo dependency upon python for its package management system. It has not broken on me yet, however i can imagine if it does it would be a nightmare to fix, as python is not a trivial program. If FreeBSD ever were to attempt an emerge-like system, it would be convenient imho (although probably less maintainable?) to have it done in something smaller and easier to manage (and easier repair when broken?) such as perl or shellscript. Craig -- "Better to reign in Hell than to serve in Heaven" -- Milton
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44743358.2020304>