Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 1 Dec 2014 08:43:48 -0800
From:      Mike Starr <starrtennis@gmail.com>
To:        Paul Pathiakis <pathiaki2@yahoo.com>
Cc:        John Johnstone <jjohnstone@tridentusa.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: UPS for FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <CABhTyc8ASzy_o%2BByJu=pRyc24n2QVq_g4N=07EEkVYfSy%2BxUrg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <547B41BE.20700@yahoo.com>
References:  <CAHieY7QGp2ELF-R91eu=vSrPsimVmVNJQ4kfucQ56PR7EEZmig@mail.gmail.com> <m57qdq$did$1@ger.gmane.org> <54777AB1.9010800@bluerosetech.com> <m581p1$65m$1@ger.gmane.org> <54779629.302@bluerosetech.com> <54789AF3.7090100@yahoo.com> <547AAC20.1050006@tridentusa.com> <547B41BE.20700@yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
unsubscribe webmaster freebsd-questions@freebsd.org

On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Paul Pathiakis via freebsd-questions <
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> wrote:

> To all that responded on this thread:
>
> Thank you.  I feel I have a better understanding of all this now. :-)
>
> The time spent to better educate others and myself is welcome and so
> "FreeBSD Community".
>
> P.
>
> On 11/30/2014 00:33, John Johnstone wrote:
>
>> I agree this thread is extremely long so I'll consolidate.
>>
>> On 11/28/14 10:55 AM, Paul Pathiakis via freebsd-questions wrote:
>>
>>> Again, these UPSes are not double sine wave, they are stepped.  You can
>>> get one for cheap, but, again, how much value do you place on your
>>> server and the information it has?  If you're looking at APC, you have
>>> to look at their 'server class' UPS.  They start (I think) at 1500VA an=
d
>>> about $850.
>>>
>>
>> I think things could be clearer about the terms "double sine wave" and
>> "stepped".  I think it should be made clear that although a UPS that
>> outputs a 60 Hz square wave is producing a poor approximation of a sine
>> wave, better designs still produce a sine wave in a stepped fashion, jus=
t
>> with a higher number of steps. One that produces an infinite number of
>> steps would be indistinguishable from a pure sine wave.
>>
>> On 11/28/14 5:04 PM, Paul Pathiakis via freebsd-questions wrote:
>>
>>> I found this which seems to be pretty solid.  I believe it someone
>>> mentioned UltraUPS.
>>>
>>> http://www.controlledpwr.com/whitepapers/uutopla1.pdf
>>>
>>
>> This whitepaper refers to the stepped approximation of a pure sine wave
>> in their design:
>>
>> "The inverter reconstructs a sinewave from the DC using PWM (pulse width
>> modulation); a method that =E2=80=9Cdigitizes=E2=80=9D the DC into vario=
us width pulses
>> to make an AC sinewave."
>>
>> The number of steps needs to be high enough to not cause problems.
>>
>> On 11/27/14 2:25 PM, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
>>
>>> Sine-wave approximating inverters do bad things to any power supply
>>> with a regulator cap (which is everything that won't catch fire on
>>> its own).  The issue is the high frequency components and the
>>> hundreds of under- and over-voltage events per second inherent to the
>>> stepped square waveforms used (every step is a spike or sag).
>>>
>>> UPS manufactures know this is bad, so they try to hide it by calling
>>> it "modified sine wave", "quasi sine wave", "simulated sine wave",
>>> "PWM sinewave", etc., and hope you're dumb enough to fall for it.  I
>>> have yet to see a consumer UPS that doesn't do this.
>>>
>>
>> I wouldn't say it fair to interpret UPS manufacturer's descriptions of
>> their methods of simulation as "hiding".
>>
>>  You need to buy a server-grade UPS to get something that won't damage
>>> your electronics.  APC SmartUPS, Cyberpower PFC Sinewave or Smart
>>> App, Eaton 5P/PX or 9 series, Tripp Lite SmartOnline, etc.
>>>
>>
>> On 11/28/14 1:22 PM, Paul Pathiakis via freebsd-questions wrote:
>>
>>> "Simulates" utility power.  This is the sneaky little bit of
>>> marketing.  Saying it's sine output....  It is, but it's simulated.
>>> I've been roped in by the APC marketing machine previously.
>>>
>>
>> As far as "simulated" being a bad thing, by definition all UPS's have to
>> simulate a sine wave once the AC power goes away. It is just a question =
of
>> how close an approximation is it.  There's no question that a 60 Hz squa=
re
>> wave would be a poor approximation.
>>
>> As the number of steps increases, the magnitude of the "high frequency
>> components" and "under- and over-voltage events" becomes so small as to =
be
>> negligible.  There are plenty of "server-grade" UPS's that produce a ste=
p
>> approximated simulated sine wave as the Controlled Power whitepaper stat=
es.
>>
>> One aspect to consider is that if a UPS isn't an on-line design, any
>> negative effects experienced by the load due to the quality of the outpu=
t
>> sine wave will only occur when the output is being produced by the UPS
>> during a power failure.  It's reasonable to expect that this is going to=
 be
>> a short interval which in many cases may not cause any power supply
>> problems.
>>
>> -
>> John J.
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-
>> unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-
> unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CABhTyc8ASzy_o%2BByJu=pRyc24n2QVq_g4N=07EEkVYfSy%2BxUrg>